Healthcare security and privacy breaches are occurring in the United States (US), and increased substantially during the pandemic. This paper reviews the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) publicati...Healthcare security and privacy breaches are occurring in the United States (US), and increased substantially during the pandemic. This paper reviews the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) publication base as an effective solution. The NIST Special Publication 800-66 Revision 1 was an essential standard in US healthcare, which was withdrawn in February 2024 and superseded by SP 800-66 Revision 2. This review investigates the academic papers concerning the application of the NIST SP 800-66 Revision 1 standard in the US healthcare literature. A systematic review method was used in this study to determine current knowledge gaps of the SP 800-66 Revision 1. Some limitations were employed in the search to enforce validity. A total of eleven articles were found eligible for the study. Consequently, this study suggests the necessity for additional academic papers pertaining to SP 800-66 Revision 2 in the US healthcare literature. In turn, it will enhance awareness of safeguarding electronic protected health information (ePHI), help to mitigate potential future risks, and eventually reduce breaches.展开更多
目的探究血清S100钙结合蛋白A8(S100A8)和程序性死亡配体-1(PD-L1)联合超声检测在子宫内膜癌诊断及预后中的价值。方法选取2020年4月至2022年4月于我院收治的确诊为子宫内膜癌的患者166例即为癌症组,按照国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)标准分...目的探究血清S100钙结合蛋白A8(S100A8)和程序性死亡配体-1(PD-L1)联合超声检测在子宫内膜癌诊断及预后中的价值。方法选取2020年4月至2022年4月于我院收治的确诊为子宫内膜癌的患者166例即为癌症组,按照国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)标准分为Ⅰ期48例、Ⅱ期52例、Ⅲ期42例、Ⅳ期24例。选择同期在我院确诊为子宫内膜增生的患者166例为对照组;使用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测血清中S100A8和PD-L1水平;使用阴道超声获取血流频谱测得血流参数:搏动指数(PI)、阻力指数(RI)。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析血清S100A8和PD-L1联合超声参数对子宫内膜癌的诊断价值以及预后的预测价值。结果与对照组相比,癌症组患者血清中S100A8和PD-L1水平显著升高(t=10.688、8.605,均P<0.001);与Ⅰ期相比,Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期患者血清中S100A8和PD-L1水平显著升高,与Ⅱ期相比,Ⅳ期患者血清中S100A8和PD-L1水平显著升高(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,癌症组PI和RI的值显著降低(t=7.183、6.799,均P<0.001);血清S100A8和PD-L1联合超声参数对子宫内膜癌诊断的曲线下面积(AUC)高于各指标单独诊断的AUC值(Z S100A8 vs.S100A8+PD-L1+PI+RI=6.472,Z PD-L1 vs.S100A8+PD-L1+PI+RI=6.903,Z PI vs.S100A8+PD-L1+PI+RI=7.072,Z RI vs.S100A8+PD-L1+PI+RI=5.987,均P<0.001);与预后良好组相比,预后不良组S100A8、PD-L1水平显著升高,PI、RI水平显著降低(P<0.001);血清S100A8和PD-L1联合超声参数对子宫内膜癌预后预测的AUC高于各指标单独预测的AUC值(Z S100A8 vs.S100A8+PD-L1+PI+RI=2.841,P=0.005;Z PD-L1 vs.S100A8+PD-L1+PI+RI=2.146,P=0.032;Z PI vs.S100A8+PD-L1+PI+RI=6.056,P<0.001;Z RI vs.S100A8+PD-L1+PI+RI=4.370,P<0.001)。结论子宫内膜癌患者血清中S100A8和PD-L1水平显著升高,血清S100A8和PD-L1联合超声能够提高对子宫内膜癌诊断及预后价值。展开更多
文摘Healthcare security and privacy breaches are occurring in the United States (US), and increased substantially during the pandemic. This paper reviews the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) publication base as an effective solution. The NIST Special Publication 800-66 Revision 1 was an essential standard in US healthcare, which was withdrawn in February 2024 and superseded by SP 800-66 Revision 2. This review investigates the academic papers concerning the application of the NIST SP 800-66 Revision 1 standard in the US healthcare literature. A systematic review method was used in this study to determine current knowledge gaps of the SP 800-66 Revision 1. Some limitations were employed in the search to enforce validity. A total of eleven articles were found eligible for the study. Consequently, this study suggests the necessity for additional academic papers pertaining to SP 800-66 Revision 2 in the US healthcare literature. In turn, it will enhance awareness of safeguarding electronic protected health information (ePHI), help to mitigate potential future risks, and eventually reduce breaches.
文摘目的探究血清S100钙结合蛋白A8(S100A8)和程序性死亡配体-1(PD-L1)联合超声检测在子宫内膜癌诊断及预后中的价值。方法选取2020年4月至2022年4月于我院收治的确诊为子宫内膜癌的患者166例即为癌症组,按照国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)标准分为Ⅰ期48例、Ⅱ期52例、Ⅲ期42例、Ⅳ期24例。选择同期在我院确诊为子宫内膜增生的患者166例为对照组;使用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测血清中S100A8和PD-L1水平;使用阴道超声获取血流频谱测得血流参数:搏动指数(PI)、阻力指数(RI)。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析血清S100A8和PD-L1联合超声参数对子宫内膜癌的诊断价值以及预后的预测价值。结果与对照组相比,癌症组患者血清中S100A8和PD-L1水平显著升高(t=10.688、8.605,均P<0.001);与Ⅰ期相比,Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期患者血清中S100A8和PD-L1水平显著升高,与Ⅱ期相比,Ⅳ期患者血清中S100A8和PD-L1水平显著升高(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,癌症组PI和RI的值显著降低(t=7.183、6.799,均P<0.001);血清S100A8和PD-L1联合超声参数对子宫内膜癌诊断的曲线下面积(AUC)高于各指标单独诊断的AUC值(Z S100A8 vs.S100A8+PD-L1+PI+RI=6.472,Z PD-L1 vs.S100A8+PD-L1+PI+RI=6.903,Z PI vs.S100A8+PD-L1+PI+RI=7.072,Z RI vs.S100A8+PD-L1+PI+RI=5.987,均P<0.001);与预后良好组相比,预后不良组S100A8、PD-L1水平显著升高,PI、RI水平显著降低(P<0.001);血清S100A8和PD-L1联合超声参数对子宫内膜癌预后预测的AUC高于各指标单独预测的AUC值(Z S100A8 vs.S100A8+PD-L1+PI+RI=2.841,P=0.005;Z PD-L1 vs.S100A8+PD-L1+PI+RI=2.146,P=0.032;Z PI vs.S100A8+PD-L1+PI+RI=6.056,P<0.001;Z RI vs.S100A8+PD-L1+PI+RI=4.370,P<0.001)。结论子宫内膜癌患者血清中S100A8和PD-L1水平显著升高,血清S100A8和PD-L1联合超声能够提高对子宫内膜癌诊断及预后价值。