A Systematic Review on Efficacy and Safety of Gasless Laparoscopy in the Management of Uterine Leiomyoma

Uterine leiomyoma causes considerable morbidity in women. This study systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of gasless laparoscopic myomectomy（GLM） in the management of uterine leiomyoma by comparing GLM with other minimally invasive procedures. Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, WANFANG database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure（CNKI） were searched for studies published in English or Chinese between January 1995 and May 2015, and related references were traced. Study outcomes from randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies were presented as mean difference（MD） or odds ratio（OR） with a 95% confidence interval（CI）. Seventeen studies（including 1862 patients） meeting the inclusion criteria, including 934 treated with GLM and 928 treated with other minimally invasive procedures were reviewed. The results of meta-analysis revealed that GLM resulted in significantly shorter operating time [MD=–10.34, 95% CI（–18.12, –2.56）, P〈0.00001], shorter hospital stay [MD=–0.47, 95% CI（–0.88, –0.06）], less time to flatus [MD=–2.04, 95% CI（–2.59, –1.48）], less postoperative complications [OR=0.20, 95% CI（0.06, 0.62）] and less blood loss [MD =–30.74, 95% CI（–47.50, –13.98）]. On the other hand, there were no significant differences in duration of post-operative fever [MD=–0.52, 95% CI（–1.46, 0.42）] between the two groups. Additionally, GLM was associated with lower febrile morbidity, lower postoperative abdominal pain, and higher postoperative hemoglobin than other minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of uterine leiomyoma. In conclusion, GLM and other minimally invasive procedures are feasible, safe, and reliable for uterine leiomyoma treatment. However, available studies show that GLM is more effective and safer than other minimally invasive approaches.

Gynecological procedures under gasless laparoscopy

Objective To evaluate gasless laparoscopy in treating gynecological conditions.Methods With Kirschner wire lifting, transversely or longitudinally introduced into abdominal wall subcutaneously, we exposed the operative field and pelvic organs with routine operative instruments under epidural anesthesia. When a dense pelvic adhesion was confronted, we used the temporarily low-pressured pneumolaparoscopy to dissect it.Results All procedures were carried out without organ injury, hematorna, or other complications. The operative field can be clearly seen with this method. The mean time for appendagectorny was one hour and for laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy 80 minutes.Conclusion Gasless laparoscopy avoids the complications which occur in the routine laparoscopy such as subcutaneous or mediastinal pneurnatoma, hypercarbonernia, air embolism, cardiopulmonary dysfunction.Our lifting method is simple, convenient, time and money saving, as well as more flexible for treating gynecological conditions.

Gasless laparoscopy for benign gynecological diseases using an abdominal wall-lifting system

Objectives: The use of gasless laparoscopy with an abdominal wall-lifting device for benign gynecological diseases was compared to conventional laparoscopy with CO2 pneumoperitoneum. Methods: From February 2007 to July 2007,76 women with uterine and/or adnexal benign diseases and candidates for laparoscopic surgery were recruited in this study. Thirty-two women underwent gasless laparoscopic surgery and 44 women underwent pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic surgery. Results: Diverse pathologies,including adnexal cyst,uterine myoma and ectopic pregnancy,were treated successfully with gasless laparoscopic surgery. Compared with the patients in the pneumoperitoneum group,the similar hospital stay (P=0.353) and intraoperative blood loss (P=0.157) were observed. However,the mean operative time in the gasless group was significantly longer than that in the pneumoperitoneum group (P=0.003). No severe intraoperative or postoperative complications were found in either group,except for one case of laparotomic conversion in the pneumoperitoneum group due to dense pelvic adhesions. The total hospital charges were significantly less in the gasless group than in the pneumoperitoneum group (P=0.001). In 38 cases of ovarian cyst resection,the mean operative time in the gasless group remained longer than that in the pneumoperitoneum group (P=0.017). The total hospital charges were also significantly less in the gasless group than in the pneumoperitoneum group (P<0.001). Conclusion: Our preliminary results demonstrated that the laparoscopic procedure using the gasless technique was a safe,effective method to treat benign gynecological diseases. Moreover,it was easy to master. As a minimally invasive treatment,gasless laparoscopic surgery provides a good choice to patients in the undeveloped regions in China without increasing the patients’ and the government’s burden significantly.

Gasless Laparoscopic Surgery plus Abdominal Wall Lifting for Giant Hiatal Hernia——Our Single-center Experience

Giant hiatal hernia（GHH） comprises 5% of hiatal hernia and is associated with significant complications.The traditional operative procedure,no matter transthoracic or transabdomen repair of giant hiatal hernia,is characteristic of more invasion and more complications.Although laparoscopic repair as a minimally invasive surgery is accepted,a part of patients can not tolerate pneumoperitoneum because of combination with cardiopulmonary diseases or severe posterior mediastinal and neck emphesema during operation.The aim of this article was to analyze our experience in gasless laparoscopic repair with abdominal wall lifting to treat the giant hiatal hernia.We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing gasless laparoscopic repair of GHH with abdominal wall lifting from 2012 to 2015 at our institution.The GHH was defined as greater than one-third of the stomach in the chest.Gasless laparoscopic repair of GHH with abdominal wall lifting was attempted in 27 patients.Mean age was 67 years.The results showed that there were no conversions to open surgery and no intraoperative deaths.The mean duration of operation was 100 min（range：90–130 min）.One-side pleura was injured in 4 cases（14.8%）.The mean postoperative length of stay was 4 days（range：3–7 days）.Median follow-up was 26 months（range：6–38 months）.Transient dysphagia for solid food occurred in three patients（11.1%）,and this symptom disappeared within three months.There was one patient with recurrent hiatal hernia who was reoperated on.Two patients still complained of heartburn three months after surgery.Neither reoperation nor endoscopic treatment due to signs of postoperative esophageal stenosis was required in any patient.Totally,satisfactory outcome was reported in 88.9% patients.It was concluded that the gasless laparoscopic approach with abdominal wall lifting to the repair of GHH is feasible,safe,and effective for the patients who cannot tolerate the pneumoperitoneum.