Emerging role of liquid biopsy in rat sarcoma virus mutated metastatic colorectal cancer:A case report

BACKGROUND In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC),the treatment options are limited and have been proved to be affected by rat sarcoma virus(RAS)mutational status.In RAS wild-type(wt)patients,the combination of antiepidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)monoclonal antibodies with chemotherapy(CT)is more effective than CT alone.On the other hand,RAS-mutated patients are not eligible for treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies.CASE SUMMARY Eleven patients with initially RAS-mutated mCRC were followed from diagnosis to May 2022.At the time of cell-free DNA determination,five patients had undergone one CT line,five patients had undergone two CT lines,and one patient had undergone three CT lines(all in combination with bevacizumab).At the second and third treatment lines[second line(2L),third line(3L)],patients with neo-RAS wt received a combination of CT and cetuximab.In neo-RAS wt patients treated with anti-EGFR,our findings indicated an increase in progression-free survival for both 2L and 3L(14.5 mo,P=0.119 and 3.9 mo,P=0.882,respectively).Regarding 2L overall survival,we registered a slight increase in neo-RAS wt patients treated with anti-EGFR(33.6 mo vs 32.4 mo,P=0.385).At data cut-off,two patients were still alive:A RAS-mutated patient undergoing 3L treatment and a neo-RAS wt patient who received 2L treatment with anti-EGFR(ongoing).CONCLUSION Our case series demonstrated that monitoring RAS mutations in mCRC by liquid biopsy may provide an additional treatment line for neo-RAS wt patients.

Vascular endothelial growth factor pathway’s influence on bevacizumab efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer treatment

In this article,an article published in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology,which focuses on whether the expression of programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1)affects the effectiveness of chemotherapy regimens,including bevacizumab,in treating patients with colorectal cancer(CRC).Through neutralization of vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF),bevacizumab inhibits tumor angiogenesis,impairing neovascularization and thereby depriving the tumor of essential nutrients and oxygen.Conversely,PD-L1 binding to VEGF receptor 2 promotes angiogenesis,supporting tumor vasculature.The interplay between these pathways complicates the assessment of bevacizumab’s efficacy in cancer therapy,notably in CRC,where VEGF and PD-L1 significantly affect treatment response.This review examines metastatic CRC treatment strategies,focusing on bevacizumab’s mechanism of action and the role of PD-L1 in this therapeutic context.

Efficacy of chemotherapy containing bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer according to programmed cell death ligand 1

BACKGROUND Bevacizumab,an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)monoclonal antibody,inhibits angiogenesis and reduces tumor growth.Serum VEGF-C,lactate dehydrogenase,and inflammatory markers have been reported as predictive markers related to bevacizumab treatment.Programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1)could act upon VEGF receptor 2 to induce cancer cell angiogenesis and metastasis.AIM To investigate the efficacy of bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(CRC)according to the expression of PD-L1.METHODS This analysis included CRC patients who received bevacizumab plus FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first-line therapy between June 24,2014 and February 28,2022,at Samsung Medical Center(Seoul,South Korea).Analysis of patient data included evaluation of PD-L1 expression by the combined positive score(CPS).We analyzed the efficacy of bevacizumab according to PD-L1 expression status in patients with CRC.RESULTS A total of 124 patients was included in this analysis.Almost all patients were treated with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFOX as the first-line chemotherapy.While 77%of patients received FOLFOX,23%received FOLFIRI as backbone first-line chemotherapy.The numbers of patients with a PD-L1 CPS of 1 or more,5 or more,or 10 or more were 105(85%),64(52%),and 32(26%),respectively.The results showed no significant difference in progression-free survival(PFS)and overall survival(OS)with bevacizumab treatment between patients with PDL1 CPS less than 1 and those with PD-L1 CPS of 1 or more(PD-L1<1%vs PD-L1≥1%;PFS:P=0.93,OS:P=0.33),between patients with PD-L1 CPS less than 5 and of 5 or more(PD-L1<5%vs PD-L1≥5%;PFS:P=0.409,OS:P=0.746),and between patients with PD-L1 CPS less than 10 and of 10 or more(PD-L1<10%vs PD-L1≥10%;PFS:P=0.529,OS:P=0.568).CONCLUSION Chemotherapy containing bevacizumab can be considered as first-line therapy in metastatic CRC irrespective of PD-L1 expression.

Therapeutic strategies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway in metastatic colorectal cancer

More than 1.9 million new colorectal cancer(CRC)cases and 935000 deaths were estimated to occur worldwide in 2020,representing about one in ten cancer cases and deaths.Overall,colorectal ranks third in incidence,but second in mortality.More than half of the patients are in advanced stages at diagnosis.Treatment options are complex because of the heterogeneity of the patient population,including different molecular subtypes.Treatments have included conventional fluorouracil-based chemotherapy,targeted therapy,immunotherapy,etc.In recent years,with the development of genetic testing technology,more and more targeted drugs have been applied to the treatment of CRC,which has further prolonged the survival of metastatic CRC patients.

Successful cetuximab rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer:A case report

BACKGROUND Metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)treatment has been evolving and increasingly driven by tumor biology and gene expression analysis.Rechallenge with epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)inhibitors(anti-EGFR)represents a promising strategy for patients with RAS wild-type(RAS-wt)mCRC and circulating tumor DNA has emerged as a potential selection strategy.Herein,we report the case of a RAS-wt mCRC patient who had a successful response to cetuximab rechallenge.CASE SUMMARY Our patient was diagnosed with stage IV RAS-wt,microsatellite-stable rectosigmoid junction adenocarcinoma.He was started on first-line treatment with FOLFIRI and cetuximab and achieved partial response,allowing for a left hepatectomy(R0),followed by post-operative chemotherapy and an anterior resection;progression-free survival(PFS)of 16 months was obtained.Due to hepatic and nodal relapse,second-line treatment with FOLFOX and bevacizumab was started with partial response;metastasectomy was performed(R0),achieving a PFS of 11 months.After a 15 months anti-EGFR-free interval,FOLFIRI and cetuximab were reintroduced upon disease progression,again with partial response and a PFS of 16 months.Following extensive hepatic relapse,cetuximab was reintroduced and a marked clinical and analytical improvement was seen,after only one cycle.RASwt status was confirmed on circulating tumor DNA.The patient’s overall survival exceeded 5 years.CONCLUSION Our case provides real-world data to support cetuximab rechallenge in later lines of RAS-wt mCRC treatment.

Comparative effectiveness of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer stratified by microsatellite instability status

BACKGROUND Immunotherapy have demonstrated promising outcomes in patients with high microsatellite instability(MSI)(MSI-H)metastatic colorectal cancer.However,the comparative effectiveness of Immunotherapy and chemotherapy for patients with low MSI(MSI-L),and microsatellite stable(MSS)metastatic colorectal cancer remains unclear.AIM To investigate immunotherapy vs chemotherapy for treatment of MSI-L/MSS metastatic colorectal cancer,and to evaluate the success of immunotherapy against chemotherapy in managing MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer during a follow-up of 50 months.METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database(NCDB)to evaluate the overall survival(OS)of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with immunotherapy or chemotherapy.The study population was stratified by MSI status(MSI-H,MSI-L,and MSS).Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between treatment modality and OS,adjusting for potential confounders.RESULTS A total of 21951 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were included in the analysis,of which 2358 were MSI-H,and 19593 were MSI-L/MSS.In the MSI-H cohort,immunotherapy treatment(n=142)was associated with a significantly improved median OS compared to chemotherapy(n=860).After adjusting for potential confounders,immunotherapy treatment remained significantly associated with better OS in the MSI-H cohort[adjusted hazard ratio(aHR):0.57,95%confidence interval(95%CI):0.43-0.77,P<0.001].In the MSS cohort,no significant difference in median OS was observed between immunotherapy treatment and chemotherapy(aHR:0.94,95%CI:0.69-1.29,P=0.715).CONCLUSION In this population-based study using the NCDB,immunotherapy treatment was associated with significantly improved OS compared to chemotherapy in patients with MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer,but not in those with MSI-L/MSS metastatic colorectal cancer.Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal therapeutic approach for patients with MSI-L/MSS metastatic colorectal cancer.

Cohort study on the treatment of BRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer with integrated Chinese and western medicine

BACKGROUND Patients with BRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)have a low incidence rate,poor biological activity,suboptimal response to conventional treatments,and a poor prognosis.In the previous cohort study on mCRC conducted by our team,it was observed that integrated Chinese and Western medicine treatment could significantly prolong the overall survival(OS)of patients with colorectal cancer.Therefore,we further explored the survival benefits in the population with BRAF V600E mutant mCRC.AIM To evaluate the efficacy of integrated Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of BRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer.METHODS A cohort study was conducted on patients with BRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer admitted to Xiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences and Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from January 2016 to December 2022.The patients were divided into two cohorts.RESULTS A total of 34 cases were included,with 23 in Chinese-Western medicine cohort(cohort A)and 11 in Western medicine cohort(cohort B).The median overall survival was 19.9 months in cohort A and 14.2 months in cohort B,with a statistically significant difference(P=0.038,hazard ratio=0.46).The 1-3-year survival rates were 95.65%(22/23),39.13%(9/23),and 26.09%(6/23)in cohort A,and 63.64%(7/11),18.18%(2/11),and 9.09%(1/11)in cohort B,respectively.Subgroup analysis showed statistically significant differences in median OS between the two cohorts in the right colon,liver metastasis,chemotherapy,and first-line treatment subgroups(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Integrated Chinese and Western medicine can prolong the survival and reduce the risk of death in patients with BRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer,with more pronounced benefits observed in patients with right colon involvement,liver metastasis,combined chemotherapy,and first-line treatment.

Systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer

Significant progress has been achieved in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)patients during the last 20 years.There are currently numerous treatments available for the first-line treatment of mCRC.Sophisticated molecular technologies have been developed to reveal novel prognostic and predictive biomarkers for CRC.The development of next-generation sequencing and wholeexome sequencing,which are strong new tools for the discovery of predictive molecular biomarkers to facilitate the delivery of customized treatment,has resulted in tremendous breakthroughs in DNA sequencing technology in recent years.The appropriate adjuvant treatments for mCRC patients are determined by the tumor stage,presence of high-risk pathologic characteristics,microsatellite instability status,patient age,and performance status.Chemotherapy,targeted therapy,and immunotherapy are the main systemic treatments for patients with mCRC.Despite the fact that these novel treatment choices have increased overall survival for mCRC,survival remains optimal for individuals with non-metastatic disease.The molecular technologies currently being used to support our ability to practice personalized medicine;the practical aspects of applying molecular biomarkers to regular clinical practice;and the evolution of chemotherapy,targeted therapy,and immunotherapy strategies for the treatment of mCRC in the front-line setting are all reviewed here.

Classification of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer into consensus molecular subtypes into real-world: A pilot study

BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is a complex disease with high mortality rates.Over time,the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)has gradually improved due to the development of modern chemotherapy and targeted therapy regimens.However,due to the inherent heterogeneity of this condition,identifying reliable predictive biomarkers for targeted therapies remains challenging.A recent promising classification system—the consensus molecular subtype(CMS)system—offers the potential to categorize mCRC patients based on their unique biological and molecular characteristics.Four distinct CMS categories have been defined:immune(CMS1),canonical(CMS2),metabolic(CMS3),and mesenchymal(CMS4).Nevertheless,there is currently no standardized protocol for accurately classifying patients into CMS categories.To address this challenge,reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction(RT-qPCR)and next-generation genomic sequencing(NGS)techniques may hold promise for precisely classifying mCRC patients into their CMSs.AIM To investigate if mCRC patients can be classified into CMS categories using a standardized molecular biology workflow.METHODS This observational study was conducted at the University of Chile Clinical Hospital and included patients with unresectable mCRC who were undergoing systemic treatment with chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy.Molecular biology techniques were employed to analyse primary tumour samples from these patients.RT-qPCR was utilized to assess the expression of genes associated with fibrosis(TGF-βandβ-catenin)and cell growth pathways(c-MYC).NGS using a 25-gene panel(TumorSec)was performed to identify specific genomic mutations.The patients were then classified into one of the four CMS categories according to the clinical consensus of a Tumour Board.Informed consent was obtained from all the patients prior to their participation in this study.All techniques were conducted at University of Chile.RESULTS Twenty-six patients were studied with the techniques and then evaluated by the Tumour Board to determine the specific CMS.Among them,23%(n=6),19%(n=5),31%(n=8),and 19%(n=5)were classified as CMS1,CMS2,CMS3,and CMS4,respectively.Additionally,8%of patients(n=2)could not be classified into any of the four CMS categories.The median overall survival of the total sample was 28 mo,and for CMS1,CMS2,CMS3 and CMS4 it was 11,20,30 and 45 mo respectively,with no statistically significant differences between groups.CONCLUSION A molecular biology workflow and clinical consensus analysis can be used to accurately classify mCRC patients.This classification process,which divides patients into the four CMS categories,holds significant potential for improving research strategies and targeted therapies tailored to the specific characteristics of mCRC.

KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer

The KRAS oncogene is mutated in approximately 35%-45% of colorectal cancers, and KRAS mutational status testing has been highlighted in recent years. The most frequent mutations in this gene, point substitutions in codons 12 and 13, were validated as negative predictors of response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. Therefore, determining the KRAS mutational status of tumor samples has become an essential tool for managing patients with colorectal cancers. Currently, a variety of detection methods have been established to analyze the mutation status in the key regions of the KRAS gene; however, several challenges remain related to standardized and uniform testing, including the selection of tumor samples, tumor sample processing and optimal testing methods. Moreover, new testing strategies, in combination with the mutation analysis of BRAF , PIK3CA and loss of PTEN proposed by many researchers and pathologists, should be promoted. In addition, we recommend that microsatellite instability, a prognostic factor, be added to the abovementioned concomitant analysis. This review provides an overview of KRAS biology and the recent advances in KRAS mutation testing. This review also addresses other aspects of status testing for determining the appropriate treatment and offers insight into the potential drawbacks of mutational testing.

Cetuximab plus FOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer: CECOG trial

AIM: To investigate efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with two chemotherapy regimens in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Randomized patients received cetuximab with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid (FA) and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) 6 (arm A, n = 74) or 5-FU, FA and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) (arm B, n = 77). KRAS mutation status was determined retrospectively in a subset of tumors (n = 117). RESULTS: No significant difference was found between treatment arms A and B in the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 9 mo, 45% vs 34%; median PFS, 8.6 mo vs 8.3 mo [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.06]; overall response rate (ORR) 43% vs 45% [odds ratio (OR) = 0.93] and median overall survival (OS), 17.4 mo vs 18.9 mo (HR = 0.98). Patients with KRAS wild-type tumors demonstrated improved PFS (HR = 0.55, P = 0.0051), OS, (HR = 0.62, P = 0.0296) and ORR (53% vs 36%) and in arm A, improved PFS (HR = 0.49, P = 0.0196), OS (HR = 0.48, P = 0.0201) and ORR (56%vs 30%), compared with patients with KRAS mutated tumors. In arm B no significant differences were found in efficacy by KRAS mutation status. Treatment in arms A and B was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that combinations of cetuximab with FOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI are effective and significantly improve clinical outcome in KRAS wild-type compared with KRAS mutated mCRC.

Mechanisms of resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer

The prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remain poor despite the impressive improvement of treatments observed over the last 20 years that led to an increase in median overall survival from 6 mo, with the only best supportive care, to approximately 30 mo with the introduction of active chemotherapy drugs and targeted agents. The monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) cetuximab and panitumumab, directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), undoubtedly represent a major step forward in the treatment of mCRC, given the relevant efficacy in terms of progression-free survival, overall survival, response rate, and quality of life observed in several phase III clinical trials among different lines of treatment. However, the anti-EGFR moAbs were shown only to be effective in a subset of patients. For instance, KRAS and NRAS mutations have been identified as biomarkers of resistance to these drugs, improving the selection of patients who might derive a benefit from these treatments. Nevertheless, several other alterations might affect the response to these drugs, and unfortunately, even the responders eventually become resistant by developing secondary (or acquired) resistance in approximately 13-18 mo. Several studies highlighted that the landscape of responsible alterations of both primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR drugs biochemically converge into MEK-ERK and PIK3CA-AKT pathways. In this review, we describe the currently known mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR moAbs together with the various strategies evaluated to prevent, overcame or revert them.

Present and future of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment: A review of new candidate targets

In the last two decades, great efforts have been made in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer(m CRC) due to the approval of new target agents for cytotoxic drugs. Unfortunately, a large percentage of patients present with metastasis at the time of diagnosis or relapse after a few months. The complex molecular heterogeneity of this disease is not completely understood; to date, there is a lack of predictive biomarkers that can be used to select subsets of patients who may respond to target drugs. Only the RAS-mutation status is used to predict resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents in patients with m CRC. In this review, we describe approved targeted therapies for the management of metastatic m CRC and discuss new candidate targets on the horizon.

Role of cetuximab in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)has evolved considerably in the last decade,currently allowing most mCRC patients to live more than two years.Monoclonal antibodies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)and vascular endothelial growth factor play an important role in the current treatment of these patients.However,only antibodies directed against EGFR have a predictive marker of response,which is the mutation status of v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog(KRAS).Cetuximab has been shown to be effective in patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC.The CRYSTAL study showed that adding cetuximab to FOLFIRI(regimen of irinotecan,infusional fluorouracil and leucovorin)significantly improved results in the first-line treatment of KRAS wildtype mCRC.However,results that evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in this setting are contradictory.On the other hand,recent advances in the management of colorectal liver metastases have improved survival in these patients.Adding cetuximab to standard chemotherapy increases the response rate in patients with wild-type KRAS and can thus increase the resectability rate of liver metastases in this group of patients.In this paper we review the different studies assessing the efficacy of cetuximab in the first-line treatment of mCRC.

Significance of postoperative follow-up of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using circulating tumor DNA

BACKGROUND One of the most notable applications for circulating tumor DNA(ctDNA)detection in peripheral blood of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)is a long-term postoperative follow-up.Sometimes referred to as a“liquid(re)biopsy”it is a minimally invasive procedure and can be performed repeatedly at relatively short intervals(months or even weeks).The presence of the disease and the actual extent of the tumor burden(tumor mass)within the patient’s body can be monitored.This is of particular importance,especially when evaluating radicality of surgical treatment as well as for early detection of disease progression or recurrence.AIM To confirm the radicality of surgery using ctDNA and compare available methods for detection of recurrence in metastatic colorectal cancer.METHODSA total of 47 patients with detected ctDNA and indications for resection of mCRC were enrolled in the multicenter study involving three surgical centers.Standard postoperative follow-ups using imaging techniques and the determination of tumor markers were supplemented by ctDNA sampling.In addition to the baseline ctDNA testing prior to surgery,a postoperative observation was conducted by evaluating ctDNA presence up to a week after surgery and subsequently at approximately three-month intervals.The presence of ctDNA was correlated with radicality of surgical treatment and the actual clinical status of the patient.RESULTS Among the monitored patients,the R0(curative)resection correlated with postoperative ctDNA negativity in 26 out of 28 cases of surgical procedures(26/28,93%).In the remaining cases of R0 surgeries that displayed ctDNA,both patients were diagnosed with a recurrence of the disease after 6 months.In 7 patients who underwent an R1 resection,4 ctDNA positivities(4/7,57%)were detected after surgery and associated with the confirmation of early disease recurrence(after 3 to 7 months).All 15 patients(15/15,100%)undergoing R2 resection remained constantly ctDNA positive during the entire follow-up period.In 22 cases of recurrence,ctDNA positivity was detected 22 times(22/22,100%)compared to 16 positives(16/22,73%)by imaging methods and 15 cases(15/22,68%)of elevated tumor markers.CONCLUSION ctDNA detection in patients with mCRC is a viable tool for early detection of disease recurrence as well as for confirmation of the radicality of surgical treatment.

Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer anti-EGFR therapy

AIM: To reviewing genetic and epigenetic make-up of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) addicted to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling.METHODS: The present study summarizes the potential value of prognostic and predictive biomarkers in selecting mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR therapy. A meta-analysis was performed using a systematic search of PubMed, Medline and Web of Science to identify eligible papers until March 21st, 2016 using these following terms: ‘‘colorectal cancer’’, “predictive biomarkers’’, “anti-EGFR therapy”, “KRAS”, “NRAS’’, “PIK3CA”, “TP53”, “PTEN”, ‘‘EGFR”, “MET”, “HER2”, “epiregulin”, “amphiregulin”, “prognostic biomarkers”, “BRAF”, “miRNA” and “antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity”. Two investigators independently evaluated and extracted data from each identified studies based on selected criteria of inclusion and exclusion.RESULTS: The introduction of agents targeting EGFR such as cetuximab and panitumumab increased overall survival of mCRCs. Nevertheless, it has firstly became evident that response rates to cetuximab regimens in unselected patient populations were typically lower than 30%. Clinical data confirmed the predictive value of RAS mutations for resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab leading to the license of these monoclonal antibodies exclusively for the management of patients with RAS-wild type colorectal cancers. So far the identification of predictive biomarkers have generated interesting, though preliminary and, at times, conflicting data on the importance of tumour mRNA levels of EGFR ligands, of activating mutations in other genes such as NRAS and PIK3CA. The prognostic value of selected microRNAs level and ADCC activity is under investigation, while the prognostic impact of BRAF status remains controversial.CONCLUSION: This review focuses on the personalized treatment of mCRC and discusses the potential of new prognostic and predictive biomarkers in selecting patients treated with anti-EGFR therapy.

Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer:A prospective,multicenter,observational,non-interventional phaseⅣtrial

Objective:Bevacizumab has an important and evolving role in improving outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)worldwide and was approved in China in 2010.However,there are limited real-world data on the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy regimens combined with bevacizumab in Chinese patients with mCRC.This observational,phase IV trial study aimed to obtain more experience on the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in Chinese mCRC patients.Methods:Between September 2013 and November 2016,patients with histologically confirmed mCRC were enrolled in a prospective,multicenter,observational,non-interventional phase IV trial at 26 centers across China.Eligible patients received different chemotherapeutic regimens combined with bevacizumab.The efficacy and safety data in the intention-to-treat study population were analyzed.Results:A total of 611 patients were included in the efficacy analysis.The median overall survival and median progression-free survival was 18.00 and 10.05 months,respectively.The objective response rate was 21.00%and disease control rate was 89.40%.In subgroup analyses,the survival differences were observed according to metastatic status,duration of treatment and elevation in blood pressure.A total of 613 patients were evaluable for safety assessments.And 569(92.82%)patients reported at least one adverse event(AE),and 151(24.63%)experienced grade 3 or higher AEs.The incidence of bevacizumab-associated AEs of special interest was reported in 31(5.06%)patients with hypertension(n=12),abscesses and fistulae(n=7),bleeding(n=6),proteinuria(n=3),gastrointestinal perforation(n=2)and venous thrombotic events(n=1).Conclusions:This observational phase IV trial broadens our experience and knowledge of bevacizumab in the Chinese population and provides a good indication of its overall efficacy and safety.Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy offers clinical benefits to Chinese patients with mCRC and has an acceptable and manageable safety profile.

Capecitabine Maintenance Therapy after First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of capecitabine maintenance therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) patients.Methods:From June 2001 to November 2006,after they had achieved clinical response from first-line chemotherapy,patients with mCRC in our hospital received two different treatment strategies.Thirty-three patients in maintenance group were treated with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 po bid d1-14,q21d.Fifty-two patients in non-maintenance group did not receive any further chemotherapy.Results:Patients in maintenance group and non-maintenance group both received FOLFOX,FOLFIRI and XELOX as first-line therapy.The median chemotherapy cycles the two groups received were the same(6 vs 6).The response rates of first-line chemotherapy were 33.3% in maintenance group and 32.7% in non-maintenance group.Patients in maintenance group received 3-9 cycles of capecitabine therapy(median cycle 4).29/33(87.9%) patients in maintenance group and 47/52(90.4%) in non-maintenance group received following second-line chemotherapy,and no patients underwent targeted therapy.The median survival time and TTP were 40.4 months(95%CI:24.2-56.6) and 9.0 months(95%CI:6.7-11.3) in maintenance group,as compared with 21.5 months(95%CI:14.9-28.0,P=0.015) and 6.5 months(95%CI:4.4-8.5,P=0.007) in non-maintenance group.No severe adverse event was observed in the capecitabine maintenance group.Conclusion:mCRC patients could benefit from capecitabine maintenance therapy by prolonging survival time and TTP.

Study protocol of the Asian XELIRI ProjecT(AXEPT):a multinational,randomized,non-inferiority,phase Ⅲ trial of second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, comparing the eicacy and safety of XELIRI with or without bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI w

Background: Capecitabine and irinotecan combination therapy(XELIRI) has been examined at various dose levels to treat metastatic colorectal cancer(m CRC). Recently, in the Association of Medical Oncology of the German Cancer Society(AIO) 0604 trial, tri?weekly XELIRI plus bevacizumab, with reduced doses of irinotecan(200 mg/m^2 on day 1) and capecitabine(1600 mg/m^2 on days 1–14), repeated every 3 weeks, has shown favorable tolerability and eicacy which were comparable to those of capecitabine and oxaliplatin(XELOX) plus bevacizumab. The doses of capecit?abine and irinotecan in the AIO trial are considered optimal. In a phase I/II study, XELIRI plus bevacizumab(BIX) as second?line chemotherapy was well tolerated and had promising eicacy in Japanese patients.Methods: The Asian XELIRI Projec T(AXEPT) is an East Asian collaborative, open?labelled, randomized, phase Ⅲ clinical trial which was designed to demonstrate the non?inferiority of XELIRI with or without bevacizumab versus standard FOLFIRI(5?fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan combination) with or without bevacizumab as second?line chemo?therapy for patients with m CRC. Patients with 20 years of age or older, histologically conirmed m CRC, Eastern Coop?erative Oncology Group performance status 0–2, adequate organ function, and disease progression or intolerance of the irst?line regimen will be eligible. Patients will be randomized(1:1) to receive standard FOLFIRI with or with?out bevacizumab(5 mg/kg on day 1), repeated every 2 weeks(FOLIRI arm) or XELIRI with or without bevacizumab(7.5 mg/kg on day 1), repeated every 3 weeks(XELIRI arm). A total of 464 events were estimated as necessary to show non?inferiority with a power of 80% at a one?sided α of 0.025, requiring a target sample size of 600 patients. The 95% conidence interval(CI) upper limit of the hazard ratio was pre?speciied as less than 1.3.Conclusion: The Asian XELIRI Projec T is a multinational phase III trial being conducted to provide evidence for XELIRI with or without bevacizumab as a second?line treatment option of mCRC.

Should capecitabine replace 5-fluorouracil in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer?

Fluoropyrimidines play a central role in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Our aim was to review whether capecitabine was a safer, non-inferior, economically superior and more convenient alternative to 5-fluorouracil. Capecitabine has previously been compared to 5-fluorouracil-either as a monotherapy or in combination with oxaliplatin, irinotecan, or biological drugs-and has been found to have comparable efficacy and safety profiles. Furthermore, pharmacoeconomic data and patients&#x02019; preferences for oral chemotherapy further favor capecitabine. Therefore, capecitabine appears to be an effective and safe alternative to fluorouracil in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.