Many Countries Say Xinjiang Riot China’s Internal Affair

Many countries around the world said the July 5 riot in northwest China is an internal affair of the country, and the Chinese government is handling the incident properly.

Accurately Comprehending the Concept of"Rule of Law in Foreign- Related Affairs" to Promote Coordinated Advancement in the Rule of Law in Chinese Domestic and Foreign-Related Affairs

The n notion of"rule of law in foreign-related affairs"signifies a critical innovation and evolution in the theory and practice of socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics.It underscores the pivotal role of rule of law in foreign-related affairs in the law-based governance and presents new topics for the theoretical study for rule of law.A precise comprehension of"rule of law in foreign-related affairs"necessitates tracing its origins and elucidating its correlations with both"rule of law in domestic affairs"as well as with"international rule of law."Acknowledging both domestic and international plerugatives,while holistically advancing law-based governance,constitutes the foundational rationale behind"rule of law in foreign-related affairs."In addition,the cognitive transition from a"socialist legal system"to the"socialist rule of law"in foreign-related affairs."In addition,the cognitive transition from a"socialist legal system"to the"socialist rule of law"forms a theoretical foundation for the rule of law in foreign-related affairs.Although national governance and global governance,as well as the rule of law in domestic and foreign-related affairs fall under distinct governance categories and legal systems,they are interconnected,mutually influential,and integrated.As a component of national rule of law,the rule of law in foreign related affairs acts as a bridge between the two independent legal systems of the rule of law in national affairs and international rule of law.It is imperative to promote a harmonized advancement of the rule of law in domestic and foreign-related affairs,thereby expediting the strategic deployment of the rule of law in foreign contexts.This strategy more effectively safeguards national sovereignty,security,and developmental interests while contributing to build a human community with|a shared future.

Developing an approach to assessing the political feasibility of global collective action and an international agreement on antimicrobial resistance

Background:Antimicrobial resistance(AMR)is a global issue.International trade,travel,agricultural practices,and environmental contamination all make it possible for resistant microbes to cross national borders.Global collective action is needed in the form of an international agreement or other mechanism that brings states together at the negotiation table and commits them to adopt or implement policies to limit the spread of resistant microorganisms.This article describes an approach to assessing whether political and stakeholder interests can align to commit to tackling AMR.Methods:Two dimensions affecting political feasibility were selected and compared across 82 countries:1)states’global influence and 2)self-interest in addressing AMR.World Bank GDP ranking was used as a proxy for global influence,while human antibiotic consumption(10-year percent change)was used as a proxy for self-interest in addressing AMR.We used these data to outline a typology of four country archetypes,and discuss how these archetypes can be used to understand whether a proposed agreement may have sufficient support to be politically feasible.Results:Four types of countries exist within our proposed typology:1)wealthy countries who have the expertise and financial resources to push for global collective action on AMR,2)wealthy countries who need to act on AMR,3)countries who require external assistance to act on AMR,and 4)neutral countries who may support action where applicable.Any international agreement will require substantial support from countries of the first type to lead global action,and from countries of the second type who have large increasing antimicrobial consumption levels.A large number of barriers exist that could derail efforts towards global collective action on AMR;issues of capacity,infrastructure,regulation,and stakeholder interests will need to be addressed in coordination with other actors to achieve an agreement on AMR.Conclusions:Achieving a global agreement on access,conservation,and innovation–the three pillars of AMR–will not be easy.However,smaller core groups of interested Initiator and Pivotal Countries could develop policy and resolve many issues.If highly influential countries take the lead,agreements could then be scaled up to achieve global action.

ANTI-CORRUPTION： AN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIR WITH DOMESTIC EFFORTS

Globalization makes corruption international. From the 1970＇s onwards, domestic laws and international conventions have been formulated to curb corruption in the international arena. The focus of this issue includes two articles on how to deal with anti-corruption in the international and domestic legal systems.