Study Objective: Establish complications and risk factors that are associated with blind tube insertion, evaluate the validity of correct placement verification methods, establish the rationales supporting its employm...Study Objective: Establish complications and risk factors that are associated with blind tube insertion, evaluate the validity of correct placement verification methods, establish the rationales supporting its employment by anesthesia providers, and describe various deployment facilitators described in current literature. Measurements: An exhaustive literature review of the databases Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Collaboration, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed applying the search terms “gastric tube”, “complications”, “decompression”, “blind insertion”, “perioperative”, “intraoperative” in various order sequences. A five-year limit was applied to limit the number and timeliness of articles selected. Main Results: Patients are exposed to potentially serious morbidity and mortality from blindly inserted gastric tubes. Risk factors associated with malposition include blind insertion, the presence of endotracheal tubes, altered sensorium, and previous tube misplacements. Pulmonary aspiration risk prevention remains the only indication for anesthesia-related intraoperative use. There are no singularly effective tools that predict or verify the proper placement of blindly inserted gastric tubes. Current placement facilitation techniques are perpetuated through anecdotal experience and technique variability warrants further study. Conclusion: In the absence of aspiration risk factors or the need for surgical decompression in ASA classification I & II patients, a moratorium should be instituted on the elective use of gastric tubes.展开更多
Objective:To explore the influencing factors of patients with dysphagia after stroke who refuse to accept gastric tube implantation,and to provide intervention basis for improving the compliance of patients with gastr...Objective:To explore the influencing factors of patients with dysphagia after stroke who refuse to accept gastric tube implantation,and to provide intervention basis for improving the compliance of patients with gastric tube implantation.Methods:Asemi-structured interview method was used to conduct in-depth interviews with 11 patients who refused gastric tube placement,and the interview data were analyzed by Colaizzi analysis method.Results:The influencing factors of patients with dysphagia after stroke can be summarized into the following three themes:patient factors(patient's cognition of disease,patient's subjective pain perception and fear),family factors(patient's caregiver's cognition of disease,economic conditions)and medical factors(trust in medical staff,medical education methods).Conclusion:Medical staff should understand the influencing factors of dysphagia after stroke and take positive measures to improve the compliance of patients with gastric tube placement and ensure the treatment effect.展开更多
文摘Study Objective: Establish complications and risk factors that are associated with blind tube insertion, evaluate the validity of correct placement verification methods, establish the rationales supporting its employment by anesthesia providers, and describe various deployment facilitators described in current literature. Measurements: An exhaustive literature review of the databases Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Collaboration, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed applying the search terms “gastric tube”, “complications”, “decompression”, “blind insertion”, “perioperative”, “intraoperative” in various order sequences. A five-year limit was applied to limit the number and timeliness of articles selected. Main Results: Patients are exposed to potentially serious morbidity and mortality from blindly inserted gastric tubes. Risk factors associated with malposition include blind insertion, the presence of endotracheal tubes, altered sensorium, and previous tube misplacements. Pulmonary aspiration risk prevention remains the only indication for anesthesia-related intraoperative use. There are no singularly effective tools that predict or verify the proper placement of blindly inserted gastric tubes. Current placement facilitation techniques are perpetuated through anecdotal experience and technique variability warrants further study. Conclusion: In the absence of aspiration risk factors or the need for surgical decompression in ASA classification I & II patients, a moratorium should be instituted on the elective use of gastric tubes.
文摘Objective:To explore the influencing factors of patients with dysphagia after stroke who refuse to accept gastric tube implantation,and to provide intervention basis for improving the compliance of patients with gastric tube implantation.Methods:Asemi-structured interview method was used to conduct in-depth interviews with 11 patients who refused gastric tube placement,and the interview data were analyzed by Colaizzi analysis method.Results:The influencing factors of patients with dysphagia after stroke can be summarized into the following three themes:patient factors(patient's cognition of disease,patient's subjective pain perception and fear),family factors(patient's caregiver's cognition of disease,economic conditions)and medical factors(trust in medical staff,medical education methods).Conclusion:Medical staff should understand the influencing factors of dysphagia after stroke and take positive measures to improve the compliance of patients with gastric tube placement and ensure the treatment effect.
