文章通过化学镀法成功制备了Ni-P催化剂,并考察了施镀温度以及还原剂浓度对硼氢化钠水解制氢性能的影响。结果表明:试验中Ni-P催化剂的最优制备条件为施镀温度为50℃,还原剂浓度为0.8 mol/L;此条件下制备的Ni-P催化剂催化硼氢化钠水解...文章通过化学镀法成功制备了Ni-P催化剂,并考察了施镀温度以及还原剂浓度对硼氢化钠水解制氢性能的影响。结果表明:试验中Ni-P催化剂的最优制备条件为施镀温度为50℃,还原剂浓度为0.8 mol/L;此条件下制备的Ni-P催化剂催化硼氢化钠水解放氢的速率为639.7 m L/(min·g),活化能为44.5 k J/mol。展开更多
The metal–support interactions induced by high-temperature hydrogen reduction have a strong influence on the catalytic performance of ceria-supported Ru catalysts. However, the appearance of the strong metal–support...The metal–support interactions induced by high-temperature hydrogen reduction have a strong influence on the catalytic performance of ceria-supported Ru catalysts. However, the appearance of the strong metal–support interaction leads to covering of the Ru species by Ce suboxides, which is detrimental to the ammonia synthesis reaction that requires metallic species as active sites. In the present work, the interaction between Ru and ceria in the Ru/CeO_(2) catalyst was induced by NaBH_(4) treatment. NaBH_(4) treatment enhanced the fraction of metallic Ru, proportion of Ce^(3+), content of exposed Ru species, and amount of surface oxygen species. As a result, a larger amount of hydrogen species would desorb by the H_(2)-formation pathway and the strength of hydrogen adsorption would be weaker, weakening the inhibition effect of the hydrogen species on ammonia synthesis. In addition, the strong electronic metal–support interaction aids in nitrogen dissociation. Consequently, Ru/CeO_(2) with NaBH_(4) treatment showed higher ammonia synthesis rates than that with only hydrogen reduction.展开更多
文摘文章通过化学镀法成功制备了Ni-P催化剂,并考察了施镀温度以及还原剂浓度对硼氢化钠水解制氢性能的影响。结果表明:试验中Ni-P催化剂的最优制备条件为施镀温度为50℃,还原剂浓度为0.8 mol/L;此条件下制备的Ni-P催化剂催化硼氢化钠水解放氢的速率为639.7 m L/(min·g),活化能为44.5 k J/mol。
基金financially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21776047, 21825801, 21978051)the Program for Qishan Scholar of Fuzhou University (Grant XRC18033)。
文摘The metal–support interactions induced by high-temperature hydrogen reduction have a strong influence on the catalytic performance of ceria-supported Ru catalysts. However, the appearance of the strong metal–support interaction leads to covering of the Ru species by Ce suboxides, which is detrimental to the ammonia synthesis reaction that requires metallic species as active sites. In the present work, the interaction between Ru and ceria in the Ru/CeO_(2) catalyst was induced by NaBH_(4) treatment. NaBH_(4) treatment enhanced the fraction of metallic Ru, proportion of Ce^(3+), content of exposed Ru species, and amount of surface oxygen species. As a result, a larger amount of hydrogen species would desorb by the H_(2)-formation pathway and the strength of hydrogen adsorption would be weaker, weakening the inhibition effect of the hydrogen species on ammonia synthesis. In addition, the strong electronic metal–support interaction aids in nitrogen dissociation. Consequently, Ru/CeO_(2) with NaBH_(4) treatment showed higher ammonia synthesis rates than that with only hydrogen reduction.