Many thanks for your continuing trust and support to Chin, ese Nursing Research! For improving the journal＇s quality, we request you to fill out this questionnaire and scan it, then sent it to hlyjywb@vip.163. com, w...Many thanks for your continuing trust and support to Chin, ese Nursing Research! For improving the journal＇s quality, we request you to fill out this questionnaire and scan it, then sent it to hlyjywb@vip.163. com, we will offer you one-year subscription of our journal Chinese Nursing Research. Thanks for your participation!展开更多
BACKGROUND Mortality after hepatectomy has decreased,and the quality of various surgical approaches to hepatectomy have been evaluated.Various assessments of quality of life(QOL)after hepatectomy have been developed a...BACKGROUND Mortality after hepatectomy has decreased,and the quality of various surgical approaches to hepatectomy have been evaluated.Various assessments of quality of life(QOL)after hepatectomy have been developed and investigated in different clinical settings.AIM To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine two clinical topics:Laparoscopic hepatectomy vs open hepatectomy,and preoperative QOL status vs postoperative QOL status.METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE,including the Cochrane Library Central.The following inclusion criteria were set for inclusion in this meta-analysis:(1)Studies comparing preoperative QOL and postoperative QOL;and(2)Studies comparing QOL between laparoscopic hepatectomy and open hepatectomy.RESULTS A total of 8 articles were included in this meta-analysis.QOL was better after laparoscopic hepatectomy than after open hepatectomy.CONCLUSION The outcomes of evaluations of QOL after hepatectomy can depend on the type of questionnaire used,the timing of the assessment,and the etiology of the hepatic disease.展开更多
文摘Many thanks for your continuing trust and support to Chin, ese Nursing Research! For improving the journal＇s quality, we request you to fill out this questionnaire and scan it, then sent it to hlyjywb@vip.163. com, we will offer you one-year subscription of our journal Chinese Nursing Research. Thanks for your participation!
基金Supported by Grant-in-Aid from JSPS KAKENHI,No.JP 20K10404(to Mizuguchi T)the Hokkaido Hepatitis B Litigation Orange Fund,No.2059198+9 种基金Terumo Life Science Foundation,No.2000666Pfizer Health Research Foundation,No.2000777Daiichi Sankyo Company,No.2109540Shionogi and Co.,No.2109493MSD,No.2099412Takeda,No,2000555Sapporo Doto Hospital,No.2039118Noguchi Hospital,No.2029083Doki-kai Tomakomai Hospital,No.2059203and Tsuchida Hospital,No.2069231.
文摘BACKGROUND Mortality after hepatectomy has decreased,and the quality of various surgical approaches to hepatectomy have been evaluated.Various assessments of quality of life(QOL)after hepatectomy have been developed and investigated in different clinical settings.AIM To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine two clinical topics:Laparoscopic hepatectomy vs open hepatectomy,and preoperative QOL status vs postoperative QOL status.METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE,including the Cochrane Library Central.The following inclusion criteria were set for inclusion in this meta-analysis:(1)Studies comparing preoperative QOL and postoperative QOL;and(2)Studies comparing QOL between laparoscopic hepatectomy and open hepatectomy.RESULTS A total of 8 articles were included in this meta-analysis.QOL was better after laparoscopic hepatectomy than after open hepatectomy.CONCLUSION The outcomes of evaluations of QOL after hepatectomy can depend on the type of questionnaire used,the timing of the assessment,and the etiology of the hepatic disease.
