Green Mark 2021是新加坡建设局最新修订发布的绿色建筑评价标准,该标准在新加坡绿色建筑十几年成功发展的基础上,进一步拓展绿色建筑发展理念,提升绿色建筑节能水平,提出的可持续评价指标充分体现了绿色建筑向智能、韧性、净零碳、可...Green Mark 2021是新加坡建设局最新修订发布的绿色建筑评价标准,该标准在新加坡绿色建筑十几年成功发展的基础上,进一步拓展绿色建筑发展理念,提升绿色建筑节能水平,提出的可持续评价指标充分体现了绿色建筑向智能、韧性、净零碳、可维护性、健康方向的发展趋势。在我国绿色建筑高质量发展的背景下,通过对Green Mark 2021进行解析,对比分析其与我国GB/T 50378-2019《绿色建筑评价标准》在指标体系方面的差异性,并进一步基于我国国情现状及气候特征,提出Green Mark 2021对未来我国绿色建筑高质量发展带来的启示和建议。展开更多
The building industry has experienced a widespread transition towards green buildings and consequently a growing need for green facilities professionals to maximize green building potential in terms of energy efficien...The building industry has experienced a widespread transition towards green buildings and consequently a growing need for green facilities professionals to maximize green building potential in terms of energy efficiency,water conservation and waste reduc-tion in their operational stage.Green buildings have unique technological systems that require facility managers to have relevant knowledge and skills to conduct proper facilities management and maintenance planning to maximize the potential of green buildings.It is important,then,to investigate whether knowledge gaps for facil-ity managers exist with respect to green buildings,and if so,how these knowledge gaps could be bridged.Though several studies have investigated the operation and maintenance processes of green buildings,few studies considered facility managers’knowledge and skills regarding green facility management(GFM).Set in the context of Singapore,this study aims to holistically investigate the knowledge and skills of managing green buildings in the community of facility managers,including their per-ceived differences between green and conventional buildings,the difficulty of GFM,the knowledge gaps of GFM and the underlying reasons,as well as how the gaps could be bridged.A total of 90 survey responses were collected and eight interviews with key stakeholders were conducted,which indicate facility managers believe green build-ings do have special features that require unique knowledge and skills,and currently knowledge gaps do exist hindering the transition towards GFM.Therefore,this paper derives plausible solutions to bridge the knowledge gaps,such as establishing holistic subsidies for those facility managers participating in training programs of GFM.This study provides references for researchers and relevant governmental departments to better understand industry professionals’knowledge gaps in the transitioning process towards a green built environment,and to make better policy decisions bridging the knowledge gaps and thereby facilitating the green transition process.展开更多
Green Building involves many parties and has attracted attention recently. In this paper, the main external actors for Green Building were explored based on literature review. Then, a structured questionnaire was deve...Green Building involves many parties and has attracted attention recently. In this paper, the main external actors for Green Building were explored based on literature review. Then, a structured questionnaire was developed to facilitate systematic data collection. Finally, a stepwise multiple regression analysis was applied and “clients,” “government,” “qualified/certified materials and products suppliers,” and “good green consultants” were found to be significant external partners of Architecture/Engineering/Construction (AEC) firms for successful delivery of Green Mark certified projects. The research findings will help AEC firms understand how to achieve competitive advantages in the Green Building market in Singapore by using external resources.展开更多
文摘Green Mark 2021是新加坡建设局最新修订发布的绿色建筑评价标准,该标准在新加坡绿色建筑十几年成功发展的基础上,进一步拓展绿色建筑发展理念,提升绿色建筑节能水平,提出的可持续评价指标充分体现了绿色建筑向智能、韧性、净零碳、可维护性、健康方向的发展趋势。在我国绿色建筑高质量发展的背景下,通过对Green Mark 2021进行解析,对比分析其与我国GB/T 50378-2019《绿色建筑评价标准》在指标体系方面的差异性,并进一步基于我国国情现状及气候特征,提出Green Mark 2021对未来我国绿色建筑高质量发展带来的启示和建议。
基金funded by the Singapore Ministry of Education Tier 1 Research Grant that is administered by the National University of Singapore(R-296-000-151-133).
文摘The building industry has experienced a widespread transition towards green buildings and consequently a growing need for green facilities professionals to maximize green building potential in terms of energy efficiency,water conservation and waste reduc-tion in their operational stage.Green buildings have unique technological systems that require facility managers to have relevant knowledge and skills to conduct proper facilities management and maintenance planning to maximize the potential of green buildings.It is important,then,to investigate whether knowledge gaps for facil-ity managers exist with respect to green buildings,and if so,how these knowledge gaps could be bridged.Though several studies have investigated the operation and maintenance processes of green buildings,few studies considered facility managers’knowledge and skills regarding green facility management(GFM).Set in the context of Singapore,this study aims to holistically investigate the knowledge and skills of managing green buildings in the community of facility managers,including their per-ceived differences between green and conventional buildings,the difficulty of GFM,the knowledge gaps of GFM and the underlying reasons,as well as how the gaps could be bridged.A total of 90 survey responses were collected and eight interviews with key stakeholders were conducted,which indicate facility managers believe green build-ings do have special features that require unique knowledge and skills,and currently knowledge gaps do exist hindering the transition towards GFM.Therefore,this paper derives plausible solutions to bridge the knowledge gaps,such as establishing holistic subsidies for those facility managers participating in training programs of GFM.This study provides references for researchers and relevant governmental departments to better understand industry professionals’knowledge gaps in the transitioning process towards a green built environment,and to make better policy decisions bridging the knowledge gaps and thereby facilitating the green transition process.
文摘Green Building involves many parties and has attracted attention recently. In this paper, the main external actors for Green Building were explored based on literature review. Then, a structured questionnaire was developed to facilitate systematic data collection. Finally, a stepwise multiple regression analysis was applied and “clients,” “government,” “qualified/certified materials and products suppliers,” and “good green consultants” were found to be significant external partners of Architecture/Engineering/Construction (AEC) firms for successful delivery of Green Mark certified projects. The research findings will help AEC firms understand how to achieve competitive advantages in the Green Building market in Singapore by using external resources.
