Background: Cryopreservation is currently the most efficient method for long-term preservation of mammalian gametes and is extensively used in swine artificial insemination(AI) centres. However, it is well-known that ...Background: Cryopreservation is currently the most efficient method for long-term preservation of mammalian gametes and is extensively used in swine artificial insemination(AI) centres. However, it is well-known that cryopreservation procedures induce changes in the water phase in both intra and extracellular compartments,which alter the content and localisation of several proteins and ends up curtailing the structural integrity of functional sperm(i.e., cryoinjuries). Alterations and deficiencies of sperm-oocyte binding proteins during gamete recognition are one of the causes of reproductive failure both in vitro and in vivo. In this sense, characterisation of cryopreservation effects upon oocyte-binding proteins of sperm, such as IZUMO1 and GSTM3, is essential when assessing the impact of this technique in swine reproduction.Results: Cryopreservation was found to induce changes in the localisation of IZUMO1 and GSTM3 in boar sperm.However, the relative content of both proteins was not altered after thawing. Furthermore, whereas IZUMO1 content was found not to be related to the cryotolerance of boar sperm, GSTM3 content was observed to be higher in poor(PFE) than in good(GFE) freezability ejaculates in both pre-frozen(1.00 INT·mm^2± 0.14 INT·mm^2 vs.0.72 INT·mm^2± 0.15 INT·mm^2;P < 0.05) and post-thawed(0.96 INT·mm^2± 0.20 INT·mm^2 vs. 70 INT·mm^2± 0.19 INT·mm^2;P < 0.05) samples. Moreover, GSTM3 levels were found to be higher in those spermatozoa that exhibited low mitochondrial activity, high reactive oxygen species(ROS) production, and high membrane lipid disorder postthaw(P < 0.05).Conclusions: The difference in GSTM3 content between GFE and PFE, together with this protein having been found to be related to poor sperm quality post-thaw, suggests that it could be used as a cryotolerance marker of boar spermatozoa. Furthermore, both IZUMO1 and GSTM3 relocate during cryopreservation, which could contribute to the reduced fertilising capacity of frozen-thawed boar sperm.展开更多
Background. Specific mutations in the cationic trypsinogen gene (PRSS1) are disease causing in patients with hereditary pancreatitis, but the genetic background still remains mysterious in about 40%of patients with th...Background. Specific mutations in the cationic trypsinogen gene (PRSS1) are disease causing in patients with hereditary pancreatitis, but the genetic background still remains mysterious in about 40%of patients with the disease. It has been suggested that oxidative stress contributes to pancreatic damage. The glutathione s transferases (GSTs) represent major detoxification enzymes that protect cells from oxidative stress. Methods. In the present study we tested whether mutations in the MGST1 and GSTM3 genes or common deletions in the GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes are associated with hereditary pancreatitis. We analyzed the entire coding region of MGST1 and GSTM3 in 30 patients that were tested negative for PRSS1 mutations, and we studied 55 controls. For GSTT1 and GSTM1, we investigated 75 hereditary pancreatitis patients who had been tested negative for PRSS1 mutations, 135 hereditary pancreatitis patients with a PRSS1 mutation, and 183 controls. Patients were further subclassified with regard to age of onset of disease as a marker of severity. Results. No mutation was found in the MGST1 gene. In We GSTM3 gene, we detected a homozygous 670G > A polymorphism (V224I) with similar frequencies in patients and controls. We found no difference in the frequencies of the GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotypes between patients and controls, and we detected no differences in age of onset in patients with or without GSTT1 and GSTM1 deletions. Conclusions. We conclude that genetic alterations in the MGST1, GSTM3, GSTT1, and GSTM1 genes do not play a dominant role in hereditary pancreatitis.展开更多
基金support from Ministry of Science,Innovation and Universities,Spain(Grants:RYC-2014-15581,AGL2017–88329-R and FJCI-2017-31689)European Commission(H2020-MSCA-IF-79212)
文摘Background: Cryopreservation is currently the most efficient method for long-term preservation of mammalian gametes and is extensively used in swine artificial insemination(AI) centres. However, it is well-known that cryopreservation procedures induce changes in the water phase in both intra and extracellular compartments,which alter the content and localisation of several proteins and ends up curtailing the structural integrity of functional sperm(i.e., cryoinjuries). Alterations and deficiencies of sperm-oocyte binding proteins during gamete recognition are one of the causes of reproductive failure both in vitro and in vivo. In this sense, characterisation of cryopreservation effects upon oocyte-binding proteins of sperm, such as IZUMO1 and GSTM3, is essential when assessing the impact of this technique in swine reproduction.Results: Cryopreservation was found to induce changes in the localisation of IZUMO1 and GSTM3 in boar sperm.However, the relative content of both proteins was not altered after thawing. Furthermore, whereas IZUMO1 content was found not to be related to the cryotolerance of boar sperm, GSTM3 content was observed to be higher in poor(PFE) than in good(GFE) freezability ejaculates in both pre-frozen(1.00 INT·mm^2± 0.14 INT·mm^2 vs.0.72 INT·mm^2± 0.15 INT·mm^2;P < 0.05) and post-thawed(0.96 INT·mm^2± 0.20 INT·mm^2 vs. 70 INT·mm^2± 0.19 INT·mm^2;P < 0.05) samples. Moreover, GSTM3 levels were found to be higher in those spermatozoa that exhibited low mitochondrial activity, high reactive oxygen species(ROS) production, and high membrane lipid disorder postthaw(P < 0.05).Conclusions: The difference in GSTM3 content between GFE and PFE, together with this protein having been found to be related to poor sperm quality post-thaw, suggests that it could be used as a cryotolerance marker of boar spermatozoa. Furthermore, both IZUMO1 and GSTM3 relocate during cryopreservation, which could contribute to the reduced fertilising capacity of frozen-thawed boar sperm.
文摘Background. Specific mutations in the cationic trypsinogen gene (PRSS1) are disease causing in patients with hereditary pancreatitis, but the genetic background still remains mysterious in about 40%of patients with the disease. It has been suggested that oxidative stress contributes to pancreatic damage. The glutathione s transferases (GSTs) represent major detoxification enzymes that protect cells from oxidative stress. Methods. In the present study we tested whether mutations in the MGST1 and GSTM3 genes or common deletions in the GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes are associated with hereditary pancreatitis. We analyzed the entire coding region of MGST1 and GSTM3 in 30 patients that were tested negative for PRSS1 mutations, and we studied 55 controls. For GSTT1 and GSTM1, we investigated 75 hereditary pancreatitis patients who had been tested negative for PRSS1 mutations, 135 hereditary pancreatitis patients with a PRSS1 mutation, and 183 controls. Patients were further subclassified with regard to age of onset of disease as a marker of severity. Results. No mutation was found in the MGST1 gene. In We GSTM3 gene, we detected a homozygous 670G > A polymorphism (V224I) with similar frequencies in patients and controls. We found no difference in the frequencies of the GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotypes between patients and controls, and we detected no differences in age of onset in patients with or without GSTT1 and GSTM1 deletions. Conclusions. We conclude that genetic alterations in the MGST1, GSTM3, GSTT1, and GSTM1 genes do not play a dominant role in hereditary pancreatitis.
