Is there a place for endoscopic management in postcholecystectomy iatrogenic bile duct injuries?

In this editorial we comment on the article by Emara et al published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.Previously,surgery was the primary treatment for bile duct injuries(BDI).The treatment of BDI has advanced due to technological breakthroughs and minimally invasive procedures.Endoscopic and percutaneous treatments have largely supplanted surgery as the primary treatment for most instances in recent years.Patient management,including the specific technique,is typically impacted by local knowledge and the kind and severity of the injury.Endoscopic therapy is a highly successful treatment for postoperative benign bile duct stenosis and offers superior long-term outcomes compared to surgical correction.Based on the damage features of BDI,therapeutic options include endoscopic duodenal papillary sphincterotomy,endoscopic nasobiliary drainage,and endoscopic biliary stent implantation.

Post-cholecystectomy iatrogenic bile duct injuries:Emerging role for endoscopic management

Post-cholecystectomy iatrogenic bile duct injuries(IBDIs),are not uncommon and although the frequency of IBDIs vary across the literature,the rates following the procedure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy are much higher than open cholecystectomy.These injuries caries a great burden on the patients,physicians and the health care systems and sometime are life-threatening.IBDIs are associated with different manifestations that are not limited to abdominal pain,bile leaks from the surgical drains,peritonitis with fever and sometimes jaundice.Such injuries if not witnessed during the surgery,can be diagnosed by combining clinical manifestations,biochemical tests and imaging techniques.Among such techniques abdominal US is usually the first choice while Magnetic Resonance Cholangio-Pancreatography seems the most appropriate.Surgical approach was the ideal approach for such cases,however the introduction of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography(ERCP)was a paradigm shift in the management of such injuries due to accepted success rates,lower cost and lower rates of associated morbidity and mortality.However,the literature lacks consensus for the optimal timing of ERCP intervention in the management of IBDIs.ERCP management of IBDIs can be tailored according to the nature of the underlying injury.For the subgroup of patients with complete bile duct ligation and lost ductal continuity,transfer to surgery is indicated without delay.Those patients will not benefit from endoscopy and hence should not do unnecessary ERCP.For low–flow leaks e.g.gallbladder bed leaks,conservative management for 1-2 wk prior to ERCP is advised,in contrary to high-flow leaks e.g.cystic duct leaks and stricture lesions in whom early ERCP is encouraged.Sphincterotomy plus stenting is the ideal management line for cases of IBDIs.Interventional radiologic techniques are promising options especially for cases of failed endoscopic repair and also for cases with altered anatomy.Future studies will solve many unsolved issues in the management of IBDIs.

Iatrogenic flexor tendon rupture caused by misdiagnosing sarcoidosis-related flexor tendon contracture as tenosynovitis: A case report

BACKGROUND Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease characterized by granuloma formation in various organs.Sarcoidosis-related flexor tendon contractures are uncommon in clinical settings.This contracture is similar to stenosing tenosynovitis and po-tentially leads to misdiagnosis and mistreatment.Herein,we report a rare case of sarcoidosis-related finger flexor tendon contracture that was misdiagnosed as tenosynovitis.A 44-year-old woman presented to our department with flexion contracture of the right ring and middle fingers.The patient was misdiagnosed with tenosynovitis and underwent acupotomy release of the A1 pulley of the middle finger in an-other hospital that resulted in iatrogenic rupture of both the superficial and profundus flexors.Radiological presentation showed multiple sarcoid involve-ments in the pulmonary locations and ipsilateral forearm.A diagnosis of sar-coidosis was made based on the presence of non-caseating granulomas with tubercles consisting of Langhans giant cells with lymphocyte infiltration on biopsy,and the patient underwent surgical repair for the contracture.After 2 mo,the patient experienced another spontaneous rupture of the repaired middle finger tendon and underwent surgical re-repair.Satisfactory results were achieved at the 10 mo follow-up after reoperation.CONCLUSION Sarcoidosis-related finger contractures are rare;thus,caution should be exercised when dealing with such patients to avoid incorrect treatment.

Iatrogenic Urethral Stenoses: Epidemiological Aspects Clinics and Therapeutic in the Urology Department of the National Hospital of Conakry

The aim is to highlight the epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspects of iatrogenic urethral strictures. Methodology: This was a retrospective study, descriptive type, 6 years from January 1st 2012, to December 31st 2017 carried out in the Urology-Andrology department of the National Hospital Ignace Deen of Conakry. All records of patients carrying the Diagnosis of iatrogenic urethral stricture were included in this study. Results: We collected 30 cases of iatrogenic urethral stricture, with a frequency of 2.5%. The average age of the patients was 62.33 years. The most affected age group is from 71 to 80 years (33.33%). Dysuria was the main reason for consultation. Retrograde urethrocystography plus voiding cystourethrography (RUC-VCU) allowed us to make the diagnosis. The treatment was essentially surgical and several techniques were used. Endoscopic internal urethrotomy alone was the most performed surgical technique, followed by segmental uretrectomy associated with end-to-end urethrography. Conclusion: Iatrogenic urethral stricture is easy to diagnose but difficult to manage due to the frequency of recurrences. Improving the quality of care, in particular urethral catheterizations and transurethral endoscopic maneuvers, makes it possible to prevent it.

Evaluation of Intraoperative Iatrogenic Lesions and Postoperative Complications in 1140 Patients Treated for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in the Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology Department of the Moulins-Yzeure Hospital Center in France

Introduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a more common form of upper limb canal syndrome, resulting from compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel, but is particularly troublesome. Medical treatment is often unsuccessful, and surgical treatment usually involves transection of the annular ligament. The aim of this study was to assess iatrogenic intraoperative and postoperative complications, as well as patient outcomes following the use of conventional and endoscopic surgery in the surgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome. Hypothesis: Are nerve, vascular and tendon injuries of iatrogenic origin always present in the surgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome, even though this surgery is performed on an outpatient basis? Patients and methods: This retrospective series is composed of 1140 patients, 230 men and 910 women, mean age 58.6 ± 16.4 years, operated on between 2010 and 2020 for carpal tunnel syndrome by conventional surgery and under endoscopy. Medical records, operative reports and consultation letters were consulted. All patients were reviewed regularly at one month post-op until recovery. Results: No nerve, vascular or tendon damage was noted, and at a maximum follow-up of 2 years, 20 patients had recurred, i.e. a 2.51% failure rate. Scar disunion was observed in 0.9%, wound infection in 0.9% and scar fibrosis in 0.9%. 92.98% of patients underwent outpatient surgery, irrespective of the type of anesthesia or surgical technique used. Patients who stayed in hospital for a short time were suffering from carpal tunnel syndrome associated with compression of the ulnar nerve in Guyon’s canal, for which both the median and ulnar nerves were freed during the same operation, under general anaesthetic. All patients were able to return to their previous activity within 30 days of surgery. Conclusion: Intraoperative iatrogenic complications, notably nerve, vascular and tendon lesions, were not identified despite the large sample size. On the other hand, postoperative skin complications related to scarring, such as wound disunion, fibrosis and recurrence, were present despite low rates.

Iatrogenic bladder neck rupture due to traumatic urethral catheterization: A case report

BACKGROUND In this article,we present a case of iatrogenic bladder neck rupture due to catheter insertion in a 94-year-old comorbid male patient.CASE SUMMARY The patient,who had a urethral catheter inserted in the palliative service 3 d ago,was consulted because the catheter did not work.Because the fluid given to the bladder could not be recovered,computed tomography was performed,which revealed that the catheter had passed the bladder neck first into the retrovesical area then into the intraabdominal area.The appearance of the anterior urethra and verumontanum was normal at cystoscopy.However,extremely severe stenosis of the bladder neck,and perforated posterior wall of the urethral segment between the prostatic urethra and the bladder neck were observed.Internal urethrotomy was applied to the bladder neck with a urethrotome.An urethral catheter was sent over the guide wire into the bladder.The patient was followed in the palliative care service and the catheter was removed 7 d later.No extravasation was observed in the control urethrography.CONCLUSION Although catheter insertion is a simple and frequently performed procedure in hospitalized patients,it is necessary to avoid unnecessary extra-indication catheter insertion.

Management of iatrogenic colorectal perforation: From surgery to endoscopy

Iatrogenic colon perforation is one the most pernicious complications for patients undergoing endoscopic screening or therapy.It is a serious but rare complication of colonoscopy.However,with the expansion of the indications for endoscopic therapies for gastrointestinal diseases,the frequency of colorectal perforation has increased.The management of iatrogenic colorectal perforation is still a challenge for many endoscopists.The methods for treating this complication vary,including conservative treatment,surgical treatment,laparoscopy and endoscopy.In this review,we highlight the etiology,recognition and treatment of colorectal iatrogenic perforation.Specifically,we shed light on the endoscopic management of this rare complication.

Iatrogenic esophago-tracheal fistula:Challenges in diagnosis and management

Esophageo-tracheal fistula is a rare condition,and in most cases such fistulas are caused by malignant disease or emergency endotracheal intubation.A case where a wrapped tablet produced a fistula between the esophagus and trachea is described.The patient is a male born in 1938 who swallowed a tablet without unwrapping it.The patient was treated with selfexpanding metal stents(SEMS),but closure of the fistula was not achieved.Different examinations and treatment options are discussed.Surgical treatment for this condition has demonstrated considerable mortality and morbidity.In some cases closure of the fistula can be achieved by use of SEMS.Although we advise treatment of such cases with SEMS,in some cases treatment with stents will prove troublesome and the risk/benefit analysis will have to be reevaluated.

Iatrogenic bile duct injuries from biliary tract surgery

BACKGROUND:Cholecystectomy is the most commonly performed procedure in general surgery.However,bile duct injury is a rare but still one of the most common complications.These injuries sometimes present variably after primary surgery.Timely detection and appropriate management decrease the morbidity and mortality of the operation. METHODS:Five cases of iatrogenic bile duct injury(IBDI) were managed at the Department of Surgery,First Affiliated Hospital,Xi’an Jiaotong University.All the cases who underwent both open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy had persistent injury to the biliary tract and were treated accordingly. RESULTS:Recovery of the patients was uneventful.All patients were followed-up at the surgical outpatient department for six months to three years.So far the patients have shown good recovery. CONCLUSIONS:In cases of IBDI it is necessary to perform the operation under the supervision of an experienced surgeon who is specialized in the repair of bile duct injuries,and it is also necessary to detect and treat the injury as soon as possible to obtain a satisfactory outcome.

Iatrogenic bile duct injuries:Etiology,diagnosis and management

Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (IBDI) remain an important problem in gastrointestinal surgery. They are most frequently caused by laparoscopic cholecystectomy which is one of the commonest surgical procedures in the world. The early and proper diagnosis of IBDI is very important for surgeons and gastroenterologists, because unrecognized IBDI lead to serious complications such as biliary cirrhosis, hepatic failure and death. Laboratory and radiological investigations play an important role in the diagnosis of biliary injuries. There are many classifications of IBDI. The most popular and simple classification of IBDI is the Bismuth scale. Endoscopic techniques are recommended for initial treatment of IBDI. When endoscopic treatment is not effective, surgical management is considered. Different surgical reconstructions are performed in patients with IBDI. According to the literature, Roux- en-Y hepaticojejunostomy is the most frequent surgical reconstruction and recommended by most authors. In the opinion of some authors, a more physiological and equally effective type of reconstruction is end- to-end ductal anastomosis. Long term results are the most important in the assessment of the effectiveness of IBDI treatment. There are a few classifications for the long term results in patients treated for IBDI; the Terblanche scale, based on clinical biliary symptoms, is regarded as the most useful classification. Proper diagnosis and treatment of IBDI may avoid many serious complications and improve quality of life.

Adult iatrogenic ureteral injury and strictureeincidence and treatment strategies

Iatrogenic ureteral injuries and strictures are relatively common complication of pelvic surgery and radiation treatment.Left untreated they are associated with severe shortand long-term complications such as urinoma,septic state,renal failure,and loss of a renal unit.Treatment depends on timing of diagnosis,as well as extent of injury,and ranges from simple endoscopic management to complex surgical reconstruction under usage of pedicled grafts.While recent advances in ureteral tissue engineering are promising the topic is still underreported.Historically a domain of open surgery,laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches have proven their feasibility in small case series,and are increasingly being utilized as means of reconstructive surgery.This review aims to give an outline of incidence and treatment of ureteral injuries and strictures in light of the latest advances.

Acute iatrogenic Budd-Chiari syndrome following hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis:A report of two cases

Budd-Chiari syndrome(BCS)is defined as hepatic venous outflow obstruction at any level from the small hepatic veins to the junction of the inferior vena cava(IVC)and the right atrium,regardless of the cause of obstruction.We present two cases of acute iatrogenic BCS and our clinical management of these cases.The first case was a 43-year-old woman who developed acute BCS following the implantation of an IVC stent for the correction of stenosis in the IVC after hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis.The second case was a61-year-old woman with complete obstruction of the outflow of hepatic veins during bilateral hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis.Acute iatrogenic BCS should be con-sidered a rare complication following hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis.Awareness of potential hepatic outflow obstructions and timely management are critical to avoid poor outcomes when performing hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis.

International multi-center study of iatrogenic retinal tears in pars plana vitrectomy

AIM: To study and compare the effect of different surgical settings on the development of iatrogenic retinal tears(IRT) in conventional(20-gauge) and microincisional vitrectomy.METHODS: An international retrospective comparative study of 394 patients who had simple vitrectomy at three tertiary centers. Surgeries were performed by four retina surgeons using different viewing systems. Two groups of eyes were compared: microincisional vitrectomy(327 eyes) and conventional(67 eyes) vitrectomy. An iatrogenic tear was defined as the occurrence of one or more peripheral retinal tears during surgery or at any visit in the first 6 wk postoperatively.RESULTS: Mean age was 67±12 y and 55% were female. Iatrogenic tears occurred in 11/394(2.8%) of eyes. The rate of tears was similar among different surgeons and viewing systems(P=0.93 and P=0.76, respectively). Surgical indication, preexisting pseudophakia/aphakia, induction of posterior vitreous detachment(PVD) during surgery, and the use triamcinolone acetonide didn’t significantly affect the rate of tears(P>0.1 for all factors). A higher rate of tears was found in the conventional group compared to the microincisional group(respectively, 7.5%, 1.8%, P=0.02).CONCLUSION: The rate of IRT in vitrectomy is not significantly affected by surgical indication, preexisting PVD or pseudophakia, or use of triamcinolone or different viewing systems but is significantly higher in conventional vitrectomy. Microincisional platforms improve the safety of vitrectomy regardless of the viewing system used.

Iatrogenic colorectal perforation induced by anorectal manometry:Report of two cases after restorative proctectomy for distal rectal cancer

There are no reports regarding perforation of the colorectum induced by anorectal manometry. We report two cases of colorectal perforation that occurred during manometry in the patients undergoing restorative proctectomy for distal rectal cancer. In the first patient, computed tomography showed an extraperitoneal perforation in the pelvic cavity and a rupture of the rectal wall. A localized perforation into the retroperitoneum was managed conservatively. In the second patient, a 3 cm linear colon rupture was detected above the anastomotic site. A primary closure of the perforated colon and proximal ileostomy were conducted, but the patient died 2 wk later. We hypothesize that the perforation induced by anorectal manometry may be associated with the relative weakening of the proximal bowel wall due to anastomosis, decreased compliance, and abnormal rectal sensation. We suggest that measurement of the maximum tolerable volume should not be routinely performed alter restorative proctectomy for distal rectal cancer.

Liver transplantation in the treatment of severe iatrogenic liver injuries

The place of liver transplantation in the treatment of severe iatrogenic liver injuries has not yet been widely discussed in the literature. Bile duct injuries during cholecystectomy represent the leading cause of liver transplantation in this setting, while other indications after abdominal surgery are less common. Urgent liver transplantation for the treatment of severe iatrogenic liver injury may-represent a surgical challenge requiring technically difficult and time consuming procedures. A debate is ongoing on the need for centralization of complex surgery in tertiary referral centers. The early referral of patients with severe iatrogenic liver injuries to a tertiary center with experienced hepato-pancreatobiliary and transplant surgery has emerged as the best treatment of care. Despite widespread interest in the use of liver transplantation as a treatment option for severe iatrogenic injuries, reported experiences indicate few liver transplants are performed. This review analyzes the literature on liver transplantation after hepatic injury and discusses our own experience along with surgical advances and future prospects in this uncommon transplant setting.

Iatrogenic extrahepatic bile duct injury in 182 patients: causes and management

Objective: To describe the causes and treatment ofiatrogenic bile duct injury caused by cholecystecto-my.Methods: 182 patients with iatrogenic extrahepaticbile duct injury from 4 university hospitals of Chinawere reviewed. Details of primary cholecystectomy,biliary reconstruction as well as postoperative ma-nagement were recorded. All patients were followedup for at least 6 months (6 months to 9 years, medi-an 3.5 years). The adequacy of repair was assessedby regular evaluation of the patients clinical statusand liver function variables. Hepatobiliary B-ultra-sonography was used routinely in the follow up of pa-tients, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatog-raphy was applied in the patients suggestive of abnor-mality.Results: In 152 patients, bile duct injury happenedduring open cholecystectomy, and in 30 patients dur-ing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All the injuries de-veloped during anterograde cholecystectomy (at theCalot’s triangle). All the patients with these injuriesunderwent choledochocholedochostomy or Roux-en-Ycholedochojejunostomy with good results (161 pa-tients), recurrent stricture (11), and death (10).Conclusions: During cholecystectomy, the Calot’s tri-angle should be identified anatomically, but retro-grade cholecystectomy is the optimal choice. Bileduct injury should be discovered as soon as possibleand be managed timely. Different operative methodsare optional according to the degree of injury and thepostoperative period.

Treatment of a rotator cuff tear combined with iatrogenic glenoid fracture and shoulder instability:A rare case report

BACKGROUND The brisement manipulation is an effective treatment for refractory shoulder stiffness.Rotator cuff tears can sometimes exist in combination with adhesive capsulitis.Arthroscopic capsular release combined with rotator cuff repair has achieved good outcomes in published reports.CASE SUMMARY We report the case of a patient with right shoulder pain for more than 1 year that was suspected to have adhesive capsulitis and a rotator cuff tear that was treated with brisement manipulation and arthroscopic management.An iatrogenic glenoid fracture with shoulder instability occurred during the manipulation.Arthroscopic treatment for fracture fixation,capsular release,and rotator cuff repair was performed,and the functional results are reported.CONCLUSION Arthroscopic fixation for iatrogenic glenoid fracture and repairing coexisting rotator cuff tear can provide the stability needed for early rehabilitation.

Focal intramural hematoma as a potential pitfall for iatrogenic aortic dissection during subclavian artery stenting: A case report

BACKGROUND Iatrogenic aortic dissection(IAD)is a rare but fatal complication of interventional treatment for the proximal supra-aortic large vessels.Several cases of IAD after endovascular treatment of subclavian artery have been reported.Nevertheless,the pathogenesis of IAD is still unclear.Here we report a patient with IAD following a balloon expandable stent implanted into the left subclavian artery(LSA).CASE SUMMARY An 84-year-old man with a history of hypertension was admitted to the Neurology Department of our hospital complaining of dizziness and gait disturbance for more than 1 mo.Computed tomography angiography of the head and neck showed severe stenosis at the proximal LSA and the origin of the left vertebral artery.Magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging of the brain revealed subacute infarctions in cerebellum,occipital lobe and medulla oblongata.He suffered a Stanford type B aortic dissection after the proximal LSA angioplasty with a balloon expandable stent.Thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed immediately with the chimney technique and he was discharged 20 d later.After exploring the pathogenesis with multimodal imaging analysis,an easily neglected focal intramural hematoma(IMH)in the aorta near the junction of the LSA was found to be the main cause of the IAD.The risk of IAD should be sufficiently evaluated according to the characteristics of aortic arch lesions before the proximal LSA angioplasty.CONCLUSION Focal aortic IMH is a potential risk factor for IAD during a seemingly simple stenting of the proximal LSA.

Percutaneous transcatheter super-selective renal arterial embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate for iatrogenic renal hemorrhage

Background:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transcatheter super-selective renal arterial embolization(SRAE)with N-butyl cyanoacrylate(NBCA)for iatrogenic renal hemorrhage.Methods:Between January 2014 and December 2019,45 patients(including 18 patients with coagulopathy),who underwent percutaneous transcatheter SRAE with NBCA for iatrogenic renal hemorrhage at our institution,were retrospectively reviewed.The technical success rate,clinical success rate,and embolization-related complications were analyzed.The values of estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR),serum creatinine(sCr),and serum urea(sUr)were analyzed at the time of pre-SRAE,post-SRAE,and last follow-up to evaluate the effects of NBCA-based SRAE on renal function.Results:Diagnostic renal arteriography revealed contrast extravasation in 18 patients and pseudoaneurysms in 27 patients.NBCA mixed with iodized oil in a 1:2–1:4 ratio was the sole embolic agent.No procedure-related mortality or major complications occurred.The technical and clinical success rates were both 100%.The values of eGFR,sCr and sUr were not found to be significantly different between pre-SRAE,post-SRAE and last follow-up(eGFR:91.52±21.17 vs.90.98±22.11 vs.92.14±23.51 mL/min/1.73 m^(2),p=0.729;sCr:74.73±11.08 vs.75.27±12.43 vs.73.95±10.14μmol/L,p=0.543;sUr:5.69±0.84 vs.5.71±0.96 vs.5.70±0.79,p=0.515,respectively).Conclusions:Percutaneous transcatheter SRAE with NBCA is a safe and effective treatment modality for iatrogenic renal hemorrhage with no deterioration of renal function.

Iatrogenic crystalline lens injury during intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide: A report of two cases

BACKGROUND Intravitreal injection has become an efficient approach for delivering drugs at therapeutic levels to the posterior segment in retinal diseases.However,the increased frequency and number of intravitreal injections have raised concerns about their side effects.As manipulation during surgery is relatively simple,details of the procedure are easily overlooked.Iatrogenic crystalline lens injury is a rare complication caused by improper manipulation during surgical procedures.We report two cases of crystalline lens injury during intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide(TA)with the hope of providing an insight into this treatment.CASE SUMMARY Case 1 was a 62-year-old woman with macular edema caused by central retinal vein occlusion in her right eye,and Case 2 was a 65-year-old man with macular edema caused by branch retinal vein occlusion in his right eye.In view of the patients’condition and economic constraints,an intravitreal injection of TA was administered.Due to inappropriate manipulation during surgery,the lens was injured.The site of lens injury and clinical manifestations were different in the two cases.Symptomatic treatment and continuous follow-up were carried out.The therapeutic effect following phacoemulsification of the cataract was satisfactory.CONCLUSION Well-defined surgical incision under proper anesthesia,sufficient patient information and proficient anatomical skills of the physician are mandatory to prevent this rare adverse event.Careful and meticulous phacoemulsification of the cataract is suggested.