目前,煤矿使用的工程专题地图基本都是CAD制图,高效提取CAD图件中的数据并快速组织成地理信息系统(GIS)服务,进而支持矿井空间对象创建和业务属性扩展,集成安全生产实时数据,是构建煤矿GIS一张图的关键。基于ArcGIS平台将CAD图件转为GI...目前,煤矿使用的工程专题地图基本都是CAD制图,高效提取CAD图件中的数据并快速组织成地理信息系统(GIS)服务,进而支持矿井空间对象创建和业务属性扩展,集成安全生产实时数据,是构建煤矿GIS一张图的关键。基于ArcGIS平台将CAD图件转为GIS服务的方法实现过程较为繁琐,且ArcGIS平台成本较高,无法较好地跨平台运行。针对该问题,设计了一种煤矿GIS一张图快速构建平台。该平台包括CAD图件管理、地图服务发布、专题地图管理3大功能模块:CAD图件管理模块用于图件基础信息管理和状态跟踪,地图服务发布模块用于地图打包发布和在线预览,专题地图管理模块用于地图服务管理、矿井对象创建及属性扩展。基于开放设计联盟(ODA)的Teigha for Java SDK实现CAD图件全要素精确识别与快速准确提取;通过构建基于GIS数据特征的煤矿CAD图件数据分层描述模型,实现了CAD图件全要素数据快速存储;按照面向对象设计思路,开发了Spring Cloud框架下的Web端煤矿CAD图件数据集存储接口及专题地图服务发布平台,实现了煤矿GIS一张图快速构建。以某煤矿采掘工程平面图为例,分别采用传统方法和快速构建平台进行煤矿GIS一张图的构建,对比结果表明,快速构建平台可大幅提高煤矿GIS一张图的构建效率,为煤矿智能化建设提供时空数字底座。展开更多
Purpose: This study aims to present the key systemic changes in the Polish book evaluation model to focus on the publisher list, as inspired by the Norwegian Model. Design/methodology/approach: In this study we recons...Purpose: This study aims to present the key systemic changes in the Polish book evaluation model to focus on the publisher list, as inspired by the Norwegian Model. Design/methodology/approach: In this study we reconstruct the framework of the 2010 and 2018 models of book evaluation in Poland within the performance-based research funding system. Findings: For almost 20 years the book evaluation system in Poland has been based on the verification of various technical criteria(e.g. length of the book). The new 2018 model is based on the principle of prestige inheritance(a book is worth as much as its publisher is) and is inspired by the publisher list used in the Norwegian Model. In this paper, we argue that this solution may be a more balanced policy instrument than the previous 2010 model in which neither the quality of the publisher nor the quality of the book played any role in the evaluation.Research limitations: We work from the framework of the 2018 model of book evaluation specified in the law on higher education and science from 20 July 2018, as implementation acts are not available yet. Practical implications: This study may provide a valuable point of reference on how structural reforms in the research evaluation model were implemented on a country level. The results of this study may be interesting to policy makers, stakeholders and researchers focused on science policy. Originality/value: This is the very first study that presents the new framework of the Polish research evaluation model and policy instruments for scholarly book evaluation. We describe what motivated policy makers to change the book evaluation model, and what arguments were explicitly raised to argue for the new solution.展开更多
With the increasing prevalence of social networks, more and more social network data are published for many applications, such as social network analysis and data mining. However, this brings privacy problems. For exa...With the increasing prevalence of social networks, more and more social network data are published for many applications, such as social network analysis and data mining. However, this brings privacy problems. For example, adversaries can get sensitive information of some individuals easily with little background knowledge. How to publish social network data for analysis purpose while preserving the privacy of individuals has raised many concerns. Many algorithms have been proposed to address this issue. In this paper, we discuss this privacy problem from two aspects： attack models and countermeasures. We analyse privacy conceres, model the background knowledge that adversary may utilize and review the recently developed attack models. We then survey the state-of-the-art privacy preserving methods in two categories： anonymization methods and differential privacy methods. We also provide research directions in this area.展开更多
The "Norwegian Model" attempts to comprehensively cover all the peer-reviewed scholarly literatures in all areas of research in one single weighted indicator. Thereby, scientific production is made comparabl...The "Norwegian Model" attempts to comprehensively cover all the peer-reviewed scholarly literatures in all areas of research in one single weighted indicator. Thereby, scientific production is made comparable across departments and faculties within and between research institutions, and the indicator may serve institutional evaluation and funding. This article describes the motivation for creating the model in Norway, how it was designed, organized and implemented, as well as the effects and experiences with the model. The article ends with an overview of a new type of bibliometric studies that are based on the type of comprehensive national publication data that the Norwegian Model provides.展开更多
文摘目前,煤矿使用的工程专题地图基本都是CAD制图,高效提取CAD图件中的数据并快速组织成地理信息系统(GIS)服务,进而支持矿井空间对象创建和业务属性扩展,集成安全生产实时数据,是构建煤矿GIS一张图的关键。基于ArcGIS平台将CAD图件转为GIS服务的方法实现过程较为繁琐,且ArcGIS平台成本较高,无法较好地跨平台运行。针对该问题,设计了一种煤矿GIS一张图快速构建平台。该平台包括CAD图件管理、地图服务发布、专题地图管理3大功能模块:CAD图件管理模块用于图件基础信息管理和状态跟踪,地图服务发布模块用于地图打包发布和在线预览,专题地图管理模块用于地图服务管理、矿井对象创建及属性扩展。基于开放设计联盟(ODA)的Teigha for Java SDK实现CAD图件全要素精确识别与快速准确提取;通过构建基于GIS数据特征的煤矿CAD图件数据分层描述模型,实现了CAD图件全要素数据快速存储;按照面向对象设计思路,开发了Spring Cloud框架下的Web端煤矿CAD图件数据集存储接口及专题地图服务发布平台,实现了煤矿GIS一张图快速构建。以某煤矿采掘工程平面图为例,分别采用传统方法和快速构建平台进行煤矿GIS一张图的构建,对比结果表明,快速构建平台可大幅提高煤矿GIS一张图的构建效率,为煤矿智能化建设提供时空数字底座。
基金supported by the DIALOG Program[grant name“Research into Excellence Patterns in Science and Art”]financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland
文摘Purpose: This study aims to present the key systemic changes in the Polish book evaluation model to focus on the publisher list, as inspired by the Norwegian Model. Design/methodology/approach: In this study we reconstruct the framework of the 2010 and 2018 models of book evaluation in Poland within the performance-based research funding system. Findings: For almost 20 years the book evaluation system in Poland has been based on the verification of various technical criteria(e.g. length of the book). The new 2018 model is based on the principle of prestige inheritance(a book is worth as much as its publisher is) and is inspired by the publisher list used in the Norwegian Model. In this paper, we argue that this solution may be a more balanced policy instrument than the previous 2010 model in which neither the quality of the publisher nor the quality of the book played any role in the evaluation.Research limitations: We work from the framework of the 2018 model of book evaluation specified in the law on higher education and science from 20 July 2018, as implementation acts are not available yet. Practical implications: This study may provide a valuable point of reference on how structural reforms in the research evaluation model were implemented on a country level. The results of this study may be interesting to policy makers, stakeholders and researchers focused on science policy. Originality/value: This is the very first study that presents the new framework of the Polish research evaluation model and policy instruments for scholarly book evaluation. We describe what motivated policy makers to change the book evaluation model, and what arguments were explicitly raised to argue for the new solution.
文摘With the increasing prevalence of social networks, more and more social network data are published for many applications, such as social network analysis and data mining. However, this brings privacy problems. For example, adversaries can get sensitive information of some individuals easily with little background knowledge. How to publish social network data for analysis purpose while preserving the privacy of individuals has raised many concerns. Many algorithms have been proposed to address this issue. In this paper, we discuss this privacy problem from two aspects： attack models and countermeasures. We analyse privacy conceres, model the background knowledge that adversary may utilize and review the recently developed attack models. We then survey the state-of-the-art privacy preserving methods in two categories： anonymization methods and differential privacy methods. We also provide research directions in this area.
文摘The "Norwegian Model" attempts to comprehensively cover all the peer-reviewed scholarly literatures in all areas of research in one single weighted indicator. Thereby, scientific production is made comparable across departments and faculties within and between research institutions, and the indicator may serve institutional evaluation and funding. This article describes the motivation for creating the model in Norway, how it was designed, organized and implemented, as well as the effects and experiences with the model. The article ends with an overview of a new type of bibliometric studies that are based on the type of comprehensive national publication data that the Norwegian Model provides.
