BACKGROUND:To investigate the clinical effectiveness of a pneumatic compression device(PCD)combined with low-molecular-weight heparin(LMWH)for the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis(DVT)in trauma patient...BACKGROUND:To investigate the clinical effectiveness of a pneumatic compression device(PCD)combined with low-molecular-weight heparin(LMWH)for the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis(DVT)in trauma patients.METHODS:This study retrospectively analyzed 286 patients with mild craniocerebral injury and clavicular fractures admitted to our department from January 2016 to February 2020.Patients treated with only LMWH served as the control group,and patients treated with a PCD combined with LMWH as the observation group.The incidence of DVT,postoperative changes in the visual analogue scale(VAS)score,and coagulation function were observed and compared between the two groups.Excluding the influence of other single factors,binary logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the use of a PCD in the patient’s postoperative coagulation function.RESULTS:After excluding 34 patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria,252 patients were were included.The incidence of DVT in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group(5.6%vs.15.1%,χ^(2)=4.605,P<0.05).The postoperative VAS scores of the two groups were lower than those before surgery(P<0.05).The coagulation function of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group,with a better combined anticoagulant effect(P<0.05).There were no significant differences between the two groups in preoperative or postoperative Glasgow Coma Scale scores,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative infection rate,or length of hospital stay(P>0.05).According to logistic regression analysis,the postoperative risk of DVT in patients who received LMWH alone was 1.764 times that of patients who received LMWH+PCD(P<0.05).The area under the receiver operating characteristic(AUROC)curve of partial thromboplastin time(APTT)and platelet(PLT)were greater than 0.5,indicating that they were the influence indicators of adding PCD to prevent DVT.Excluding the influence of other variables,LMWH+PCD effectively improved the coagulation function of patients.CONCLUSIONS:Compared with LMWH alone,LMWH+PCD could improve blood rheology and coagulation function in patients with traumatic brain injury and clavicular fracture,reduce the incidence of DVT,shorten the length of hospital stay,and improve the clinical effectiveness of treatment.展开更多
Background Venous thromboembolism is known to be an important social and health care problem because of its high incidence among patients who undergo surgery. Studies on the mechanical prophylaxis of thromboembolism a...Background Venous thromboembolism is known to be an important social and health care problem because of its high incidence among patients who undergo surgery. Studies on the mechanical prophylaxis of thromboembolism after gynaecological pelvic surgery are few. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of mechanical thromboembolism prophylaxis after gynaecological pelvic surgery using a combination of graduated compression stockings （GCS） and intermittent pneumatic compression （IPC） or GCS alone. Methods The study was performed on 108 patients who were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group received GCS before the operation and IPC during the operation （IPC＋GCS group）, The second group received GCS before the operation （GCS group）. To analyze the effect of the preventive measures and the laboratory examination on the incidence of thrombosis and to compare the safety of these measures, the incidence of adverse reactions was assessed. Results The morbidity associated with DVT was 4.8% （5/104） in the IPC＋GCS group and 12.5% （14/112） in the GCS group. There were significant statistical differences between the two groups. There were no adverse effects in either group. Conclusions The therapeutic combination of GCS and prevention in high-risk patients undergoing gynaecological group.（No. ChiCTR-PRC-10000935）. IPC was more effective than GCS alone for thrombosis pelvic surgery, and there were no adverse effects in either展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND:To investigate the clinical effectiveness of a pneumatic compression device(PCD)combined with low-molecular-weight heparin(LMWH)for the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis(DVT)in trauma patients.METHODS:This study retrospectively analyzed 286 patients with mild craniocerebral injury and clavicular fractures admitted to our department from January 2016 to February 2020.Patients treated with only LMWH served as the control group,and patients treated with a PCD combined with LMWH as the observation group.The incidence of DVT,postoperative changes in the visual analogue scale(VAS)score,and coagulation function were observed and compared between the two groups.Excluding the influence of other single factors,binary logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the use of a PCD in the patient’s postoperative coagulation function.RESULTS:After excluding 34 patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria,252 patients were were included.The incidence of DVT in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group(5.6%vs.15.1%,χ^(2)=4.605,P<0.05).The postoperative VAS scores of the two groups were lower than those before surgery(P<0.05).The coagulation function of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group,with a better combined anticoagulant effect(P<0.05).There were no significant differences between the two groups in preoperative or postoperative Glasgow Coma Scale scores,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative infection rate,or length of hospital stay(P>0.05).According to logistic regression analysis,the postoperative risk of DVT in patients who received LMWH alone was 1.764 times that of patients who received LMWH+PCD(P<0.05).The area under the receiver operating characteristic(AUROC)curve of partial thromboplastin time(APTT)and platelet(PLT)were greater than 0.5,indicating that they were the influence indicators of adding PCD to prevent DVT.Excluding the influence of other variables,LMWH+PCD effectively improved the coagulation function of patients.CONCLUSIONS:Compared with LMWH alone,LMWH+PCD could improve blood rheology and coagulation function in patients with traumatic brain injury and clavicular fracture,reduce the incidence of DVT,shorten the length of hospital stay,and improve the clinical effectiveness of treatment.
文摘Background Venous thromboembolism is known to be an important social and health care problem because of its high incidence among patients who undergo surgery. Studies on the mechanical prophylaxis of thromboembolism after gynaecological pelvic surgery are few. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of mechanical thromboembolism prophylaxis after gynaecological pelvic surgery using a combination of graduated compression stockings （GCS） and intermittent pneumatic compression （IPC） or GCS alone. Methods The study was performed on 108 patients who were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group received GCS before the operation and IPC during the operation （IPC＋GCS group）, The second group received GCS before the operation （GCS group）. To analyze the effect of the preventive measures and the laboratory examination on the incidence of thrombosis and to compare the safety of these measures, the incidence of adverse reactions was assessed. Results The morbidity associated with DVT was 4.8% （5/104） in the IPC＋GCS group and 12.5% （14/112） in the GCS group. There were significant statistical differences between the two groups. There were no adverse effects in either group. Conclusions The therapeutic combination of GCS and prevention in high-risk patients undergoing gynaecological group.（No. ChiCTR-PRC-10000935）. IPC was more effective than GCS alone for thrombosis pelvic surgery, and there were no adverse effects in either
