Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas in a young male with main pancreatic duct dilatation: A case report

BACKGROUND Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms(SPNs)are rare tumors of the pancreas.Typically,they occur in young females,often have characteristic imaging features,such as cystic components and calcification,and have few effects on the pancreatic duct.CASE SUMMARY A 31-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with the chief complaint of epigastric pain.There was only mild tenderness in his upper abdomen,and blood tests showed only a slight increase in alkaline phosphatase.Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a 40-mm-diameter,hypovascular mass in the head of the pancreas,and the main pancreatic duct upstream of the mass was severely dilated.Magnetic resonance imaging showed low intensity on T1-weighted images,with high intensity on T2-weighted image in some parts.Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was the primary differential diagnosis.Portal vein infiltration could not be ruled out,so this case was a candidate for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Subsequently,endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration was performed,and pathological evaluation and immunostaining suggested a diagnosis of SPN.Thus,pancreatoduodenectomy was performed.One year after the operation,the patient is alive with no recurrence.CONCLUSION Main pancreatic duct dilatation is usually a finding of suspected pancreatic cancer.However,pancreatic duct dilatation can occur in SPN depending on the location and growth speed.Therefore,SPN should be considered in the differential diagnosis of tumors with pancreatic duct dilatation,and pathological evaluation by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration should be actively performed.

Endoscopic ultrasound in chronic pancreatitis: Where are we now?

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is well suited for assessment of the pancreas due to its high resolution and the proximity of the transducer to the pancreas, avoiding air in the gut. Evaluation of chronic pancreatitis (CP) was an early target for EUS, initially just for diagnosis but later for therapeutic purposes. The diagnosis of CP is still accomplished using the standard scoring based on nine criteria, all considered to be of equal value. For diagnosis of any CP, at least three or four criteria must be fulf illed, but for diagnosis of severe CP at least six criteria are necessary. The Rosemont classif ication, more restrictive, aims to standardize the criteria and assigns different values to different features, but requires further validation. EUS-f ine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is less advisable for diagnosis of diffuse CP due to its potential side effects. Elastography and contrast-enhanced EUS are orientation in differentiating a focal pancreatic mass in a parenchyma with features of CP, but they cannot replace EUS-FNA. The usefulness of EUS-guided celiac block for painful CP is still being debated with regard to the best technique and the indications. EUS-guided drainage of pseudocysts is preferred in non-bulging pseudocysts or in the presence of portal hypertension. EUS-guided drainage of the main pancreatic duct should be reserved for cases in which endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has failed owing to difficult cannulation of the papilla or diff icult endotherapy. It should be performed only by highly skilled endoscopists, due to the high rate of complications.