Background: Work related low back pain has been identified as a one of the most costly disorders among the worldwide working population. This condition was highly prevalent that approximately 85% patients having back ...Background: Work related low back pain has been identified as a one of the most costly disorders among the worldwide working population. This condition was highly prevalent that approximately 85% patients having back pain were brought on by prolonged sitting. With the rapid development of modern technology, sitting has now become the most common posture in today’s work- place. Idea of using motor control learning approach provides the optimal control and coordination of the spine. The McKenzie evaluation was received using repeated movements and sustained positions. Therefore high quality randomized clinical trial was required to compare the effectiveness of these treatments for work related low back pain. Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of motor control exercises and McKenzie exercises in reducing pain and disability in work related low back pain. Method: The study included 40 subjects with work related low back pain due to prolonged sitting. They were randomly allocated into two groups (Group A and Group B). Group A was treated with motor control exercises and group B was treated with McKenzie exercises for 4 weeks. Results: Both the groups have shown statically significant improvement in vas with p < 0.0001 and ODI with p < 0.0001. When the comparison was done after the 4 weeks, the percentage of improvement in group A was much higher than Group B. Conclusion: The study concluded that motor control exercises have shown statically and clinically significant improvement in reducing pain and disability when compared to McKenzie exercises among work related low back pain subjects.展开更多
目的:观察"出痧"刮痧、"不出痧"刮痧与针刺治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛(NLBP)的临床疗效差异。方法:通过中央网络随机分组系统,将150例符合纳入标准的NLBP患者随机分为出痧组、不出痧组和针刺组,每组50例。出痧组在受...目的:观察"出痧"刮痧、"不出痧"刮痧与针刺治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛(NLBP)的临床疗效差异。方法:通过中央网络随机分组系统,将150例符合纳入标准的NLBP患者随机分为出痧组、不出痧组和针刺组,每组50例。出痧组在受试者腰部(肾俞、志室到次髎、秩边)、下肢(从承扶过委中至承山)进行刮痧,每个部位刮8-10次,并且要求"刮致出痧",每次刮痧治疗间隔4d,总共治疗7次。不出痧组操作方法与出痧组相同,但要求"不出痧",每次刮痧治疗间隔2d,总共治疗7次。针刺组针刺患者肾俞和委中,直刺进针,施平补平泻手法至局部出现酸麻肿重感,每次治疗30min,每次针刺间隔2d,总共治疗7次。比较3组受试者治疗前、治疗结束后及1个月与3个月的随访时视觉模拟量表(VAS)、自拟临床症状积分和Oswetery功能障碍指数(ODI)。根据M5P决策树算法,使用Weka Explorer 3.6软件计算刮痧治疗NLBP疗效预测方程。结果:1治疗结束时,出痧组脱落7例,不出痧组脱落6例,针刺组脱落8例,最终完成129例。3组受试者在治疗过程中未发生不良反应。2治疗结束后,3组NLBP患者VAS、临床症状积分、ODI指数均明显降低(P<0.05),且随访1个月、3个月随访疗效稳定;出痧组3个指标的改善均优于不出痧组和针刺组,针刺组3个指标的改善亦优于不出痧组(均P<0.05)。3根据M5P决策树算法,提出刮痧治疗NLBP疗效预测方程,且使用ODI作为因变量方程拟合度较高。结论:刮痧治疗NLBP疗效明显,安全性高,且中短期疗效优于"不出痧"刮痧和针刺治疗,表明刮痧"出痧"是临床疗效的重要影响因素;同时ODI可以作为刮痧治疗腰痛的敏感指标之一。展开更多
文摘Background: Work related low back pain has been identified as a one of the most costly disorders among the worldwide working population. This condition was highly prevalent that approximately 85% patients having back pain were brought on by prolonged sitting. With the rapid development of modern technology, sitting has now become the most common posture in today’s work- place. Idea of using motor control learning approach provides the optimal control and coordination of the spine. The McKenzie evaluation was received using repeated movements and sustained positions. Therefore high quality randomized clinical trial was required to compare the effectiveness of these treatments for work related low back pain. Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of motor control exercises and McKenzie exercises in reducing pain and disability in work related low back pain. Method: The study included 40 subjects with work related low back pain due to prolonged sitting. They were randomly allocated into two groups (Group A and Group B). Group A was treated with motor control exercises and group B was treated with McKenzie exercises for 4 weeks. Results: Both the groups have shown statically significant improvement in vas with p < 0.0001 and ODI with p < 0.0001. When the comparison was done after the 4 weeks, the percentage of improvement in group A was much higher than Group B. Conclusion: The study concluded that motor control exercises have shown statically and clinically significant improvement in reducing pain and disability when compared to McKenzie exercises among work related low back pain subjects.
文摘目的:观察"出痧"刮痧、"不出痧"刮痧与针刺治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛(NLBP)的临床疗效差异。方法:通过中央网络随机分组系统,将150例符合纳入标准的NLBP患者随机分为出痧组、不出痧组和针刺组,每组50例。出痧组在受试者腰部(肾俞、志室到次髎、秩边)、下肢(从承扶过委中至承山)进行刮痧,每个部位刮8-10次,并且要求"刮致出痧",每次刮痧治疗间隔4d,总共治疗7次。不出痧组操作方法与出痧组相同,但要求"不出痧",每次刮痧治疗间隔2d,总共治疗7次。针刺组针刺患者肾俞和委中,直刺进针,施平补平泻手法至局部出现酸麻肿重感,每次治疗30min,每次针刺间隔2d,总共治疗7次。比较3组受试者治疗前、治疗结束后及1个月与3个月的随访时视觉模拟量表(VAS)、自拟临床症状积分和Oswetery功能障碍指数(ODI)。根据M5P决策树算法,使用Weka Explorer 3.6软件计算刮痧治疗NLBP疗效预测方程。结果:1治疗结束时,出痧组脱落7例,不出痧组脱落6例,针刺组脱落8例,最终完成129例。3组受试者在治疗过程中未发生不良反应。2治疗结束后,3组NLBP患者VAS、临床症状积分、ODI指数均明显降低(P<0.05),且随访1个月、3个月随访疗效稳定;出痧组3个指标的改善均优于不出痧组和针刺组,针刺组3个指标的改善亦优于不出痧组(均P<0.05)。3根据M5P决策树算法,提出刮痧治疗NLBP疗效预测方程,且使用ODI作为因变量方程拟合度较高。结论:刮痧治疗NLBP疗效明显,安全性高,且中短期疗效优于"不出痧"刮痧和针刺治疗,表明刮痧"出痧"是临床疗效的重要影响因素;同时ODI可以作为刮痧治疗腰痛的敏感指标之一。
