The present objective is to observe the side effects and complications of fem ale tubalsterilization by phenol-atabrinepaste (PAP) and phenolm ucilage (PM). 1 705 eligible w om en w ere divided random ly into tw o g...The present objective is to observe the side effects and complications of fem ale tubalsterilization by phenol-atabrinepaste (PAP) and phenolm ucilage (PM). 1 705 eligible w om en w ere divided random ly into tw o groups, 871 usinig PAP and 834 w om en using PM. Results: Thefeverratesw ere8.0and 4.4( P< 0.01 ) respec- tively in group PAP and group PM. Infection rates of the appendages w ere 2.3 and 1.2 respectively. The incidence of chem ical peritonitis, w ithin the lim its of pelvic cavity, w ere 1.1and 2.4respectively. Perforation of uterus, pelvic ab- scessand ectopicpregnancy w ere notfound during thisobservation. Slightabdom inal pain after the proceduresw ere 33.6and 30.8respectively. Slightvaginalbleed- ing after the procedure w as 23.2 and 18.0 respectively. Menstruation of the w om en w as not affected by the instillation. This five-year follow -up study neither show ed a positivePap testnor a potentialdeseasecaused by thesterilizing agents. This technique isa safe and efficientm ethod for fem ale sterilization.展开更多
A multi center randomized clinical trial was adopted in the present study. 1705 eligible women with identical demographic and gynecological characteristics were divided into two groups: 871 using phenol atabrine pas...A multi center randomized clinical trial was adopted in the present study. 1705 eligible women with identical demographic and gynecological characteristics were divided into two groups: 871 using phenol atabrine paste (PAP) and 834 using phenol mucilage (PM). The five year follow up rates for the two groups were 97.5% and 98.1%, respectively. The multiple decrement life table analysis showed that there was a significant difference in the gross cumulative failure rates between the two groups. The 60th month gross cumulative failure rates for PAP group and PM group were 4.61% and 11.87%, respectively, thus indicating the efficacy of PAP to be significantly higher than that of PM. 97.7% users had cervical smear examinations, but no suspected cancer cells or cancer cells were found. Meanwhile, there was no known diseases related to the chemical reagent. This follow up study indicates that tubal sterilization by chemical instillation is a simple,safe and efficient female method. It suggested that this method would be introduced to a wider use on the basis of modification in the composition of chemical agents, standardized operational procedure, and improved administrative regulation in the use of this technology.展开更多
文摘The present objective is to observe the side effects and complications of fem ale tubalsterilization by phenol-atabrinepaste (PAP) and phenolm ucilage (PM). 1 705 eligible w om en w ere divided random ly into tw o groups, 871 usinig PAP and 834 w om en using PM. Results: Thefeverratesw ere8.0and 4.4( P< 0.01 ) respec- tively in group PAP and group PM. Infection rates of the appendages w ere 2.3 and 1.2 respectively. The incidence of chem ical peritonitis, w ithin the lim its of pelvic cavity, w ere 1.1and 2.4respectively. Perforation of uterus, pelvic ab- scessand ectopicpregnancy w ere notfound during thisobservation. Slightabdom inal pain after the proceduresw ere 33.6and 30.8respectively. Slightvaginalbleed- ing after the procedure w as 23.2 and 18.0 respectively. Menstruation of the w om en w as not affected by the instillation. This five-year follow -up study neither show ed a positivePap testnor a potentialdeseasecaused by thesterilizing agents. This technique isa safe and efficientm ethod for fem ale sterilization.
文摘A multi center randomized clinical trial was adopted in the present study. 1705 eligible women with identical demographic and gynecological characteristics were divided into two groups: 871 using phenol atabrine paste (PAP) and 834 using phenol mucilage (PM). The five year follow up rates for the two groups were 97.5% and 98.1%, respectively. The multiple decrement life table analysis showed that there was a significant difference in the gross cumulative failure rates between the two groups. The 60th month gross cumulative failure rates for PAP group and PM group were 4.61% and 11.87%, respectively, thus indicating the efficacy of PAP to be significantly higher than that of PM. 97.7% users had cervical smear examinations, but no suspected cancer cells or cancer cells were found. Meanwhile, there was no known diseases related to the chemical reagent. This follow up study indicates that tubal sterilization by chemical instillation is a simple,safe and efficient female method. It suggested that this method would be introduced to a wider use on the basis of modification in the composition of chemical agents, standardized operational procedure, and improved administrative regulation in the use of this technology.