Prevalence of hypercoagulable states in stented thrombotic iliac vein compression syndrome with comparison of re-intervention and anticoagulation regimens

BACKGROUND Endovascular therapy is playing an increasing role in the treatment of iliofemoral venous disease.Iliac stent patency is multifactorial,and current management is based on best clinical practices,varying by institution.AIM To evaluate how thrombophilia influences management and outcomes of patients who undergo venous stenting for thrombotic iliac vein compression syndromes.METHODS A retrospective observational analysis was performed on 65 patients with thrombotic iliac vein compression syndrome that underwent common iliac vein(CIV)stenting between December 2013 and December 2019 at a large academic center.Search criteria included CIV stenting and iliac vein compression.Nonthrombotic lesions and iliocaval thrombosis and/or occlusions were excluded.A total of 65 patients were selected for final analysis.Demographic information,procedural data points,and post-procedural management and outcomes were collected.Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact and Chi-square tests to compare discrete variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare continuous variables between thrombophilia positive and negative patients.RESULTS 65 patients underwent successful balloon angioplasty and CIV stenting.Of these patients,33(50.8%)underwent thrombophilia testing,with 16(48.5%)testing positive.Stent patency on ultrasound did not significantly differ between thrombophilia positive and negative patients at 1 mo(92.3%vs 81.3%,P=0.6),6 mo(83.3%vs 80%,P>0.9),or 12 mo(77.8%vs 76.9%,P=0.8).Immediately after stent placement,thrombophilia patients were more likely to be placed on dual therapy(aspirin and anticoagulation)or triple therapy(aspirin,clopidogrel,and anticoagulation)(50%vs 41.2%,P>0.9),and remain on dual therapy at 6 mo(25%vs 12.5%,P=0.5)and 12 mo(25%vs 6.7%,P=0.6).There was no significant difference in re-intervention rates(25%vs 35.3%,P=0.7)or number of reinterventions(average 2.3 vs 1.3 per patient,P=0.4)between thrombophilia positive and negative patients.CONCLUSION Half of patients with stented thrombotic iliac vein compression syndrome and thrombophilia testing were positive.The presence of thrombophilia did not significantly impact stent patency or re-intervention rates.

Endovascular treatment of iliac vein compression syndrome

Background Iliac vein compression syndrome （IVCS）, the symptomatic compression of the left common iliac vein between the right common iliac artery and the vertebrae, is not an uncommon condition. The aim of this research was to retrospectively evaluate long-term outcome and the significance of endovascular treatment in patients with left IVCS. Methods Between January 1997 and September 2008, 296 patients received interventional therapy in the left common iliac vein. In the second stage, 170 cases underwent saphenous vein high ligation and stripping. Two hundred and thirty-one cases were followed up over a period of 6 to 120 months （average 46 months） and evaluated for symptom improvement with color ultrasound and ascending venography. Results The stenotic or occlusive segments of the left iliac vein were successfully dilated in 285 cases, of whom 272 received stent implantation therapy. Most of the patients achieved satisfactory results on discharge. During the follow-up period, varicose veins were alleviated in 98.7% of the patients, and leg swelling disappeared or was obviously relieved in 84% of cases. About 85% of leg ulcers completely healed. The total patency rate was 91.7% as evaluated with color ultrasound and 91.5% with ascending venography. Conclusions Endovascular treatment of IVCS provides effective symptomatic improvement and good long-term patency in most patients.

Endovascular treatment of acute proximal deep venous thrombosis secondary to iliac vein compression syndrome： a novel technique for thrombus removal

Iliac vein compression syndrome （IVCS）,also known as May-Thurner syndrome or Cockett syndrome,is caused by compression of the left common iliac vein between the right common iliac artery and the vertebrae.A recent imaging study have demonstrated that at least a 25%compression of the left iliac vein at the arterial crossover point may be present in 66% of the asymptomatic patient population.1 With the development of interventional technique,endovascular management as a less invasive means is becoming the first-line treatment,which can not only treat the thrombosis but also correct the venous anatomic abnormalities.2 In this study,we described a novel technique combining percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy （PAT） with Fogarty catheter thrombectomy （FCT） as the thrombus removal therapy without femoral venotomy in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis （DVT） due to IVCS and evaluated its technical feasibility and short-term outcomes.

A systematic review of DVT and stent restenosis after stent implantation for iliac vein compression syndrome

Iliac vein compression syndrome(IVCS)is a common venous disease caused by joint compression of the right common iliac artery and the lumbosacral vertebrae.The compression of iliac vein not only causes venous hypertension in the lower extremities,but also induces venous valve dysfunction and superficial varicose veins in lower extremities.Moreover,the compression of iliac vein is an important potential factor for iliofemoral vein thrombosis.Currently,open surgery and stent implantation are the main treatment for IVCS.Due to the advantages of minimally invasive and postoperative patency,stent implantation for IVCS has gradually become the standard treatment.However,when the stent is implanted into the iliac vein to treat IVCS,the complications,such as restenosis,deep vein thrombosis(DVT)appear,which affect the patency of stent and hamper the patient recovery.Up to now,the mechanism how the stent implantation induces the restenosis and DVT is still unclear.In this review,we summarized the clinical symptoms,treatment methods of IVCS and the complications after stent implantation,and analyzed the mechanism of stent restenosis and DVT,and finally discuss the iliac vein stent design specifically for treating IVCS.

Challenging anticoagulation therapy for multiple primary malignant tumors combined with thrombosis:A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism significantly contributes to patient deterioration and mortality.Management of its etiology and anticoagulation treatment is intricate,necessitating a comprehensive consideration of various factors,including the bleeding risk,dosage,specific anticoagulant medications,and duration of therapy.Herein,a case of lower extremity thrombosis with multiple primary malignant tumors and high risk of bleeding was reviewed to summarize the shortcomings of treatment and prudent anticoagulation experience.CASE SUMMARY An 83-year-old female patient was admitted to the hospital due to a 2-wk history of left lower extremity edema that had worsened over 2 d.Considering her medical history and relevant post-admission investigations,it was determined that the development of left lower extremity venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in this case could be attributed to a combination of factors,including multiple primary malignant tumors,iliac venous compression syndrome,previous novel coronavirus infection,and inadequate treatment for prior thrombotic events.However,the selection of appropriate anticoagulant medications,determination of optimal drug dosages,and establishment of an appropriate duration of anticoagulation therapy were important because of concurrent thrombocytopenia,decreased quantitative fibrinogen levels,and renal insufficiency.CONCLUSION Anticoagulant prophylaxis should be promptly initiated in cases of high-risk thrombosis.Individualized anticoagulation therapy is required for complex thrombosis.