Background:Technical advances in radiotherapy delivery have simultaneously enabled dose escalation and enhanced bladder and rectal sparing.However,the optimal radiation fractionation regimen for localized prostate can...Background:Technical advances in radiotherapy delivery have simultaneously enabled dose escalation and enhanced bladder and rectal sparing.However,the optimal radiation fractionation regimen for localized prostate cancer is unclear.Laboratory and clinical evidence suggest that hypofractionation may improve the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy.We report our institutional outcomes using moderately hypofractionated,intensity-modulated radio-therapy(IMRT),and an endorectal balloon,with emphasis on long-term biochemical control and treatment-related adverse events in patients with localized prostate cancer.Methods:Between January 1997 and April 2004,596 patients with cT1-T3 prostate cancer underwent IMRT using a moderate hypofractionation regimen(76.70 Gy at 2.19 Gy/fraction)with an endorectal balloon.Using D’Amico clas-sification,226(37.9%),264(44.3%),and 106(17.8%)patients had low-,intermediate-,or high-risk disease,respectively.The majority of intermediate-and high-risk patients received androgen deprivation therapy.Biochemical relapse-free survival(bRFS)was evaluated using 2005 Phoenix criteria and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results:The median follow-up was 62 months.Overall 5-and 10-year bRFS rates were 92.7%and 87.7%.For low-,intermediate-,and high-risk patients,the 5-year bRFS rates were 96.9%,93.3%,and 82.0%,respectively;the 10-year bRFS rates were 91.4%,89.3%,and 76.2%,respectively.Prostate-specific antigen,Gleason score,and T stage were significant predictors of bRFS(all P<0.01).The 5-year rates of severe(≥Grade 3)adverse events were very low:1.2%for gastrointestinal events and 1.1%for genitourinary events.Conclusions:Long-term outcomes after moderately hypofractionated IMRT are encouraging.Moderate hypofrac-tionation represents a safe,efficacious,alternative regimen in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.展开更多
Objectives: In 1997, a study was launched to investigate the treatment of early prostate cancer. Using a patient preference design, health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) and disease specific HRQOL was assessed prospe...Objectives: In 1997, a study was launched to investigate the treatment of early prostate cancer. Using a patient preference design, health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) and disease specific HRQOL was assessed prospectively to compare men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP), hypo-fractionated conformal radiotherapy (CRT) or brachytherapy (BT). Methods: Patients with localised prostate cancer were counselled by a urological surgeon, clinical oncologist and specialist uro-oncology nurse. Patients received treatment according to individual preference. 430 men chose and received RP (n = 217), CRT (n = 161) and BT (n = 52). 354 (82%) completed pre-treatment RAND 36-Item Short-Form Health survey version-2 (SF36v2) and University of California, Los Angeles Prostate cancer index (UCLA-PCI) questionnaires. HRQOL score changes from baseline to 24 months were compared using Kruskall-Wallis test. Results: Pre-treatment, the CRT cohort scored lower for physical function (p = 0.0029) and general health perception (p = 0.0021). The BT cohort reported better baseline scores for urinary function (p = 0.0291), urinary bother (p = 0.0030), sexual function (p = 0.0009) and bowel bother (p = 0.0063). At 24 months, bowel function was similar for CRT and BT but both modalities were worse than RP (p = 0.0010). Urinary continence deteriorated most following RP (p < 0.0001) but BT had worse urinary bother (p = 0.0153). Sexual function deteriorated most following RP and BT (p < 0.0005). Percentages of patients achieving erections adequate for sexual activity (from baseline to 24 months) were 66% to 29% for RP, 62% to 49% for CRT and 88% to 65% for BT. Conclusion: This data demonstrates significant differences in disease specific quality-of-life between RP, CRT and BT and should be available for men with early prostate cancer making treatment decisions.展开更多
文摘Background:Technical advances in radiotherapy delivery have simultaneously enabled dose escalation and enhanced bladder and rectal sparing.However,the optimal radiation fractionation regimen for localized prostate cancer is unclear.Laboratory and clinical evidence suggest that hypofractionation may improve the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy.We report our institutional outcomes using moderately hypofractionated,intensity-modulated radio-therapy(IMRT),and an endorectal balloon,with emphasis on long-term biochemical control and treatment-related adverse events in patients with localized prostate cancer.Methods:Between January 1997 and April 2004,596 patients with cT1-T3 prostate cancer underwent IMRT using a moderate hypofractionation regimen(76.70 Gy at 2.19 Gy/fraction)with an endorectal balloon.Using D’Amico clas-sification,226(37.9%),264(44.3%),and 106(17.8%)patients had low-,intermediate-,or high-risk disease,respectively.The majority of intermediate-and high-risk patients received androgen deprivation therapy.Biochemical relapse-free survival(bRFS)was evaluated using 2005 Phoenix criteria and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results:The median follow-up was 62 months.Overall 5-and 10-year bRFS rates were 92.7%and 87.7%.For low-,intermediate-,and high-risk patients,the 5-year bRFS rates were 96.9%,93.3%,and 82.0%,respectively;the 10-year bRFS rates were 91.4%,89.3%,and 76.2%,respectively.Prostate-specific antigen,Gleason score,and T stage were significant predictors of bRFS(all P<0.01).The 5-year rates of severe(≥Grade 3)adverse events were very low:1.2%for gastrointestinal events and 1.1%for genitourinary events.Conclusions:Long-term outcomes after moderately hypofractionated IMRT are encouraging.Moderate hypofrac-tionation represents a safe,efficacious,alternative regimen in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.
文摘Objectives: In 1997, a study was launched to investigate the treatment of early prostate cancer. Using a patient preference design, health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) and disease specific HRQOL was assessed prospectively to compare men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP), hypo-fractionated conformal radiotherapy (CRT) or brachytherapy (BT). Methods: Patients with localised prostate cancer were counselled by a urological surgeon, clinical oncologist and specialist uro-oncology nurse. Patients received treatment according to individual preference. 430 men chose and received RP (n = 217), CRT (n = 161) and BT (n = 52). 354 (82%) completed pre-treatment RAND 36-Item Short-Form Health survey version-2 (SF36v2) and University of California, Los Angeles Prostate cancer index (UCLA-PCI) questionnaires. HRQOL score changes from baseline to 24 months were compared using Kruskall-Wallis test. Results: Pre-treatment, the CRT cohort scored lower for physical function (p = 0.0029) and general health perception (p = 0.0021). The BT cohort reported better baseline scores for urinary function (p = 0.0291), urinary bother (p = 0.0030), sexual function (p = 0.0009) and bowel bother (p = 0.0063). At 24 months, bowel function was similar for CRT and BT but both modalities were worse than RP (p = 0.0010). Urinary continence deteriorated most following RP (p < 0.0001) but BT had worse urinary bother (p = 0.0153). Sexual function deteriorated most following RP and BT (p < 0.0005). Percentages of patients achieving erections adequate for sexual activity (from baseline to 24 months) were 66% to 29% for RP, 62% to 49% for CRT and 88% to 65% for BT. Conclusion: This data demonstrates significant differences in disease specific quality-of-life between RP, CRT and BT and should be available for men with early prostate cancer making treatment decisions.
