Objective:To analyze the hotspots of the Orem self-care model research from the construction of CNKI database to May 2019,and to understand the research status in this field and to explore its development trend.Method...Objective:To analyze the hotspots of the Orem self-care model research from the construction of CNKI database to May 2019,and to understand the research status in this field and to explore its development trend.Methods:"Orem self-care model"was used as the search term to search CNKI database,and the Bibliographic Items Co-occurrence Matrix Builder(BICOMB)was used to perform bibliometric analysis on the annual distribution,authors,keywords,etc.in related articles,and SPSS 23.0 was utilized to cluster analysis of high-frequency keywords.Results:A total of 1845 associated articles were included.The annual change of Orem self-care model literatures showed an increasing trend and a total of 1604 first authors were extracted.Today Nurse published the most relevant literatures.The research extracted 56 high-frequency keywords,accounting for 50.88%of the total frequency.Co-word cluster analysis obtained five research hotspots:clinical application effect and patient satisfaction of Orem self-care model;self-care ability and quality of life of breast cancer patients;self-care behaviors for the elderly and community care;rehabilitation nursing of stroke and spinal cord injury;Orem self-care model,nursing theory.Conclusion:Analyzing the research hotspots of Orem self-care model in recent years is helpful to understand the current status in this field and future development trends,and provide references for future nursing clinical practice work and education and scientific research.展开更多
目的:探讨Orem自理模式结合康复训练在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的应用效果。方法:选取2019年10月至2021年12月本院收治的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者106例,根据随机数字表法分为Orem组和康复组各53例,所有患者给予常规治疗和护理措施,康复组给...目的:探讨Orem自理模式结合康复训练在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的应用效果。方法:选取2019年10月至2021年12月本院收治的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者106例,根据随机数字表法分为Orem组和康复组各53例,所有患者给予常规治疗和护理措施,康复组给予康复训练干预,Orem组给予Orem自理模式结合康复训练干预,比较两组患者干预前后肺功能治疗和血气指标、自我护理能力评分,并对两组患者负性情绪和生活质量进行比较,统计两组患者护理满意度。结果:干预前两组患者肺功能指标、血气指标、自我护理能力评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,Orem组第1秒用力呼气容积(forced expiratory volume in one second, FEV1)、用力肺活量(forced vital capacity, FVC)和FEV1/FVC水平高于康复组(P<0.05);干预后,Orem组动脉血氧分压(partial pressure of oxygen, PaO2)和血氧饱和度(oxygen saturation, SpO2)水平高于康复组(P<0.05),自护技能、自护责任感、自我概念和自护知识评分高于康复组(P<0.05),抑郁自评量表(Self-Rating Depression Scale, SDS)和生存质量特异性量表(Diabetes Specific Quality of Life, QSQL)评分低于康复组(P<0.05),患者总满意度(96.23%)高于康复组(79.25%)(χ^(2)=10.610,P=0.005)。结论:Orem自理模式结合康复训练在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的应用效果较好,可明显改善患者肺功能和血气指标,提高患者自我护理能力,改善患者焦虑情绪,提高生活质量,患者满意度较高,值得进一步推广应用。展开更多
BACKGROUND Nursing practices based on the dynamic interaction model have been shown to be superior to generic nursing practices.However,whether this model is effective in patients recovering from intracranial aneurysm...BACKGROUND Nursing practices based on the dynamic interaction model have been shown to be superior to generic nursing practices.However,whether this model is effective in patients recovering from intracranial aneurysm surgery is not well studied.AIM To investigate the effect of nursing based on a dynamic interaction model on functional rehabilitation of patients after aneurysm surgery.METHODS A total of 86 cases in our hospital with intracranial aneurysm from April 2019 to April 2021,were selected and divided into the study group and the control group,with 43 patients in each group.The control group received routine nursing,and the research group received nursing intervention based on a dynamic interaction model.The daily living ability(activities of daily living,ADL),cognitive function(Simple Intelligent Mental State Scale,MMSE),quality of life(Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74,GQOL-74),self-care ability(Exercise of Self-Care Agency scale),incidence of complications,and nursing satisfaction were recorded before and after intervention.RESULTS Before intervention,ADL(52.09±6.44),MMSE(18.03±4.11),and GQOL-74(53.68±4.34)scores in the study group were not significantly different from those in the control group(ADL:50.97±7.32,MMSE:17.59±3.82,GQOL-74:55.06±3.98)(P>0.05).After intervention,ADL(86.12±5.07),MMSE(26.64±2.66),and GQOL-74(83.13±5.67)scores in the study group were higher than those in the control group(ADL:79.81±6.35,MMSE:24.51±3.00,and GQOL-74:77.96±6.27)(P<0.05).Before intervention,self-concept(17.46±4.44),self-care skills(25.22±4.20),self-care knowledge(22.35±4.74),and self-care responsibility(15.06±3.29)scores in the study group was similar to those in the control group(self-concept:16.89±5.53,self-care skills:24.59±4.46,self-care knowledge:21.80±3.61,and self-care responsibility:14.83±3.11)(P>0.05).After the intervention,self-concept(26.01±3.18),self-care skills(37.68±6.05),self-care knowledge(45.56±5.83),and self-care responsibility(22.01±3.77)scores in the study group were higher than those in the control group(self-concept:22.97±3.46,self-care skills:33.02±5.65,selfcare skills knowledge:36.81±5.54,and self-care responsibility:17.97±3.56 points)(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the study group(4.65%)was lower than that in the control group(18.60%)(P<0.05).Nursing satisfaction in the study group(95.35%)was higher than that in the control group(81.40%)(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Nursing intervention based on a dynamic interaction model can improve postoperative cognitive function,daily living ability,self-care ability,quality of life,and patient satisfaction,while reducing the risk of complications.展开更多
Objective: To study the application effect of the family collaborative care model on elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its influence on self-care ability. Methods: The elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus...Objective: To study the application effect of the family collaborative care model on elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its influence on self-care ability. Methods: The elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (400 cases) treated in our hospital between March 2020 and July 2023 were divided into two groups by randomized grouping method;the control group received the conventional nursing program, while the observation group received the family collaborative nursing model. Blood glucose level, self-care ability, and quality of life were compared between the groups. Results: The blood glucose level of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The self- care ability and quality of life scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The family collaborative care model for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus can promote their self- care ability, improve the effect of glycemic control, and improve their quality of life, and is suitable for further promotion and application.展开更多
文摘Objective:To analyze the hotspots of the Orem self-care model research from the construction of CNKI database to May 2019,and to understand the research status in this field and to explore its development trend.Methods:"Orem self-care model"was used as the search term to search CNKI database,and the Bibliographic Items Co-occurrence Matrix Builder(BICOMB)was used to perform bibliometric analysis on the annual distribution,authors,keywords,etc.in related articles,and SPSS 23.0 was utilized to cluster analysis of high-frequency keywords.Results:A total of 1845 associated articles were included.The annual change of Orem self-care model literatures showed an increasing trend and a total of 1604 first authors were extracted.Today Nurse published the most relevant literatures.The research extracted 56 high-frequency keywords,accounting for 50.88%of the total frequency.Co-word cluster analysis obtained five research hotspots:clinical application effect and patient satisfaction of Orem self-care model;self-care ability and quality of life of breast cancer patients;self-care behaviors for the elderly and community care;rehabilitation nursing of stroke and spinal cord injury;Orem self-care model,nursing theory.Conclusion:Analyzing the research hotspots of Orem self-care model in recent years is helpful to understand the current status in this field and future development trends,and provide references for future nursing clinical practice work and education and scientific research.
文摘目的:探讨Orem自理模式结合康复训练在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的应用效果。方法:选取2019年10月至2021年12月本院收治的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者106例,根据随机数字表法分为Orem组和康复组各53例,所有患者给予常规治疗和护理措施,康复组给予康复训练干预,Orem组给予Orem自理模式结合康复训练干预,比较两组患者干预前后肺功能治疗和血气指标、自我护理能力评分,并对两组患者负性情绪和生活质量进行比较,统计两组患者护理满意度。结果:干预前两组患者肺功能指标、血气指标、自我护理能力评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,Orem组第1秒用力呼气容积(forced expiratory volume in one second, FEV1)、用力肺活量(forced vital capacity, FVC)和FEV1/FVC水平高于康复组(P<0.05);干预后,Orem组动脉血氧分压(partial pressure of oxygen, PaO2)和血氧饱和度(oxygen saturation, SpO2)水平高于康复组(P<0.05),自护技能、自护责任感、自我概念和自护知识评分高于康复组(P<0.05),抑郁自评量表(Self-Rating Depression Scale, SDS)和生存质量特异性量表(Diabetes Specific Quality of Life, QSQL)评分低于康复组(P<0.05),患者总满意度(96.23%)高于康复组(79.25%)(χ^(2)=10.610,P=0.005)。结论:Orem自理模式结合康复训练在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的应用效果较好,可明显改善患者肺功能和血气指标,提高患者自我护理能力,改善患者焦虑情绪,提高生活质量,患者满意度较高,值得进一步推广应用。
文摘BACKGROUND Nursing practices based on the dynamic interaction model have been shown to be superior to generic nursing practices.However,whether this model is effective in patients recovering from intracranial aneurysm surgery is not well studied.AIM To investigate the effect of nursing based on a dynamic interaction model on functional rehabilitation of patients after aneurysm surgery.METHODS A total of 86 cases in our hospital with intracranial aneurysm from April 2019 to April 2021,were selected and divided into the study group and the control group,with 43 patients in each group.The control group received routine nursing,and the research group received nursing intervention based on a dynamic interaction model.The daily living ability(activities of daily living,ADL),cognitive function(Simple Intelligent Mental State Scale,MMSE),quality of life(Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74,GQOL-74),self-care ability(Exercise of Self-Care Agency scale),incidence of complications,and nursing satisfaction were recorded before and after intervention.RESULTS Before intervention,ADL(52.09±6.44),MMSE(18.03±4.11),and GQOL-74(53.68±4.34)scores in the study group were not significantly different from those in the control group(ADL:50.97±7.32,MMSE:17.59±3.82,GQOL-74:55.06±3.98)(P>0.05).After intervention,ADL(86.12±5.07),MMSE(26.64±2.66),and GQOL-74(83.13±5.67)scores in the study group were higher than those in the control group(ADL:79.81±6.35,MMSE:24.51±3.00,and GQOL-74:77.96±6.27)(P<0.05).Before intervention,self-concept(17.46±4.44),self-care skills(25.22±4.20),self-care knowledge(22.35±4.74),and self-care responsibility(15.06±3.29)scores in the study group was similar to those in the control group(self-concept:16.89±5.53,self-care skills:24.59±4.46,self-care knowledge:21.80±3.61,and self-care responsibility:14.83±3.11)(P>0.05).After the intervention,self-concept(26.01±3.18),self-care skills(37.68±6.05),self-care knowledge(45.56±5.83),and self-care responsibility(22.01±3.77)scores in the study group were higher than those in the control group(self-concept:22.97±3.46,self-care skills:33.02±5.65,selfcare skills knowledge:36.81±5.54,and self-care responsibility:17.97±3.56 points)(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the study group(4.65%)was lower than that in the control group(18.60%)(P<0.05).Nursing satisfaction in the study group(95.35%)was higher than that in the control group(81.40%)(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Nursing intervention based on a dynamic interaction model can improve postoperative cognitive function,daily living ability,self-care ability,quality of life,and patient satisfaction,while reducing the risk of complications.
文摘Objective: To study the application effect of the family collaborative care model on elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its influence on self-care ability. Methods: The elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (400 cases) treated in our hospital between March 2020 and July 2023 were divided into two groups by randomized grouping method;the control group received the conventional nursing program, while the observation group received the family collaborative nursing model. Blood glucose level, self-care ability, and quality of life were compared between the groups. Results: The blood glucose level of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The self- care ability and quality of life scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The family collaborative care model for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus can promote their self- care ability, improve the effect of glycemic control, and improve their quality of life, and is suitable for further promotion and application.
