Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD)is the most rapidly growing contributor to liver mortality and morbidity.Hepatocellular injury in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis(NASH)is caused by an increase in metabolic substrat...Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD)is the most rapidly growing contributor to liver mortality and morbidity.Hepatocellular injury in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis(NASH)is caused by an increase in metabolic substrates(glucose,fructose,and fatty acids),leading fatty acids to participate in pathways that cause cellular injury and a poor response to injury.The pathogenesis of this disease is largely associated with obesity,type 2 diabetes,and increasing age.To date,there are no Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for NAFLD/NASH or its associated fibrosis.Since one of the pathogenic drivers of NASH is insulin resistance,therapies approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes are being evaluated in patients with NASH.Currently,the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist(GLP-1RA)semaglutide is a safe,well-studied therapeutic for NAFLD/NASH patients.Existing research demonstrates that semaglutide can increase the resolution of NASH but not improve fibrosis.However,improving the fibrosis of NAFLD is the only way to improve the long-term prognosis of NAFLD.Given the complex pathophysiology of NASH,combining therapies with complementary mechanisms may be beneficial.Researchers have conducted trials of semaglutide in combination with antifibrotic drugs.However,the results have not fully met expectations,and it cannot be ruled out that the reason is the short trial time.We should continue to pay increasing attention to GLP-1RAs.展开更多
AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of vildagliptin to low-dose metformin and compare it to an uptitration of metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) patients who have inadequate control with m...AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of vildagliptin to low-dose metformin and compare it to an uptitration of metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) patients who have inadequate control with metformin monotherapy.METHODS:Eligible patients were randomized to receive vildagliptin 100 mg qd or metformin(500 mg qd for 2 wk and then 500 mg bid) added to open label me tformin 500 mg bid for the 24 wk.The primary endpoi nt was baseline to endpoint hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c) change.RESULTS:The adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c at the 24th wk was-0.51% in the vildagliptin/metformin group(mean baseline HbA1c:7.4%) and-0.37% in the metformin monothera py group(mean baseline HbA1c:7.3%).The mean diffe rence was-0.14% with 95% Confidence Interval(-0.24%,-0.05%).As non-inf e riority(margin of 0.4%) was achieved,a test for superiority was performed.This test showed statistically significant superiority of the combination over monotherapy group(P = 0.002).Gastrointestinal(GI) adverse events were signif icantly more frequent in the metformin group than the combin ation group(21.0% vs 15.4%,P = 0.032).CONCLUSION:In patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with metformin up to 1000 mg daily,the addition of vildagliptin 100 mg daily achieved larger HbA1c reduction with fewer GI events than with increa sing the metformin dose.展开更多
Diabetes mellitus is a major health problem with increasing prevalence at a global level.The discovery of insulin in the early 1900 s represented a major breakthrough in diabetes management,with further milestones bei...Diabetes mellitus is a major health problem with increasing prevalence at a global level.The discovery of insulin in the early 1900 s represented a major breakthrough in diabetes management,with further milestones being subsequently achieved with the identification of glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1)and the introduction of GLP-1 receptor agonists(GLP-1 RAs)in clinical practice.Moreover,the subcutaneous delivery of biotherapeutics is a well-established route of administration generally preferred over the intravenous route due to better patient compliance and prolonged drug absorption.However,current subcutaneous formulations of GLP-1 RAs present pharmacokinetic problems that lead to adverse reactions and treatment discontinuation.In this review,we discuss the current challenges of subcutaneous administration of peptide-based therapeutics and provide an overview of the formulations available for the different routes of administration with improved bioavailability and reduced frequency of administration.展开更多
文摘Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD)is the most rapidly growing contributor to liver mortality and morbidity.Hepatocellular injury in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis(NASH)is caused by an increase in metabolic substrates(glucose,fructose,and fatty acids),leading fatty acids to participate in pathways that cause cellular injury and a poor response to injury.The pathogenesis of this disease is largely associated with obesity,type 2 diabetes,and increasing age.To date,there are no Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for NAFLD/NASH or its associated fibrosis.Since one of the pathogenic drivers of NASH is insulin resistance,therapies approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes are being evaluated in patients with NASH.Currently,the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist(GLP-1RA)semaglutide is a safe,well-studied therapeutic for NAFLD/NASH patients.Existing research demonstrates that semaglutide can increase the resolution of NASH but not improve fibrosis.However,improving the fibrosis of NAFLD is the only way to improve the long-term prognosis of NAFLD.Given the complex pathophysiology of NASH,combining therapies with complementary mechanisms may be beneficial.Researchers have conducted trials of semaglutide in combination with antifibrotic drugs.However,the results have not fully met expectations,and it cannot be ruled out that the reason is the short trial time.We should continue to pay increasing attention to GLP-1RAs.
基金Supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, NC-T00396357
文摘AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of vildagliptin to low-dose metformin and compare it to an uptitration of metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) patients who have inadequate control with metformin monotherapy.METHODS:Eligible patients were randomized to receive vildagliptin 100 mg qd or metformin(500 mg qd for 2 wk and then 500 mg bid) added to open label me tformin 500 mg bid for the 24 wk.The primary endpoi nt was baseline to endpoint hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c) change.RESULTS:The adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c at the 24th wk was-0.51% in the vildagliptin/metformin group(mean baseline HbA1c:7.4%) and-0.37% in the metformin monothera py group(mean baseline HbA1c:7.3%).The mean diffe rence was-0.14% with 95% Confidence Interval(-0.24%,-0.05%).As non-inf e riority(margin of 0.4%) was achieved,a test for superiority was performed.This test showed statistically significant superiority of the combination over monotherapy group(P = 0.002).Gastrointestinal(GI) adverse events were signif icantly more frequent in the metformin group than the combin ation group(21.0% vs 15.4%,P = 0.032).CONCLUSION:In patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with metformin up to 1000 mg daily,the addition of vildagliptin 100 mg daily achieved larger HbA1c reduction with fewer GI events than with increa sing the metformin dose.
基金funded by Xunta de Galicia grant number GRC2013/015 and GPC2017/015(Spain)。
文摘Diabetes mellitus is a major health problem with increasing prevalence at a global level.The discovery of insulin in the early 1900 s represented a major breakthrough in diabetes management,with further milestones being subsequently achieved with the identification of glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1)and the introduction of GLP-1 receptor agonists(GLP-1 RAs)in clinical practice.Moreover,the subcutaneous delivery of biotherapeutics is a well-established route of administration generally preferred over the intravenous route due to better patient compliance and prolonged drug absorption.However,current subcutaneous formulations of GLP-1 RAs present pharmacokinetic problems that lead to adverse reactions and treatment discontinuation.In this review,we discuss the current challenges of subcutaneous administration of peptide-based therapeutics and provide an overview of the formulations available for the different routes of administration with improved bioavailability and reduced frequency of administration.
