Objective： Correct nutritional assessment is essential for leukemia patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation （HSCT）. This study aimed to investigate the best nutritional assessment method for leukemia...Objective： Correct nutritional assessment is essential for leukemia patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation （HSCT）. This study aimed to investigate the best nutritional assessment method for leukemia patients after HSCT, and find the possible nutritional risk of the patients during the transplantation process in order to intervene in the patients with nutritional risks and undernourished patients timely, so that the entire transplantation process could be successfully completed. Methods： A prospective study was performed in 108 leukemia patients after HSCT, and different nutritional assessment methods, including nutritional risk screening 2002 （NRS2002）, mini nutritional assessment （MNA）, subjective globe assessment （SGA） and malnutritional universal screening tools （MUST）, were used. The associations between nutritional status of these patients and nutritional assessment methods were analyzed. Results： A total of 108 patients completed SGA, and 99 patients completed NRS2002, MNA and MUST. During the treatment process, 85.2% of the patients lost weight, wherein, 50% lost weight greater than 5%, and 42.6% had significantly reduced food intake. For nutritional risk assessment, the positive rates of NRS2002, MNA and MUST were 100%, 74.7% and 63.6%, respectively. There was a significant difference （P〈0.05） among the positive rates of NRS2002, MNA and MUST. In undernutrition assessment, the positive rate of SGA （83.3%） was significantly higher than that of MNA （17.2%） （P〈0.05）, and the incidence rate of nutritional risk among leukemia patients _〈30 years old was greater than that of patients 〉30 years old （P〈0.05）. Conclusions： Patients with leukemia were in poor nutritional status during and after HSCT. The leukemia patients 〈30 years old had a greater incidence rate of nutritional risk. As nutritional risk screening tool, the specificity of NRS2002 is not high, but it can be used for evaluating nutritional deficiencies. MNA is a good nutritional risk screening tool, but not an adequate tool for nutritional assessment. If assessment of undernutrition is necessary, the combination of all these screening tools and clinical laboratory indicators should he applied to improve accuracy.展开更多
Quality of life for the elderly in an ageing society is receiving more attention than ever. After age 40, muscle mass loses at the rate of 3% to 8% every 10 years. More- over, the decline intensifies after 60 years ol...Quality of life for the elderly in an ageing society is receiving more attention than ever. After age 40, muscle mass loses at the rate of 3% to 8% every 10 years. More- over, the decline intensifies after 60 years old. Although many people do not experience changes in total body weight, their muscle mass is slowly replaced by body fat. Decreased muscle mass means lower muscle strength, which affects physical functioning. As a result, daily activities become con- strained, risks of fall and bone fracture elevated,展开更多
目的本研究采用主观评估(微型营养评估法与主观全面评估法)与客观指标结合的综合评估方法,初步探讨复方α酮酸制剂对于透析患者蛋白营养不良的治疗作用。方法选择上海交通大学附属第一人民医院透析中心血清白蛋白低于35g/L老年血液透析...目的本研究采用主观评估(微型营养评估法与主观全面评估法)与客观指标结合的综合评估方法,初步探讨复方α酮酸制剂对于透析患者蛋白营养不良的治疗作用。方法选择上海交通大学附属第一人民医院透析中心血清白蛋白低于35g/L老年血液透析及腹膜透析患者各24例,透析时间均大于一年,其中,血液透析组及腹膜透析组各设对照组12例。除对照组外,所有患者均服用开同6个月。营养评估采用综合评估法,即客观营养指标结合主观营养评估。客观指标包括:体重指数(BMI)、血白蛋白(Alb)、血前白蛋白和平均每日每公斤体重能量与蛋白质摄入(DEI、DPI)。主观评估采用了两种评分方法:即通用的主观全面评估法(Subject Global Assessment,SGA)与专门用于老年患者的微型营养评估法(Mini NutritionalAssessment,MNA),同时测定了患者饮食中的蛋白质与能量摄入情况。结果①伴营养不良的患者普遍存在SGA与MNA评分偏低,提示主客观的评估一致性较好;②与对照组相比,应用酮酸制剂治疗的透析患者3个月后,蛋白质与能量的摄入明显上升,虽体重指数改变不明显,但血清白蛋白水平明显升高,;治疗6个月以后,SGA评分、MNA评分明显上升;低血清白蛋白血症进一步改善,而蛋白质与能量的摄入未进一步增加,患者的体重指数BMI、透析充分性、C反应蛋白(CRP)、血脂改变仍不明显。结论复方酮酸制剂能够提高血清白蛋白水平,改善营养状况,微型营养评估法更适合老年透析患者的营养评估。展开更多
目的本研究的目的是研究不同的营养评估方法与维持性血液透析患者的预后的关系。方法对我院血液透析中心的83名患者进行营养评估,包括主观综合性营养评估(subjective global assessment,SGA)、营养不良-炎症评分(malnutrition inflammat...目的本研究的目的是研究不同的营养评估方法与维持性血液透析患者的预后的关系。方法对我院血液透析中心的83名患者进行营养评估,包括主观综合性营养评估(subjective global assessment,SGA)、营养不良-炎症评分(malnutrition inflammation score,MIS)和微型营养评定简表(mini nutrition assessment short form,MNA-SF)。同时收集基本资料、辅助检查结果。随访48月(40±13月),采用Kaplan-Meier以及Cox回归分析比较不同营养评估方法与患者全因死亡风险的差别。结果 Kaplan-Meier分析提示:SGA<25分患者的死亡风险较SGA≥25分患者高(P<0.05),MIS>10分组比MIS≤10分死亡风险高(P>0.05)。以MNA-SF分组,MNA-SF≥11分死亡风险低于NA-SF<11分(P>0.05)。多因素Cox回归分析提示,SGA及MIS不同分组仍然与维持性血液透析患者不同的全因死亡风险有关(P<0.05)。结论不同营养评估方法对于维持性血液透析患者长期生存的预测能力不同,SGA法以及MIS法所评价的营养状况与维持性血液透析患者长期的全因死亡风险有较好相关性。展开更多
文摘Objective： Correct nutritional assessment is essential for leukemia patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation （HSCT）. This study aimed to investigate the best nutritional assessment method for leukemia patients after HSCT, and find the possible nutritional risk of the patients during the transplantation process in order to intervene in the patients with nutritional risks and undernourished patients timely, so that the entire transplantation process could be successfully completed. Methods： A prospective study was performed in 108 leukemia patients after HSCT, and different nutritional assessment methods, including nutritional risk screening 2002 （NRS2002）, mini nutritional assessment （MNA）, subjective globe assessment （SGA） and malnutritional universal screening tools （MUST）, were used. The associations between nutritional status of these patients and nutritional assessment methods were analyzed. Results： A total of 108 patients completed SGA, and 99 patients completed NRS2002, MNA and MUST. During the treatment process, 85.2% of the patients lost weight, wherein, 50% lost weight greater than 5%, and 42.6% had significantly reduced food intake. For nutritional risk assessment, the positive rates of NRS2002, MNA and MUST were 100%, 74.7% and 63.6%, respectively. There was a significant difference （P〈0.05） among the positive rates of NRS2002, MNA and MUST. In undernutrition assessment, the positive rate of SGA （83.3%） was significantly higher than that of MNA （17.2%） （P〈0.05）, and the incidence rate of nutritional risk among leukemia patients _〈30 years old was greater than that of patients 〉30 years old （P〈0.05）. Conclusions： Patients with leukemia were in poor nutritional status during and after HSCT. The leukemia patients 〈30 years old had a greater incidence rate of nutritional risk. As nutritional risk screening tool, the specificity of NRS2002 is not high, but it can be used for evaluating nutritional deficiencies. MNA is a good nutritional risk screening tool, but not an adequate tool for nutritional assessment. If assessment of undernutrition is necessary, the combination of all these screening tools and clinical laboratory indicators should he applied to improve accuracy.
文摘Quality of life for the elderly in an ageing society is receiving more attention than ever. After age 40, muscle mass loses at the rate of 3% to 8% every 10 years. More- over, the decline intensifies after 60 years old. Although many people do not experience changes in total body weight, their muscle mass is slowly replaced by body fat. Decreased muscle mass means lower muscle strength, which affects physical functioning. As a result, daily activities become con- strained, risks of fall and bone fracture elevated,
文摘目的本研究采用主观评估(微型营养评估法与主观全面评估法)与客观指标结合的综合评估方法,初步探讨复方α酮酸制剂对于透析患者蛋白营养不良的治疗作用。方法选择上海交通大学附属第一人民医院透析中心血清白蛋白低于35g/L老年血液透析及腹膜透析患者各24例,透析时间均大于一年,其中,血液透析组及腹膜透析组各设对照组12例。除对照组外,所有患者均服用开同6个月。营养评估采用综合评估法,即客观营养指标结合主观营养评估。客观指标包括:体重指数(BMI)、血白蛋白(Alb)、血前白蛋白和平均每日每公斤体重能量与蛋白质摄入(DEI、DPI)。主观评估采用了两种评分方法:即通用的主观全面评估法(Subject Global Assessment,SGA)与专门用于老年患者的微型营养评估法(Mini NutritionalAssessment,MNA),同时测定了患者饮食中的蛋白质与能量摄入情况。结果①伴营养不良的患者普遍存在SGA与MNA评分偏低,提示主客观的评估一致性较好;②与对照组相比,应用酮酸制剂治疗的透析患者3个月后,蛋白质与能量的摄入明显上升,虽体重指数改变不明显,但血清白蛋白水平明显升高,;治疗6个月以后,SGA评分、MNA评分明显上升;低血清白蛋白血症进一步改善,而蛋白质与能量的摄入未进一步增加,患者的体重指数BMI、透析充分性、C反应蛋白(CRP)、血脂改变仍不明显。结论复方酮酸制剂能够提高血清白蛋白水平,改善营养状况,微型营养评估法更适合老年透析患者的营养评估。
文摘目的本研究的目的是研究不同的营养评估方法与维持性血液透析患者的预后的关系。方法对我院血液透析中心的83名患者进行营养评估,包括主观综合性营养评估(subjective global assessment,SGA)、营养不良-炎症评分(malnutrition inflammation score,MIS)和微型营养评定简表(mini nutrition assessment short form,MNA-SF)。同时收集基本资料、辅助检查结果。随访48月(40±13月),采用Kaplan-Meier以及Cox回归分析比较不同营养评估方法与患者全因死亡风险的差别。结果 Kaplan-Meier分析提示:SGA<25分患者的死亡风险较SGA≥25分患者高(P<0.05),MIS>10分组比MIS≤10分死亡风险高(P>0.05)。以MNA-SF分组,MNA-SF≥11分死亡风险低于NA-SF<11分(P>0.05)。多因素Cox回归分析提示,SGA及MIS不同分组仍然与维持性血液透析患者不同的全因死亡风险有关(P<0.05)。结论不同营养评估方法对于维持性血液透析患者长期生存的预测能力不同,SGA法以及MIS法所评价的营养状况与维持性血液透析患者长期的全因死亡风险有较好相关性。
