Pathological Fractures in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients in a Teaching Hospital in Senegal: Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors

Introduction: The lack of follow-up and adequate management of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) in chronic hemodialysis patients is associated with pathological fractures. Few studies are available on the subject in sub-Saharan Africa. The objective of this work was to evaluate the prevalence of pathological fractures in our chronic hemodialysis patients, to analyze their clinical aspects and to determine the factors associated with their occurrence. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive and analytical study over 9 years (January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020) based on the medical records of chronic hemodialysis patients at the CHU Aristide Le Dantec. The diagnosis of pathological fracture was retained in front of any fracture occurring spontaneously or following minimal trauma and confirmed by X-ray. Results: Nineteen cases of pathological fractures were collected with a hospital prevalence of 19.39%. The mean age was 53.32 ± 13.94 years with a sex ratio of 0.36. The average seniority in dialysis was 84.16 ± 29.88 months. Among these patients, one had had 3 episodes of fractures and another 6 episodes. The circumstances of occurrence of the fractures were the fall in 63% of the cases, spontaneously in 37% of the cases. The predominant site of fractures was the femoral neck (47.38% cases). Female gender (p 5 years (p = 0.049), gait disturbances prior to the fracture (p = 0.001), positive CRP (p = 0.028) and the presence of vascular calcifications (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with the occurrence of pathological fractures. Conclusion: This study has identified the factors associated with the occurrence of pathological invoices in hemodialysis patients in our context. These fractures are often associated with the lack of regular biological follow-up due to the low socioeconomic level of our patients.

Ankle Arthrodesis Nail Combined with Locking Compression Plate to Stabilize Two-Level Pathologic Tibial Fractures

Treatment of fragility fractures of the distal tibia in the elderly is demanding because of osteopenic bone quality, the delicate soft tissue cuff and frequent critical circulation. We report the case of two-level tibial pseudarthroses in an 83- year-old woman caused by multiple myeloma successfully stabilized by a long ankle arthrodesis nail combined with locking compression plate osteosynthesis. This case is unique, as to our best knowledge, herein diaphyseal fractures were treated for the first time using a technique reported hitherto primarily for fragility ankle and pilon fractures.

Intramedullary nailing for pathological fractures of the proximal humerus caused by multiple myeloma: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND Multiple myeloma(MM)bone disease is indicative of MM,and reduces patient life quality.In addition to oncological,antineoplastic systemic therapy,surgical therapy in patients with MM is an essential treatment within the framework of supportive therapy measures and involves orthopedic tumor surgery.Nevertheless,there are few reports on intramedullary(IM)nailing in the treatment of MM-induced proximal humeral fracture to prevent fixation loss.We here describe a case of pathological fracture of the proximal humerus caused by MM successfully treated with IM nailing without removal of tumors and a review of the current literature.CASE SUMMARY A 64-year-old male patient complaining of serious left shoulder pain and limited movement was admitted.The patient was finally diagnosed with MM(IgAλ,IIIA/II).After treatment of the pathological fracture with IM nailing,the patient's function recovered and his pain was rapidly relieved.Histopathological examination demonstrated plasma cell myeloma.The patient received chemotherapy in the Hematology Department.The humeral fracture displayed good union during the 40-mo follow-up,with complete healing of the fracture,and the clinical outcome was satisfactory.At the most recent follow-up,the patient's function was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score,which was 29.CONCLUSION Early surgery should be performed for the fracture of the proximal humerus caused by MM.IM nailing can be used without removal of tumors.Bone cement augmentation for bone defects and local adjuvant therapy can also be employed.

Pathological humerus fracture due to anti-interferon-gamma autoantibodies:A case report

BACKGROUND Various etiologies contribute to pathological fractures,including bone infections.Recently,non-tuberculosis Mycobacterium-related bone infections among patients with anti-interferon-gamma autoantibody-induced adult-onset immunodeficiency has raised concerns in Southeast Asia,with the common presentations including osteomyelitis.However,it also rarely manifests as traumatic fractures,as reported in this case.CASE SUMMARY A diabetic female fractured her humerus after a traumatic accident and received fixation surgery.Abnormal necrotic bone tissue and abscess formation were noted,and she was diagnosed with a pathological fracture due to nontuberculosis Mycobacterium infection.Multiple bone involvement was also revealed in a bone scan.Anti-interferon-gamma autoantibodies were then checked due to an unexplained immunocompromised status and found to be positive.Her humerus fracture and multiple bone infections healed after steroid and anti-non-tuberculosis Mycobacterium medication treatment following fixation surgery.CONCLUSION Comprehensive preoperative evaluations may help identify pathological fractures and guide the treatment course.

Treatment of Pathological Fractures of the Proximal Femur Due to Advanced Metastasis of Highly Malignant Tumors: A Clinical Controlled Study of Enterostenosis Reconstruction and Conservative Treatment

Objective: To investigate whether different treatment methods have an impact on the quality of life and life span after fracture of patients with proximal femoral pathological fractures caused by advanced metastasis of highly malignant tumors. Methods: Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and visual analogue score (VAS) were counted at the time of admission and 2 months after the treatments. Survival analysis was implemented to compare the median survival time and 6-month survival rate of the 2 groups. Musculoskeletal score (MSTS) was used to evaluate limb function in the surgical group at 2 months after the treatment. Results: There was no significant difference in KPS score and VAS score between the two groups at the time of admission (p > 0.05). At 2 months after treatment, the KPS score of the surgical group was higher than that of the conservative group (P < 0.05), and the VAS score of the survivors of the surgical group was lower than that of the conservative group (P < 0.05). Survival analysis showed that the median survival time and 6-month survival rate after fracture in the surgical group were higher than those in the conservative group (P < 0.05). After 2 months of treatment, the average MTST score of survivors in the surgical group was 20.38 ± 0.9 (16 - 26 points). Conclusion: Surgical intervention can benefit patients with pathological fractures of the proximal femur due to metastasis of highly malignant tumors in terms of quality of life and survival. Local tumor resection and endoparasitic replacement, which can be tolerated by most patients, can effectively reconstruct the limb function of these patients and restore their self-care ability.

HYBRID EXTERNAL FIXATOR FOR THE TREATMENT OF UNICAMERAL BONE CYSTS WITH PATHOLOGICAL FRACTURE IN THE PROXIMAL HUMERUS

Objective: Unicameral bone cyst is a nonneoplasticbone lesion characterized by its tenacity and risk ofrecurrence. Pathological fracture is common and is often the presenting symptom. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the results of hybrid external fixator for thetreatment of a unicameral bone cyst with a pathologicalfracture. Methods: Hybrid external fixator for thetreatment of a unicameral bone cyst was performed intwelve patients. These patients presented with a pathological fracture and were managed immediately with hybridexternal fixator, of whom four had been managedconservatively at other clinics before they were referred toour department. The cyst was located in the proximalhumerus in all patients. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 8.7 years, and the mean duration offollow-up was 32.6 months. Radiographic evaluation wasperformed according to the criteria of Capanna et al., andthe cyst was classified as completely healed, healed withresidual radiolucency (osteolysis), recurred, or having noresponse. Results: The healing period ranged from three to eight months. Eight cysts healed completely, and threehealed with residual radiolucent areas visible onradiographs. There was recurrence of one cyst that hadhealed with residual radiolucency. All of the cysts in thepresent study responded to treatment. A modulation ofhybrid external fixator was necessary in three patients, asthe bars had become too short after bone growth or the pins had been loose. No major complications were observed.Conclusion: Hybrid external fixator provides earlystability, which allows early mobilization and thus obviates the need for a plaster cast. This method of treatment alsoallows for an early return to normal activity.

Coincident Bilateral Atraumatic Hip Fracture in a Young Patient with Renal Osteodystrophy

Bilateral, coincident, atraumatic hip fracture is extremely uncommon and usually occurs secondary to seizures, trauma and metabolic disease including renal osteodystrophy. One of the major types, secondary hyperparathyroidism is associated with high bone turnover due to excess parathyroid hormone and usually seen in a chronic dialysis patient. We reported a 20-year-old woman with end stage renal failure and renal osteodystrophy. She sustained atraumatic right subtrochanteric fracture and left neck of femur fracture (Garden 1), then underwent bilateral long proximal femoral nail. Renal osteodystrophy causes pathological fracture by affecting calcium metabolism that stimulates bone resorptions and leads to osteoporotic bone. The aim of this case report is to discuss the approach and management done to the patient presented to our center. Bilateral long proximal femoral nail (PFN) was chosen, taking into account the patient’s premorbid, age, fracture pattern and potential complications. Careful multidisciplinary team approach led by the orthopaedic surgeon, nephrologist and physical therapist is vital for the patient to achieve good outcome postoperatively, thus reducing morbidity and mortality.

Fracture risk assessment in children with benign bone lesions of long bones

BACKGROUND Fracture risk assessment in children with benign bone lesions of long bones remains poorly investigated.AIM To investigate the risk factors for pathological fracture in children with benign bone lesions and to propose a modified scoring system for quantitative analysis of the pathologic fracture risk.METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 96 pediatric patients with benign bone lesions.We compared radiographic and clinical features between 40 patients who had fractures through a benign bone lesion and 56 who had no fracture.Information including histological diagnosis,anatomical site,radiographic appearance,severity of pain,and lesion size was recorded for the patients.A modified scoring system was proposed to predict the risk of fracture.RESULTS The univariate comparisons showed a significant difference between the fracture and non-fracture groups in terms of lesion type,pain,lesion-to-bone width,and axial cortical involvement of the patients(P<0.05).Lesion type,pain,lesion-tobone width,and axial cortical involvement were independently correlated with an increased risk of fracture.The mean score of the fracture group was 7.89,whereas the mean score of the non-fracture group was 6.01.The optimum cut-off value of the score to predict pathological fracture was 7.The scoring system had a sensitivity of 70%and a specificity of 80%for detecting patients with fractures.The Youden index was 0.5,which was the maximum value.The area under the receiver operator characteristic was 0.814.CONCLUSION Lesion type,pain,lesion-to-bone width,and axial cortical involvement are risk factors for pathological fracture.The modified scoring system can provide evidence for clinical decision-making in children with benign bone lesions.A bone lesion with a total score>7 indicates a high risk of a pathologic fracture and is an indication for prophylactic internal fixation.

Reciprocal hematogenous osteomyelitis of the femurs caused by Anaerococcus prevotii:A case report

BACKGROUND Haematogenous osteomyelitis is an extremely rare disease occurring in adults,especially in developed countries.It is clearly a systemic infection,because bacteraemia spreads over proximal and distal long bones or paravertebral plexuses,resulting in acute or chronic bone infection and destruction.CASE SUMMARY A 46-year-old Caucasian male was complaining of a left thigh pain.It is known from the anamnesis that the patient developed severe pneumonia three months ago before the onset of these symptoms.The patient was diagnosed with haematogenous osteomyelitis,which developed a turbulent course and required complex combination therapy.The primary pathogen is thought to be Anaerococcus prevotii,which caused pneumonia before the onset of signs of osteomyelitis.Unfortunately,due to the complexity of identifying anaerobes and contributing nosocomial infections,the primary pathogen was not extracted immediately.After the manifestation of this disease,pathological fractures occurred in both femurs,as well as purulent processes in the lungs and molars accompanied.The patient received broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy and countless amounts of orthopaedic and reconstructive surgeries,but no positive effect was observed.The patient underwent osteosynthesis using an Ilizarov’s external fixation apparatus,re-fixations,external AO,debridements,intramedullary osteosynthesis with a silver-coated intramedullary nail,abscessotomies.The right femur healed completely after the pathological fracture and osteomyelitis did not recur.Left femur could not be saved due to non-healing,knee contracture and bone destruction.After almost three years of struggle,it was decided to amputate the left limb,after which the signs of osteomyelitis no longer appeared.CONCLUSION To sum it all up,complicated or chronic osteomyelitis requires surgery to remove the infected tissue and bone.Osteomyelitis surgery prevents the infection from spreading further or getting even worse up to such condition that amputation is the only option left.

Dynamic condylar screw or hip joint （spanning） external fixator for treatment of pathological fractures of femoral neck and trochanter secondary to benign lesions

The treatment of pathological fractures of the femoral neck and trochanteric region secondary to benignlesions can be a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons because of the size and nature of the lesions, the resulting bony defect, the risk of recurrence, the possible associated deformities, and the risk of osteonecrosis. Numerous treatment modalities have been reported for the management of pathological fractures of the proximal femur secondary to benign lesions. An unsatisfactory outcome in 25% of patients and a complication rate of 45% have been observed.

Clinical features of neoplastic pathological fracture in long bones

Background Pathological fractures signify a potentially more aggressive subset of the original disease with higher misdiagnosis rates and inferior oncologic results. The purpose of the present study was to explore the clinical features of neoplastic pathological fracture in extremities. Methods From August 2002 to December 2010, a consecutive series of 139 patients suffering neoplastic pathological fracture were recruited, including 79 males and 60 females with a mean age of 31.3 years. Fractures were classified into five groups： tumor-like lesions （55）, benign bone tumors （13）, giant cell tumors （7）, primary malignant bone tumors （28）, and metastatic bone tumors （36）. Based on their inducing forces, pathologic fractures were classified into four grades： spontaneous fracture, functional fracture, minor injury, and traumatic injury. Patients＇ age, fracture site, histological diagnoses, fracture forces, prodromes, and misdiagnosis were well reviewed. Kruskal-Wallis and X2 tests were used to compare forces and prodromes within different types of bone tumors. Results The highest pathologic fracture morbidity was 32.3% （45/139）, which lay in the 11-20 year group, and 86.1% of metastatic tumors occurred in the 50-80 year group. The common sites of fractures were femur, humerus, and tibia. The fracture forces in benign bone tumors and tumor-like lesions are the strongest, followed by metastatic tumors and primary malignant bone tumors （Hc=80.980, P=0.000）. Sixty-seven patients （48.2%） had local prodromes before pathologic fracture. The incidence rates of prodromes between primary malignant tumors and metastatic bone tumors had no significant difference （P=0.146）, but they were all obviously higher than that of benign bone tumors and tumor-like lesions. Twenty patients experienced misdiagnosis. Conclusion Minor injury forces and local prodromes are clinical features of neoplastic pathologic fractures and they are also the critical factor avoiding misdiagnoses.

Current concepts in the surgical treatment of skeletal metastases

Symptomatic metastatic bone disease affects a large proportion of patients with malignant tumours and significantly impairs patients’quality of life.There are still controversies regarding both surgical indications and methods,mainly because of the relatively few high-quality studies in this field.Generally,prosthetic reconstruction has been shown to result in fewer implant failures and should be preferred in patients with a good prognosis.Survival estimation tools should be used as part of preoperative planning.Adjuvant treatment,which relies on radiotherapy and inhibition of osteoclast function may also offer symptomatic relief and prevent implant failure.In this review we discuss the epidemiology,indications for surgery,preoperative planning,surgical techniques and adjuvant treatment of metastatic bone disease.

Surgical treatment of metastatic bone disease of the distal extremities

Metastatic bone disease of the distal extremities,also known as acrometastasis,is very rare.Thus,there is very limited information regarding the clinical manifestations and methods of surgical treatment.The current available literature shows that acrometastases are often encountered in the context of advanced disease and are thus associated with poor patient survival.As metastatic bone disease is generally uncurable,the goal of surgical treatment is to provide the patient with good function with as few complications as possible.In this article,we discuss the clinical manifestation of acrometastases,the methods of surgical intervention,and the expected clinical outcome.Non-surgically managed pathological fractures generally remain ununited;therefore,conservative treatment is reserved for patients with poor general condition or dismal prognosis.The current evidence suggests that in lesions of the lower arm and leg,osteosynthesis(plate and screw fixation or intramedullary nail)is the most common method of reconstruction,whereas local excision or amputation are more commonly used in cases of more distal lesions(such as ankle,foot and hand).Following surgery most patients receive adjuvant radiotherapy,even though its role is poorly documented.Close collaboration between orthopedic surgeons and medical oncologists is necessary to improve patient care and treatment outcome.Further studies are needed in order to provide stronger clinical evidence and improve decision-making,in an effort to optimize the patients’quality of life and avoid the need for revision surgery.