Background: Compared with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD) transplantation, it remains unclear whether haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation has a superior graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) eff...Background: Compared with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD) transplantation, it remains unclear whether haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation has a superior graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect for Philadelphia-negative (Ph-) high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). This study aimed to compare the GVL effect between HID and MSD transplantation for Ph- high-risk B-ALL.Methods: This study population came from two prospective multicenter trials (NCT01883180, NCT02673008). Immunosuppressant withdrawal and prophylactic or pre-emptive donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) were administered in patients without active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) to prevent relapse. All patients with measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity posttransplantation (post-MRD+) or non-remission (NR) pre-transplantation received prophylactic/pre-emptive interventions. The primary endpoint was the incidence of post-MRD+.Results: A total of 335 patients with Ph- high-risk B-ALL were enrolled, including 145 and 190, respectively, in the HID and MSD groups. The 3-year cumulative incidence of post-MRD+ was 27.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.2%-34.7%) and 42.6% (35.5%-49.6%) in the HID and MSD groups(P = 0.003), respectively. A total of 156 patients received DLI, including 60 (41.4%) and 96 (50.5%), respectively, in the HID and MSD groups (P= 0.096). The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 18.6% (95% CI: 12.7%-25.4%) and 25.9% (19.9%-32.3%;P = 0.116) in the two groups, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 67.4% (95% CI: 59.1%-74.4%) and 61.6% (54.2%-68.1%;P = 0.382), leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 63.4% (95% CI: 55.0%-70.7%) and 58.2% (50.8%-64.9%;P= 0.429), and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 51.7% (95% CI: 43.3%-59.5%) and 37.8% (30.9%-44.6%;P= 0.041), respectively, in the HID and MSD groups.Conclusion: HID transplantation has a lower incidence of post-MRD+ than MSD transplantation, suggesting that HID transplantation might have a superior GVL effect than MSD transplantation for Ph- high-risk B-ALL patients.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01883180, NCT02673008.展开更多
In order to compare the effect between haploidentical(HID) stem cell transplantation(HSCT) and matched sibling donor(MSD)stem cell transplantation for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia(AML) in first complete remission ...In order to compare the effect between haploidentical(HID) stem cell transplantation(HSCT) and matched sibling donor(MSD)stem cell transplantation for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia(AML) in first complete remission status(CR1), we retrospectively studied 170 cases who received stem cell transplantation from Jan 2008 to Jul 2015 in Peking University People's Hospital. We divided all cases into MSD group(43 cases) and HID(127 cases) group. Patients in HID and MSD group displayed similar baseline characteristics except for age distribution. There were no statistic differences for overall survival(OS), cumulative incidence of relapse, leukemia free survival(LFS), transplantation related mortality(TRM) between HID and MSD group. The 3-year OS, LFS for all patients was 63.9% and 59.7% respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that grade III-IV acute graft versus host disease(aGVHD) was an independent risk factor for treatment related mortality(HR=8.134, 95% CI:3.210–20.611, P<0.001), monosomy/complex chromosomal karyotype and white blood cell count more than 50×109 L-1 were two independent factors for relapse(HR=1.533, 95% CI: 1.040–2.260, P=0.031)(HR=1.004, 95% CI: 1.001–1.008, P=0.015).Grade III-IV aGVHD was an independent factor for mortality(HR=3.184, 95% CI: 1.718–5.902, P<0.001). These results demonstrated some risk factors for high-risk AML leukemia transplantation and indicated for AML patients in CR1 status, haplo stem cell transplantation could have the same therapeutic effect as MSD transplantation.展开更多
Background:Although the need for consolidation chemotherapy after successful induction therapy is well established in patients with acute myeloid leukemia(AML)in first complete remission(CR1),the value of consolidatio...Background:Although the need for consolidation chemotherapy after successful induction therapy is well established in patients with acute myeloid leukemia(AML)in first complete remission(CR1),the value of consolidation chemotherapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains controversial.Methods:We retrospectively compared the effect of the number of pre-transplant consolidation chemotherapies on outcomes of human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling stem cell transplantation(MSDT)for patients with AML in CR1 in multicenters across China.In our study,we analyzed data of 373 AML patients in CR1 from three centers across China.Results:With a median follow-up of 969 days,patients with≥3 courses of consolidation chemotherapy had higher probabilities of leukemia-free survival(LFS)(85.6%vs.67.0%,P<0.001)and overall survival(89.2%vs.78.5%,P=0.007),and better cumulative incidences of relapse(10.5%vs.19.6%,P=0.020)and non-relapse mortality(4.2%vs.14.9%,P=0.001)than those with≤2 courses of consolidation chemotherapy.Pre-transplantation minimal residual disease-negative patients with AML in CR1 who received MSDT with≥3 courses of consolidation chemotherapy had a higher probability of LFS(85.9%vs.67.7%,P=0.003)and a lower cumulative incidence of relapse(9.6%vs.23.3%,P=0.013)than those with≤2 courses.Conclusion:Our results indicate that patients with AML in CR1 who received MSDT might benefit from pre-transplant consolidation chemotherapy.展开更多
Background: Several studies have shown that detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an independent prognostic factor. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of dynamic MRD...Background: Several studies have shown that detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an independent prognostic factor. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of dynamic MRD pretransplantation on outcome of AML patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo?HSCT). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 145 consecutive AML patients undergoing allo?HSCT in complete remission status between June 2013 and June 2016. MRD was determined with multiparameter flow cytometry after the first and second courses of chemotherapy and pre?HSCT. Results: In matched sibling donor transplantation (MSDT) settings, patients with positive MRD had higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) than those without MRD after the first (32.3 ± 9.7% vs. 7.7 ± 3.1%, χ2 = 3.661, P = 0.055) or second course of chemotherapy (57.1 ± 3.6% vs. 12.5 ± 2.7%, χ2 = 8.759, P = 0.003) or pre?HSCT (50.0 ± 9.7% vs. 23.0 ± 3.2%, χ2 = 5.547, P = 0.019). In haploidentical SCT (haplo?SCT) settings, the MRD status at those timepoints had no significant impact on clinical outcomes. However, patients with persistent positive MRD from chemotherapy to pre?HSCT had higher CIR than those without persistent positive MRD both in MSDT and haplo?SCT settings. Patients with persistent positive MRD underwent MSDT had the highest relapse incidence, followed by those with persistent positive MRD underwent haplo?SCT, those without persistent MRD underwent haplo?SCT, and those without persistent MRD underwent MSDT (66.7 ± 9.2% vs. 38.5 ± 6.0% vs. 18.8 ± 8.7% vs. 12.0 ± 1.0%, χ2 = 20.763, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that persistent positive MRD before transplantation was associated with higher CIR (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.200–2.382, P = 0.003), worse leukemia?free survival (HR = 1.812, 95% CI: 1.168–2.812, P = 0.008), and overall survival (HR = 2.354, 95% CI: 1.528–3.627, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Our results suggest that persistent positive MRD before transplantation, rather than positive MRD at single timepoint, could predict poor outcome both in MSDT and haplo?SCT settings.展开更多
基金National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos. 81770190, 81970161)National Key Research and Development Program of China(Nos. 2017YFA105500,2017YFA105504)+3 种基金Research and Development Program in Key Areas of Guangdong Province(No. 2019B020236004)Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province(No. 2019A1515011924)Project of the Zhujiang Science and Technology Star of Guangzhou City(No. 201806010029)Key Clinical Research Project of Southern Medical University(No. LC2016ZD009)。
文摘Background: Compared with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD) transplantation, it remains unclear whether haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation has a superior graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect for Philadelphia-negative (Ph-) high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). This study aimed to compare the GVL effect between HID and MSD transplantation for Ph- high-risk B-ALL.Methods: This study population came from two prospective multicenter trials (NCT01883180, NCT02673008). Immunosuppressant withdrawal and prophylactic or pre-emptive donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) were administered in patients without active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) to prevent relapse. All patients with measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity posttransplantation (post-MRD+) or non-remission (NR) pre-transplantation received prophylactic/pre-emptive interventions. The primary endpoint was the incidence of post-MRD+.Results: A total of 335 patients with Ph- high-risk B-ALL were enrolled, including 145 and 190, respectively, in the HID and MSD groups. The 3-year cumulative incidence of post-MRD+ was 27.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.2%-34.7%) and 42.6% (35.5%-49.6%) in the HID and MSD groups(P = 0.003), respectively. A total of 156 patients received DLI, including 60 (41.4%) and 96 (50.5%), respectively, in the HID and MSD groups (P= 0.096). The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 18.6% (95% CI: 12.7%-25.4%) and 25.9% (19.9%-32.3%;P = 0.116) in the two groups, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 67.4% (95% CI: 59.1%-74.4%) and 61.6% (54.2%-68.1%;P = 0.382), leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 63.4% (95% CI: 55.0%-70.7%) and 58.2% (50.8%-64.9%;P= 0.429), and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 51.7% (95% CI: 43.3%-59.5%) and 37.8% (30.9%-44.6%;P= 0.041), respectively, in the HID and MSD groups.Conclusion: HID transplantation has a lower incidence of post-MRD+ than MSD transplantation, suggesting that HID transplantation might have a superior GVL effect than MSD transplantation for Ph- high-risk B-ALL patients.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01883180, NCT02673008.
文摘In order to compare the effect between haploidentical(HID) stem cell transplantation(HSCT) and matched sibling donor(MSD)stem cell transplantation for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia(AML) in first complete remission status(CR1), we retrospectively studied 170 cases who received stem cell transplantation from Jan 2008 to Jul 2015 in Peking University People's Hospital. We divided all cases into MSD group(43 cases) and HID(127 cases) group. Patients in HID and MSD group displayed similar baseline characteristics except for age distribution. There were no statistic differences for overall survival(OS), cumulative incidence of relapse, leukemia free survival(LFS), transplantation related mortality(TRM) between HID and MSD group. The 3-year OS, LFS for all patients was 63.9% and 59.7% respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that grade III-IV acute graft versus host disease(aGVHD) was an independent risk factor for treatment related mortality(HR=8.134, 95% CI:3.210–20.611, P<0.001), monosomy/complex chromosomal karyotype and white blood cell count more than 50×109 L-1 were two independent factors for relapse(HR=1.533, 95% CI: 1.040–2.260, P=0.031)(HR=1.004, 95% CI: 1.001–1.008, P=0.015).Grade III-IV aGVHD was an independent factor for mortality(HR=3.184, 95% CI: 1.718–5.902, P<0.001). These results demonstrated some risk factors for high-risk AML leukemia transplantation and indicated for AML patients in CR1 status, haplo stem cell transplantation could have the same therapeutic effect as MSD transplantation.
基金National Key Research and Development Program of China(No.2019YFC0840606)Ministry of Science and Technology,the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.82070189,81621001 and 82270227)CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences(CIFMS)(No.2019-I2M-5-034)
文摘Background:Although the need for consolidation chemotherapy after successful induction therapy is well established in patients with acute myeloid leukemia(AML)in first complete remission(CR1),the value of consolidation chemotherapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains controversial.Methods:We retrospectively compared the effect of the number of pre-transplant consolidation chemotherapies on outcomes of human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling stem cell transplantation(MSDT)for patients with AML in CR1 in multicenters across China.In our study,we analyzed data of 373 AML patients in CR1 from three centers across China.Results:With a median follow-up of 969 days,patients with≥3 courses of consolidation chemotherapy had higher probabilities of leukemia-free survival(LFS)(85.6%vs.67.0%,P<0.001)and overall survival(89.2%vs.78.5%,P=0.007),and better cumulative incidences of relapse(10.5%vs.19.6%,P=0.020)and non-relapse mortality(4.2%vs.14.9%,P=0.001)than those with≤2 courses of consolidation chemotherapy.Pre-transplantation minimal residual disease-negative patients with AML in CR1 who received MSDT with≥3 courses of consolidation chemotherapy had a higher probability of LFS(85.9%vs.67.7%,P=0.003)and a lower cumulative incidence of relapse(9.6%vs.23.3%,P=0.013)than those with≤2 courses.Conclusion:Our results indicate that patients with AML in CR1 who received MSDT might benefit from pre-transplant consolidation chemotherapy.
文摘Background: Several studies have shown that detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an independent prognostic factor. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of dynamic MRD pretransplantation on outcome of AML patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo?HSCT). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 145 consecutive AML patients undergoing allo?HSCT in complete remission status between June 2013 and June 2016. MRD was determined with multiparameter flow cytometry after the first and second courses of chemotherapy and pre?HSCT. Results: In matched sibling donor transplantation (MSDT) settings, patients with positive MRD had higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) than those without MRD after the first (32.3 ± 9.7% vs. 7.7 ± 3.1%, χ2 = 3.661, P = 0.055) or second course of chemotherapy (57.1 ± 3.6% vs. 12.5 ± 2.7%, χ2 = 8.759, P = 0.003) or pre?HSCT (50.0 ± 9.7% vs. 23.0 ± 3.2%, χ2 = 5.547, P = 0.019). In haploidentical SCT (haplo?SCT) settings, the MRD status at those timepoints had no significant impact on clinical outcomes. However, patients with persistent positive MRD from chemotherapy to pre?HSCT had higher CIR than those without persistent positive MRD both in MSDT and haplo?SCT settings. Patients with persistent positive MRD underwent MSDT had the highest relapse incidence, followed by those with persistent positive MRD underwent haplo?SCT, those without persistent MRD underwent haplo?SCT, and those without persistent MRD underwent MSDT (66.7 ± 9.2% vs. 38.5 ± 6.0% vs. 18.8 ± 8.7% vs. 12.0 ± 1.0%, χ2 = 20.763, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that persistent positive MRD before transplantation was associated with higher CIR (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.200–2.382, P = 0.003), worse leukemia?free survival (HR = 1.812, 95% CI: 1.168–2.812, P = 0.008), and overall survival (HR = 2.354, 95% CI: 1.528–3.627, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Our results suggest that persistent positive MRD before transplantation, rather than positive MRD at single timepoint, could predict poor outcome both in MSDT and haplo?SCT settings.
