Petrolezum Science is pleased to announce the winners of the 2016 Highly Cited Paper Award in which we recognize highly cited papers published in our journal between 2014and 2015.Citation data of papers are based on c...Petrolezum Science is pleased to announce the winners of the 2016 Highly Cited Paper Award in which we recognize highly cited papers published in our journal between 2014and 2015.Citation data of papers are based on citations in Web of Science in 2016.Petroleum Science also announces the winners of the 2016 Best Reviewer Award who have made an outstanding contribution in 2016 as reviewer to Petroleum Science.Congratulations and thanks to all the winners!The winners of the 2016 Highly Cited Paper Award展开更多
Petroleum Science is pleased to announce the winners of the 2017 Highly Cited Paper Award in which we recognize highly cited papers published in our journal between 2015 and 2016.Citation data of papers are based on c...Petroleum Science is pleased to announce the winners of the 2017 Highly Cited Paper Award in which we recognize highly cited papers published in our journal between 2015 and 2016.Citation data of papers are based on citations in Web of Science in 2017.Petroleum Science also announces the winners of the 2017 Best Reviewer Award who have made an outstanding contribution in 2017 as reviewer to Petroleum Science.Congratulations and thanks to all the winners!展开更多
1. HIF-1α pathway: role, regulation and intervention for cancer therapy Acta Pharm Sin B 2015; 5: 378-389(Georgina N. Masoud, Wei Li) 2. Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors Acta Pharm Sin B 20...1. HIF-1α pathway: role, regulation and intervention for cancer therapy Acta Pharm Sin B 2015; 5: 378-389(Georgina N. Masoud, Wei Li) 2. Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors Acta Pharm Sin B 2015; 5: 390-401(Lihua Huang, Liwu Fu) 3. Cancer metastases: challenges and opportunities Acta Pharm Sin B 2015; 5: 402-418(Xiangming Guan)展开更多
1. HIF-1α pathway: role, regulation and intervention for cancer therapy Acta Pharm Sin B 2015;5:378-389 (Georgina N. Masoud, Wei Li).2. Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors Acta Pharm Sin B 201...1. HIF-1α pathway: role, regulation and intervention for cancer therapy Acta Pharm Sin B 2015;5:378-389 (Georgina N. Masoud, Wei Li).2. Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors Acta Pharm Sin B 2015;5: 390-401(Lihua Huang, Liwu Fu).3. Cancer metastases: challenges and opportunities Acta Pharm Sin B 2015;5: 402-418 (XiangmingGuan).4. Insoluble drug delivery strategies: review of recent advances and business prospects Acta PharmSin B 2015;5: 442-453 (Sandeep Kalepu, VijaykumarNekkanti).展开更多
The data of this research was mainly collected from the Web of Science (WOS) and Incites database platform, which was filtered and cataloged according to the different platforms. For tracing the change in scientific r...The data of this research was mainly collected from the Web of Science (WOS) and Incites database platform, which was filtered and cataloged according to the different platforms. For tracing the change in scientific research at Shanghai Ocean University, make use of Bibliometric analysis to get the image and table of highly cited papers and hot papers. In this study, the scientific aspects in highly cited papers and hot papers, published in the last year in the core collection of Web of Science, were taken as objects, and office software was used as the main tool to carry out bibliometric and figure analysis. From the four aspects to find the difference in these fields, the production of specific fields and cited times is inconsistent. And suggest the department and management adjust the policy and method via elastic personnel and rewards to prompt the advancement of the research fields.展开更多
Purpose:The ranking lists of highly cited researchers receive much public attention.In common interpretations,highly cited researchers are perceived to have made extraordinary contributions to science.Thus,the metrics...Purpose:The ranking lists of highly cited researchers receive much public attention.In common interpretations,highly cited researchers are perceived to have made extraordinary contributions to science.Thus,the metrics of highly cited researchers are often linked to notions of breakthroughs,scientific excellence,and lone geniuses.Design/methodology/approach:In this study,we analyze a sample of individuals who appear on Clarivate Analytics’Highly Cited Researchers list.The main purpose is to juxtapose the characteristics of their research performance against the claim that the list captures a small fraction of the researcher population that contributes disproportionately to extending the frontier and gaining—on behalf of society—knowledge and innovations that make the world healthier,richer,sustainable,and more secure.Findings:The study reveals that the highly cited articles of the selected individuals generally have a very large number of authors.Thus,these papers seldom represent individual contributions but rather are the result of large collective research efforts conducted in research consortia.This challenges the common perception of highly cited researchers as individual geniuses who can be singled out for their extraordinary contributions.Moreover,the study indicates that a few of the individuals have not even contributed to highly cited original research but rather to reviews or clinical guidelines.Finally,the large number of authors of the papers implies that the ranking list is very sensitive to the specific method used for allocating papers and citations to individuals.In the"whole count"methodology applied by Clarivate Analytics,each author gets full credit of the papers regardless of the number of additional co-authors.The study shows that the ranking list would look very different using an alternative fractionalised methodology.Research limitations:The study is based on a limited part of the total population of highly cited researchers.Practical implications:It is concluded that"excellence"understood as highly cited encompasses very different types of research and researchers of which many do not fit with dominant preconceptions.Originality/value:The study develops further knowledge on highly cited researchers,addressing questions such as who becomes highly cited and the type of research that benefits by defining excellence in terms of citation scores and specific counting methods.展开更多
特高频(ultra high frequency,UHF)局放检测是变压器油纸绝缘缺陷定位的常用方法,实际应用过程中局放定位准确性易受噪声和传感器布置方式影响。为保证变压器油纸绝缘缺陷局放定位检测有效性,文中首先建立油纸绝缘缺陷UHF局放定位检测平...特高频(ultra high frequency,UHF)局放检测是变压器油纸绝缘缺陷定位的常用方法,实际应用过程中局放定位准确性易受噪声和传感器布置方式影响。为保证变压器油纸绝缘缺陷局放定位检测有效性,文中首先建立油纸绝缘缺陷UHF局放定位检测平台,在常规K-means方法的基础上,提出基于修正聚类分界的变压器油纸绝缘缺陷局放抗干扰定位方法,有效降低了定位误差。然后针对样本聚类分界混叠问题,选择最优修正系数L为1.1时,UHF局放定位误差可减小至0.1 m内,验证了文中方法的有效性。最后分析不同传感器布置方式的定位误差变化规律,提出变压器油纸绝缘缺陷检测用UHF传感器优化布置方案,可为变压器局放在线监测传感器布置及定位提供参考。展开更多
目的探讨合成生物学高被引论文替代计量学指标和文献计量学指标与被引频次的相关性。方法检索Web of Science数据库中合成生物学相关论文,检索时间为2023年6月21日,筛选高被引论文(被引频次排名前1%);同时,通过该数据库获取期刊引证报告...目的探讨合成生物学高被引论文替代计量学指标和文献计量学指标与被引频次的相关性。方法检索Web of Science数据库中合成生物学相关论文,检索时间为2023年6月21日,筛选高被引论文(被引频次排名前1%);同时,通过该数据库获取期刊引证报告(JCR)影响因子,与论文被引频次共同作为文献计量学指标,通过Altmetric官网获取Altmetric评分、Twitters等7个指标作为替代计量学指标;排除数据缺失比例超过20%的指标。分析合成生物学高被引论文发文量的年度变化趋势;分别采用多变量、单变量回归模型分析各指标与被引频次的相关性。结果共纳入100篇高被引论文及6个指标[包括2个文献计量学指标(被引频次和JCR影响因子)及4个替代计量学指标(Altmetric评分、Twitters、Mendeley和Patents)]。1999年至2021年,合成生物学高被引论文发文量先上升后下降,集中发表于2011年至2015年(51篇)。多变量回归模型分析显示,Altmetric评分、Mendeley、Patents与被引频次呈显著正相关,JCR影响因子和Twitters与被引频次的相关性不显著。单变量回归模型分析显示,与被引频次的相关性除Twitters不显著外,其他变量均显著,其中JCR影响因子相关性较弱,Mendeley和Patents分别可解释被引频次90.0%和85.6%的变化。结论替代计量学指标在一定程度上可反映论文的影响力;JCR影响因子与论文影响力相关性弱或无关。展开更多
人工智能技术近年来已快速运用到社会各个领域当中,对人工智能研究进行高频术语的分析为科技的发展及智能社会的构建奠定了基础。以Web of Science数据库收录的近5年按被引频次从高到低的前1 000篇SCI文献为样本,运用CiteSpace可视化文...人工智能技术近年来已快速运用到社会各个领域当中,对人工智能研究进行高频术语的分析为科技的发展及智能社会的构建奠定了基础。以Web of Science数据库收录的近5年按被引频次从高到低的前1 000篇SCI文献为样本,运用CiteSpace可视化文献计量软件对人工智能的前沿和热点进行分析研究发现,人工智能研究主要集中于机器学习、深度学习、神经网络、新型冠状病毒肺炎等方面,全球在人工智能领域应加大国际之间的合作与科技创新力度,加大高校专业人才的培养。展开更多
文摘Petrolezum Science is pleased to announce the winners of the 2016 Highly Cited Paper Award in which we recognize highly cited papers published in our journal between 2014and 2015.Citation data of papers are based on citations in Web of Science in 2016.Petroleum Science also announces the winners of the 2016 Best Reviewer Award who have made an outstanding contribution in 2016 as reviewer to Petroleum Science.Congratulations and thanks to all the winners!The winners of the 2016 Highly Cited Paper Award
文摘Petroleum Science is pleased to announce the winners of the 2017 Highly Cited Paper Award in which we recognize highly cited papers published in our journal between 2015 and 2016.Citation data of papers are based on citations in Web of Science in 2017.Petroleum Science also announces the winners of the 2017 Best Reviewer Award who have made an outstanding contribution in 2017 as reviewer to Petroleum Science.Congratulations and thanks to all the winners!
文摘1. HIF-1α pathway: role, regulation and intervention for cancer therapy Acta Pharm Sin B 2015; 5: 378-389(Georgina N. Masoud, Wei Li) 2. Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors Acta Pharm Sin B 2015; 5: 390-401(Lihua Huang, Liwu Fu) 3. Cancer metastases: challenges and opportunities Acta Pharm Sin B 2015; 5: 402-418(Xiangming Guan)
文摘1. HIF-1α pathway: role, regulation and intervention for cancer therapy Acta Pharm Sin B 2015;5:378-389 (Georgina N. Masoud, Wei Li).2. Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors Acta Pharm Sin B 2015;5: 390-401(Lihua Huang, Liwu Fu).3. Cancer metastases: challenges and opportunities Acta Pharm Sin B 2015;5: 402-418 (XiangmingGuan).4. Insoluble drug delivery strategies: review of recent advances and business prospects Acta PharmSin B 2015;5: 442-453 (Sandeep Kalepu, VijaykumarNekkanti).
文摘The data of this research was mainly collected from the Web of Science (WOS) and Incites database platform, which was filtered and cataloged according to the different platforms. For tracing the change in scientific research at Shanghai Ocean University, make use of Bibliometric analysis to get the image and table of highly cited papers and hot papers. In this study, the scientific aspects in highly cited papers and hot papers, published in the last year in the core collection of Web of Science, were taken as objects, and office software was used as the main tool to carry out bibliometric and figure analysis. From the four aspects to find the difference in these fields, the production of specific fields and cited times is inconsistent. And suggest the department and management adjust the policy and method via elastic personnel and rewards to prompt the advancement of the research fields.
基金the Research Council of Norway,grant number 256223(the R-QUEST centre)。
文摘Purpose:The ranking lists of highly cited researchers receive much public attention.In common interpretations,highly cited researchers are perceived to have made extraordinary contributions to science.Thus,the metrics of highly cited researchers are often linked to notions of breakthroughs,scientific excellence,and lone geniuses.Design/methodology/approach:In this study,we analyze a sample of individuals who appear on Clarivate Analytics’Highly Cited Researchers list.The main purpose is to juxtapose the characteristics of their research performance against the claim that the list captures a small fraction of the researcher population that contributes disproportionately to extending the frontier and gaining—on behalf of society—knowledge and innovations that make the world healthier,richer,sustainable,and more secure.Findings:The study reveals that the highly cited articles of the selected individuals generally have a very large number of authors.Thus,these papers seldom represent individual contributions but rather are the result of large collective research efforts conducted in research consortia.This challenges the common perception of highly cited researchers as individual geniuses who can be singled out for their extraordinary contributions.Moreover,the study indicates that a few of the individuals have not even contributed to highly cited original research but rather to reviews or clinical guidelines.Finally,the large number of authors of the papers implies that the ranking list is very sensitive to the specific method used for allocating papers and citations to individuals.In the"whole count"methodology applied by Clarivate Analytics,each author gets full credit of the papers regardless of the number of additional co-authors.The study shows that the ranking list would look very different using an alternative fractionalised methodology.Research limitations:The study is based on a limited part of the total population of highly cited researchers.Practical implications:It is concluded that"excellence"understood as highly cited encompasses very different types of research and researchers of which many do not fit with dominant preconceptions.Originality/value:The study develops further knowledge on highly cited researchers,addressing questions such as who becomes highly cited and the type of research that benefits by defining excellence in terms of citation scores and specific counting methods.
文摘特高频(ultra high frequency,UHF)局放检测是变压器油纸绝缘缺陷定位的常用方法,实际应用过程中局放定位准确性易受噪声和传感器布置方式影响。为保证变压器油纸绝缘缺陷局放定位检测有效性,文中首先建立油纸绝缘缺陷UHF局放定位检测平台,在常规K-means方法的基础上,提出基于修正聚类分界的变压器油纸绝缘缺陷局放抗干扰定位方法,有效降低了定位误差。然后针对样本聚类分界混叠问题,选择最优修正系数L为1.1时,UHF局放定位误差可减小至0.1 m内,验证了文中方法的有效性。最后分析不同传感器布置方式的定位误差变化规律,提出变压器油纸绝缘缺陷检测用UHF传感器优化布置方案,可为变压器局放在线监测传感器布置及定位提供参考。
文摘随着Web 2.0和社交网络的发展,补充学术成果评价的Altmetrics指标应运而生,已有研究表明Altmetrics指标与被引频次之间存在相关性,但集成Altmetrics指标的论文高被引预测研究较少。因此,基于引用理论,将Altemetrics指标与学术层面指标相结合,构建论文高被引预测的指标体系;选取ESI高被引论文榜单,获取2022年4月经济与商业学科高被引论文合集,由此从Web of Science数据库获取论文集相关的学术层面数据,并从Altmetric LLP平台获取论文集相关的Altmetrics指标数据;经过数据清洗和预处理,共得到27953篇论文数据,对比3种常用机器学习算法的论文高被引预测结果,得到最优的预测模型。研究结果表明:相较于仅使用学术层面指标,引入Altmetrics指标的论文高被引预测效果更优;Altmetrics指标中的在线阅读平台读者数对论文被引频次的影响最大,随后是学术层面指标中的期刊被引半衰期、论文首次被引两年内被引频次、一作总被引频次。研究可以为探究论文高被引的影响因素及其影响程度,完善学术成果的评价体系提供理论依据。
文摘目的探讨合成生物学高被引论文替代计量学指标和文献计量学指标与被引频次的相关性。方法检索Web of Science数据库中合成生物学相关论文,检索时间为2023年6月21日,筛选高被引论文(被引频次排名前1%);同时,通过该数据库获取期刊引证报告(JCR)影响因子,与论文被引频次共同作为文献计量学指标,通过Altmetric官网获取Altmetric评分、Twitters等7个指标作为替代计量学指标;排除数据缺失比例超过20%的指标。分析合成生物学高被引论文发文量的年度变化趋势;分别采用多变量、单变量回归模型分析各指标与被引频次的相关性。结果共纳入100篇高被引论文及6个指标[包括2个文献计量学指标(被引频次和JCR影响因子)及4个替代计量学指标(Altmetric评分、Twitters、Mendeley和Patents)]。1999年至2021年,合成生物学高被引论文发文量先上升后下降,集中发表于2011年至2015年(51篇)。多变量回归模型分析显示,Altmetric评分、Mendeley、Patents与被引频次呈显著正相关,JCR影响因子和Twitters与被引频次的相关性不显著。单变量回归模型分析显示,与被引频次的相关性除Twitters不显著外,其他变量均显著,其中JCR影响因子相关性较弱,Mendeley和Patents分别可解释被引频次90.0%和85.6%的变化。结论替代计量学指标在一定程度上可反映论文的影响力;JCR影响因子与论文影响力相关性弱或无关。
文摘人工智能技术近年来已快速运用到社会各个领域当中,对人工智能研究进行高频术语的分析为科技的发展及智能社会的构建奠定了基础。以Web of Science数据库收录的近5年按被引频次从高到低的前1 000篇SCI文献为样本,运用CiteSpace可视化文献计量软件对人工智能的前沿和热点进行分析研究发现,人工智能研究主要集中于机器学习、深度学习、神经网络、新型冠状病毒肺炎等方面,全球在人工智能领域应加大国际之间的合作与科技创新力度,加大高校专业人才的培养。