The emergency room is a very potent environment in the hospital.With the growing demands of the population,improved accessibility to health resources,and the onslaught of the triple pandemic,it is extremely crucial to...The emergency room is a very potent environment in the hospital.With the growing demands of the population,improved accessibility to health resources,and the onslaught of the triple pandemic,it is extremely crucial to triage patients at presentation.In the spectrum of complaints,chest pain is the commonest.Despite it being a daily ailment,chest pain brings concern to every physician at first.Chest pain could span from acute coronary syndrome,pulmonary embolism,and aortic dissection(all potentially fatal)to reflux,zoster,or musculoskeletal causes that do not need rapid interventions.We often employ scoring systems such as GRACE/PURSUIT/TIMI to assist in clinical decision-making.Over the years,the HEART score became a popular and effective tool for predicting the risk of 30-d major adverse cardiovascular events.Recently,a new scoring system called SVEAT was developed and compared to the HEART score.We have attempted to summarize how these scoring systems differ and their generalizability.With an increasing number of scoring systems being introduced,one must also prevent anchorage bias;i.e.,tools such as these are only diagnosis-specific and not organ-specific,and other emergent differential diagnoses must also be kept in mind before discharging the patient home without additional workup.展开更多
【目的】评价GRACE评分对急诊科急性胸痛患者30 d心血管不良事件(MACE)的预测价值。【方法】使用前瞻性观察研究的方法纳入2016年1月1日至2016年4月1日在我院急诊科首诊急性胸痛的患者,记录患者临床基本资料,完成GRACE评分的计算,并对...【目的】评价GRACE评分对急诊科急性胸痛患者30 d心血管不良事件(MACE)的预测价值。【方法】使用前瞻性观察研究的方法纳入2016年1月1日至2016年4月1日在我院急诊科首诊急性胸痛的患者,记录患者临床基本资料,完成GRACE评分的计算,并对入组的患者进行30 d MACE的随访。【结果】入选209例患者,男性110例(52.63%),女性99例(47.37%),年龄范围20~98岁,平均年龄(65.28±16.85)岁。发生MACE 12例,其中急诊死亡2例,住院期间死亡3例,出院后死亡6例,再发心肌梗死1例。与非MACE组相比,MACE组患者年龄,BMI,住院人数,CCU住院例数、GRACE评分均高于非MACE组患者,两组比较具有统计学差异(P<0.05);GRACE评分预测急性胸痛30 d MACE的ROC曲线下面积(95%CI)为0.819(0.735-0.902),最佳敏感性为0.92,特异性为0.65。不同GRACE评分危险分层中对30 d心血管不良事件概率分别为0.95%(低危)、6.67%(中危)、18.92%(高危)。【结论】GRACE评分对急性胸痛患者30展开更多
文摘The emergency room is a very potent environment in the hospital.With the growing demands of the population,improved accessibility to health resources,and the onslaught of the triple pandemic,it is extremely crucial to triage patients at presentation.In the spectrum of complaints,chest pain is the commonest.Despite it being a daily ailment,chest pain brings concern to every physician at first.Chest pain could span from acute coronary syndrome,pulmonary embolism,and aortic dissection(all potentially fatal)to reflux,zoster,or musculoskeletal causes that do not need rapid interventions.We often employ scoring systems such as GRACE/PURSUIT/TIMI to assist in clinical decision-making.Over the years,the HEART score became a popular and effective tool for predicting the risk of 30-d major adverse cardiovascular events.Recently,a new scoring system called SVEAT was developed and compared to the HEART score.We have attempted to summarize how these scoring systems differ and their generalizability.With an increasing number of scoring systems being introduced,one must also prevent anchorage bias;i.e.,tools such as these are only diagnosis-specific and not organ-specific,and other emergent differential diagnoses must also be kept in mind before discharging the patient home without additional workup.
文摘【目的】评价GRACE评分对急诊科急性胸痛患者30 d心血管不良事件(MACE)的预测价值。【方法】使用前瞻性观察研究的方法纳入2016年1月1日至2016年4月1日在我院急诊科首诊急性胸痛的患者,记录患者临床基本资料,完成GRACE评分的计算,并对入组的患者进行30 d MACE的随访。【结果】入选209例患者,男性110例(52.63%),女性99例(47.37%),年龄范围20~98岁,平均年龄(65.28±16.85)岁。发生MACE 12例,其中急诊死亡2例,住院期间死亡3例,出院后死亡6例,再发心肌梗死1例。与非MACE组相比,MACE组患者年龄,BMI,住院人数,CCU住院例数、GRACE评分均高于非MACE组患者,两组比较具有统计学差异(P<0.05);GRACE评分预测急性胸痛30 d MACE的ROC曲线下面积(95%CI)为0.819(0.735-0.902),最佳敏感性为0.92,特异性为0.65。不同GRACE评分危险分层中对30 d心血管不良事件概率分别为0.95%(低危)、6.67%(中危)、18.92%(高危)。【结论】GRACE评分对急性胸痛患者30
