Background: During the last decades, deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) has gained a place in the therapeutic algorithm of well-selected patients harbouring non-resectable secondary liver tumors. Living-donor...Background: During the last decades, deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) has gained a place in the therapeutic algorithm of well-selected patients harbouring non-resectable secondary liver tumors. Living-donor LT (LDLT) might represent a valuable means to further expand this indication for LT. Methods: Between 1985 and 2016, twenty-two adults were transplanted because of neuroendocrine ( n = 18, 82%) and colorectal metastases ( n = 4, 18%);50% received DDLT and 50% LDLT. In LDLT, 4 (36%) right and 7 (64%) left grafts were used;the median graft-to-recipient-weight ratios (GRWR) were 1.03%(IQR 0.86%- 1.30%) and 0.59%(IQR 0.51%- 0.91%), respectively. Median post-LT follow-up was 64 months (IQR 17–107) in the DDLT group and 40 months (IQR 35–116) in the LDLT group. DDLT and LDLT recipients were compared in terms of overall survival, graft survival, postoperative complications and recurrence. Results: The 1- and 5-year actuarial patient survivals were 82% and 55% after DDLT, 100% and 100% after LDLT, respectively ( P < 0.01). One- and 5-year actuarial graft survivals were 73% and 36% after DDLT, 91% and 91% after LDLT ( P < 0.01). The outcomes of right or left LDLT were comparable. Donor hepatectomy proved safe, and one donor experienced a Clavien IIIb complication. Bilirubin peak was significantly lower after left hepatectomy compared with that after right hepatectomy [1.3 (IQR 1.2–2.2) vs. 3.3 (IQR 2.3–5.2) mg/dL;P = 0.02]. Conclusions: The more recent LDLT series compared favorably to our DDLT series in the treatment of secondary liver malignancies. The absence of portal hypertension and the use of smaller left grafts make recipient and donor surgeries safe. The safety of the procedures and lack of interference with the scarce allograft pool are expected to lead to a more frequent use of LDLT in the field of transplant oncology.展开更多
To our best knowledge, no case of a tumor that was incidentally detected during living donor hepatectomy(LDH) has been reported in the English language medical literature. We present two cases in which grade Ⅰ neuroe...To our best knowledge, no case of a tumor that was incidentally detected during living donor hepatectomy(LDH) has been reported in the English language medical literature. We present two cases in which grade Ⅰ neuroendocrine tumors(NET) were incidentally detected during our twelve-year LDH experience. First Case: A 26-yearold male underwent LDH for his brother suffering from HBV-related chronic liver disease(CLD). After right lobe LDH, intestinal length was measured as part of a study concerning the relationship between small intestinal lengths and surgical procedure. At this stage, a mass lesion with a size of 10 mm × 10 mm was detected on the antimesenteric surface, approximately 90 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve. A wedge resection with primary intestinal anastomosis was performed. Second Case: A 29-year-old male underwent right lobe LDH for his father with hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related CLD. An abdominal exploration immediately prior to the closure of the incision revealed that the appendix vermiformis was edematous and had firmness with a size of 8-10 mm at its tip. An appendectomy was performed. The pathological examinations of the specimens of both patients revealedgrade 1 NET. In conclusion, even if patients undergoing LDH are healthy individuals, whole abdominal cavity should be gently palpated and all findings recorded after completing laparotomy. Suspected masses or lesions should be confirmed by frozen section examination. Such an approach would avert potential medicolegal issues.展开更多
Background: Liver transplantation is the treatment for end-stage liver diseases and well-selected malignancies. The allograft shortage may be alleviated with living donation. The initial UCLouvain experience of adult ...Background: Liver transplantation is the treatment for end-stage liver diseases and well-selected malignancies. The allograft shortage may be alleviated with living donation. The initial UCLouvain experience of adult living-donor liver transplantation(LDLT) is presented. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 64 adult-to-adult LDLTs performed at our institution between 1998 and 2016 was conducted. The median age of 29(45.3%) females and 35(54.7%) males was 50.2 years(interquartile range, IQR 32.9–57.5). Twenty-two(34.4%) recipients had no portal hypertension. Three(4.7%) patients had a benign and 33(51.6%) a malignant tumor [19(29.7%) hepatocellular cancer, 11(17.2%) secondary cancer and one(1.6%) each hemangioendothelioma, hepatoblastoma and embryonal liver sarcoma]. Median donor and recipient follow-ups were 93 months(IQR 41–159) and 39 months(22–91), respectively. Results: Right and left hemi-livers were implanted in 39(60.9%) and 25(39.1%) cases, respectively. Median weights of right-and left-liver were 810 g(IQR 730–940) and 454 g(IQR 394–534), respectively. Graft-to-recipient weight ratios(GRWRs) were 1.17%(right, IQR 0.98%-1.4%) and 0.77%(left, 0.59%-0.95%). One-and five-year patient survivals were 85% and 71%(right) vs. 84% and 58%(left), respectively. Oneand five-year graft survivals were 74% and 61%(right) vs. 76% and 53%(left), respectively. The patient and graft survival of right and left grafts and of very small( < 0.6%), small(0.6%–0.79%) and large( ≥0.8%) GRWR were similar. Survival of very small grafts was 86% and 86% at 3-and 12-month. No donor died while five(7.8%) developed a Clavien–Dindo complication IIIa, IIIb or IV. Recipient morbidity consisted mainly of biliary and vascular complications; three(4.7%) recipients developed a small-for-size syndrome according to the Kyushu criteria. Conclusions: Adult-to-adult LDLT is a demanding procedure that widens therapeutic possibilities of many hepatobiliary diseases. The donor procedure can be done safely with low morbidity. The recipient operation carries a major morbidity indicating an important learning curve. Shifting the risk from the donor to the recipient, by moving from the larger right-liver to the smaller left-liver grafts, should be further explored as this policy makes donor hepatectomy safer and may stimulate the development of transplant oncology.展开更多
BACKGROUND Loco-regional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) during the period awaiting liver transplantation(LT) appears to be a logical approach to reduce the risk of tumor progression and dropout in the waitl...BACKGROUND Loco-regional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) during the period awaiting liver transplantation(LT) appears to be a logical approach to reduce the risk of tumor progression and dropout in the waitlist.Living donor LT(LDLT)offers a flexible timing for transplantation providing timeframe for well preparation of transplantation.AIM To investigate outcomes in relation to the intention of pre-transplantation locoregional therapy in LDLT for HCC patients.METHODS A total of 308 consecutive patients undergoing LDLTs for HCC between August2004 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were grouped according to the intention of loco-regional therapy prior to LT,and outcomes of patients were analyzed and compared between groups.RESULTS Overall,38 patients(12.3%) were detected with HCC recurrence during the follow-up period after LDLT.Patients who were radiologically beyond the University of California at San Francisco criteria and received loco-regional therapy as down-staging therapy had significant inferior outcomes to other groups for both recurrence-free survival(RFS,P < 0.0005) and overall survival(P= 0.046).Moreover,patients with defined profound tumor necrosis(TN) by locoregional therapy had a superior RFS(5-year of 93.8%) as compared with others(P= 0.010).CONCLUSION LDLT features a flexible timely transplantation for patient with HCC.However,the loco-regional therapy prior to LDLT does not seem to provide benefit unless a certain effect in terms of profound TN is noted.展开更多
目的探讨微信平台健康教育对膀胱癌患者术后生活质量与日常生活活动能力的影响。方法选取2021年1月至2022年10月于连云港市第二人民医院行经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术的膀胱癌患者68例,根据出院时间先后顺序分为试验组与对照组,每组34例。对...目的探讨微信平台健康教育对膀胱癌患者术后生活质量与日常生活活动能力的影响。方法选取2021年1月至2022年10月于连云港市第二人民医院行经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术的膀胱癌患者68例,根据出院时间先后顺序分为试验组与对照组,每组34例。对照组患者采用常规延续性护理,试验组患者在此基础上采用微信平台健康教育,比较2组患者的健康认知问卷评分、日常生活活动能力量表(ADL)、自我护理能力量表、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、生活质量(SF-36量表)。结果与对照组相比,试验组患者干预后的健康认知评分包括药物认知评分、疾病认知评分、健康生活方式评分及生活能力评分均明显较高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与对照组的自我护理能力评分相比,试验组明显较高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预结束1 d,2组患者HAMD、HAMA评分较干预前下降;且与对照组相比,试验组患者干预结束1 d HAMD、HAMA评分均较低(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,试验组患者干预后的生活质量评分包括躯体功能评分、心理功能评分、社会功能评分明显较高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论微信平台健康教育可提高膀胱癌患者术后健康认知,提高患者的自护水平和生活能力,改善患者心理状态与生活质量,干预效果良好,值得推荐。展开更多
文摘Background: During the last decades, deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) has gained a place in the therapeutic algorithm of well-selected patients harbouring non-resectable secondary liver tumors. Living-donor LT (LDLT) might represent a valuable means to further expand this indication for LT. Methods: Between 1985 and 2016, twenty-two adults were transplanted because of neuroendocrine ( n = 18, 82%) and colorectal metastases ( n = 4, 18%);50% received DDLT and 50% LDLT. In LDLT, 4 (36%) right and 7 (64%) left grafts were used;the median graft-to-recipient-weight ratios (GRWR) were 1.03%(IQR 0.86%- 1.30%) and 0.59%(IQR 0.51%- 0.91%), respectively. Median post-LT follow-up was 64 months (IQR 17–107) in the DDLT group and 40 months (IQR 35–116) in the LDLT group. DDLT and LDLT recipients were compared in terms of overall survival, graft survival, postoperative complications and recurrence. Results: The 1- and 5-year actuarial patient survivals were 82% and 55% after DDLT, 100% and 100% after LDLT, respectively ( P < 0.01). One- and 5-year actuarial graft survivals were 73% and 36% after DDLT, 91% and 91% after LDLT ( P < 0.01). The outcomes of right or left LDLT were comparable. Donor hepatectomy proved safe, and one donor experienced a Clavien IIIb complication. Bilirubin peak was significantly lower after left hepatectomy compared with that after right hepatectomy [1.3 (IQR 1.2–2.2) vs. 3.3 (IQR 2.3–5.2) mg/dL;P = 0.02]. Conclusions: The more recent LDLT series compared favorably to our DDLT series in the treatment of secondary liver malignancies. The absence of portal hypertension and the use of smaller left grafts make recipient and donor surgeries safe. The safety of the procedures and lack of interference with the scarce allograft pool are expected to lead to a more frequent use of LDLT in the field of transplant oncology.
文摘To our best knowledge, no case of a tumor that was incidentally detected during living donor hepatectomy(LDH) has been reported in the English language medical literature. We present two cases in which grade Ⅰ neuroendocrine tumors(NET) were incidentally detected during our twelve-year LDH experience. First Case: A 26-yearold male underwent LDH for his brother suffering from HBV-related chronic liver disease(CLD). After right lobe LDH, intestinal length was measured as part of a study concerning the relationship between small intestinal lengths and surgical procedure. At this stage, a mass lesion with a size of 10 mm × 10 mm was detected on the antimesenteric surface, approximately 90 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve. A wedge resection with primary intestinal anastomosis was performed. Second Case: A 29-year-old male underwent right lobe LDH for his father with hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related CLD. An abdominal exploration immediately prior to the closure of the incision revealed that the appendix vermiformis was edematous and had firmness with a size of 8-10 mm at its tip. An appendectomy was performed. The pathological examinations of the specimens of both patients revealedgrade 1 NET. In conclusion, even if patients undergoing LDH are healthy individuals, whole abdominal cavity should be gently palpated and all findings recorded after completing laparotomy. Suspected masses or lesions should be confirmed by frozen section examination. Such an approach would avert potential medicolegal issues.
文摘Background: Liver transplantation is the treatment for end-stage liver diseases and well-selected malignancies. The allograft shortage may be alleviated with living donation. The initial UCLouvain experience of adult living-donor liver transplantation(LDLT) is presented. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 64 adult-to-adult LDLTs performed at our institution between 1998 and 2016 was conducted. The median age of 29(45.3%) females and 35(54.7%) males was 50.2 years(interquartile range, IQR 32.9–57.5). Twenty-two(34.4%) recipients had no portal hypertension. Three(4.7%) patients had a benign and 33(51.6%) a malignant tumor [19(29.7%) hepatocellular cancer, 11(17.2%) secondary cancer and one(1.6%) each hemangioendothelioma, hepatoblastoma and embryonal liver sarcoma]. Median donor and recipient follow-ups were 93 months(IQR 41–159) and 39 months(22–91), respectively. Results: Right and left hemi-livers were implanted in 39(60.9%) and 25(39.1%) cases, respectively. Median weights of right-and left-liver were 810 g(IQR 730–940) and 454 g(IQR 394–534), respectively. Graft-to-recipient weight ratios(GRWRs) were 1.17%(right, IQR 0.98%-1.4%) and 0.77%(left, 0.59%-0.95%). One-and five-year patient survivals were 85% and 71%(right) vs. 84% and 58%(left), respectively. Oneand five-year graft survivals were 74% and 61%(right) vs. 76% and 53%(left), respectively. The patient and graft survival of right and left grafts and of very small( < 0.6%), small(0.6%–0.79%) and large( ≥0.8%) GRWR were similar. Survival of very small grafts was 86% and 86% at 3-and 12-month. No donor died while five(7.8%) developed a Clavien–Dindo complication IIIa, IIIb or IV. Recipient morbidity consisted mainly of biliary and vascular complications; three(4.7%) recipients developed a small-for-size syndrome according to the Kyushu criteria. Conclusions: Adult-to-adult LDLT is a demanding procedure that widens therapeutic possibilities of many hepatobiliary diseases. The donor procedure can be done safely with low morbidity. The recipient operation carries a major morbidity indicating an important learning curve. Shifting the risk from the donor to the recipient, by moving from the larger right-liver to the smaller left-liver grafts, should be further explored as this policy makes donor hepatectomy safer and may stimulate the development of transplant oncology.
文摘BACKGROUND Loco-regional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) during the period awaiting liver transplantation(LT) appears to be a logical approach to reduce the risk of tumor progression and dropout in the waitlist.Living donor LT(LDLT)offers a flexible timing for transplantation providing timeframe for well preparation of transplantation.AIM To investigate outcomes in relation to the intention of pre-transplantation locoregional therapy in LDLT for HCC patients.METHODS A total of 308 consecutive patients undergoing LDLTs for HCC between August2004 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were grouped according to the intention of loco-regional therapy prior to LT,and outcomes of patients were analyzed and compared between groups.RESULTS Overall,38 patients(12.3%) were detected with HCC recurrence during the follow-up period after LDLT.Patients who were radiologically beyond the University of California at San Francisco criteria and received loco-regional therapy as down-staging therapy had significant inferior outcomes to other groups for both recurrence-free survival(RFS,P < 0.0005) and overall survival(P= 0.046).Moreover,patients with defined profound tumor necrosis(TN) by locoregional therapy had a superior RFS(5-year of 93.8%) as compared with others(P= 0.010).CONCLUSION LDLT features a flexible timely transplantation for patient with HCC.However,the loco-regional therapy prior to LDLT does not seem to provide benefit unless a certain effect in terms of profound TN is noted.
文摘目的探讨微信平台健康教育对膀胱癌患者术后生活质量与日常生活活动能力的影响。方法选取2021年1月至2022年10月于连云港市第二人民医院行经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术的膀胱癌患者68例,根据出院时间先后顺序分为试验组与对照组,每组34例。对照组患者采用常规延续性护理,试验组患者在此基础上采用微信平台健康教育,比较2组患者的健康认知问卷评分、日常生活活动能力量表(ADL)、自我护理能力量表、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、生活质量(SF-36量表)。结果与对照组相比,试验组患者干预后的健康认知评分包括药物认知评分、疾病认知评分、健康生活方式评分及生活能力评分均明显较高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与对照组的自我护理能力评分相比,试验组明显较高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预结束1 d,2组患者HAMD、HAMA评分较干预前下降;且与对照组相比,试验组患者干预结束1 d HAMD、HAMA评分均较低(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,试验组患者干预后的生活质量评分包括躯体功能评分、心理功能评分、社会功能评分明显较高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论微信平台健康教育可提高膀胱癌患者术后健康认知,提高患者的自护水平和生活能力,改善患者心理状态与生活质量,干预效果良好,值得推荐。
