AIM: To investigate the short-term and long-term ef-ficacy and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) for treatment of splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL). METHODS: A total of 18 continuous patients who were diagno...AIM: To investigate the short-term and long-term ef-ficacy and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) for treatment of splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL). METHODS: A total of 18 continuous patients who were diagnosed with SMZL and underwent LS in our department from 2008 to 2012 were reviewed. The perioperative variables and long-term follow-up were evaluated. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure better, we also included 34 patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent LS, 49 patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who underwent LS, and 20 patients with SMZL who underwent open splenectomy (OS). The results observed in the different groups were compared.RESULTS: No differences were found in the sex and Child-Pugh class of the patients in SMZL-LS, SMZL-OS, ITP, and liver cirrhosis groups. The splenic length of the patients in the SMZL-LS group was similar to that in the SMZL-OS and liver cirrhosis groups but significantly longer than in the ITP group. The SMZL-LS group had a significantly longer operating time compared with the SMZL-OS, ITP, and liver cirrhosis groups, and the SMZL-LS group exhibited significantly less blood loss compared with the SMZL-OS group. No difference was found in the length of the postoperative hospital stay between the SMZL-LS, SMZL-OS, ITP, and liver cirrhosis-LS groups. After surgery, 6 (33.3%) SMZL-LS patients suffered slight complications. During mean fol-low-up periods of 13.6 and 12.8 mo, one patient from the SMZL-LS group and two from the SMZL-OS group died as a result of metastasis after surgery. None of the ITP and liver cirrhosis patients died. CONCLUSION: LS should be considered a feasible and safe procedure for treatment of SMZL in an effort to improve the treatment options and survival of patients.展开更多
AIM:To compare the laparoscopic and the open gastrectomy approaches for short term morbidity,length of hospital stay and also long term gastrointestinal symptoms.METHODS:Patients who have undergone gastrectomy had the...AIM:To compare the laparoscopic and the open gastrectomy approaches for short term morbidity,length of hospital stay and also long term gastrointestinal symptoms.METHODS:Patients who have undergone gastrectomy had their medical records reviewed for demographic data,type of gastrectomy,short term morbidity,and length of hospital stay.Patients were contacted and asked to complete the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale(GSRS).The GSRS measures three domains of GI symptoms:Dyspepsia Syndrome(DS) for the foregut(best score 0,worse score 15),indigestion syndrome(IS) for the midgut(best score 0,worse score 12),and bowel dysfunction syndrome(BDS) for the hindgut(best score 0,worse score 16).Statistical analysis was done using the Mann-Whitney U-test.RESULTS:We had complete data on 32 patients:7 laparoscopic and 25 open.Of these,25 had a gastroenteric anastomosis and 6 did not.The table shows the results as medians with interquartile range.Laparoscopic gastrectomy had a better score than open gastrectomy in the DS domain(0 vs 1,P = 0.02),while gastrectomy without anastomosis had a better score than gastrectomy with anastomosis in the IS domain(0 vs 1,P = 0.05).CONCLUSION:Patients have little adverse gastroin-testinal symptoms and preserve good gastrointestinal function after undergoing any type of gastrectomy.Laparoscopic approach had better dyspepsia and foregut symptoms.Performing an anastomosis led to mild adverse midgut and indigestion展开更多
文摘AIM: To investigate the short-term and long-term ef-ficacy and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) for treatment of splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL). METHODS: A total of 18 continuous patients who were diagnosed with SMZL and underwent LS in our department from 2008 to 2012 were reviewed. The perioperative variables and long-term follow-up were evaluated. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure better, we also included 34 patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent LS, 49 patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who underwent LS, and 20 patients with SMZL who underwent open splenectomy (OS). The results observed in the different groups were compared.RESULTS: No differences were found in the sex and Child-Pugh class of the patients in SMZL-LS, SMZL-OS, ITP, and liver cirrhosis groups. The splenic length of the patients in the SMZL-LS group was similar to that in the SMZL-OS and liver cirrhosis groups but significantly longer than in the ITP group. The SMZL-LS group had a significantly longer operating time compared with the SMZL-OS, ITP, and liver cirrhosis groups, and the SMZL-LS group exhibited significantly less blood loss compared with the SMZL-OS group. No difference was found in the length of the postoperative hospital stay between the SMZL-LS, SMZL-OS, ITP, and liver cirrhosis-LS groups. After surgery, 6 (33.3%) SMZL-LS patients suffered slight complications. During mean fol-low-up periods of 13.6 and 12.8 mo, one patient from the SMZL-LS group and two from the SMZL-OS group died as a result of metastasis after surgery. None of the ITP and liver cirrhosis patients died. CONCLUSION: LS should be considered a feasible and safe procedure for treatment of SMZL in an effort to improve the treatment options and survival of patients.
文摘AIM:To compare the laparoscopic and the open gastrectomy approaches for short term morbidity,length of hospital stay and also long term gastrointestinal symptoms.METHODS:Patients who have undergone gastrectomy had their medical records reviewed for demographic data,type of gastrectomy,short term morbidity,and length of hospital stay.Patients were contacted and asked to complete the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale(GSRS).The GSRS measures three domains of GI symptoms:Dyspepsia Syndrome(DS) for the foregut(best score 0,worse score 15),indigestion syndrome(IS) for the midgut(best score 0,worse score 12),and bowel dysfunction syndrome(BDS) for the hindgut(best score 0,worse score 16).Statistical analysis was done using the Mann-Whitney U-test.RESULTS:We had complete data on 32 patients:7 laparoscopic and 25 open.Of these,25 had a gastroenteric anastomosis and 6 did not.The table shows the results as medians with interquartile range.Laparoscopic gastrectomy had a better score than open gastrectomy in the DS domain(0 vs 1,P = 0.02),while gastrectomy without anastomosis had a better score than gastrectomy with anastomosis in the IS domain(0 vs 1,P = 0.05).CONCLUSION:Patients have little adverse gastroin-testinal symptoms and preserve good gastrointestinal function after undergoing any type of gastrectomy.Laparoscopic approach had better dyspepsia and foregut symptoms.Performing an anastomosis led to mild adverse midgut and indigestion
文摘目的:观察术前短期戒烟对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后舒芬太尼静脉镇痛用量的影响。方法80例行择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术男性患者,按戒烟时间分为多于2周(SA 组)、多于1周少于2周(SB 组)、少于1周(SC 组)及无吸烟史(N 组)四组,每组20例,术后行舒芬太尼患者自控静脉镇痛。记录舒芬太尼术后第1、2天的用量。结果SC 组术后第1天舒芬太尼用量高于 SA 组和 N 组,SB 组高于 N 组(P <0.05);四组术后第2天舒芬太尼用量差异无显著意义(P >0.05)。结论术前短期戒烟可减少术后第1天舒芬太尼静脉镇痛用量,且戒烟时间越长,用量越少。