Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy for lower ureteral stones therapy, we sought to identify and summarize randomized controlled...Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy for lower ureteral stones therapy, we sought to identify and summarize randomized controlled trials that were used to treat distal ureteral stone. Methods: Eligible studies were identified from electronic databases. Database search, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. Our primary outcome was the stone-free rate. Secondary outcomes were the fragmentation rate, complications and the rate of re-treatment and secondary procedures. The results were assessed by Review Manager 5.0. Publication bias was evaluated by Stata 11.0. Results: 13 trials were included. Meta-analysis of pooled data showed that pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy demonstrated a significant advantage over extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (OR = 0.14, 95% CI [0.09, 0.23], P < 0.00001) in the stone-free rate;the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy had statistical disadvantages over pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the fragmentation rate of ureteral stones (OR = 0.14, 95% CI [0.05, 0.39], P = 0.0002);and the rate of re-treatment and secondary procedure was lower in pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy than in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (OR = 5.37, 95% CI [2.61, 11.07], P < 0.00001). Our pooled results showed that there was no statistical difference between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy in hematuresis, ureteral stricture and urosepsis or fever. Finally extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy had a higher incidence of colic pain than pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis suggested that pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy had large advantages over extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower ureteral stones.展开更多
patients with left/right intrahepatic bile-duct calculi received ultrasonic lithotresis via abdomen by using the percutaneous cholecystoscopeand ultrasonic lithotresis apparatus. The results indicated that all the sur...patients with left/right intrahepatic bile-duct calculi received ultrasonic lithotresis via abdomen by using the percutaneous cholecystoscopeand ultrasonic lithotresis apparatus. The results indicated that all the surgical manipulations were successful with a residual rate of 6. 7 %, compared with a residual rate of 78. 2 % in 23 cases of left/right intrahepatic bile-duct lithiasis treated simultaneously by lithotomy apparatus. The differences between them were statistically significant (μ= 4. 29, P<0. 01). Among 12 cases undergoing follow-up observation , no side effect due to ultrasonic lithotresis and no residual calculus after 2- 4 check-ups with B-mode ultrasound diagnostic set were found and all of their symptoms disappeared except for 1 case.展开更多
1临床资料患者男,76岁,因“发作性胸痛半年余,加重1周”入院。查体:脉搏74次/min,血压138/73 mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 k Pa),口唇无发绀,肝颈静脉反流征阴性,双肺呼吸音清。心界正常,心率74次/min,律齐,无杂音。心电图检查示V1-5导联ST-T...1临床资料患者男,76岁,因“发作性胸痛半年余,加重1周”入院。查体:脉搏74次/min,血压138/73 mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 k Pa),口唇无发绀,肝颈静脉反流征阴性,双肺呼吸音清。心界正常,心率74次/min,律齐,无杂音。心电图检查示V1-5导联ST-T变化。心肌肌钙蛋白(cardiac troponin,cTn)I 2.46μg/L,诊断为急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死。冠状动脉造影显示罪犯病变前降支近中段弥漫性重度钙化狭窄,最重处95%狭窄(图1(1)),心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)血流分级3级。展开更多
文摘Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy for lower ureteral stones therapy, we sought to identify and summarize randomized controlled trials that were used to treat distal ureteral stone. Methods: Eligible studies were identified from electronic databases. Database search, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. Our primary outcome was the stone-free rate. Secondary outcomes were the fragmentation rate, complications and the rate of re-treatment and secondary procedures. The results were assessed by Review Manager 5.0. Publication bias was evaluated by Stata 11.0. Results: 13 trials were included. Meta-analysis of pooled data showed that pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy demonstrated a significant advantage over extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (OR = 0.14, 95% CI [0.09, 0.23], P < 0.00001) in the stone-free rate;the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy had statistical disadvantages over pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the fragmentation rate of ureteral stones (OR = 0.14, 95% CI [0.05, 0.39], P = 0.0002);and the rate of re-treatment and secondary procedure was lower in pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy than in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (OR = 5.37, 95% CI [2.61, 11.07], P < 0.00001). Our pooled results showed that there was no statistical difference between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy in hematuresis, ureteral stricture and urosepsis or fever. Finally extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy had a higher incidence of colic pain than pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis suggested that pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy had large advantages over extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower ureteral stones.
文摘patients with left/right intrahepatic bile-duct calculi received ultrasonic lithotresis via abdomen by using the percutaneous cholecystoscopeand ultrasonic lithotresis apparatus. The results indicated that all the surgical manipulations were successful with a residual rate of 6. 7 %, compared with a residual rate of 78. 2 % in 23 cases of left/right intrahepatic bile-duct lithiasis treated simultaneously by lithotomy apparatus. The differences between them were statistically significant (μ= 4. 29, P<0. 01). Among 12 cases undergoing follow-up observation , no side effect due to ultrasonic lithotresis and no residual calculus after 2- 4 check-ups with B-mode ultrasound diagnostic set were found and all of their symptoms disappeared except for 1 case.
文摘1临床资料患者男,76岁,因“发作性胸痛半年余,加重1周”入院。查体:脉搏74次/min,血压138/73 mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 k Pa),口唇无发绀,肝颈静脉反流征阴性,双肺呼吸音清。心界正常,心率74次/min,律齐,无杂音。心电图检查示V1-5导联ST-T变化。心肌肌钙蛋白(cardiac troponin,cTn)I 2.46μg/L,诊断为急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死。冠状动脉造影显示罪犯病变前降支近中段弥漫性重度钙化狭窄,最重处95%狭窄(图1(1)),心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)血流分级3级。
