AIM: To assess the feasibility, accuracy and acceptability of PillCam Colon 2 in detection of significant lesions in colorectal cancer risk patients, unable or unwilling to perform colonoscopy. METHODS: This is a pros...AIM: To assess the feasibility, accuracy and acceptability of PillCam Colon 2 in detection of significant lesions in colorectal cancer risk patients, unable or unwilling to perform colonoscopy. METHODS: This is a prospective, single center study using the second generation of PillCam Colon capsule. In all patients the readers were instructed to review the entire colon capsule endoscopy(CCE) examination using Rapid 7 software and additionally to note significant extra-colonic findings. Colonic significant findings were described according to European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines. CCE procedure completion rate, level of bowel preparation and rate of adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients at risk of colorectal cancer were enrolled in the study. In three patients the procedure failed because the capsule was not functioning when entered the colon. PillCam Colon 2 showed positive findings in 23(34%, 95%CI: 21.6%-44.1%) of the remaining 67 patients. Six patients were diagnosedwith tumors: 4 with colon cancers, 1 with gastric cancer and 1 with a small bowel cancer. The capsule findings were confirmed after surgery in all these patients. The capsule excretion rate in twelve hours was 77% with 54 patients having a complete examination. The rectum was not explored during CCE procedure, in 16 patients(23%, 95%CI: 13.7%-34.1%). Every patient accepted CCE as an alternative exploration tool and 65/70(93%) agreed to have another future control by CCE. No complications were reported during or after CCE examination. CONCLUSION: PillCam Colon 2 capsule was effective in detecting significant lesions and might be considered an adequate alternative diagnostic tool in patients unable or unwilling to undergo colonoscopy.展开更多
Whipple's disease is a rare chronic systemic infection determined by the Gram-positive bacillus Tropheryma whipplei.The infection usually mainly involves the small bowel,but sometimes other organs are affected as ...Whipple's disease is a rare chronic systemic infection determined by the Gram-positive bacillus Tropheryma whipplei.The infection usually mainly involves the small bowel,but sometimes other organs are affected as well.Since the current standard clinical and biological tests are nonspecific,diagnosis is very difficult and relies on histopathology.Here we present the case of a 52-yearold man with chronic diarrhea and weight loss whose symptoms had been evolving for 2 years and whose diagnosis came unexpectedly after capsule examination.Diagnosis was confirmed by the histopathologic examination of endoscopic biopsy samples,and treatment with co-trimoxazole resulted in remission of symptoms.We present the first images of Whipple's disease obtained with the Pillcam Colon 2 video capsule system.展开更多
Colon capsule endoscopy(CCE) may be a means to overcome the low adherence to colorectal cancer screening. The device is an ingestible capsule with a video camera at both ends that can take photographs as it progresses...Colon capsule endoscopy(CCE) may be a means to overcome the low adherence to colorectal cancer screening. The device is an ingestible capsule with a video camera at both ends that can take photographs as it progresses through the gastrointestinal tract.PillCam colon(PCC1) may be used for structural evaluation of the large bowel following an adequate cleaning procedure.PCC1 measures 11 mm×31 mm and has dual cameras that enable the device to acquire video images from both ends with a wide coverage area,automatic light control and a frame rate of four frames per second.The system includes a sensor array and data recorder connected to the patient during the procedure.The recorded data are downloaded to the Given Imaging Rapid workstation for review of the colon video.The second generation of PillCam Colon(PCC2) is similar to PCC1 and incorporates new developments.The angle of view has been increased to 172 degrees.It has an adaptive frame rate,alternating from 35 frames per second while in motion to 4 images when virtually stationary.The new RAPIDsoftware now includes a simple graphic interface tool for polyp size estimation.The procedure of bowel cleansing until capsule ingestion is similar to that used for traditional colonoscopy.However it is more rigorous as the bowel cleanliness for capsule colonoscopy has to be excellent or at least good to result in an adequate sensi-tivity of the method.Briefly,it consists of 3.5-4 L of split dose polyethylene glycol.Oral NaP boosters are administered after 1-2 h if the capsule has entered the small bowel.Sodium phosphate(NaP) seems to be a necessary adjunct to the regimen because the total transit time is doubled without NaP.The cleansing level was considered to be good to excellent in 72%-88%in studies with PCC1.The sensitivity for significant polyps(>6 mm or more than 3 polyps>3 mm) ranged from 63%-88% with specificities between 64%-94%.PCC2 showed an improved sensitivity of 89%and a specificity of 76%. CCE seems to be a safe and effective method of visualizing the colonic mucosa through colon fluids without the need for sedation or insufflation of air.The sensitivity of CCE to detect polyps,advanced adenomas and cancer is lower compared to optical colonoscopy but improvements will be made in the near future.With an increased recording duration,even a panenteric examination of the whole gastrointestinal tract may be possible.展开更多
Since the first reports almost ten years ago, wireless capsule endoscopy has gained new f ields of application. Colon capsule endoscopy represents a new diagnostic technology for colonic exploration. Clinical trials h...Since the first reports almost ten years ago, wireless capsule endoscopy has gained new f ields of application. Colon capsule endoscopy represents a new diagnostic technology for colonic exploration. Clinical trials have shown that colon capsule endoscopy is feasible, accurate and safe in patients suffering from colonic diseases and might be a valid alternative to conventional colonoscopy in selected cases such as patients refusing conventional colonoscopy or with contraindications to colonoscopy or when colonoscopy is incomplete. Despite the enthusiasm surrounding this new technique, few clinical and randomized controlled trials are to be found in the current literature, leading to heterogeneous or controversial results. Upcoming studies are needed to prove the substantial utility of colon capsule endoscopy for colon cancer screening, especially in a low prevalence of disease population, and for other indications such as inflammatory bowel disease. Possible perspectives are critically analysed and reported in this paper.展开更多
文摘AIM: To assess the feasibility, accuracy and acceptability of PillCam Colon 2 in detection of significant lesions in colorectal cancer risk patients, unable or unwilling to perform colonoscopy. METHODS: This is a prospective, single center study using the second generation of PillCam Colon capsule. In all patients the readers were instructed to review the entire colon capsule endoscopy(CCE) examination using Rapid 7 software and additionally to note significant extra-colonic findings. Colonic significant findings were described according to European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines. CCE procedure completion rate, level of bowel preparation and rate of adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients at risk of colorectal cancer were enrolled in the study. In three patients the procedure failed because the capsule was not functioning when entered the colon. PillCam Colon 2 showed positive findings in 23(34%, 95%CI: 21.6%-44.1%) of the remaining 67 patients. Six patients were diagnosedwith tumors: 4 with colon cancers, 1 with gastric cancer and 1 with a small bowel cancer. The capsule findings were confirmed after surgery in all these patients. The capsule excretion rate in twelve hours was 77% with 54 patients having a complete examination. The rectum was not explored during CCE procedure, in 16 patients(23%, 95%CI: 13.7%-34.1%). Every patient accepted CCE as an alternative exploration tool and 65/70(93%) agreed to have another future control by CCE. No complications were reported during or after CCE examination. CONCLUSION: PillCam Colon 2 capsule was effective in detecting significant lesions and might be considered an adequate alternative diagnostic tool in patients unable or unwilling to undergo colonoscopy.
文摘Whipple's disease is a rare chronic systemic infection determined by the Gram-positive bacillus Tropheryma whipplei.The infection usually mainly involves the small bowel,but sometimes other organs are affected as well.Since the current standard clinical and biological tests are nonspecific,diagnosis is very difficult and relies on histopathology.Here we present the case of a 52-yearold man with chronic diarrhea and weight loss whose symptoms had been evolving for 2 years and whose diagnosis came unexpectedly after capsule examination.Diagnosis was confirmed by the histopathologic examination of endoscopic biopsy samples,and treatment with co-trimoxazole resulted in remission of symptoms.We present the first images of Whipple's disease obtained with the Pillcam Colon 2 video capsule system.
文摘Colon capsule endoscopy(CCE) may be a means to overcome the low adherence to colorectal cancer screening. The device is an ingestible capsule with a video camera at both ends that can take photographs as it progresses through the gastrointestinal tract.PillCam colon(PCC1) may be used for structural evaluation of the large bowel following an adequate cleaning procedure.PCC1 measures 11 mm×31 mm and has dual cameras that enable the device to acquire video images from both ends with a wide coverage area,automatic light control and a frame rate of four frames per second.The system includes a sensor array and data recorder connected to the patient during the procedure.The recorded data are downloaded to the Given Imaging Rapid workstation for review of the colon video.The second generation of PillCam Colon(PCC2) is similar to PCC1 and incorporates new developments.The angle of view has been increased to 172 degrees.It has an adaptive frame rate,alternating from 35 frames per second while in motion to 4 images when virtually stationary.The new RAPIDsoftware now includes a simple graphic interface tool for polyp size estimation.The procedure of bowel cleansing until capsule ingestion is similar to that used for traditional colonoscopy.However it is more rigorous as the bowel cleanliness for capsule colonoscopy has to be excellent or at least good to result in an adequate sensi-tivity of the method.Briefly,it consists of 3.5-4 L of split dose polyethylene glycol.Oral NaP boosters are administered after 1-2 h if the capsule has entered the small bowel.Sodium phosphate(NaP) seems to be a necessary adjunct to the regimen because the total transit time is doubled without NaP.The cleansing level was considered to be good to excellent in 72%-88%in studies with PCC1.The sensitivity for significant polyps(>6 mm or more than 3 polyps>3 mm) ranged from 63%-88% with specificities between 64%-94%.PCC2 showed an improved sensitivity of 89%and a specificity of 76%. CCE seems to be a safe and effective method of visualizing the colonic mucosa through colon fluids without the need for sedation or insufflation of air.The sensitivity of CCE to detect polyps,advanced adenomas and cancer is lower compared to optical colonoscopy but improvements will be made in the near future.With an increased recording duration,even a panenteric examination of the whole gastrointestinal tract may be possible.
文摘Since the first reports almost ten years ago, wireless capsule endoscopy has gained new f ields of application. Colon capsule endoscopy represents a new diagnostic technology for colonic exploration. Clinical trials have shown that colon capsule endoscopy is feasible, accurate and safe in patients suffering from colonic diseases and might be a valid alternative to conventional colonoscopy in selected cases such as patients refusing conventional colonoscopy or with contraindications to colonoscopy or when colonoscopy is incomplete. Despite the enthusiasm surrounding this new technique, few clinical and randomized controlled trials are to be found in the current literature, leading to heterogeneous or controversial results. Upcoming studies are needed to prove the substantial utility of colon capsule endoscopy for colon cancer screening, especially in a low prevalence of disease population, and for other indications such as inflammatory bowel disease. Possible perspectives are critically analysed and reported in this paper.
