Technical note for intraoperative determination of proper acetabular cup size in primary total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND Selecting the optimal size of components is crucial when performing a primary total hip arthroplasty.Implanting the accurate size of the acetabular component can occasionally be exacting,chiefly for surgeons with little experience,whilst the complications of imprecise acetabular sizing or over-reaming can be potentially devastating.AIM To assist clinicians intraoperatively with a simple and repeatable tip in elucidating the ambivalence when determining the proper acetabular component size is not straightforwardly achieved,specifically when surgeons are inexperienced or preoperative templating is unavailable.METHODS This method was employed in 263 operations in our department from June 2021 to December 2022.All operations were performed by the same team of joint reconstruction surgeons,employing a typical posterior hip approach technique.The types of acetabular shells implanted were:The Dynasty®acetabular cup system(MicroPort Orthopedics,Shanghai,China)and the R3®acetabular system(Smith&Nephew,Watford,United Kingdom),which both feature cementless press-fit design.RESULTS The mean value of all cases was calculated and collated with each other.We distinguished as oversized an implanted acetabular shell when its size was>2 mm larger than the size of the acetabular size indicator reamer(ASIR)or when the implanted shell was larger than 4 mm compared to the preoperative planned cup.The median size of the implanted acetabular shell was 52(48–54)mm,while the median size of the preoperatively planned cup was 50(48–56)mm,and the median size of the ASIR was 52(50–54)mm.The correlation coefficient between ASIR size and implanted acetabular component size exhibited a high positive correlation with r=0.719(P<0.001).Contrariwise,intraoperative ASIR measurements precisely predicted the implanted cups’size or differed by only one size(2 mm)in 245 cases.CONCLUSION In our study,we demonstrated that the size of the first acetabular reamer not entering freely in the acetabular rim corroborates the final acetabular component size to implant.This was also corresponding in the majority of the cases with conventional preoperative templating.It can be featured as a valid tool for avoiding the potentially pernicious complications of acetabular cup over-reaming and over-sizing in primary total hip arthroplasty.It is a simple and reproducible technical note useful for confirming the predicted acetabular cup size preoperatively;thus,its application could be considered routinely,even in cases where preoperative templating is unavailable.

Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty on Complex Hips Conditions in a Low-Resource Setting

Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty of complex morphology is a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. Careful analysis of the hip’s anatomy helps to unravel the difficulties and anticipate the procedures to be performed and the implants to be planned. The aim was to identify the types of hip that make first-line THR difficult, specify the technical procedures to be used on these sites, and assess the functional results of the series. Material and Methods: This was a retrospective study that concerned patients operated on for total hip arthroplasty between January 2015 and December 2022 at the medical center “La Grâce” in Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. Patients with coxarthrosis (on hip dysplasia, acetabular protrusio, acetabular malunion or neurological hip) and those with ankylosis of the hip, osteonecrosis secondary to neglected dislocation of the hip or hemoglobinopathy were included. Results: A total of 31 total hip replacements were performed in 30 patients. The mean age of patients at the surgery time was 36.2 years with extremes of 17 and 61 years. The male-to-female sex ratio was 1. The main indications for THA were the dysplasic hip osteoarthritis (11 cases) and the neglected hip dislocations (7 cases). In situ femoral neck osteotomy before hip dislocation was performed in seven cases. The acetabulum reconstruction techniques varied from the structural iliac bone graft (n = 3) and cancellous bone graft (n = 4) to the Kerboull plate (n = 1). After 45 months of mean follow-up, all hips were evaluated. The mean PMA score increased from 7.1 [4 - 8] before the surgery to 13.2 [13 - 17]. Conclusion: The large spectrum of challenges in complex hip management requires effective preoperative planning. Preoperative planning minimizes complications and ensures a better outcome.

Long-term results of an anatomically implanted hip arthroplasty with a short stem prosthesis (MiniHip^(TM))

AIM To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome nineand ten years after short-stemmed, bone preserving and anatomical hip arthroplasty with the MiniHip^(TM) system. METHODS In a prospective study, 186 patients underwent hip arthroplasty with a partial neck preserving short stem(MiniHip^(TM), Corin). Elderly patients were not excluded from this study, thus the mean age at the time of surgery was 59.3 years(range 32 to 82 years). Surgery and the follow-up assessments were performed at two Centers. Up until now, the mean follow-up was 112.5 ± 8.2 mo. The Oxford Hip Score(OHS) and the Hip Dysfunction Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score(HOOS) was assessed pre-and each year after surgery. The clinical follow-up was accompanied by standardized a.p. and axial radiological examinations. Periprosthetic lucencies, hypertrophies within the Gruen zones one to fourteen were assessed. A subsidence of the stem was investigated according to Morray and heterotopic ossifications were assessed according to Brooker.RESULTS The OHS and HOOS improved from 18 ± 3.3 to 46 ± 2.0 and from 30 ± 8.3 to 95 ± 4.6 points, P < 0.001 respectively. There were no differences regarding age, etiology, friction pairings, etc.,(P > 0.05). Two stems were revised due to a symptomatic subsidence four and twelve months postoperatively. Thus, the survivorship for aseptic loosening at nine to ten years was 98.66%. Including one stem revision due to a symptomatic exostosis, bursitis and thigh pain as well as one revision because of a septic stem loosening, the overall survival for the stem with revision for any reason was 97.32%. Besides one asymptomatic patient, radiological signs of a proximal stress-shielding, such as bone resorptions within the proximal Gruen zones, were not noticed. Findings suggesting a distal loading, e.g., bony hypertrophies or bone appositions of more than 2 mm, were also not detected. CONCLUSION Regarding these first long-term results on the MiniHip^(TM), the implant performed exceedingly well with a high rate of survivorship for aseptic loosening. Our radiological results within the Gruen zones support the design rationale of the Minihip to provide a reliable metaphyseal anchoring with the expected proximal, more physiological load transfer. This might minimize or exclude a stress shielding which might be associated with thigh pain, proximal bone loss and an increased risk of aseptic loosening. The MiniHip^(TM) is a reliable partial-neck retaining prosthesis with good a clinical long-term outcome in younger as well as elderly patients.

Highly cross-linked versus conventional polyethylene inserts in total hip arthroplasty,a five-year Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND Polyethylene(PE)particles produced by wear of the acetabular insert are thought to cause osteolysis and thereby aseptic loosening of the implant in total hip arthroplasty(THA).As highly cross-linked polyethylene(HXLPE)is presumed to give lower wear rates,in vivo studies are needed to confirm this.AIM To compare the wear of REXPOL,a HXPLE,with conventional PE within the first five years after implantation using Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis(RSA).METHODS Patients were randomised to receive either a HXLPE(REXPOL)or a conventional PE insert during primary THA.RSA images were obtained directly postoperative and after 6 wk,12 wk,6 mo,12 mo,24 mo and five years.Functional outcomes were assessed using the Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Harris Hip Score at baseline and five years after surgery.RESULTS The HXLPE(REXPOL)showed less wear in the latero-medial direction.Significant wear rates of conventional PE were seen in the latero-medial and center-proximal direction and in volume and corrected volume,whereas the REXPOL did not show these outcomes over time.Improvement from baseline in functional outcome did not significantly differ.CONCLUSION Total 3D wear is less in THAs inserted with a REXPOL inlay than a conventional PE inlay after five years.This study confirms,for the first,that the REXPOL HXLPE inlay is preferred to standard PE.