This meta-analysis compared the therapeutic effect of cable pin system（CPS） with K-wire tension band（KTB） in the treatment of patella fractures among Chinese Han population. The databases of PubM ed, Cochrane libr...This meta-analysis compared the therapeutic effect of cable pin system（CPS） with K-wire tension band（KTB） in the treatment of patella fractures among Chinese Han population. The databases of PubM ed, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure（CNKI）, Chinese Wan Fang and Chinese VIP were searched for studies on CPS versus KTB in the treatment of patella fractures among Chinese Han population. Literatures were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of the studies was assessed, and meta-analysis was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration＇s REVMAN 5.3 software. A total of 932 patients from 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis（426 fractures treated with CPS and 506 fractures treated with KTB）. There were significant differences in duration of hospital stay [mean difference（MD）=–1.07; 95% confidence interval（CI）： –1.71 to –0.43], fracture healing time（MD=–1.23; 95% CI： –1.68 to –0.77）, flexion degree of knee joint at 6 th month after operation（MD=14.82; 95% CI： 10.93 to 18.71）, incidence of postoperative complication [risk ratio（RR）=0.16; 95% CI： 0.09 to 0.27] and excellent-good rate of B？stman score（RR=1.09; 95% CI： 1.03 to 1.16） between the CPS group and KTB group, while no significant difference was found in operative time between the two groups（MD=–4.52; 95% CI： –11.70 to 2.67）. For the treatment of patella fractures among Chinese Han population, limited evidence suggests that the CPS is more suitable than the KTB when considering the hospital stay, fracture healing time, flexion degree of knee at 6 th month after operation, incidence of postoperative complication and excellent-good rate of B？stman joint score. Due to the limitation of high quality evidence and sample size, more large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to validate the findings in the future.展开更多
目的掌指骨骨折是手外科常见创伤性疾病,掌指骨参与腕掌、掌指、指间关节的构成,治疗不当将严重影响患者的手的功能。文中探讨微型钢板、穿髓克氏针固定、牵引位石膏托3种不同治疗方法在掌指骨骨折治疗中的临床疗效。方法选取掌指骨骨...目的掌指骨骨折是手外科常见创伤性疾病,掌指骨参与腕掌、掌指、指间关节的构成,治疗不当将严重影响患者的手的功能。文中探讨微型钢板、穿髓克氏针固定、牵引位石膏托3种不同治疗方法在掌指骨骨折治疗中的临床疗效。方法选取掌指骨骨折患者60例共95个部位,分别平均进入微型钢板内固定、穿髓克氏针固定及牵引位石膏托3种不同治疗方法组,术后随访6～12个月,平均随访(8.1±1.5)个月,按照总主动屈曲度系统(total active flexion system,TAFS)评分评估3组临床疗效。结果微型钢板组内固定优良率为90.9%,穿髓克氏针内固定组优良率为71.4%,牵引位石膏保守治疗组优良率为55.6%,3组结果差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.05)。骨折愈合时间微型钢板组较其他2组短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。切开复位感染率微型钢板内固定组为0.0%,穿髓克氏针组为15.4%(P<0.05)。结论微型钢板内固定治疗掌指骨骨折在术后关节功能恢复、骨折愈合时间、术后感染预防方面都具有明显优势,是首选的治疗方法。展开更多
文摘This meta-analysis compared the therapeutic effect of cable pin system（CPS） with K-wire tension band（KTB） in the treatment of patella fractures among Chinese Han population. The databases of PubM ed, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure（CNKI）, Chinese Wan Fang and Chinese VIP were searched for studies on CPS versus KTB in the treatment of patella fractures among Chinese Han population. Literatures were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of the studies was assessed, and meta-analysis was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration＇s REVMAN 5.3 software. A total of 932 patients from 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis（426 fractures treated with CPS and 506 fractures treated with KTB）. There were significant differences in duration of hospital stay [mean difference（MD）=–1.07; 95% confidence interval（CI）： –1.71 to –0.43], fracture healing time（MD=–1.23; 95% CI： –1.68 to –0.77）, flexion degree of knee joint at 6 th month after operation（MD=14.82; 95% CI： 10.93 to 18.71）, incidence of postoperative complication [risk ratio（RR）=0.16; 95% CI： 0.09 to 0.27] and excellent-good rate of B？stman score（RR=1.09; 95% CI： 1.03 to 1.16） between the CPS group and KTB group, while no significant difference was found in operative time between the two groups（MD=–4.52; 95% CI： –11.70 to 2.67）. For the treatment of patella fractures among Chinese Han population, limited evidence suggests that the CPS is more suitable than the KTB when considering the hospital stay, fracture healing time, flexion degree of knee at 6 th month after operation, incidence of postoperative complication and excellent-good rate of B？stman joint score. Due to the limitation of high quality evidence and sample size, more large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to validate the findings in the future.
文摘目的掌指骨骨折是手外科常见创伤性疾病,掌指骨参与腕掌、掌指、指间关节的构成,治疗不当将严重影响患者的手的功能。文中探讨微型钢板、穿髓克氏针固定、牵引位石膏托3种不同治疗方法在掌指骨骨折治疗中的临床疗效。方法选取掌指骨骨折患者60例共95个部位,分别平均进入微型钢板内固定、穿髓克氏针固定及牵引位石膏托3种不同治疗方法组,术后随访6～12个月,平均随访(8.1±1.5)个月,按照总主动屈曲度系统(total active flexion system,TAFS)评分评估3组临床疗效。结果微型钢板组内固定优良率为90.9%,穿髓克氏针内固定组优良率为71.4%,牵引位石膏保守治疗组优良率为55.6%,3组结果差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.05)。骨折愈合时间微型钢板组较其他2组短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。切开复位感染率微型钢板内固定组为0.0%,穿髓克氏针组为15.4%(P<0.05)。结论微型钢板内固定治疗掌指骨骨折在术后关节功能恢复、骨折愈合时间、术后感染预防方面都具有明显优势,是首选的治疗方法。
