Treatment effects and periodontal status of chronic periodontitis after routine Er:YAG laser-assisted therapy

BACKGROUND Routine preclinical interventions for patients with chronic periodontitis such as supragingival cleaning and subgingival curettage,establishing a balanced occlusal relationship,and irrigation with 3%hydrogen peroxide can relieve the symptoms to some extent.However,there is room for improvement in the overall effect.For example,Er:YAG lasers can quickly increase the temperature of the irradiated tissue,effectively eliminate dental plaque and calculus,reduce periodontal pockets,adjust periodontal microecology,and reduce the gingival sulcus.The content of factors in the liquid,and then achieve the purpose of treatment.AIM The aim was evaluate the effect of Er:YAG laser-assisted routine therapy on the periodontal status in chronic periodontitis.METHODS Between October 2018 and January 2020,106 patients with chronic periodontitis in our hospital were randomly assigned to either the study or control group,with 53 patients in each group.The control group underwent routine therapy,and the study group underwent Er:YAG laser therapy in addition to routine therapy.We evaluated the treatment outcome in both groups.Periodontal status was determined by clinical attachment loss(CAL),gingival index(GI),periodontal probing depth(PD),dental plaque index(PLI),and sulcular bleeding index(SBI),inflammatory factors in the gingival crevicular fluid,tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),interleukin-6(IL-6),IL-8],and colony forming units(CFUs).RESULTS Total effectiveness in the study group(94.34%)was higher than that in the control group(79.25%,P<0.05).The clinical parameters in the study group(PD,5.28±1.08 mm;CAL,4.81±0.79 mm;SBI,3.37±0.59;GI,1.38±0.40;PLI,2.05±0.65)were not significantly different from those in the control group(PD,5.51±1.14 mm;CAL,5.09±0.83 mm;SBI,3.51±0.62;GI,(1.41±0.37;PLI,1.98±0.70)before treatment(P>0.05).However,after treatment,the parameters in the study group(PD,2.97±0.38 mm;CAL,2.71±0.64 mm;SBI,2.07±0.32;GI,0.51±0.11;PLI,1.29±0.34)were lower than those in the control group(PD,3.71±0.42 mm;CAL,3.60±0.71 mm;SBI,2.80±0.44;GI,0.78±0.23;PLI,1.70±0.51)(P<0.05).Differences in crevicular TNF-α,IL-6,and IL-8 levels in the study(TNF-α,7.82±3.43 ng/mL;IL-6,11.67±2.59 ng/mL;IL-8,12.12±3.19 pg/mL)and control groups(TNF-α,9.06±3.89 ng/ml,IL-6,12.13±2.97 ng/mL,IL-8,10.99±3.30 pg/mL)before therapy(P>0.05)were not significant.Following treatment,the parameters were significantly lower in the study group(TNF-α,2.04±0.89 ng/mL;IL-6,4.60±1.26 ng/mL;IL-8,3.15±1.08 pg/mL)than in the control group(TNF-α,3.11±1.07 ng/mL;IL-6,6.25±1.41 ng/mL;IL-8,4.64±1.23 pg/mL,P<0.05).The difference in the CFU of the study group[(367.91±74.32)×104/mL and control group(371.09±80.25)×104/mL]before therapy was not significant(P>0.05).The CFU decreased in both groups following therapy,however,the CFU values were lower in the study group[(36.09±15.26)×104/mL]than in the control group[(45.89±18.08)×104/mL](P<0.05).CONCLUSION Combining Er:YAG lasers with routine measures significantly improved the overall periodontal therapy outcomes by improving periodontal status and reducing oral levels of inflammatory factors and CFUs.

The Impact of Electronic Cigarettes (e-Cigs) Smoking Habit on Periodontal Status and Salivary pH among Some Passive e-Cigs Smokers Referred to the College of Dentistry Clinics, King Khalid University

Background: Electronic cigarette (e-cigs) smoking is substitutional to traditional cigarette smoking to reduce the dangerous combustion of products. Moreover, passive smoking is involuntarily tobacco smoking due to the exposure to cigarette or tobacco smoke among non-smokers and due to there being little knowledge about the impact of passive e-cigs smoking on periodontal status and salivary pH. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the effect of e-cigs smoking habit on periodontal tissue and salivary pH among some passive e-cigs smokers referred to the college of dentistry clinics, King Khalid University. Material and Methods: Ninety male participants who were referred to the college of dentistry clinics at King Khalid University were included in the study. Age, gender, e-cigs smoking, and general health were recorded. The participants were divided into three equal groups (n = 30) as follows: Group I (Non-passive e-cigs smokers and non-smokers) as the control group, Group II (e-cigs users), and Group III (Passive e-cigs smokers). Salivary pH, plaque control record (PCR), gingival bleeding index (GBI), clinical attachment loss (CAL), percentage of radiographic bone loss (% RBL), periodontal pocket depth (PPD), more than 5 missing teeth due to periodontal diseases (>5 MTDP), tooth mobility (TM), furcation involvement (FI), Bite collapse (BC), and less than 20 remaining teeth (10 Opposing pairs) (L20RT) as well as HbA1c were recorded. ANOVA test was used to the comparison between Groups I, II, and III in the participants’ ages and periodontitis staging clinical findings. The mean of participants’ age groups, the mean of salivary pH values of study groups, and the periodontitis staging complexity and HbA1c were compared between groups with the ANOVA test, Tukey’s test, and the chi-square test. P-value was recorded, and less than 0.5 was considered a statistically significant difference (p Results: The e-cigs users group revealed higher means of PCR, GBI %RBL values, and the participants percentages of >5 MTDP, TM, FI, L20RT, and diabetes mellitus (DM) among participants compared to the passive e-cigs smokers group and control group except for the participants percentage of BC among the participants, which was higher among the control group participants. The differences were not significant in PCR, GBI, %RBL and DM (p > 0.5) and significant in >5 MTDP, TM, FI, L20RT and smoking (p 7% values compared to the e-cigs users group and control group participants. The differences were not significant in CAL and PPD (p > 0.5) and significant in the participants percentages of salivary pH values (p Conclusion: The e-cigs smoking habit was the cause of an increase in periodontal disease severity among the electronic smokers rather than passive e-cigs smokers, although the salivary pH was higher in the latter.

The Influence of Kidney Stones and Salivary Uric Acid on Dental Calculus Formation and Periodontal Status among Some Saudi Patients Aged 25 - 70 Years

Background: The formation of kidney stones is considered a complicated process. Consequently, there are many questions about the link between kidney stones formation and level of salivary uric acid and calculus formation on the teeth surfaces. Objectives: To evaluate the correlation between the level of salivary uric acid and kidney stones formation and their influence on dental calculus and periodontal status among Saudi patients aged 25 - 70 years. Materials and Methods: 120 Saudi male patients were examined (60 of Kidney stones patients and 60 patients of non-kidney stones patients) for clinical evaluation of plaque index (PLI), gingival index (GI), calculus index of oral hygiene (CI) and clinical attachment loss (CAL). Moreover, lab assessment of uric acid level in the collected salivary samples was done. The findings were analyzed using of ANOVA test and Tukey’s test. Results: There were statistically significant differences in clinical parameters among kidney stones patients and non-kidney stones patients (p < 0.05), but these differences were highly statistically significant in the correlation between calculus index (CI), plaque index (PLI) and gingival index (GI) among kidney stone patients in group II, moreover, PLI and clinical attachment loss (CAL) among kidney stone patients in group III (p < 0.001). The statistical analyses revealed statistically significant differences in the level of salivary uric acid (mg/dl) in the comparison between kidney stones patients and non-kidney stones patients in group I and group III, whereas there were highly statistically significant in the comparison between kidney stones patients and non-kidney stones patients in group III. Conclusion: At the end of this study, we concluded that there was a relationship between dental calculus formation, kidney stones formation, and an increase in the level of salivary uric acid.

The Impact of Salivary pH Value and Dental Caries Index on Periodontal Status among Adult Age Groups of Patients from Aseer Region, Saudi Arabia

Background: The patients’ age is considered a modified risk factor that causes periodontal disease, dental caries, and their development. Objective: The present study was designed to evaluate the impact of salivary pH value and dental caries index on periodontal status among adult age groups of patients from Aseer region, Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis carried out in the college of dentistry, King Khalid University on 750 adult patients (400 males and 350 females). The adults patients were divided into three equal groups according to the patients’ age: group I (20 - 30 years), group II (31 - 40 years), and group III (41 - 50 years). Plaque index (PLI), gingival index (GI), clinical attachment loss (CAL), and the dental caries index (DMFT) recorded as well as salivary pH. All findings collected, then analyzed by an ANOVA test and the t-test. A p-value at <0.05 was considered a statistical significance level. Results: The clinical findings of the current study showed that there were statistically significant differences in the patients’ age of both males and females. Moreover, there were statistically significant differences in GI. On the other hand, there were highly statistically significant differences in PLI and DMFS, but there were no significant differences in CAL of both males and females Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences in salivary pH. Conclusion: We concluded that DMFT Index correlated to periodontal and oral health status and, it increased with the progression of the patient’s age and can be used in the epidemiological evaluation of periodontal and oral health status.