期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
The Implementation Mode of No-Fly Zones in International Relations
1
作者 ZHAO Guangcheng 《Cultural and Religious Studies》 2023年第12期589-599,共11页
A No-Fly Zone(NFZ)is a unique mode of humanitarian intervention which is understudied in international relations.This article focuses on the political dimension of NFZs in international relations and investigates thei... A No-Fly Zone(NFZ)is a unique mode of humanitarian intervention which is understudied in international relations.This article focuses on the political dimension of NFZs in international relations and investigates their implementations by empirically reviewing all three cases of NFZs to date.There may be efforts by intervening states to highlight humanitarian crises among certain targets to secure UN authorization for the NFZs;yet the implementation of NFZs is also driven largely by the security interests of enforcing states.As a result,there is the potential for those states implementing NFZs to transcend legal authorization and sometimes use excessive force,with likely calamitous results for local populations,or in extreme cases,accomplishing regime change by supporting opposition parties in target states. 展开更多
关键词 No-Fly Zone humanitarian intervention limited use of force human rights international norm China’s diplomacy
下载PDF
“人道干涉”神话与美国意识形态 被引量:11
2
作者 张睿壮 《南开学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第2期109-117,共9页
近年来“人道于涉”论在西方甚嚣尘上,其实,所谓“人道干涉”并无人道可言,“人道干涉”论只是西方为确立美国霸权下的世界新秩序所做的舆论准备,以此为法理依据的关国新干涉主义对非西方国家的安全和主权造成了极大威胁。美国海外干涉... 近年来“人道于涉”论在西方甚嚣尘上,其实,所谓“人道干涉”并无人道可言,“人道干涉”论只是西方为确立美国霸权下的世界新秩序所做的舆论准备,以此为法理依据的关国新干涉主义对非西方国家的安全和主权造成了极大威胁。美国海外干涉往往具有多重动机,包括国家利益和意识形态,后者除政治意识形态如民主、人权外,还包括民族意识形态即关国的道德优越感和全球使命感。美国意识形态与国家利益和国家实力三者之间的互动关系是理解美国外交政策尤其是美国新干涉主义的关键。 展开更多
关键词 人道主义干涉 新干涉主义 美国 国家实力 外交政策 种族清洗 动机 科索沃 意识形态 国家利益
下载PDF
On the Great Power Intervention in the Middle East Upheaval and Political Trend in the Middle East
3
作者 LIU Yueqin 《Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies》 2013年第2期1-34,共34页
During the political upheaval in the Middle East in 2011,the Western countries adopted a policy focusing on both military intervention and the so-called“humanitarian interference”in the Middle East countries.Europe,... During the political upheaval in the Middle East in 2011,the Western countries adopted a policy focusing on both military intervention and the so-called“humanitarian interference”in the Middle East countries.Europe,the US and other Western powers distorted the“legitimacy”authorized by the UN and took military means to impose regime change in Libya,seriously disrupting the order of international relations.Their intervention efforts in this have far exceeded the ones before the Cold War.In the Intervention,they tried to secure legalization of their intervention,to take collective intervention,as well as nurture and support the country’s opposition parties to cause the“civil war”approach as the model of intervention.Their intervention has been blatant,fraudulent,hidden,and mandatory.From the development trend,because of the importance of the geopolitical position and strategic energy position of the Middle East and North Africa,as well as Western powers’pursuit of global geopolitical interests,the Western powers’intervention in the Middle East and North Africa will continue.These countries will still be faced with the historical responsibility to oppose power intervention.Their self-development and ability to maintain their own security will continue to face serious challenges. 展开更多
关键词 Forms of intervention Military intervention humanitarian intervention Middle East Politics
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部