A deep kernel method for lithofacies identification using conventional well logs

How to fit a properly nonlinear classification model from conventional well logs to lithofacies is a key problem for machine learning methods.Kernel methods(e.g.,KFD,SVM,MSVM)are effective attempts to solve this issue due to abilities of handling nonlinear features by kernel functions.Deep mining of log features indicating lithofacies still needs to be improved for kernel methods.Hence,this work employs deep neural networks to enhance the kernel principal component analysis(KPCA)method and proposes a deep kernel method(DKM)for lithofacies identification using well logs.DKM includes a feature extractor and a classifier.The feature extractor consists of a series of KPCA models arranged according to residual network structure.A gradient-free optimization method is introduced to automatically optimize parameters and structure in DKM,which can avoid complex tuning of parameters in models.To test the validation of the proposed DKM for lithofacies identification,an open-sourced dataset with seven con-ventional logs(GR,CAL,AC,DEN,CNL,LLD,and LLS)and lithofacies labels from the Daniudi Gas Field in China is used.There are eight lithofacies,namely clastic rocks(pebbly,coarse,medium,and fine sand-stone,siltstone,mudstone),coal,and carbonate rocks.The comparisons between DKM and three commonly used kernel methods(KFD,SVM,MSVM)show that(1)DKM(85.7%)outperforms SVM(77%),KFD(79.5%),and MSVM(82.8%)in accuracy of lithofacies identification;(2)DKM is about twice faster than the multi-kernel method(MSVM)with good accuracy.The blind well test in Well D13 indicates that compared with the other three methods DKM improves about 24%in accuracy,35%in precision,41%in recall,and 40%in F1 score,respectively.In general,DKM is an effective method for complex lithofacies identification.This work also discussed the optimal structure and classifier for DKM.Experimental re-sults show that(m_(1),m_(2),O)is the optimal model structure and linear svM is the optimal classifier.(m_(1),m_(2),O)means there are m KPCAs,and then m2 residual units.A workflow to determine an optimal classifier in DKM for lithofacies identification is proposed,too.

How to improve machine learning models for lithofacies identification by practical and novel ensemble strategy and principles

Typically, relationship between well logs and lithofacies is complex, which leads to low accuracy of lithofacies identification. Machine learning (ML) methods are often applied to identify lithofacies using logs labelled by rock cores. However, these methods have accuracy limits to some extent. To further improve their accuracies, practical and novel ensemble learning strategy and principles are proposed in this work, which allows geologists not familiar with ML to establish a good ML lithofacies identification model and help geologists familiar with ML further improve accuracy of lithofacies identification. The ensemble learning strategy combines ML methods as sub-classifiers to generate a comprehensive lithofacies identification model, which aims to reduce the variance errors in prediction. Each sub-classifier is trained by randomly sampled labelled data with random features. The novelty of this work lies in the ensemble principles making sub-classifiers just overfitting by algorithm parameter setting and sub-dataset sampling. The principles can help reduce the bias errors in the prediction. Two issues are discussed, videlicet (1) whether only a relatively simple single-classifier method can be as sub-classifiers and how to select proper ML methods as sub-classifiers;(2) whether different kinds of ML methods can be combined as sub-classifiers. If yes, how to determine a proper combination. In order to test the effectiveness of the ensemble strategy and principles for lithofacies identification, different kinds of machine learning algorithms are selected as sub-classifiers, including regular classifiers (LDA, NB, KNN, ID3 tree and CART), kernel method (SVM), and ensemble learning algorithms (RF, AdaBoost, XGBoost and LightGBM). In this work, the experiments used a published dataset of lithofacies from Daniudi gas field (DGF) in Ordes Basin, China. Based on a series of comparisons between ML algorithms and their corresponding ensemble models using the ensemble strategy and principles, conclusions are drawn: (1) not only decision tree but also other single-classifiers and ensemble-learning-classifiers can be used as sub-classifiers of homogeneous ensemble learning and the ensemble can improve the accuracy of the original classifiers;(2) the ensemble principles for the introduced homogeneous and heterogeneous ensemble strategy are effective in promoting ML in lithofacies identification;(3) in practice, heterogeneous ensemble is more suitable for building a more powerful lithofacies identification model, though it is complex.

Characteristics and identification of Carboniferous volcanic lithofacies in Shixi area, Junggar Basin

The identification of volcanic lithofacies is the basis for establishing volcanic institutions and making high-quality reservoir predictions.As the formation of Carboniferous volcanic rocks in Shixi area of Junggar Basin is strongly related to the cyclonic period of volcanic eruption and the location of volcanic channel development,the lithological variety changes rapidly and the lithofacies are complex.Moreover,the volcanic rocks had undergone strong weathering modification at later stage,the identification of volcanic facies becomes more difficult.This paper uses core observation,thin section identification,logging data and seismic attributes to classify and identify the lithology and lithofacies,and to summarize the methods of lithology classification and lithofacies identification of volcanic rocks in the study area.The lithology is mainly andesite and dacite,followed by volcanic breccia and tuff.Basalt and rhyolite develop locally in a few localities.The lithofacies of Carboniferous Period in Shixi area mainly consists of intermediate-acid effusive facies,followed by explosive facies,with basic effusive facies being rare and thinly developed,according to the well data.The volcanic conduit facies is developed only in a few places.The lithofacies are mainly identified based on the characteristics of the logging curves and the combination of external morphology and internal structure of the seismic reflections.The research method of this paper provides a case for the study of Carboniferous volcanic rocks and the dissection of volcanic edifices in Shixi Area.