Objectives To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transradial coronary procedures （TRCP）. Methods The data of 83 cases who accepted transradial coronary angiography （CAG） and transradial percutaneous coronary inte...Objectives To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transradial coronary procedures （TRCP）. Methods The data of 83 cases who accepted transradial coronary angiography （CAG） and transradial percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） in our department were summarized. The success rates, proximal coronary complications, peripheral vascular complications, severe vagal reflex, mean operation time （MOT）, mean recumbent time （MRT）, mean hospital-staying time （MHT） were analyzed. The data were compared with that of 420 cases of transfemoral coronary procedures （TFCP） in the same period. Results Success rates and proximal coronary complications were similar in both groups. Severe vagal reflexes were less in TRCP group than in TFCP group. MOT was longer in TRCP group. MRT and MHT were shorter in TRCP group. 12（14.5%） radial artery spasm, 3（3.6%） radial artery obstruction, 1 sudden respiratory arrest caused by jugular hematoma were observed in TRCP group. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of TRCP are definite. TRCP is more economical. For the purpose of properly evaluate the peripheral vascular complications of TRCP, it is necessary to pay special attention to radial artery occlusion, radial artery stenosis, and jugular hematoma.展开更多
文摘Objectives To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transradial coronary procedures （TRCP）. Methods The data of 83 cases who accepted transradial coronary angiography （CAG） and transradial percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） in our department were summarized. The success rates, proximal coronary complications, peripheral vascular complications, severe vagal reflex, mean operation time （MOT）, mean recumbent time （MRT）, mean hospital-staying time （MHT） were analyzed. The data were compared with that of 420 cases of transfemoral coronary procedures （TFCP） in the same period. Results Success rates and proximal coronary complications were similar in both groups. Severe vagal reflexes were less in TRCP group than in TFCP group. MOT was longer in TRCP group. MRT and MHT were shorter in TRCP group. 12（14.5%） radial artery spasm, 3（3.6%） radial artery obstruction, 1 sudden respiratory arrest caused by jugular hematoma were observed in TRCP group. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of TRCP are definite. TRCP is more economical. For the purpose of properly evaluate the peripheral vascular complications of TRCP, it is necessary to pay special attention to radial artery occlusion, radial artery stenosis, and jugular hematoma.
