Acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) represents a serious problem in critically ill patients and is associated with in-hospital mortality rates of 33%-52%. Recruitment maneuvers(RMs) are a simple, low-cost, feasi...Acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) represents a serious problem in critically ill patients and is associated with in-hospital mortality rates of 33%-52%. Recruitment maneuvers(RMs) are a simple, low-cost, feasible intervention that can be performed at the bedside in patients with ARDS. RMs are characterized by the application of airway pressure to increase transpulmonary pressure transiently. Once non-aerated lung units are reopened, improvements are observed in respiratory system mechanics, alveolar reaeration on computed tomography, and improvements in gas exchange(functional recruitment). However, the reopening process could lead to vascular compression, which can be associated with overinflation, and gas exchange may not improve as expected(anatomical recruitment). The purpose of this review was to discuss the effects of different RM strategies- sustained inflation, intermittent sighs, and stepwise increases of positive end-expiratory pressure(PEEP) and/or airway inspiratory pressure- on the following parameters: hemodynamics, oxygenation, barotrauma episodes, and lung recruitability through physiological variables and imaging techniques. RMs and PEEP titration are interdependent events for the success of ventilatory management. PEEP should be adjusted on the basis of respiratory system mechanics and oxygenation. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that RMs are associated with lower mortality in patients with ARDS. However, the optimal RM method(i.e., that providing the best balance of benefit and harm) and the effects of RMs on clinical outcome are still under discussion, and further evidence is needed.展开更多
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of protective lung ventilation strategy combined with lung recruitment maneuver (RM) in the treatment patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).Methods:Tota...Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of protective lung ventilation strategy combined with lung recruitment maneuver (RM) in the treatment patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).Methods:Totally 74 patients with ARDS admitted to the Department of Intensive Care Unit, Changshu Second People's Hospital in Jiangsu Province between September 2010 and June 2013 were selected and randomly divided into lung recruitment group and non-lung recruitment group, and the initial ventilation solution for both groups was synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV). For RM, SIMV mode (pressure control and pressure support) was adopted. Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) was increased by 5 cm H2O every time and maintained for 40-50 s before entering the next increasing period, and the peak airway pressure was kept below 45 cm H2O. After PEEP reached the maximum value, it was gradually reduced by 5 cm H2O every time and finally maintained at 15 cm H2O for 10 min.Results:A total of 74 patients with mean age of (49.0±18.6) years old were enrolled, 36 patients were enrolled in lung recruitment maneuver (RM) group and 38 patients were enrolled into non-lung recruitment maneuver (non-RM) group. 44 were male and accounted for 59.5% of all the patients. For the indicators such as PEEP, pressure support (PS), plateau airway pressure (Pplat), peak airway pressure (Ppeak), vital capacity (VC) and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), no statistical differences in the indicators were found between the RM group and non-RM group on D1, D3 and D7 (P>0.05), except that only FiO2 of RM group on D7 was significantly lower than that of non-RM group (47.2±10.0) vs. (52.2±10.5),P<0.05]. For the indicators of blood gas analysis, including pH, arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2), arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2) and oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2), PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 of RM group were significantly higher than those of non-RM group on D7, and the values were [(90.2±16.1) mmHg vs. (76.4±11.3) mmHg,P<0.05] and [(196.5±40.7) mmHg vs. (151.7±37.3) mmHg,P<0.05] respectively. There was no statistical difference in heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), central venous pressure (CVP) or mean arterial pressure (MAP) between RM group and non-RM group on D1, D3 and D7 (P>0.05). 28-day mortality, ICU mortality and in-hospital mortality were 25% vs. 28.9%, 25% vs. 26.3% and 36.1% vs. 39.5% respectively between RM group and non-RM group (allP>0.05).Conclusion:Protective lung ventilation strategy combined with lung recruitment maneuver can improve the indicators such as PaO2, FiO2 and PaO2/FiO2 on D7, but failed to improve the final outcomes such as 28-day mortality, ICU mortality and in-hospital mortality.展开更多
Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are currently treated with a lung protective ventilation strategy and the application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), sometimes in combination with ...Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are currently treated with a lung protective ventilation strategy and the application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), sometimes in combination with recruitment maneuvers. In this study, the respiratory system elastance and airway resistance of each breath before, during and after a specific recruitment maneuver (PEEP wave maneuver) were analyzed in two patient groups, ARDS and control group. A reduction of elastance after the maneuver was observed in ARDS patients. In addition, only healthy lungs exhibited a reduction of the elastance during the course of the maneuver, while the lungs of ARDS patients didn’t show that reduction of elastance. The capability of PEEP wave maneuvers to improve lung ventilation was shown and the dynamic behavior of the elastance after the maneuver was illustrated. Healthy lungs adapt faster to changes in mechanical ventilation than the lungs of ARDS patients.展开更多
目的 探讨肺复张治疗急性A型主动脉夹层(acute type A aortic dissection,ATAAD)术后低氧血症的疗效及安全性。方法 选取2019年11月至2022年5月广西医科大学第一附属医院ATAAD术后低氧血症患者56例,将其随机分为肺复张组(n=36)及常规治...目的 探讨肺复张治疗急性A型主动脉夹层(acute type A aortic dissection,ATAAD)术后低氧血症的疗效及安全性。方法 选取2019年11月至2022年5月广西医科大学第一附属医院ATAAD术后低氧血症患者56例,将其随机分为肺复张组(n=36)及常规治疗组(n=20)。常规治疗组患者在肺保护性通气基础上行常规机械通气,肺复张组患者采用呼气末正压通气(positive end expiratory pressure,PEEP)递增法进行肺复张。比较两组患者治疗前后的动脉血气分析、呼吸力学指标、血流动力学指标和血清白细胞介素(interleukin,IL)-6及IL-10水平。结果 治疗后12h、24h,两组患者的动脉血氧分压(arterial partial pressure of oxygen,PaO_(2))、氧合指数(oxygenation index,OI)、肺静态顺应性(C_(stat))及肺动态顺应性(C_(dyn))均显著高于本组治疗前,肺泡动脉氧分压差[PO_(2)(A-a)]、呼吸指数(respiratory index,RI)、气道峰压(P_(peak))及气道平台压(P_(plat))均显著低于本组治疗前(P<0.05);肺复张组患者的PaO_(2)、OI、C_(stat)及C_(dyn)均显著高于常规治疗组,PO_(2)(A-a)、RI、P_(peak)及P_(plat)均显著低于常规治疗组(P<0.05)。肺复张组患者肺复张过程中收缩压及平均动脉压有所下降(P<0.05),中心静脉压有所升高(P<0.05),肺复张结束后均恢复至基线水平。治疗后12h,两组患者的血清IL-6和IL-10水平均显著低于本组治疗前(P<0.05)。结论 PEEP递增法肺复张可改善ATAAD术后低氧血症患者的氧合及肺顺应性,但对血流动力学存在一过性影响,治疗时应进行严密监测。展开更多
基金Supported by Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development(CNPq),Carlos Chagas Filho Rio de Janeiro State Research Foundation(FAPERJ),Department of Science and Technology(DECIT)/Brazilian Ministry of HealthCoordination for the Improvement of Higher Level Personnel(CAPES)
文摘Acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) represents a serious problem in critically ill patients and is associated with in-hospital mortality rates of 33%-52%. Recruitment maneuvers(RMs) are a simple, low-cost, feasible intervention that can be performed at the bedside in patients with ARDS. RMs are characterized by the application of airway pressure to increase transpulmonary pressure transiently. Once non-aerated lung units are reopened, improvements are observed in respiratory system mechanics, alveolar reaeration on computed tomography, and improvements in gas exchange(functional recruitment). However, the reopening process could lead to vascular compression, which can be associated with overinflation, and gas exchange may not improve as expected(anatomical recruitment). The purpose of this review was to discuss the effects of different RM strategies- sustained inflation, intermittent sighs, and stepwise increases of positive end-expiratory pressure(PEEP) and/or airway inspiratory pressure- on the following parameters: hemodynamics, oxygenation, barotrauma episodes, and lung recruitability through physiological variables and imaging techniques. RMs and PEEP titration are interdependent events for the success of ventilatory management. PEEP should be adjusted on the basis of respiratory system mechanics and oxygenation. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that RMs are associated with lower mortality in patients with ARDS. However, the optimal RM method(i.e., that providing the best balance of benefit and harm) and the effects of RMs on clinical outcome are still under discussion, and further evidence is needed.
文摘Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of protective lung ventilation strategy combined with lung recruitment maneuver (RM) in the treatment patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).Methods:Totally 74 patients with ARDS admitted to the Department of Intensive Care Unit, Changshu Second People's Hospital in Jiangsu Province between September 2010 and June 2013 were selected and randomly divided into lung recruitment group and non-lung recruitment group, and the initial ventilation solution for both groups was synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV). For RM, SIMV mode (pressure control and pressure support) was adopted. Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) was increased by 5 cm H2O every time and maintained for 40-50 s before entering the next increasing period, and the peak airway pressure was kept below 45 cm H2O. After PEEP reached the maximum value, it was gradually reduced by 5 cm H2O every time and finally maintained at 15 cm H2O for 10 min.Results:A total of 74 patients with mean age of (49.0±18.6) years old were enrolled, 36 patients were enrolled in lung recruitment maneuver (RM) group and 38 patients were enrolled into non-lung recruitment maneuver (non-RM) group. 44 were male and accounted for 59.5% of all the patients. For the indicators such as PEEP, pressure support (PS), plateau airway pressure (Pplat), peak airway pressure (Ppeak), vital capacity (VC) and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), no statistical differences in the indicators were found between the RM group and non-RM group on D1, D3 and D7 (P>0.05), except that only FiO2 of RM group on D7 was significantly lower than that of non-RM group (47.2±10.0) vs. (52.2±10.5),P<0.05]. For the indicators of blood gas analysis, including pH, arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2), arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2) and oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2), PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 of RM group were significantly higher than those of non-RM group on D7, and the values were [(90.2±16.1) mmHg vs. (76.4±11.3) mmHg,P<0.05] and [(196.5±40.7) mmHg vs. (151.7±37.3) mmHg,P<0.05] respectively. There was no statistical difference in heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), central venous pressure (CVP) or mean arterial pressure (MAP) between RM group and non-RM group on D1, D3 and D7 (P>0.05). 28-day mortality, ICU mortality and in-hospital mortality were 25% vs. 28.9%, 25% vs. 26.3% and 36.1% vs. 39.5% respectively between RM group and non-RM group (allP>0.05).Conclusion:Protective lung ventilation strategy combined with lung recruitment maneuver can improve the indicators such as PaO2, FiO2 and PaO2/FiO2 on D7, but failed to improve the final outcomes such as 28-day mortality, ICU mortality and in-hospital mortality.
基金Partial support by the EU-Project-“eTime”-ID:“FP7-PEOPLE-2012-IRSES”is gratefully acknowledged.
文摘Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are currently treated with a lung protective ventilation strategy and the application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), sometimes in combination with recruitment maneuvers. In this study, the respiratory system elastance and airway resistance of each breath before, during and after a specific recruitment maneuver (PEEP wave maneuver) were analyzed in two patient groups, ARDS and control group. A reduction of elastance after the maneuver was observed in ARDS patients. In addition, only healthy lungs exhibited a reduction of the elastance during the course of the maneuver, while the lungs of ARDS patients didn’t show that reduction of elastance. The capability of PEEP wave maneuvers to improve lung ventilation was shown and the dynamic behavior of the elastance after the maneuver was illustrated. Healthy lungs adapt faster to changes in mechanical ventilation than the lungs of ARDS patients.
文摘目的 探讨肺复张治疗急性A型主动脉夹层(acute type A aortic dissection,ATAAD)术后低氧血症的疗效及安全性。方法 选取2019年11月至2022年5月广西医科大学第一附属医院ATAAD术后低氧血症患者56例,将其随机分为肺复张组(n=36)及常规治疗组(n=20)。常规治疗组患者在肺保护性通气基础上行常规机械通气,肺复张组患者采用呼气末正压通气(positive end expiratory pressure,PEEP)递增法进行肺复张。比较两组患者治疗前后的动脉血气分析、呼吸力学指标、血流动力学指标和血清白细胞介素(interleukin,IL)-6及IL-10水平。结果 治疗后12h、24h,两组患者的动脉血氧分压(arterial partial pressure of oxygen,PaO_(2))、氧合指数(oxygenation index,OI)、肺静态顺应性(C_(stat))及肺动态顺应性(C_(dyn))均显著高于本组治疗前,肺泡动脉氧分压差[PO_(2)(A-a)]、呼吸指数(respiratory index,RI)、气道峰压(P_(peak))及气道平台压(P_(plat))均显著低于本组治疗前(P<0.05);肺复张组患者的PaO_(2)、OI、C_(stat)及C_(dyn)均显著高于常规治疗组,PO_(2)(A-a)、RI、P_(peak)及P_(plat)均显著低于常规治疗组(P<0.05)。肺复张组患者肺复张过程中收缩压及平均动脉压有所下降(P<0.05),中心静脉压有所升高(P<0.05),肺复张结束后均恢复至基线水平。治疗后12h,两组患者的血清IL-6和IL-10水平均显著低于本组治疗前(P<0.05)。结论 PEEP递增法肺复张可改善ATAAD术后低氧血症患者的氧合及肺顺应性,但对血流动力学存在一过性影响,治疗时应进行严密监测。
