TRIANGLE operation,combined with adequate adjuvant chemotherapy,can improve the prognosis of pancreatic head cancer:A retrospective study

BACKGROUND The TRIANGLE operation involves the removal of all tissues within the triangle bounded by the portal vein-superior mesenteric vein,celiac axis-common hepatic artery,and superior mesenteric artery to improve patient prognosis.Although previously promising in patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC),data are limited regarding the long-term oncological outcomes of the TRIANGLE operation among resectable PDAC patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD).AIM To evaluate the safety of the TRIANGLE operation during PD and the prognosis in patients with resectable PDAC.METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent PD for pancreatic head cancer between January 2017 and April 2023,with or without the TRIANGLE operation.Patients were divided into the PD_(TRIANGLE)and PD_(non-TRIANGLE)groups.Surgical and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups.Adequate adjuvant chemotherapy was defined as adjuvant chemotherapy≥6 months.RESULTS The PD_(TRIANGLE)and PD_(non-TRIANGLE) groups included 52 and 55 patients,respectively.There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics or perioperative indexes between the two groups.Furthermore,the recurrence rate was lower in the PD_(TRIANGLE) group than in the PD_(non-TRIANGLE) group(48.1%vs 81.8%,P<0.001),and the local recurrence rate of PDAC decreased from 37.8%to 16.0%.Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that PD_(TRIANGLE)(HR=0.424;95%CI:0.256-0.702;P=0.001),adequate adjuvant chemotherapy≥6 months(HR=0.370;95%CI:0.222-0.618;P<0.001)and margin status(HR=2.255;95%CI:1.252-4.064;P=0.007)were found to be independent factors for the recurrence rate.CONCLUSION The TRIANGLE operation is safe for PDAC patients undergoing PD.Moreover,it reduces the local recurrence rate of PDAC and may improve survival in patients who receive adequate adjuvant chemotherapy.

Optimal extent of lymphadenectomy improves prognosis and guides adjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal cancer: A propensity scorematched analysis

BACKGROUND The optimal extent of lymphadenectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC)patients remained debatable.AIM To explore the ideal number of cleared lymph nodes in ESCC patients undergoing upfront surgery.METHODS In this retrospective,propensity score-matched study,we included 1042 ESCC patients who underwent esophagectomy from November 2008 and October 2019.Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy were excluded.We collected pa-tients’clinicopathological features and information regarding lymph nodes,in-cluding the total number of resected lymph nodes(NRLN),and pathologically diagnosed positive lymph nodes(RPLN).SPSS and R software were used for statistical analysis.RESULTS Among the included 1042 patients,two cohorts:≤21(n=664)and>21 NRLN(n=378)were identified.The final prognostic model included four variables:T stage,N,venous thrombus,and the number of removed lymph nodes.Among them,NRLN>21 was determined as an independent prognosticator after surgery for esophageal cancer(hazards regression=0.66,95%confidence interval:0.50-0.87,P=0.004).A nomogram was created based on the regression coefficients of the variables in the final model.In the training cohort,the predictive model dis-played an uncorrected five-year overall survival C-index of 0.659,with a bootstrap-corrected C-index of 0.654.In the subgroup analysis,adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial in the subgroup with NRLN>21 and RPLN≤0.16 and NRLN≤21 and RPLN>0.16.CONCLUSION NRLN>21 was an independent prognostic factor after ESCC surgery.The combination of NRLN and RPLN may provide a reference for adjuvant chemotherapy use in potential beneficiaries.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for isolated resectable colorectal lung metastasis: A retrospective study using inverse probability treatment weighting propensity analysis

BACKGROUND The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy(ACT)for patients with no evidence of disease after pulmonary metastasis resection(PM)from colorectal cancer(CRC)remains controversial.AIM To assess the efficacy of ACT in patients after PM resection for CRC.METHODS This study included 96 patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC at a single institution between April 2008 and July 2023.The primary end-point was overall survival(OS);secondary endpoints included cancer-specific survival(CSS)and disease-free survival(DFS).An inverse probability of treat-ment-weighting(IPTW)analysis was conducted to address indication bias.Sur-vival outcomes compared using Kaplan-Meier curves,log-rank test,Cox regre-ssion and confirmed by propensity score-matching(PSM).RESULTS With a median follow-up of 27.5 months(range,18.3-50.4 months),the 5-year OS,CSS and DFS were 72.0%,74.4%and 51.3%,respectively.ACT had no significant effect on OS after PM resection from CRC[original cohort:P=0.08;IPTW:P=0.15].No differences were observed for CSS(P=0.12)and DFS(P=0.68)between the ACT and non-ACT groups.Multivariate analysis showed no association of ACT with better survival,while sublobar resection(HR=0.45;95%CI:0.20-1.00,P=0.049)and longer disease-free interval(HR=0.45;95%CI:0.20-0.98,P=0.044)were associated with improved survival.CONCLUSION ACT does not improve survival after PM resection for CRC.Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the optimal ACT regimen and duration.

Predictors of disease recurrence after radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIb-IIIa squamous cell lung cancer:A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND Lung cancer(LC)is a global medical,social and economic problem and is one of the most common cancers and the leading cause of mortality from malignant neoplasms.LC is characterized by an aggressive course,and in the presence of disease recurrence risk factors,patients,even at an early stage,may be indicated for adjuvant therapy to improve survival.However,combined treatment does not always guarantee a favorable prognosis.In this regard,establishing predictors of LC recurrence is highly important both for determining the optimal treatment plan for the patients and for evaluating its effectiveness.AIM To establish predictors of disease recurrence after radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIb-IIIa lung squamous cell carcinoma(LSCC).METHODS A retrospective case-control cohort study included 69 patients with LSCC who underwent radical surgery at the Orenburg Regional Clinical Oncology Center from 2009 to 2018.Postoperatively,all patients received adjuvant chemotherapy.Histological samples of the resected lung were stained with Mayer's hematoxylin and eosin and examined under a light microscope.Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictors associated with the risk of disease recurrence.Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to discriminate between patients with a high risk of disease recurrence and those with a low risk of disease recurrence.Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves between patient subgroups.Differences were considered to be significant at P<0.05.RESULTS The following predictors of a high risk of disease recurrence in patients with stage IIb-IIa LSCC were established:a low degree of tumor differentiation[odds ratio(OR)=7.94,95%CI=1.08-135.81,P=0.049];metastases in regional lymph nodes(OR=5.67,95%CI=1.09-36.54,P=0.048);the presence of loose,fine-fiber connective tissue in the tumor stroma(OR=21.70,95%CI=4.27-110.38,P=0.0002);and fragmentation of the tumor solid component(OR=2.53,95%CI=1.01-12.23,P=0.049).The area under the curve of the predictive model was 0.846(95%CI=0.73-0.96,P<0.0001).The sensitivity,accuracy and specificity of the method were 91.8%,86.9%and 75.0%,respectively.In the group of patients with a low risk of LSCC recurrence,the 1-,2-and 5-year disease-free survival(DFS)rates were 84.2%,84.2%and 75.8%,respectively,while in the group with a high risk of LSCC recurrence the DFS rates were 71.7%,40.1%and 8.2%,respectively(P<0.00001).Accordingly,in the first group of patients,the 1-,2-and 5-year overall survival(OS)rates were 94.7%,82.5%and 82.5%,respectively,while in the second group of patients,the OS rates were 89.8%,80.1%and 10.3%,respectively(P<0.00001).CONCLUSION The developed method allows us to identify a group of patients at high risk of disease recurrence and to adjust to ongoing treatment.

Clinical,pathological,and adjuvant chemotherapy use differences among microsatellite unstable and microsatellite stable colon cancers

Background:Colon cancers are categorized into mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite unstable(MSI-H)and mismatch repair proficient/microsatellite stable(MSS)cancers.This study aims to compare the disease char-acteristics and trends in the utilization of cancer therapies across different age groups and stages in these two groups.Methods:MSI-H and MSS colon adenocarcinomas from 2010 to 2016 were identified using the National Can-cer Database.We compared patient and disease characteristics between the two groups and evaluated the use of adjuvant chemotherapy across age groups and cancer stages.Within MSI-H and MSS groups,we conducted a land-mark analysis after propensity score matching for adjuvant chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy to determine its effect on survival.Results:Of the 542,368 patients that met inclusion criteria,120,751(22%)had mismatch repair results avail-able-out of these 96,928(80%)had MSS colon cancers while 23,823(19.7%)had MSI-H cancers.MSI-H disease had a bimodal age distribution(<40 years=22%;≥75 years=26%)and was frequent among females(22%)and non-Hispanic Whites(20%).Among those<65 years,15%of low-risk stage 2 MSI-H patients and 40%of high-risk stage 2 MSI-H patients received adjuvant chemotherapy.More than two-thirds of stage 3 patients<65 years received adjuvant chemotherapy in both groups.After conducting propensity-score matching for age,gender,and co-morbidities,we found that adjuvant chemotherapy use had a trend towards lower overall survival(OS)in low-risk stage 2 MSI-H(HR=1.8[95%CI,0.8-4.02])and high-risk stage 2 MSI-H(HR=1.42[95%CI,0.96-2.12])groups.Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved OS in stage 3 colon cancer patients irrespective of microsatellite status or risk category of disease.Conclusions:MSI-H colon cancer had bimodal age distribution.Among stage 2 MSI-H patients<65 years,a notable proportion received adjuvant chemotherapy.Among MSI-H stage 2 patients,adjuvant chemotherapy use was associated with lower survival while it significantly improved survival for stage 3 patients,irrespective of MSI status.

Role of Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is a tumour characterized by the production of osteoid by malignant cells. The incidence is approximately 1 to 3 million/year. The incidence is slightly higher in males. Onset can occur at any age;however, primary high grade osteosarcoma usually occurs in the second decade of life. Historically patients with osteosarcoma were treated with immediate wide or radical amputation. Despite the treatment, 80% patients with apparently isolated disease died of distant metastases. In recent years the number of patients with osteosarcoma of the limb treated by amputation + chemotherapy has increased. In our study, we divided the patients into two groups. One group (A) was treated with amputation + adjuvant chemotherapy. The other group (B) was treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy + amputation followed by adjuvant-chemotherapy. In our study, the margin negativity in post surgical specimen was significantly higher (P-value 0.0007) for the group treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Local recurrence in the group treated without neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly more (P-value 0.0005).The systemic recurrence at the end of 6 months was higher the group treated without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P-value 0.0169).However systemic recurrence between 6 months -1 year and 1 year - 2 years were not significant(P-values 0.1501 and 0.4902). From the above figures it may be concluded that treatment with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy + amputation + adjuvant chemotherapy had definite advantages over upfront amputation + adjuvant chemotherapy.)

Survival benefit of adjuvant treatment for ampullary cancer with lymph nodal involvement:A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:The efficacy of adjuvant treatment(AT)in ampullary cancer(AmC)remains controversial.This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the role of AT for AmC.Data sources:A comprehensive systematic search was performed in PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Library,and Web of Science databases.Studies comparing overall survival(OS)and recurrence-free survival(RFS)of patients who underwent AT or not following AmC resection were included.Results:A total of 3971 patients in 21 studies were analyzed.Overall pooled data showed no significant difference in effect on the OS by AT[hazard ratio(HR)=0.998,95%confidence interval(CI):0.768–1.297].No significant difference in recurrence between the AT and non-AT(nAT)groups was noted(HR=1.158,95%CI:0.764–1.755).In subgroup analysis,patients who received AT showed favorable outcomes in the OS compared with those who received nAT in nodal-positive AmC(HR=0.627,95%CI:0.451–0.870).Neither AT consisted of adjuvant chemotherapy with radiotherapy(HR=0.804,95%CI:0.563–1.149)nor AT with adjuvant chemotherapy(HR=0.883,95%CI:0.642–1.214)showed any significant effect on the OS.Conclusions:The effect of AT in AmC on survival and recurrence did not show a significant benefit.Furthermore,effectiveness according to AT strategies did not show enhancement in survival.AT had an advantage in survival compared with nAT strategy in nodal-positive AmC.In cases of AmC with positive lymph nodal involvement,AT may be warranted regardless of detailed strategies.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colorectal cancermetastases:literature review and meta-analysis

Surgical resection is the only option of cure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(CRC). However, the risk of recurrence within 18 mo after metastasectomy is around 75% and the liver is the most frequent site of relapse. The current international guidelines recommend an adjuvant therapy after surgical resection of CRC metastases despite the lower level of evidence(based on the quality of studies in this setting). However, there is still no standard treatment and the effective role of an adjuvant therapy remains controversial. The aim of this review is to report the state-of-art of systemic chemotherapy and regional chemotherapy with hepatic arterial infusion in the management of patients after resection of metastases from CRC, with a literature review and meta-analysis of the relevant randomized controlled trials.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin in lymph node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Objective： No standard postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy has ever been established in node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma （ESCC）. This is a study to explore the effect of postoperative paelitaxel （PTX） and cisplatin （DDP） in lymph node-positive, completely resected thoracic ESCC patients. Methods： We conducted a prospective phase II trial. Patients had pathologically node-positive thoracic ESCC with negative margins. Outcomes of disease-free survival （DFS） and overall survival （OS） were compared with a matched historical control cohort. The postoperative chemotherapy regimen consisted of 4 to 6 cycles of PTX 150 mg/m2 administered intravenously on d 1 followed by DDP 50 mg/m2 on d 2 every 14 d. Results： Forty-three patients were accrued from December 2007 to May 2012 at Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences for adjuvant chemotherapy. The historical control group consisted of 80 patients who received complete resection but no adjuvant chemotherapy during the same period of time. Of the 43 patients with adjuvant chemotherapy, 37 （86.0%） patients completed 4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy. The 3-year DFS rates were 56.3% in the adjuvant group and 34.6% in the control group （P=0.006）. The 3-year OS rates were 55.0% in the adjuvant group and 37.5% in the control group （P=0.013）. Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative chemotherapy was the significant predictor for improved OS （P=0.005）. Conclusions： Biweekly adjuvant PTX and DDP might improve 3-year DFS and OS in lymph node-positive, curatively resected thoracic ESCC patients. These conclusions warrant further study in randomized phase III clinical trials.

Oxaliplatin plus S-1 or capecitabine as neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer with D2lymphadenectomy: 5-year follow-up results of a phase II-III randomized trial

Objective： To compare the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy （NACT） with adjuvant chemotherapy （ACT） using oxaliplatin plus S-1 （sex） or capecitabine （CapeOX） on gastric cancer patients with D2 lymphadenectomy. Methods： This was a two-by-two factorial randomized phase Ⅱ-Ⅲ trial, and registered on ISRCTN registry （No. ISRCTN12206108）. Locally advanced gastric cancer patients were randomized to neoadjuvant sex, neoadjuvant CapeOX, adjuvant sex, or adjuvant CapeOX arms. Primary analysis was performed on an intention- to-treat （ITT） basis using overall survival （OS） as primary endpoint. Results： This trial started in September 2011 and closed in December 2012 with 100 patients enrolled. Treatment completion rate was 56%, 52%, 38% and 30% in the four arms, respectively. NACT group had fewer dropouts due to unacceptable toxicity （P=0.042）. Surgical complication rate did not differ by the four groups （P=0.986）. No survival signifcant difference was found comparing NACT with ACT （P=0.664; 5-year-OS： 70% vs. 74% respectively）, nor between the sex and CapeOX groups （P=0.252; 5-year-OS： 78% vs. 66% respectively）. Subgroup analysis showed sex significantly improved survival in patents with diffuse type （P=0.048）. Conclusions： No significant survival difference was found between NACT and ACT. sex and CapeOX had good safety and efficacy as neoadjuvant regimens. Diffuse type patients may survive longer due to sex.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer:Current evidence and future challenges

Gastric cancer still represents one of the major causes of cancer mortality worldwide.Patients survival is mainly related to stage,with a high proportion of patients with metastatic disease at presentation.Thus,the cure rate largely depend upon surgical resection.Despite the additional,albeit small,benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy has been clearly demonstrated,no general consensus has been reached on the best treatment option.Moreover,the narrow therapeutic index of adjuvant chemotherapy(i.e.,limited survival benefit with considerable toxicity)requires a careful assessment of expected risks and benefits for individual patients.Treatment choices vary widely based on the different geographic areas,with chemotherapy alone more often preferred in Europe or Asia and chemoradiotherapy in the United States.In the present review we discuss the current evidence and future challenges regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in curatively resected gastric cancer with particular emphasis on the recently completed landmark studies and meta-analyses.The most recent patient-level meta-analysis demonstrated the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy over curative surgery;the same Authors also showed that disease free survival may be used as a surrogate end-point for overall survival.We finally discuss future research issues such as the need of economic evaluations,development of prognostic or predictive biomarkers,and the unmet clinical need of trials comparing perioperative chemotherapy with adjuvant treatment.

The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Background: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable cholangiocarcinoma remains unclear due to the lack of randomized control studies. This study aimed to investigate the possible benefit of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable cholangiocarcinoma. Data sources: Relevant research articles published before 1 st March 2018 in Pub Med, Embase and the Cochrane library databases were retrieved. Published data were extracted and analyzed by RevMan 5.3, and the results were presented as hazard ratios(HRs) [95% confidence intervals(CI)] and forest plots. Results: One prospective and eighteen retrospective studies were included, with a total number of 11,458 patients, 4696 of whom received postoperative chemotherapy. There was a significant improvement of the overall survival(OS) for patients who underwent operation + adjuvant chemotherapy compared to those who underwent operation alone(HR = 0.61; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses show that the postoperative chemotherapy group compared with operation alone group are indicated as follows: hilar cholangiocarcinoma group(HR = 0.60; P < 0.001), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma group(HR = 0.60; P < 0.001), R1 resection group(HR = 0.71; P = 0.04), LN-positive diagnosis group(HR = 0.58; P < 0.001), gemcitabine-based chemotherapy group(HR = 0.42; P < 0.001), distal cholangiocarcinoma group(HR = 0.48; P = 0.17), R0 resection group(HR = 0.69; P = 0.43), and 5-flurouracil-based chemotherapy group(HR = 0.90; P = 0.66), respectively. Conclusions: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the OS in intrahepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients. However, distal cholangiocarcinoma patients gain no benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective randomized trials are warranted in order to define the standard chemotherapy regimen.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage cervical cancer

The aim of this review is to address the current status of adjuvant chemotherapy alone in early-stage cervical cancer treatments in the literature. At present, the therapeutic effect of adjuvant chemotherapy alone after radical surgery （RS） has not yet been established, and radiation therapy （RT） or concurrent chemoradiotherapy （CCRT） is recommended as the standard adjuvant therapy after RS for early-stage cervical cancer in various guidelines. The main purpose of adjuvant therapy after RS, however, should be to reduce extrapelvic recurrence rather than local recurrence, although adjuvant RT or CCRT has survival benefits for patients with intermediate- or high-risk factors for recurrence. Moreover, several studies reported that adjuvant therapies including RT were associated with a higher incidence of complications, such as lymphedema, bowel obstruction and urinary disturbance, and a lower grade of long-term quality of life （QOL） or sexual functioning than adjuvant chemotherapy alone. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy alone for early-stage cervical cancer with intermediate- or high-risk factors for recurrence were not fully investigated in prospective studies, but several retrospective studies suggest that the adjuvant effects of chemotherapy alone are at least similar to that of RT or CCRT in terms of recurrence rate, disease-free survival, or overall survival （OS） with lower incidence of complications. Whereas cisplatin based combination regimens were used in these studies, paclitaxel/cisplatin （TP） regimen, which is currently recognized as a standard chemotherapy regimen for patients with metastatic, recurrent or persistent cervical cancer by Gynecologic Oncology Group （GOG）, had also survival benefit as an adjuvant therapy. Therefore, it may be worth considering a prospective randomized controlled trial （RCT） of adjuvant chemotherapy alone using TP regimen versus adjuvant RT as an alternative adjuvant therapy. Because early-stage cervical cancer is a curable condition, it is necessary that the therapeutic strategies should be improved with considering adverse events and QOL for long-term survivors.

Current status of adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer

Although radical gastrectomy is a standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer,recurrence remains high.After several large-scale controlled studies have shown the beneficial effects of adjuvant chemotherapy,that treatment emerged as a standard option for advanced gastric cancer after gastrectomy.However,various guidelines from different countries have suggested different adjuvant chemotherapies.Understanding the differences between guidelines is very important for investigating further therapeutic strategies.Fortunately,because there are many ongoing studies about new regimens for adjuvant treatment,it is expected that patients with gastric cancer after surgery will have better outcome.

Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant chemotherapy benefits overall survival of locally advanced gastric cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has drawn more attention to the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in the current multidisciplinary treatment model. EORTC trial 40954 has recently reported that NAC plus surgery without postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy could not benefit the locally AGC patients in their overall survival. We performed a meta-analysis of 10 studies including 1518 gastric cancer patients. Stratified subgroups were NAC plus surgery and NAC plus both surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), while control was surgery alone. The results showed that NAC plus surgery did not benefit the patients with locally AGC in their overall survival [odds ratio (OR) = 1.20, 95% CI 0.80-1.80, P = 0.37] and the number needed to treat (NNT) was 74. However, the NAC plus both surgery and AC had a slight overall survival benefit (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.03-1.71, P = 0.03) and NNT was 14, which is superior to the NAC plus surgery. Therefore, we recommend that combined NAC and AC should be used to improve the overall survival of the locally AGC patients.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin improves survival of patients with gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy: A multicenter propensity score-matched study

AIM To investigate the safety and efficacy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin(SOX) as an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in gastric cancer(GC) after D2 dissection.METHODS GC Patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy from September 2009 to December 2011 in four Chinese institutions were enrolled. Patients with stage ⅠB-ⅢC GC, who received adjuvant SOX treatment were matched by propensity scores with those who underwent surgery alone and those who conducted capecitabine plus oxaliplatin(XELOX) regimen. Disease-free survival(DFS) and overall survival(OS) were compared among the groups. In addition, adverse events in SOX patients were analyzed.Of 1944 GC patients who underwent D2 dissection, 867 were included for analysis. One hundred and seventeen patients treated with SOX were matched to 234 patients who conducted surgery alone. Fifty-seven patients treated with SOX were matched to 57 patients who received XELOX. The estimated five-year DFS was 57.5% in the adjuvant SOX group which was higher than that(44.6%) in the surgery alone group(P = 0.001); and the estimated five-year OS was 68.3% which was higher than that(45.8%) of surgery alone group(P < 0.001). Survival benefit was also revealed in stage III and > 60 years old subgroups(P < 0.001 and P = 0.015, respectively). Compared with XELOX regimen, SOX showed no significant difference in DFS(P = 0.340) and OS(P = 0.361). The most common ≥ 3 grade adverse events of SOX regimen were neutropenia(22.6%), leukopenia(8.9%) and thrombocytopenia(5.6%).CONCLUSION Compared with surgery alone, SOX regimen significantly improves the long-term survival and has acceptable toxicity in patients with stage ⅠB-ⅢC GC after D2 dissection. It may be a novel adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in GC patients.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: To use or not to use, the anthracyclines

Breast cancer continues to be one of the leading causes of cancer mortality in the world. The treatment generally involves multiple modalities including surgery, radiation and/or chemotherapy. Anthracyclines, one of the first chemotherapeutic agents introduced in the 1960 s, has been the backbone for the last 30 years and has been used extensively so far. However, the cardiac toxicity and the concern for secondary hematological malignancy has always been a challenge. A better understanding of the tumor biology, role of Her2 expression and the discovery of trastuzumab and other anti-Her 2 agents along with other effective novel therapeutic options, have revolutionized the treatment for breast cancer. The role of anthracyclines has come under close scrutiny, especially in the adjuvant setting for patients with early stage breast cancer and those with low or intermediate risk of disease recurrence. Recent studies have highlighted such a shift in the use of anthracyclines in both the academic and community clinical practice. However, in patients with a high risk of relapse, anthracyclines still hold promise. Ongoing clinical trials are underway to further define the role of anthracyclines in such a patient population. This review highlights the development, clinical utility, limitations and potential future use of anthracyclinesin the adjuvant setting for patients with breast cancer. We consulted Pub Med, Scopus, MEDLINE, ASCO annual symposium abstracts, and http://clinicaltrials.gov/ for the purpose of this review.

High-risk endometrial cancer may be benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy plus chemotherapy

Objective： To present patterns of practice and outcomes in the adjuvant treatment of intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer. Methods： Retrospective data on 224 women with intermediate-risk and high-risk endometrial cancer from 1999 to 2006 were reviewed. All patients underwent surgical staging. Patterns of adjuvant treatment, consisting of pelvic radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy plus chemotherapy, were assessed. The 3- and 5-year disease-specific survival （DSS） rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results： The difference in 5-year DSS rate was statistically significant between adjuvant group and non-adjuvant group （80.65% vs. 63.80%, P=0.040）. In 110 high-risk patients who underwent adjuvant treatment, both 5-year DSS rate and recurrent rate were significantly different in combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy group compared with radiotherapy alone and chemotherapy alone groups （DSS rate, P=0.049; recurrent rate, P=0.047）. In 83 intermediate-risk women who underwent adjuvant treatment, there was no significant difference in 5-year DSS rate and recurrence rate among the combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy, radiotherapy alone and chemotherapy alone groups （DSS rate, P=0.776; recurrent rate, P=0.937）.

Implications of clinical research on adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: Where to go next?

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy(ACT)confers superior gastric cancer(GC)survival in the Eastern cohort.However,is the current standard of ACT already excessive,or is it still necessary to increase its intensity for specific subgroups?Tailored ACT strategies for GC depend on gradual exploration by clinical trials in selected patients.Thus,understanding the implications of previous and current research can help us respond wisely and design effective,rational trials,save medical resources and make better decisions in clinical practice.After reviewing and analyzing studies on ACT for GC patients undergoing curative resection,we found that research strategies for conducting"addition""ACT for specific stages of the disease have achieved great progress in making ACT more tailored and personalized in consideration of pathology stages.Furthermore,trials indicate that"addition"ACT strategies for GC patient subgroups based on histological characteristics might be helpful to move toward a more specific tailored and personalized management approach.Designing ACT research focused on different node statuses should also be conducted according to the biological specificity of lymph node(LN)metastasis.Therefore,future trials designed to determine tailored treatment based on histological and biological characteristics for specific subgroups are urgently needed and conducted as the theme of the 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology(ASCO):Caring for Every Patient,Learning from Every Patient.

The efficacy of fluoropyrimidine.based adjuvant chemotherapy on biliary tract cancer after R0 resection

Background: The optimal treatment strategy for biliary tract cancer(BTC) after curative?intent resection remains con?troversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fluoropyrimidine?based adjuvant chemotherapy for BTC patients undergoing microscopically margin?negative(R0) resection.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of BTC patients who underwent curative?intent R0 resection. Patients were eligible if they received either fluoropyrimidine?based adjuvant chemotherapy or observation after R0 resection.Results: A total of 153 patients were included. In the entire patient cohort, no significant differences were observed in 5?year overall survival(OS) rates(48.4% vs. 39.6%, P = 0.439) or 3?year recurrence?free survival(RFS) rates(49.1% vs. 39.5%, P = 0.299) between patients who received fluoropyrimidine?based adjuvant chemotherapy or observation. However, for patients with stages Ⅱ and Ⅲ BTC, chemotherapy significantly improved 5?year OS rate(52.4% vs. 35.6%, P = 0.002) and 3?year RFS rate(55.5% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.021) compared with observation.Conclusion: Fluoropyrimidine?based adjuvant chemotherapy may prolong the survival of patients with stages Ⅱ and Ⅲ BTC after R0 resection.