A Comparative Study of the Short-Term Efficacy of Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Right-Sided Colon Cancer with Two Different Surgeon Positions and Trocar Placements

Objective: To investigate the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer with two different surgeon positions and trocar placements. Methods: The data of 78 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer between January 2018 and August 2019 were retrospectively analysed. The surgical method was selected by the patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgeons’ positioning habits and trocar placements. The group with the lead surgeon standing between the patient’s legs had 35 patients, and the group with the lead surgeon standing at the left side of the patient had 43 patients. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative anal gas evacuation time, postoperative urinary catheter indwelling time, postoperative hospital stay, C-reactive protein (CRP) level on the first day after surgery, and postoperative pathological data and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: All patients underwent the laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer, none converting to laparotomy. No significant difference (P > 0.05) in intraoperative blood loss (57.6 ± 21.3 ml vs 60.2 ± 35.3 ml), postoperative anal gas evacuation time (3.5 ± 1.1 d vs 3.8 ± 1.3 d), postoperative urinary catheter indwelling time (2.6 ± 1.3 d vs 2.4 ± 1.2 d), postoperative hospital stay (7.1 ± 1.8 d vs 7.5 ± 2.1 d), or CRP level on the first day after surgery (54.7 ± 9.6 mg/L vs 53.9 ± 8.2 mg/L) was detected between the two groups. The operation time was shorter in the group with the lead surgeon standing between the patient’s legs (185.2 ± 25.6 min vs 196.2 ±19.7 min) (P < 0.05). The two groups did not differ significantly in the tumour length (4.2 ± 1.3 cm vs 3.9 ± 1.5 cm), number of dissected lymph nodes (27.5 ± 11.6 vs 25.1 ± 15.4), pathological type, or postoperative pathological tumour-node-metastasis stage (P > 0.05). No patients died or had anastomotic fistula during their postoperative hospital stay, and the incidence of postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups (22.9% (8/35) vs 23.3% (10/42);P > 0.05). Conclusion: Under the principle of radical resection, the surgeon should adopt the most suitable standing position and trocar placement according to the specific situation. If the surgeon stands between the patient’s legs, this might shorten the operation time and promote a smoother surgery.

Laparoscopic radical resection for situs inversus totalis with colonic splenic flexure carcinoma:A case report

BACKGROUND Situs inversus totalis(SIT)is a rare group of congenital developmental malformations in the clinical setting,with all organs in the chest and abdomen existing in a mirror image reversal of their normal positions.Few reports have described laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in patients with SIT,and it is considered difficult even for an experienced surgeon because of the mirror positioning.We present a case report of laparoscopic radical resection of a colonic splenic flexure carcinoma in a patient with SIT.CASE SUMMARY A 72-year-old male was referred to our hospital with colonic splenic flexure carcinoma,and computed tomography showed that all the organs in the chest and abdomen were inverted.Laparoscopic hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision was safely performed.The operating surgeon stood on the patient’s left side,which is opposite of the normal location.CONCLUSION Abdominal computed tomography is an effective method for diagnosing SIT preoperatively in patients with colonic splenic flexure carcinomas.Laparoscopic radical resection is difficult,but it is well established and safe.The surgeon should stand in the opposite position and perform backhand operations.

Laparoscopic vs open radical resection in management of gallbladder carcinoma:A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Radical resection offers the only hope for the long-term survival of patients with gallbladder carcinoma(GBC)above the T1b stage.However,whether it should be performed under laparoscopy for GBC is still controversial.AIM To compare laparoscopic radical resection(LRR)with traditional open radical resection(ORR)in managing GBC.METHODS A comprehensive search of online databases,including Medline(PubMed),Cochrane Library,and Web of Science,was conducted to identify comparative studies involving LRR and ORR in GBCs till March 2023.A meta-analysis was subsequently performed.RESULTS A total of 18 retrospective studies were identified.In the long-term prognosis,the LRR group was comparable with the ORR group in terms of overall survival and tumor-free survival(TFS).LRR showed superiority in terms of TFS in the T2/tumor-node-metastasis(TNM)Ⅱstage subgroup vs the ORR group(P=0.04).In the short-term prognosis,the LRR group had superiority over the ORR group in the postoperative length of stay(POLS)(P<0.001).The sensitivity analysis showed that all pooled results were robust.CONCLUSION The meta-analysis results show that LRR is not inferior to ORR in all measured outcomes and is even superior in the TFS of patients with stage T2/TNMⅡdisease and POLS.Surgeons with sufficient laparoscopic experience can perform LRR as an alternative surgical strategy to ORR.