Regional economic vitality reflects the scale and development potential of a region’s economy.It largely determines the development of the city,and is also affected by many factors such as population competitiveness,...Regional economic vitality reflects the scale and development potential of a region’s economy.It largely determines the development of the city,and is also affected by many factors such as population competitiveness,corporate competitiveness,market vitality,innovation vitality,and environmental vitality.A pilot model was constructed with Hebei Province as the inspection area.Quantitative measurement of regional economic vitality was made by finding 21 indicators that indirectly or indirectly affect the economic vitality of Hebei Province.By analyzing the data of 21 indicators for nearly 10 years,the time series clustering is used to achieve the dimensionality reduction of the indicators.After the dimension reduction,it is divided into four categories:overall scale,development potential,market vitality,and innovation vitality.Construct the economic vitality structure model of Hebei Province,and determine the four types of contribution to economic vitality and compare them.On this basis,more accurately grasp the indicators that affect economic vitality and work out reasonable and effective action plans.From the perspective of human resources and corporate vitality,analyze how the action plan accurately affects the economic vitality of Hebei Province[1].The 11 cities in Hebei Province are the target of regional economic vitality.The economic vitality structure model constructed uses the required contribution value to select priority indicators.Finally,the six indicators of GPD,GPD growth rate,fiscal revenue,fiscal revenue growth rate,number of industrial enterprises above designated size,and total profit of industrial enterprises above designated size were established for eleven cities in Hebei Province to construct a TOPSIS scoring model,and calculation rankings were conducted through MATLAB.Results The top three cities were Shijiazhuang,Tangshan and Cangzhou.展开更多
The structural adjustment of China＇s economy requires the support of economic theories dedicated to structural issues. But new structural economics （NSE） is significantly different from old structural economics （...The structural adjustment of China＇s economy requires the support of economic theories dedicated to structural issues. But new structural economics （NSE） is significantly different from old structural economics （OSE） in terms of development strategies and policies. They expound on the paths of industrial structure improvement and steady economic growth for developing countries from two different perspectives, comparative advantage and first-mover advantage, which result in a toss-up. From the clashing theories and observations of the true state of Chinese economy, we can see that the core features of China＇s current economic structure are a cumulative result of the insufficient ＂complementary＂ and ＂inducing＂ roles of government investment, which requires the introduction of certain investment models to design an effective structural adjustment plan. From the perspective of investment priority, scope （public service or production）, motives, capacity and decision-making and multi-sectoral coordination, this paper analyzes the key connections between NSE and OSE and strives to design an appropriate and accurate investment plan from the perspective of stability, flexibility and under- pinning in the hope of resolving the issues facing the structural adjustment of the Chinese economy. The first step is to identify investment priorities and enable the market to play the decisive role and the government the guiding role. The second step is to identify crucial nodes and adapt investments to trends of the new industrial revolution. The third step is to focus on the resolution of livelihood issues to steer China out of the low-income trap and clear of the middle-income trap. Not only do investment variables have to become an instrument to continuously improve Chi- na＇s factor endowment structure, but also investment as a mechanism underpinning development has to be adopted throughout the entire duration of the process of reform to fulfill the goal of structural adjustment pursued by both NSE and OSE.展开更多
文摘Regional economic vitality reflects the scale and development potential of a region’s economy.It largely determines the development of the city,and is also affected by many factors such as population competitiveness,corporate competitiveness,market vitality,innovation vitality,and environmental vitality.A pilot model was constructed with Hebei Province as the inspection area.Quantitative measurement of regional economic vitality was made by finding 21 indicators that indirectly or indirectly affect the economic vitality of Hebei Province.By analyzing the data of 21 indicators for nearly 10 years,the time series clustering is used to achieve the dimensionality reduction of the indicators.After the dimension reduction,it is divided into four categories:overall scale,development potential,market vitality,and innovation vitality.Construct the economic vitality structure model of Hebei Province,and determine the four types of contribution to economic vitality and compare them.On this basis,more accurately grasp the indicators that affect economic vitality and work out reasonable and effective action plans.From the perspective of human resources and corporate vitality,analyze how the action plan accurately affects the economic vitality of Hebei Province[1].The 11 cities in Hebei Province are the target of regional economic vitality.The economic vitality structure model constructed uses the required contribution value to select priority indicators.Finally,the six indicators of GPD,GPD growth rate,fiscal revenue,fiscal revenue growth rate,number of industrial enterprises above designated size,and total profit of industrial enterprises above designated size were established for eleven cities in Hebei Province to construct a TOPSIS scoring model,and calculation rankings were conducted through MATLAB.Results The top three cities were Shijiazhuang,Tangshan and Cangzhou.
文摘The structural adjustment of China＇s economy requires the support of economic theories dedicated to structural issues. But new structural economics （NSE） is significantly different from old structural economics （OSE） in terms of development strategies and policies. They expound on the paths of industrial structure improvement and steady economic growth for developing countries from two different perspectives, comparative advantage and first-mover advantage, which result in a toss-up. From the clashing theories and observations of the true state of Chinese economy, we can see that the core features of China＇s current economic structure are a cumulative result of the insufficient ＂complementary＂ and ＂inducing＂ roles of government investment, which requires the introduction of certain investment models to design an effective structural adjustment plan. From the perspective of investment priority, scope （public service or production）, motives, capacity and decision-making and multi-sectoral coordination, this paper analyzes the key connections between NSE and OSE and strives to design an appropriate and accurate investment plan from the perspective of stability, flexibility and under- pinning in the hope of resolving the issues facing the structural adjustment of the Chinese economy. The first step is to identify investment priorities and enable the market to play the decisive role and the government the guiding role. The second step is to identify crucial nodes and adapt investments to trends of the new industrial revolution. The third step is to focus on the resolution of livelihood issues to steer China out of the low-income trap and clear of the middle-income trap. Not only do investment variables have to become an instrument to continuously improve Chi- na＇s factor endowment structure, but also investment as a mechanism underpinning development has to be adopted throughout the entire duration of the process of reform to fulfill the goal of structural adjustment pursued by both NSE and OSE.
