Late gadolinium enhancement(LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance(CMR) is the gold standard for imaging myocardial viability.An important application of LGE CMR is the assessment of the location and extent of the myo...Late gadolinium enhancement(LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance(CMR) is the gold standard for imaging myocardial viability.An important application of LGE CMR is the assessment of the location and extent of the myocardial scar in patients with ventricular tachycardia(VT), which allows for more accurate identification of the ablation targets.However, a large percentage of patients with VT have cardiac implantable electronic devices(CIEDs), which is a relative contraindication for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging due to safety and image artifact concerns.Previous studies showed that these patients can be safely scanned on 1.5 T scanners provided that an adequate imaging protocol is adopted.Nevertheless, imaging patients with a CIED result in metal artifacts due to the strong frequency off-resonance effects near the device; therefore, the spins in the surrounding myocardium are not completely inverted, and thus give rise to hyperintensity artifacts.These artifacts obscure the myocardial scar tissue and limit the ability to study the correlation between the myocardial scar structure and the electro-anatomical map during catheter ablation.In this study, we developed a modified inversion recovery technique to alleviate the CIED-induced metal artifacts and improve the diagnostic image quality of LGE images in patients with CIEDs without increasing scan time or requiring additional hardware.The developed technique was tested in phantom experiments and in vivo scans, which showed its capability for suppressing the hyperintensity artifacts without compromising myocardium nulling in the resulting LGE images.展开更多
目的比较不同场强不同序列伪影的差异。方法制作钛合金水模,分别在1.5 T和3.0 T MRI扫描仪上采用矢状位快速自旋回波(TSE)-T1、TSE-T2、TSE的短反转时间的反转恢复(STIR)的脂肪抑制、TSE的频率选择饱和法(FS)抑制、梯度回波序列(GRE)/...目的比较不同场强不同序列伪影的差异。方法制作钛合金水模,分别在1.5 T和3.0 T MRI扫描仪上采用矢状位快速自旋回波(TSE)-T1、TSE-T2、TSE的短反转时间的反转恢复(STIR)的脂肪抑制、TSE的频率选择饱和法(FS)抑制、梯度回波序列(GRE)/快速小角度激发(FLASH)、扩散加权成像(DWI)等常用序列扫描。分析扫描得到图像伪影特点及进行伪影大小测量。结果GRE/FLASH序列图像和DWI图像伪影最大,FS抑制序列得到图像伪影比STIR序列图像伪影大,各序列伪影形状也有差别。在不同场强下相同类型序列扫描伪影也不同,高场强伪影明显大于低场强伪影。同一场强不同序列伪影大小不同,同一类型序列3.0 T MRI图像伪影比1.5 T MRI图像伪影要大,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论可以通过场强选择、序列的选择来减少金属植入物磁共振扫描带来的伪影。展开更多
目的探讨最新标准牌号金属植入物MRI扫描安全性。方法选择螺钉、锁骨锁定板、桡骨锁定板、肱骨远端锁定板、胫骨髓内钉、股骨髓内钉、骨折重建钢板等,按材料成分分为钛合金组和不锈钢组。将金属植入物(钛合金、不锈钢)在1.5 T MRI下进...目的探讨最新标准牌号金属植入物MRI扫描安全性。方法选择螺钉、锁骨锁定板、桡骨锁定板、肱骨远端锁定板、胫骨髓内钉、股骨髓内钉、骨折重建钢板等,按材料成分分为钛合金组和不锈钢组。将金属植入物(钛合金、不锈钢)在1.5 T MRI下进行受力实验,测定磁场下的偏转角度。结果钛合金组和不锈钢组在1.5 T MRI待机状态下均受磁场吸引而受力偏转,钛合金组偏转角度4.60°±0.22°,不锈钢组偏转角度7.80°±0.25°,两者偏转角度差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.01)。不锈钢组偏转角度大于钛合金组,但两者都远小于45°。结论从受力情况看,最新标准牌号钛合金植入物和不锈钢植入物在1.5 T MRI待机状态下均受磁场吸引而受力偏转,但受到的磁力远小于自身重力。单从受力方面看,2种金属植入物在1.5 T MRI下检查是安全的。展开更多
目的探讨植入磁共振兼容心脏起搏器患者行心血管磁共振(Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance,CMR)检查的临床应用。方法纳入2020年1月至2021年12月我院10例植入磁共振兼容心脏起搏器患者为研究对象,CMR检查前以图示法进行检查流程须知宣...目的探讨植入磁共振兼容心脏起搏器患者行心血管磁共振(Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance,CMR)检查的临床应用。方法纳入2020年1月至2021年12月我院10例植入磁共振兼容心脏起搏器患者为研究对象,CMR检查前以图示法进行检查流程须知宣教;检查过程中医生、技师、护士、工程师四方配合保证流程顺利推进,扫描间隙完成必要护理操作,以及患者心理沟通;检查后行个体化访视,记录观察指标,进行统计学分析。结果10例植入磁共振兼容心脏起搏器患者均完成CMR检查,平均耗时(45±6)min,射频能量吸收率未超过标准上限。检查前后患者心率、血压无异常改变,起搏器无异常脉冲;整体检查流程配合满意度评分(4.4±0.6)分,患者对专业知识满意度最高。结论植入磁共振兼容心脏起搏器患者行CMR检查,需制定详尽的临床观察指标与相应流程配合,以此对患者安全保证和满意度提升起到积极作用。展开更多
目的比较优化短反转恢复(Short TI Inversion Recovery,STIR)和三点非对称法脂肪抑制技术(Iterative Dixon of Water-fat with Echo Asymmetry and Least-squares Estimation,IDEAL)对金属植入物磁共振成像(Magnetic Resonance Imaging,...目的比较优化短反转恢复(Short TI Inversion Recovery,STIR)和三点非对称法脂肪抑制技术(Iterative Dixon of Water-fat with Echo Asymmetry and Least-squares Estimation,IDEAL)对金属植入物磁共振成像(Magnetic Resonance Imaging,MRI)图像质量的影响。方法选取腰椎金属内固定术后需行MRI检查的患者30例,行常规序列以及优化STIR、IDEAL序列扫描,通过对感兴趣区信号的强度值分别计算信噪比(Signal to Noise Ratio,SNR)和信噪比(Contrast to Noise Ratio,CNR),对数据结果做统计学分析;对脂肪抑制均匀性、金属伪影大小进行主观评价。结果优化STIR和IDEAL两种方法图像信噪比分别为:19.26±0.96、20.26±1.24(t=-2.94,P<0.01);图像噪声比分别为:7.03±0.94、8.28±0.97(t=-6.07,P<0.01);主观评分脂肪抑制的均匀性分别为:3.47±0.51、3.63±0.50(t=1.37,P>0.05);金属伪影的大小分别为:3.68±0.67,3.74±0.65(t=-0.57,P>0.05)。结论IDEAL技术在脂肪抑制均匀性、金属伪影、图像信噪比等图像质量方面和优化STIR脂肪抑制技术相当,并且可以得到更好的SNR和CNR。因此在机器条件允许的情况下,对于金属植入物的患者可以选择IDEAL脂肪抑制技术进行检查。展开更多
文摘Late gadolinium enhancement(LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance(CMR) is the gold standard for imaging myocardial viability.An important application of LGE CMR is the assessment of the location and extent of the myocardial scar in patients with ventricular tachycardia(VT), which allows for more accurate identification of the ablation targets.However, a large percentage of patients with VT have cardiac implantable electronic devices(CIEDs), which is a relative contraindication for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging due to safety and image artifact concerns.Previous studies showed that these patients can be safely scanned on 1.5 T scanners provided that an adequate imaging protocol is adopted.Nevertheless, imaging patients with a CIED result in metal artifacts due to the strong frequency off-resonance effects near the device; therefore, the spins in the surrounding myocardium are not completely inverted, and thus give rise to hyperintensity artifacts.These artifacts obscure the myocardial scar tissue and limit the ability to study the correlation between the myocardial scar structure and the electro-anatomical map during catheter ablation.In this study, we developed a modified inversion recovery technique to alleviate the CIED-induced metal artifacts and improve the diagnostic image quality of LGE images in patients with CIEDs without increasing scan time or requiring additional hardware.The developed technique was tested in phantom experiments and in vivo scans, which showed its capability for suppressing the hyperintensity artifacts without compromising myocardium nulling in the resulting LGE images.
文摘目的比较不同场强不同序列伪影的差异。方法制作钛合金水模,分别在1.5 T和3.0 T MRI扫描仪上采用矢状位快速自旋回波(TSE)-T1、TSE-T2、TSE的短反转时间的反转恢复(STIR)的脂肪抑制、TSE的频率选择饱和法(FS)抑制、梯度回波序列(GRE)/快速小角度激发(FLASH)、扩散加权成像(DWI)等常用序列扫描。分析扫描得到图像伪影特点及进行伪影大小测量。结果GRE/FLASH序列图像和DWI图像伪影最大,FS抑制序列得到图像伪影比STIR序列图像伪影大,各序列伪影形状也有差别。在不同场强下相同类型序列扫描伪影也不同,高场强伪影明显大于低场强伪影。同一场强不同序列伪影大小不同,同一类型序列3.0 T MRI图像伪影比1.5 T MRI图像伪影要大,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论可以通过场强选择、序列的选择来减少金属植入物磁共振扫描带来的伪影。
文摘目的:探讨金属置入物在超高场3.0T MR中的安全性,为该类患者MRI检查提供依据。方法:收集金属置入物患者40例,平均70.9岁。置入物包括节育环、人工股骨头、钛网,心脏支架、动脉支架等。置入到扫描时间:半年~5年,平均2年。扫描部位:头、脊柱、腹部、前列腺、血管等。3.0T MR扫描,扫描时间10~25min,平均15min。记录检查前、检查后即刻、检查后3d生理指标和不适症状,并作统计学分析。图像进行质量评估。结果:3个时间段生理指标稳定,无统计学意义(P>0.05)。全部病例未发生由检查引发的不良反应。图像符合诊断要求。结论:在确认金属置入物是非铁磁性或弱磁性的前提下,行3.0T M R检查是安全的。根据置入物情况选择感兴趣区能避免金属伪影干扰。
基金Supported by Key Basic Research Project of Hebei Applied Basic Research Program contract(11965628D)Tianjin Application Foundation and Advanced Technology Research Program contract(11JCZDJC1700)National Science Foundation of China Program contract(1207106)
文摘目的探讨最新标准牌号金属植入物MRI扫描安全性。方法选择螺钉、锁骨锁定板、桡骨锁定板、肱骨远端锁定板、胫骨髓内钉、股骨髓内钉、骨折重建钢板等,按材料成分分为钛合金组和不锈钢组。将金属植入物(钛合金、不锈钢)在1.5 T MRI下进行受力实验,测定磁场下的偏转角度。结果钛合金组和不锈钢组在1.5 T MRI待机状态下均受磁场吸引而受力偏转,钛合金组偏转角度4.60°±0.22°,不锈钢组偏转角度7.80°±0.25°,两者偏转角度差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.01)。不锈钢组偏转角度大于钛合金组,但两者都远小于45°。结论从受力情况看,最新标准牌号钛合金植入物和不锈钢植入物在1.5 T MRI待机状态下均受磁场吸引而受力偏转,但受到的磁力远小于自身重力。单从受力方面看,2种金属植入物在1.5 T MRI下检查是安全的。
文摘目的探讨植入磁共振兼容心脏起搏器患者行心血管磁共振(Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance,CMR)检查的临床应用。方法纳入2020年1月至2021年12月我院10例植入磁共振兼容心脏起搏器患者为研究对象,CMR检查前以图示法进行检查流程须知宣教;检查过程中医生、技师、护士、工程师四方配合保证流程顺利推进,扫描间隙完成必要护理操作,以及患者心理沟通;检查后行个体化访视,记录观察指标,进行统计学分析。结果10例植入磁共振兼容心脏起搏器患者均完成CMR检查,平均耗时(45±6)min,射频能量吸收率未超过标准上限。检查前后患者心率、血压无异常改变,起搏器无异常脉冲;整体检查流程配合满意度评分(4.4±0.6)分,患者对专业知识满意度最高。结论植入磁共振兼容心脏起搏器患者行CMR检查,需制定详尽的临床观察指标与相应流程配合,以此对患者安全保证和满意度提升起到积极作用。
文摘目的比较优化短反转恢复(Short TI Inversion Recovery,STIR)和三点非对称法脂肪抑制技术(Iterative Dixon of Water-fat with Echo Asymmetry and Least-squares Estimation,IDEAL)对金属植入物磁共振成像(Magnetic Resonance Imaging,MRI)图像质量的影响。方法选取腰椎金属内固定术后需行MRI检查的患者30例,行常规序列以及优化STIR、IDEAL序列扫描,通过对感兴趣区信号的强度值分别计算信噪比(Signal to Noise Ratio,SNR)和信噪比(Contrast to Noise Ratio,CNR),对数据结果做统计学分析;对脂肪抑制均匀性、金属伪影大小进行主观评价。结果优化STIR和IDEAL两种方法图像信噪比分别为:19.26±0.96、20.26±1.24(t=-2.94,P<0.01);图像噪声比分别为:7.03±0.94、8.28±0.97(t=-6.07,P<0.01);主观评分脂肪抑制的均匀性分别为:3.47±0.51、3.63±0.50(t=1.37,P>0.05);金属伪影的大小分别为:3.68±0.67,3.74±0.65(t=-0.57,P>0.05)。结论IDEAL技术在脂肪抑制均匀性、金属伪影、图像信噪比等图像质量方面和优化STIR脂肪抑制技术相当,并且可以得到更好的SNR和CNR。因此在机器条件允许的情况下,对于金属植入物的患者可以选择IDEAL脂肪抑制技术进行检查。