Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy is a useful surgical treatment method for patients with excessive splenomegaly: A metaanalysis

BACKGROUND Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy(HALS) can help overcome the drawbacks of laparoscopic splenectomy(LS) while maintaining its advantages.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and advantages of HALS for splenomegaly.METHODS The relevant literature was reviewed using the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane,Ovid Medline, and Wanfang databases to compare the clinical outcomes of HALS and LS. Odds ratios or mean differences were calculated with 95% confidence intervals for fixed-effects and random-effects models. Overall, 754 patients from16 trials who met the inclusion criteria were selected.RESULTS In pure splenectomy, blood loss volume(P < 0.001) and conversion rate(P =0.008) were significantly lower in the HALS group than in the LS group.Conversely, for splenomegaly, the operative time(P = 0.04) was shorter and blood loss volume(P < 0.001) and conversion rate(P = 0.001) were significantly lower in the HALS group than in the LS group. However, no significant difference was observed in hospital stay length, blood transfusion, time to food intake, complications, or mortality rate between the two groups. Moreover, in splenectomy and devascularization of the upper stomach(DUS), the operative time(P = 0.04) was significantly shorter and blood loss volume(P < 0.001) andconversion rate(P = 0.05) were significantly lower in the HALS + DUS group than in the LS + DUS group. However, no significant difference was observed in hospital stay length, timing of diet, and complications between the two groups.CONCLUSION HALS is an ideal surgical treatment method for splenomegaly because it can maximize the benefits for patients while maintaining the advantages of LS.

Surgical outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection vs. open liver resection: A retrospective propensity scorematched cohort study

Objective: Hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection has the advantages of open and laparoscopic surgeries.There is still lack of comparison of surgical outcomes between hand-assistied laparoscopic liver resection(HALLR)and open liver resection(OLR). This study compared the surgical outcomes of the two approaches between wellmatched patient cohorts.Methods: Patients who received liver resection during January 2014 and October 2017 in Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College were included in this retrospective study. Propensity score matching(PSM) was performed to reduce selection bias between the two groups. Operation and short-term surgical outcomes were compared between the well matched groups.Results: During this period, 232 patients with a median age of 55.1 years old received OLR, while 49 patients with a median age of 54.7 years old received HALLR. Compared with HALLR group, OLR group has a higher proportion in male patients(190/232, 81.9% vs. 34/49, 69.4%, P=0.048) and lower albumin(43.2±4.5 vs. 44.8±3.7,P=0.020). After PSM, 49 patients from each group were included in the following analysis. Two groups were well balanced in their baseline characteristics, liver functions, preoperative treatments, abdominal surgery history, and surgical difficulty. None perioperative mortality was observed in both groups. Operation time and postoperative complications were similar in two groups(P=0.935, P=0.056). The HALLR group showed less bleeding amount(177.8±217.1 mL vs. 283.1±225.0 mL, P=0.003) and shorter postoperative stay period(6.9±2.2 d vs. 9.0±3.5 d,P=0.001).Conclusions: We demonstrated that hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery is feasible and safe for liver resection,including some difficult cases. HALLR can provide better bleeding control and faster recovery after surgery.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis

AIM To evaluate the utility of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy(HALS-RP) compared with the conventional open procedure(OPEN-RP).METHODS Fifty-one patients who underwent restorative total proctocolectomy with rectal mucosectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis between January 2008 and July 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.Twentythree patients in the HALS-RP group and twentyfour patients in the OPEN-RP group were compared.Four patients who had purely laparoscopic surgery were excluded.Restorative total proctocolectomy was performed with mucosectomy and a hand-sewn ilealpouch-anal anastomosis.Preoperative comorbidities,intraoperative factors such as blood loss and operative time,postoperative complications,and postoperative course were compared between two groups.RESULTS Patients in both groups were matched with regards to patient age,gender,and American Society of Anesthesiologists score.There were no significant differences in extent of colitis,indications for surgery,preoperative comorbidities,and preoperative medications in the two groups.The median operative time for the HALS-RP group was 369(320-420) min,slightly longer than the OPEN-RP group at 355(318-421) min; this was not statistically significant.Blood loss was significantly less in HALS-RP [300(230-402) m L] compared to OPEN-RP [512(401-1162) m L,P = 0.003].Anastomotic leakage was noted in 3 patients in the HALS-RP group and 2 patients in the OPEN-RP group(13% vs 8.3%,NS).The rates of other postoperative complications and the length of hospital stay were not different between the two groups.CONCLUSION HALS-RP can be performed with less blood loss and smaller skin incisions.This procedure is a feasible technique for total proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic approach for the treatment of gastrosplenic fistula:A case report and review of the literature

Gastrosplenic fistula is a rare complication of gastric or splenic lymphoma.Here we report the case of a 48 years old man who developed a gastrosplenic fistula secondary to splenic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma,successfully managed with hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy and gastric wedge resection.A review of the available literature is also presented,33 cases of gastrosplenic fistula associated to gastric or splenic lymphoma were found,of which 25 were treated surgically.This case represents the first report of laparoscopic treatment of lymphoma-related gastrosplenic fistula described to our knowledge in the available literature.

Postoperative outcomes after open splenectomy versus laparoscopic splenectomy in cirrhotic patients:a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND： Laparoscopic splenectomy is considered the gold standard for resecting normal-to-moderately bigger spleens in benign conditions, and in addition could be tried for patients with malignant splenic disorders. However, the safety of laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with hyper- splenism is not well-known. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy for pa- tients with hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis by com- paring with the open splenectomy.

Partial splenectomy using a laparoscopic bipolar radiofrequency device:A case report

We report a 51-year-old female patient with a solitary lymphangioma located in the upper splenic pole which was managed successfully with laparoscopic partial splenectomy.Surgery lasted 170 min and did not require blood transfusions.The patient recovered well post-operatively and was asymptomatic at the 3-mo follow-up.She had a normal platelet count and no recurrence on ultrasonography or computed tomography.Laparoscopic partial splenectomy is a safe,minimally invasive technique for the treatment of solitary splenic lymphangiomas in the splenic pole.We performed the procedure using the HabibTM 4X device.This laparoscopic bipolar radiofrequency device ensured a "bloodless" splenic parenchymal resection.

Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy for Giant Hemangioma Misdiagnosed as Splenic Cyst:a Case Report

ALTHOUGH unusual, hemangioma is the most common type of primary splenic neoplasm.1 Usually, splenic hemangioma appears as solid mass, but sometimes it presents cystic corn-ponent as well, which is difficult to discriminate from some other lesions, such as abscess, simple cyst, parasitic cyst, and lymphangioma.2 Preoperative diagnosis of splenic hemangioma mainly depends on imaging study （e.g. ultrasonography, CT, MRI）.

Laparoscopic splenectomy for primary immune thrombocytopenia:Current status and challenges

Primary immune thrombocytopenia(ITP) is an immunemediated disorder affecting both adults and children, characterised by bleeding complications and low platelet counts. Corticosteroids are the first-line therapy for ITP, but only 20%-40% of cases achieve a stable response. Splenectomy is the main therapy for patients failing to respond to corticosteroids for decades, and about two-thirds of patients achieve a long-lasting response. Although some new drugs are developed to treat ITP as second-line therapies in recent years, splenectomy is still the better choice with less cost and more efficiency. Laparoscopic splenectomy(LS) for ITP proves to be a safe technique associated with lower morbidity and faster recovery and similar hematological response when compared to traditional open splenectomy. Based on the unified hematological outcome criteria by current international consensus, the response rate of splenectomy should be reassessed. So far, there are not widely accepted preoperative clinical indicators predicting favorable response to LS. Since the patients undergoing surgery take the risk of complications and poor hematological outcome, the great challenge facing the doctors is to identify a reliable biomarker for predicting longterm outcome of splenectomy which can help make the decision of operation.

Laparoscopic splenectomy for splenic hamartoma:Case management and clinical consequences

Splenic hamartoma is a rare benign tumor,and although minimally invasive surgery may be suitable for this condition,there have only been 2 previous reports of laparoscopic surgery.Here we report the third case of splenic hamartoma managed by laparoscopic splenectomy.A 37-year-old male was incidentally diagnosed by abdominal ultrasonography with a hypoechoic mass measuring 2.5 cm × 2.4 cm in the spleen.Color Doppler sonography showed multiple flow signals within the mass and contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed strong enhancement of the lesion.On T1-and T2-weighted magnetic resonance images,the splenic mass was demonstrated as isointense and hyperintense respectively.Although a malignant tumor could not be ruled out,a hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy was performed because the splenic mass was limited in size and had not invaded adjacent organs.The pathological diagnosis was splenic hamartoma.The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged by the seventh postoperative day.Although splenic hamartomas have some specific imaging features,more reports and analyses of these cases are required to increase the reliability of the diagnosis and management.Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy may play a pivotal role in the postoperative diagnosis and management of this condition.

Laparoscopic versus Traditional Open Splenectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Hypersplenism

This study aimed to examine the efficacy of the laparoscopic vs. traditional open splenectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma（HCC） with hypersplenism. Between 2002 and 2013, 51 Chinese HCC patients with hypersplenism underwent either simultaneous laparoscopic splenectomy plus anticancer therapies（Lap-S＆A）（n=25） or traditional open splenectomy plus anti-cancer therapies（TOS＆A）（n=26）. The outcomes were reviewed during and after the operation. Anti-cancer therapies for HCC included laparoscopic hepatectomy（LH） and laparoscopic microwave ablation（LMA）. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the operating time between the two groups, but the blood loss and blood transfusion were less, pain intensity after surgery was weaker, the time to first bowel movement, time to the first flatus and postoperative hospital stay were shorter, and the postoperative complication rate and the readmission rate were lower in the Lap-S＆A group than in the TO-S＆A group. Two patients in the Lap-S＆A group and one patient in the TO-S＆A group died 30 days after surgery. However, no significant difference in the mortality rate was noted between the two groups. It was concluded that simultaneous Lap-S＆A holds the advantages of more extensive indications, lower complication incidence and less operative expenditure than conventional open approach and it is a feasible and safe approach for HCC with hypersplenism.

Laparoscopic splenectomy for histiocytic sarcoma of the spleen

Primary histiocytic sarcoma of the spleen is a rare but potentially lethal condition. It can remain asymptomatic or only mildly symptomatic for a long time. An 81-year-old woman presented with an extremely enlarged spleen. She suffered from progressive anemia and required a red blood cell transfusion once a month. Although computed tomography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging were performed for diagnosis, a confirmed diagnosis was not obtained. Her enlarged spleen compressed her stomach, and she suffered from gastritis and a sense of gastric fullness just after meals. She underwent laparoscopic splenectomy for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. Her postoperative course was uneventful. After surgery, her red blood cell and platelet counts increased markedly. The tumor was diagnosed as splenic histiocytic sarcoma. Post-surgical chemotherapy was not performed, and the patient died of liver failure due to liver metastasis 5 mo after surgery. Laparoscopic splenectomy is minimally invasive and useful for the relief of symptoms related to hematological disorders. However, in cases of an enlarged spleen, optimal views and working space are limited. In such cases, splenic artery ligation can markedly reduce the size of the spleen, thus facilitating the procedure. The case reported herein suggests that laparoscopic splenectomy may be useful for the treatment of splenic malignancy.

Reaching proficiency in laparoscopic splenectomy

AIM:To investigate the proficiency level reached in laparoscopic splenectomy using the learning curve method.METHODS:All patients in need of splenectomy for benign causes in whom laparoscopic splenectomy was attempted by a single surgeon during a time period of 6 years were included in the study (n=33). Besides demographics, operation-related variables and the response to surgery were recorded. The patients were allocated to groups of five, ranked according to the date of the operation. Operation duration, complications, postoperative length of stay, conversion to laparotomy and splenic weight were then compared between these groups.RESULTS: There was a significant difference regarding operation times between the groups (P = 0.001). An improvement was observed after the first 5 cases. The learning curve was flat up to the 25th case. Following the 25th case the operation times decreased still further. There was no difference between the groups regarding the other parameters.CONCLUSION: Unlike the widely accepted "L" shape, the learning curve for laparoscopic splenectomy is a horizontal lazy "S" with two distinct slopes. Privileges may be granted after the first 5 cases. However proficiency seems to require 25 cases.

Laparoscopic splenectomy:Current concepts

Since early 1990's,when it was inaugurally introduced,laparoscopic splenectomy has been performed with excellent results in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications.Nowadays laparoscopic splenectomy is the approach of choice for both benign and malignant diseases of the spleen.However some contraindications still apply.The evolution of the technology has allowed though,cases which were considered to be absolute contraindications for performing a minimal invasive procedure to be treated with modified laparoscopic approaches.Moreover,the introduction of advanced laparoscopic tools for ligation resulted in less intraoperative complications.Today,laparoscopic splenectomy is considered safe,with better outcomes in comparison to open splenectomy,and the increased experience of surgeons allows operative times comparable to those of an open splenectomy.In this review we discuss the indications and the contraindications of laparoscopic splenectomy.Moreover we analyze the standard and modified surgical approaches,and we evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes.

Laparoscopic splenectomy for treatment of splenic marginal zone lymphoma

AIM: To investigate the short-term and long-term ef-ficacy and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) for treatment of splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL). METHODS: A total of 18 continuous patients who were diagnosed with SMZL and underwent LS in our department from 2008 to 2012 were reviewed. The perioperative variables and long-term follow-up were evaluated. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure better, we also included 34 patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent LS, 49 patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who underwent LS, and 20 patients with SMZL who underwent open splenectomy (OS). The results observed in the different groups were compared.RESULTS: No differences were found in the sex and Child-Pugh class of the patients in SMZL-LS, SMZL-OS, ITP, and liver cirrhosis groups. The splenic length of the patients in the SMZL-LS group was similar to that in the SMZL-OS and liver cirrhosis groups but significantly longer than in the ITP group. The SMZL-LS group had a significantly longer operating time compared with the SMZL-OS, ITP, and liver cirrhosis groups, and the SMZL-LS group exhibited significantly less blood loss compared with the SMZL-OS group. No difference was found in the length of the postoperative hospital stay between the SMZL-LS, SMZL-OS, ITP, and liver cirrhosis-LS groups. After surgery, 6 (33.3%) SMZL-LS patients suffered slight complications. During mean fol-low-up periods of 13.6 and 12.8 mo, one patient from the SMZL-LS group and two from the SMZL-OS group died as a result of metastasis after surgery. None of the ITP and liver cirrhosis patients died. CONCLUSION: LS should be considered a feasible and safe procedure for treatment of SMZL in an effort to improve the treatment options and survival of patients.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open partial splenectomy in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND In order to avoid consequences of total splenectomy,partial splenectomy(PS)is increasingly reported.The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic PS(LPS)and open PS(OPS)in children and adolescents.AIM To compare perioperative outcomes of patients with LPS and OPS.METHODS After institutional review board approval,a total of 26 patients that underwent LPS or OPS between January 2008 and July 2018 were identified from the database of our tertiary referral center.In total,10 patients had LPS,and 16 patients underwent OPS.Blood loss was calculated by Mercuriali’s formula.Pain scores,analgesic requirements and complications were assessed.The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for comparison.To compare categorical variables,Fisher’s exact test was applied.RESULTS LPS was performed in 10 patients;16 patients had OPS.Demographics(except for body mass index and duration of follow-up),indicating primary disease,preoperative spleen size and postoperative spleen volume,perioperative hematological parameters,postoperative pain scores,analgesic requirements,adverse events according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and the comprehensive complication index,median time from operation to initiation of feeds,median time from operation to full feeds,median time from operation to mobilization and median length of hospital stay did not differ between LPS and OPS.Median(range)operative time(min)was longer in LPS compared to the OPS group[185(135-298)vs 144(112-270),respectively;P=0.048].Calculated perioperative blood loss(mL of red blood cell count)was higher in the LPS group compared to OPS[87(-45-777)vs-37(-114-553),respectively;P=0.039].CONCLUSION This is the first study that compared outcomes of LPS and OPS.Both operative approaches had comparable perioperative outcomes.LPS appears to be a viable alternative to OPS.

Clinical efficacy of total laparoscopic splenectomy for portal hypertension and its influence on hepatic hemodynamics and liver function

BACKGROUND The liver hemodynamic changes caused by portal hypertension(PH)are closely related to various complications such as gastroesophageal varices and portosystemic shunts,which may lead to adverse clinical outcomes in these patients,so it is of great clinical significance to find treatment strategies with favorable clinical efficacy and low risk of complications.AIM To study the clinical efficacy of total laparoscopic splenectomy(TLS)for PH and its influence on hepatic hemodynamics and liver function.METHODS Among the 199 PH patients selected from October 2016 to October 2020,100 patients[observation group(OG)]were treated with TLS,while the remaining 99[reference group(RG)]were treated with open splenectomy(OS).We observed and compared the clinical efficacy,operation indexes[operative time(OT)and intraoperative bleeding volume],safety(intraperitoneal hemorrhage,ascitic fluid infection,eating disorders,liver insufficiency,and perioperative death),hepatic hemodynamics(diameter,velocity,and flow volume of the portal vein system),and liver function[serum alanine aminotransferase(ALT),serum aspartate aminotransferase(AST),and serum total bilirubin(TBil)]of the two groups.RESULTS The OT was significantly longer and intraoperative bleeding volume was significantly lesser in the OG than in the RG.Additionally,the overall response rate,postoperative complications rate,and liver function indexes(ALT,AST,and TBil)did not differ significantly between the OG and RG.The hepatic hemodynamics statistics showed that the pre-and postoperative blood vessel diameters in the two cohorts did not differ statistically.Although the postoperative blood velocity and flow volume reduced significantly when compared with the preoperative values,there were no significant inter-group differences.CONCLUSION TLS contributes to comparable clinical efficacy,safety,hepatic hemodynamics,and liver function as those of OS in treating PH,with a longer OT but lesser intraoperative blood loss.

Splenic lymphangioma masquerading as splenic abscess managed by laparoscopic splenectomy: A case report

BACKGROUND Primary benign splenic tumours are unique and account for<0.007%of all tumours identified during surgery and autopsy.Splenic lymphangiomas are rarely seen in adults.Splenic lymphangiomas may be asymptomatic,or may present with upper left abdominal pain,splenomegaly,hypersplenism,or splenic rupture with haemorrhagic shock.The clinical and radiological features of these lesions are not specific.This case report serves to remind the clinician to consider the rare but important differential diagnosis of splenic lymphangioma while treating splenic lesions.CASE SUMMARY We report a case of splenic lymphangioma in a 22-year-old woman who presented with left upper quadrant abdominal pain for three months.Initial investigations were unremarkable;however,computed tomography later revealed multiple splenic micro-abscesses.The patient underwent laparoscopic splenectomy,and histopathological examination revealed splenic lymphangioma.The patient was discharged on postoperative day three.One month after surgery,the abdominal pain resolved completely,with no new complaints.Splenic lymphangiomas present clinically as splenomegaly or left upper quadrant abdominal pain;prompt intervention is necessary for avoiding complications.CONCLUSION This case report concludes that splenic lymphangiomas should be considered in the differential diagnosis of splenomegaly or left upper quadrant pain,even in adults,because they are amenable to curative treatment.Delays in surgical intervention may lead to severe complications,such as infection,rupture,and hemorrhage.Such lesions can be safely managed with laparoscopy,involving less postoperative pain and early patient discharge with excellent cosmetic outcomes.

Consecutive laparoscopic gallbladder and spleen resections in cirrhotic patients

AIM:To evaluate the feasibility,safety,and effectiveness of consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)plus splenectomy(LS)in liver cirrhosis patients.METHODS:From 2003 to 2013,17(group 1)patients with liver cirrhosis complicated by hypersplenism and symptomatic gallstones were treated with combined LC and LS,while 58(group 2)patients with liver cirrhosis and hypersplenism received LS alone.An additional 14(group 3)patients who received traditional open procedures during the same period were included as controls.Data were retrospectively collected and reviewed in regard to demographic characteristics and preoperative,intraoperative and postoperative features.Differences between the three groups were assessed by statistical analysis.RESULTS:The three groups showed no significant differences in the demographic characteristics or preoperative status.However,the patients treated with LC and LS required significantly longer operative time,shorter postoperative stay as well as shorter time of return to the first oral intake,and suffered less intraoperative blood loss as well as fewer postoperative surgical infections than the patients treated with traditional open procedures(group 1 vs group 3,P<0.05 for all).The patients treated with LC and LS showed no significant differences in the intraoperative and postoperative variables from those treated with LS alone(group 1 vs group 2).All patients showed significant improvements in the haematological responses(preoperative period vs postoperative period,P<0.05 for all).None of the patients treated with LC and LS presented with any gallstone-associated symptoms following discharge,while the patients treated with the traditional open procedures expressed complaints of discomfort related to their surgical incisions.CONCLUSION:Consecutive LC and LS is an appropriate treatment option for liver cirrhosis patients with gallstones and hypersplenism,especially for those with Child-Pugh A and B.

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: Up-to-date and literature review

Pancreatic surgery represents one of the most challenging areas in digestive surgery. In recent years, an increasing number of laparoscopic pancreatic procedures have been performed and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has gained world-wide acceptance because it does not require anastomosis or other reconstruction. To date, English literature reports more than 300 papers focusing on LDP, but only 6% included more than 30 patients. Literature review confirms that LDP is a feasible and safe procedure in patients with benign or low grade malignancies. Decreased blood loss and morbidity, early recovery and shorter hospital stay may be the main advantages. Several concerns still exist for laparoscopic pancreatic adenocarcinoma excision. The individual surgeon determines the technical conduction of LDP, with or without spleen preservation; currently robotic pancreatic surgery has gained diffu- sion. Additional researches are necessary to determine the best technique to improve the procedure results.

Pancreatic cancer–Laparoscopic resection

Objective: To assess current role of laparoscopic resection for pancreatic cancer, so as to improve the surgical management of pancreatic cancer. Methods: A comprehensive review of articles from PubMed was carried out. Results: Cur- rently, the advantages of a complete laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) are still outweighed by the morbidity associ- ated with the procedure. However, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) offers patients benefits in terms of postoperative recovery and the length of hospital stay with similar morbidity and mortality to open surgery. Hand-assisted laparoscopic sur- gery can help to overcome the limitation of a complete laparoscopic surgery while maintaining a minimally invasive approach. Conclusion: Current literature suggests that laparoscopic resection of pancreatic cancer is feasible and safe in experienced hands. The hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery shows a promising future in pancreatic cancer surgery.