BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) is one of the most common complications of myocardial infarction (MI), and ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation are the main causes for sudden cardiac death. This study...BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) is one of the most common complications of myocardial infarction (MI), and ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation are the main causes for sudden cardiac death. This study aimed to explore the effect of ramipril on the occurrence of VA and its mechanism after MI in rabbits. METHODS: Twenty-four New Zealand rabbits purchased from the Wuhan Laboratory Animal Research Center were divided into three groups: sham-operated (SHAM) group (n=8), MI group (n=8) and MI with ramipril (RAM) group (n=8). Rabbits in the SHAM group received a median sternotomy without ligation of the left ventricular coronary artery. Rabbits in the MI and RAM groups received a median sternotomy followed by ligation of the left coronary artery. The successful anterior MI was confirmed by elevation of the ST segment with more than 0.2 mV in lead II and II1. After MI, rabbits in the RAM group were fed with intragastric ramipril (1 mg/kg per day ) for 12 weeks. Before and 12 weeks after MI in the three groups, ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF) episodes and MAP in cadiocytes of the epicardium, mid-myocardium and endocardium were recorded by a multichannel physiograph. Student's t test and ANOVA were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: VT/VF episodes were decreased more markedly in the RAM group than in the MI group after 12 weeks (2.6±0.8 vs. 12.±+2.9, P〈0.05). Twelve weeks after MI, the duration of repolarization for 90% (APD90) of three-tier ventricular myocytes in the MI group was longer than that before MI (258.2±21.1 vs. 230.1±23.2,278.0±23.8 vs. 245.8±25.4,242.6±22.7 vs. 227.0±21.7, P〈0.05). However, the APD90 was not significantly different at 12 weeks before and after MI in the RAM group (P〉0.05). Moreover, the transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) was increased more markedly 12 weeks after MI in the MI group than in the SHAM and RAM groups (36.2±10.2 vs. 18.7±6.2, 24.9±8.7, P〈0.05). But the TDR was not significantly different between the RAM and SHAM groups (18.7±6.2 vs. 24.9±8.7, P〉0.05). CONCLUSION: Ramipril may reduce the incidence of malignant ventricular arrhythmia via mprovement of transmembrance repolarization heterogeneity after MI.展开更多
AnRP-HPLC method for the simultaneous determination ofRamipril (RP) andAmlodipine (AL) in tablets was developed and validated by Chinese Pharmacopoeia 2010. The linearity of the proposed method was investigated in...AnRP-HPLC method for the simultaneous determination ofRamipril (RP) andAmlodipine (AL) in tablets was developed and validated by Chinese Pharmacopoeia 2010. The linearity of the proposed method was investigated in the range of 0.01-0.25 mg/mL (r^2=0.9998) for RP and 0.014-0.36 mg/mL (r^2=0.9997) for AL. The limits of detection (LOD) were 0.06 lag/mL and 0.02 μg/mL for RP and AL, and the limits of quantitation (LOQ) were 0.2 Dg/mL and 0.07 μg/mL, respectively. Some major impurities and degradation products did not disturb the detection of RP and AL and the assay can thus be considered stability-indicating.展开更多
Objective To investigate the effect of ramipril on progression of nonculprit lesions in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PPCI). Methods A total o...Objective To investigate the effect of ramipril on progression of nonculprit lesions in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PPCI). Methods A total of 200 patients(60.1 ± 11.3 years) with STEMI who underwent successful PPCI from January 2010 to December 2013 were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent PPCI as treatment for culprit lesions. Patients were divided into two groups according to the dosage of ramipril used at hospital discharge as follows: high dosage group(2.5–10 mg, q.d.) and low dosage group(1.25–2.5 mg, q.d.). Clinical and angiographic follow-up was performed for 12 months. The primary endpoint was clinically-driven percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) for nonculprit lesions. The clinical and angiographic features were analyzed. Results Clinical and angiographic follow-up was performed with 87 patients in the high dosage group and 113 patients in the low dosage group. The numbers of patients who underwent additional PCI were six and 20 in the high and low dosage groups, respectively. The rate of having additional PCI performed was lower in the high dosage group than in the low dosage group(6.90% vs. 17.70%, P = 0.03). Conclusions A high dosage of ramipril may prevent progression of nonculprit lesions, which could be the major cause of recurrent PCI in patients with STEMI after PPCI.展开更多
A novel, sensitive and precise UHPLC method has been developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of the all the active components of a Polypill viz Zycad, i.e., Aspirin (ASP) Atorvastatin (ATV), Ramipri...A novel, sensitive and precise UHPLC method has been developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of the all the active components of a Polypill viz Zycad, i.e., Aspirin (ASP) Atorvastatin (ATV), Ramipril (RMP) and Metoprolol (MTP) in Zycad tablet dosage form in the presence of degradation products. Forced degradation of individual as well as combination of all the drug substances components of Polypill was conducted in accordance with ICH guidelines. Acidic, basic, neutral, and oxidative hydrolysis, thermal stress, and photolytic degradation were used to assess the stability-indicating power of the method. Use of 100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm stationary phases with simple mobile phase combination buffer consisting of 0.1% Perchloric acid (adjusted to pH 2.5) and Acetonitrile, delivered in a gradient mode and quantitation was carried out using ultraviolet detection at 215 nm with a flow rate of 0.6 mL?min–1. The method was optimized using samples generated by forced degradation studies. The method was validated for linearity, accuracy (recovery), precision, Specificity and robustness. The method was linear in the range of 37.5 to 150.0 μg?mL–1 for ASP, 5.0 to 20.0 μg?mL–1 for ATV and 2.5 to 10.0 μg?mL–1 for RMP and 25.0 to 100.0 μg?mL–1 for MTP.展开更多
Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the anti-angiotensinic drug, ramipril and irbesartan on the vascular protection of kidneys of streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats (DR). Methods: 1...Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the anti-angiotensinic drug, ramipril and irbesartan on the vascular protection of kidneys of streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats (DR). Methods: 110 male albino rats were divided into 7 main groups. Group-1 (10 normal control rats;NC). Group-2 (10 rats) was injected intra-peritoneally with STZ (Diabetic Rats;DR). Group-3 (10 DR) is controlled by insulin. Groups 4 to 7 (20 DR), each is subdivided into two subgroups that received either low or high dose of ramipril or irbesartan with or without insulin. Two months post treatment, rat-tail blood was collected to measure: Fasting blood sugar, HbA1c, total serum proteins, albumin and lipid profiles. Urine was collected to measure albuminuria. Kidneys were isolated for histopathological study. Results: Biochemically, both ramipril and irbesartan (without insulin) lowered albumin concentration in urine samples especially at high doses. Histopathologically, there is no beneficial response of both drugs without insulin. Combination of insulin together with either drug has beneficial effects biochemically and histopathologically at high doses. Low dose irbesartan only has renoprotective effect in DR treated with insulin. The other biochemical parameters showed negligible response to both drugs. Conclusion: Low dose irbesartan and high doses of both drugs have renoprotective effect in DR treated with insulin.展开更多
Objective:To explore the effect of Ramipril on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system of young and middle-aged patients with hypertension.Methods 90 young and middle-aged patients with hypertension who had been seeking ...Objective:To explore the effect of Ramipril on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system of young and middle-aged patients with hypertension.Methods 90 young and middle-aged patients with hypertension who had been seeking treatment in the hospital between August 2017 and August 2018 were selected and randomly divided into a control group and an observation group according to the random number table,with 45 cases in each group.The control group received Amlodipine for treatment,whereas the observation group was given Amlodipine combined with Ramipril for treatment.The hemodynamic indexes,blood lipid,blood pressure,angiotensinⅡ(AngⅡ),plasma renin(PRA),aldosterone(ALD)levels and incidence of adverse reactions during the medication in the two groups were compared before and after treatment.Results After treatment,thefibrinogen,plasma viscosity and whole blood viscosity in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group,with statistically significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05);total cholesterol(TC),triacylglycerol(TG)and low density lipoprotein cholesterin(LDL-C)in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group,and statistically significant difference was registered between the two groups(P<0.05);the diastolic pressure and systolic pressure in the observation group were decreased more significantly compared with the control group,with statistically significant difference shown between the two groups(P<0.05);the AngⅡ,ALD and PRA levels in the observation group were significantly lower than the control group,and the difference between two groups were statistically significant(P<0.05);during the medication,no significant bleeding or liver and kidney function damages occurred in the two groups.Conclusions For young and middle-aged patients with hypertension,the treatment with Ramipril,which is of high safety,can effectively improve the activity of their renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system,reduce the level of blood pressure and AngⅡ,ALD and PRA levels.展开更多
Background Aliskiren is a novel blood pressure-lowering agent acting as an oral direct renin inhibitor. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of aliskiren on arterial stiffness, compared with that of ramipril...Background Aliskiren is a novel blood pressure-lowering agent acting as an oral direct renin inhibitor. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of aliskiren on arterial stiffness, compared with that of ramipril in mild to moderate essential hypertensive patients. Methods Following a two week placebo run-in period, patients with a mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (ms-DBP) 〉95 and 〈110 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), and a mean sitting systolic blood pressure (ms-SBP) 〈180 mmHg were randomly allocated to treatment with aliskiren (150 mg/d, n=20) or ramipril (5 mg/d, n=20) for eight weeks. Blood pressure, plasma renin activity, and the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (ba-PWV) were measured before and after eight weeks of treatment. Results Eight weeks of treatment significantly decreased systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in both the aliskiren group and ramipril group. The hypotensJve effect did not differ between the two groups. Plasma renin activity decreased after aliskiren treatment and increased after ramipril treatment. There was no significant difference in baseline ba-PWV between the aliskiren and ramipril groups (P=-0.892). The ba-PWV was significantly reduced in both the aliskiren group (1535 (1405-1666) vs. 1464 (1360-1506) cm/s) (P 〈0.01) and the ramipril group (1544 (1433-1673) vs. 1447 (1327-1549) cm/s) (P 〈0.01). No statistically significant difference was found in the decline of ba-PWV between the two groups (P=0.766). Conclusions The current study revealed that aliskiren (150 mg/d) could ameliorate arterial stiffness and its effect was similar to ramipril (5 mg/d) in mild to moderate hypertensive patients, indicating that in addition to lowering blood pressure, aliskiren had beneficial effect on vascular protection.展开更多
Background The results from the ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) indicated that the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan was not inferior to the angiote...Background The results from the ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) indicated that the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan was not inferior to the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor ramipril in reducing the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalization for congestive heart failure in high-risk patients, and telmisartan was associated with slightly superior tolerability. The combination of the two drugs was associated with more adverse events without an increase in benefit. This study aimed to analyze the data from ONTARGET obtained from a subgroup of patients enrolled in China and to evaluate the demographic and baseline characteristics, the compliance, efficacy, and safety of the different treatment strategies in randomized patients in China. Methods A total of 1159 high-risk patients were randomized into three treatment groups: with 390 assigned to receive 80 mg of telmisartan, 385 assigned to receive 10 mg of ramipril and 384 assigned to receive both study medications. The median follow-up period was 4.3 years. Results The mean age of Chinese patients was 65.6 years, 73.6% of patients were male. The proportion of patients with stroke/transient ischemic attacks at baseline in China was two times more than the entire study population (47.7% vs 20.9%). In Chinese patients the proportion of permanent discontinuation of study medication due to cough was 0.5% in the telmisartan group, which was much less than that in the combination or the ramipril group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of primary outcome among three treatment groups of Chinese patients. More strokes occurred in Chinese patients than in the entire study population (8.5% vs. 4.5%). Greater systolic blood pressure reduction (-9.8 mmHg), and more renal function failure were noted in the combination treatment group than in the ramipril or telmisartan group (2.6% vs. 1.6% and 1.0%). Conclusions There was no evidence that the results of ONTARGET differed between Chinese patients and the entire study population with respect to the incidence of primary outcome, particularly safety. Compliance with study medications was good. The evidence from ONTARGET indicated that the treatment strategies in ONTARGET were applicable to patients in China.展开更多
Background: Combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers has been successfully used in the ant±hypertensive therapy for many years. Fixed dose combinations of ramipril/aml...Background: Combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers has been successfully used in the ant±hypertensive therapy for many years. Fixed dose combinations of ramipril/amlodipine have a benefit effect for patients to achieve target blood pressure (BP). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of fixed dose combinations oframipril and amlodipine (Egiramlon) in hypertensive diabetic patients. Methods: Hypertensive diabetic patients who were enrolled into the RAMONA trial were included in this open, prospective, Phase Ⅳ observational clinical study. Patients had mild-to-moderate hypertension and failed to reach target BP levels through their previous therapy. During the four months of observation, patients took part in three visits (1 st day - visit 1, 1 st month = visit 2, and 4th month = visit 3) where they received a fixed dose combination of 5/5, 5/10, 10/5, or 10/10 nag ramipril/amlodipine, respectively, with the possibly required dose titrations, based on the decision of their attending physician. Target BP for diabetic patients was 〈 140/85 mmHg. BP levels were measured in all visits, by taking two readings at 2-min interval. Laboratory tests including full blood count, renal function test, electrolytes, blood glucose, serum cholesterol, uric acid, triglycerides, liver function test, creatinine kinase, and midstream urinalysis were performed at visit 1 and visit 3. Results: The 6423 patients completed the study. Among these patients, 1276 (19.9%) patients suffered from type 2 diabetes mellitus. The mean age of these diabetic patients was 64.2 ±10.0 years; 707 (55.4%) patients were males. Target BP was achieved by 891 (69.8%) of diabetic patients at visit 3 (primary endpoint). BP decreased from 157.5/91.3 ±9.6/7.6 mmHg (visit 1) to 130.9/79.6 ± 7.4/5.8 mmHg (visit 3). As for the secondary endpoint of the study, total cholesterol decreased from 5.50 ±1.13 mmol/L (visit 1 ) to 5.20 ±0.95 mmol/L (P = 0.000), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased from 3.20 ±0.93 mmol/L to 3.00 ±0.77 mmol/L (P = 0.000), triglyceride decreased from 2.20 ±1.14 mmol/L to 2.00 ±1.97 mmol/L (P = 0.000), while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased from 1.30 ±0.42 to 1.35 ±0.30 mmol/L (P = 0.001) until the end of the 4th month (visit 3). Fasting blood glucose of the hypertensive diabetic patients decreased from 7.20 ± 1,88 mmol/L to 6.70 ± 1.38 mmol/L (P = 0.000), while HbAlc decreased from 7.90 ± 1.78% to 7.60 ± 1.83% (P = 0.000). Various fixed dose combinations of ramipril/amlodipine were well tolerated and no adverse event related to the use of the medicine has appeared. Conclusions: The fixed dose combination of ramipril/amlodipine was effective in hypertensive diabetic patients who failed to reach target BP previously.展开更多
基金supported by a grant from the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei(2007ABA288)
文摘BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) is one of the most common complications of myocardial infarction (MI), and ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation are the main causes for sudden cardiac death. This study aimed to explore the effect of ramipril on the occurrence of VA and its mechanism after MI in rabbits. METHODS: Twenty-four New Zealand rabbits purchased from the Wuhan Laboratory Animal Research Center were divided into three groups: sham-operated (SHAM) group (n=8), MI group (n=8) and MI with ramipril (RAM) group (n=8). Rabbits in the SHAM group received a median sternotomy without ligation of the left ventricular coronary artery. Rabbits in the MI and RAM groups received a median sternotomy followed by ligation of the left coronary artery. The successful anterior MI was confirmed by elevation of the ST segment with more than 0.2 mV in lead II and II1. After MI, rabbits in the RAM group were fed with intragastric ramipril (1 mg/kg per day ) for 12 weeks. Before and 12 weeks after MI in the three groups, ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF) episodes and MAP in cadiocytes of the epicardium, mid-myocardium and endocardium were recorded by a multichannel physiograph. Student's t test and ANOVA were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: VT/VF episodes were decreased more markedly in the RAM group than in the MI group after 12 weeks (2.6±0.8 vs. 12.±+2.9, P〈0.05). Twelve weeks after MI, the duration of repolarization for 90% (APD90) of three-tier ventricular myocytes in the MI group was longer than that before MI (258.2±21.1 vs. 230.1±23.2,278.0±23.8 vs. 245.8±25.4,242.6±22.7 vs. 227.0±21.7, P〈0.05). However, the APD90 was not significantly different at 12 weeks before and after MI in the RAM group (P〉0.05). Moreover, the transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) was increased more markedly 12 weeks after MI in the MI group than in the SHAM and RAM groups (36.2±10.2 vs. 18.7±6.2, 24.9±8.7, P〈0.05). But the TDR was not significantly different between the RAM and SHAM groups (18.7±6.2 vs. 24.9±8.7, P〉0.05). CONCLUSION: Ramipril may reduce the incidence of malignant ventricular arrhythmia via mprovement of transmembrance repolarization heterogeneity after MI.
文摘AnRP-HPLC method for the simultaneous determination ofRamipril (RP) andAmlodipine (AL) in tablets was developed and validated by Chinese Pharmacopoeia 2010. The linearity of the proposed method was investigated in the range of 0.01-0.25 mg/mL (r^2=0.9998) for RP and 0.014-0.36 mg/mL (r^2=0.9997) for AL. The limits of detection (LOD) were 0.06 lag/mL and 0.02 μg/mL for RP and AL, and the limits of quantitation (LOQ) were 0.2 Dg/mL and 0.07 μg/mL, respectively. Some major impurities and degradation products did not disturb the detection of RP and AL and the assay can thus be considered stability-indicating.
基金supported by grants from Beijing’s high professional talents training project in the health sector (2013-3-009)
文摘Objective To investigate the effect of ramipril on progression of nonculprit lesions in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PPCI). Methods A total of 200 patients(60.1 ± 11.3 years) with STEMI who underwent successful PPCI from January 2010 to December 2013 were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent PPCI as treatment for culprit lesions. Patients were divided into two groups according to the dosage of ramipril used at hospital discharge as follows: high dosage group(2.5–10 mg, q.d.) and low dosage group(1.25–2.5 mg, q.d.). Clinical and angiographic follow-up was performed for 12 months. The primary endpoint was clinically-driven percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) for nonculprit lesions. The clinical and angiographic features were analyzed. Results Clinical and angiographic follow-up was performed with 87 patients in the high dosage group and 113 patients in the low dosage group. The numbers of patients who underwent additional PCI were six and 20 in the high and low dosage groups, respectively. The rate of having additional PCI performed was lower in the high dosage group than in the low dosage group(6.90% vs. 17.70%, P = 0.03). Conclusions A high dosage of ramipril may prevent progression of nonculprit lesions, which could be the major cause of recurrent PCI in patients with STEMI after PPCI.
文摘A novel, sensitive and precise UHPLC method has been developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of the all the active components of a Polypill viz Zycad, i.e., Aspirin (ASP) Atorvastatin (ATV), Ramipril (RMP) and Metoprolol (MTP) in Zycad tablet dosage form in the presence of degradation products. Forced degradation of individual as well as combination of all the drug substances components of Polypill was conducted in accordance with ICH guidelines. Acidic, basic, neutral, and oxidative hydrolysis, thermal stress, and photolytic degradation were used to assess the stability-indicating power of the method. Use of 100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm stationary phases with simple mobile phase combination buffer consisting of 0.1% Perchloric acid (adjusted to pH 2.5) and Acetonitrile, delivered in a gradient mode and quantitation was carried out using ultraviolet detection at 215 nm with a flow rate of 0.6 mL?min–1. The method was optimized using samples generated by forced degradation studies. The method was validated for linearity, accuracy (recovery), precision, Specificity and robustness. The method was linear in the range of 37.5 to 150.0 μg?mL–1 for ASP, 5.0 to 20.0 μg?mL–1 for ATV and 2.5 to 10.0 μg?mL–1 for RMP and 25.0 to 100.0 μg?mL–1 for MTP.
文摘Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the anti-angiotensinic drug, ramipril and irbesartan on the vascular protection of kidneys of streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats (DR). Methods: 110 male albino rats were divided into 7 main groups. Group-1 (10 normal control rats;NC). Group-2 (10 rats) was injected intra-peritoneally with STZ (Diabetic Rats;DR). Group-3 (10 DR) is controlled by insulin. Groups 4 to 7 (20 DR), each is subdivided into two subgroups that received either low or high dose of ramipril or irbesartan with or without insulin. Two months post treatment, rat-tail blood was collected to measure: Fasting blood sugar, HbA1c, total serum proteins, albumin and lipid profiles. Urine was collected to measure albuminuria. Kidneys were isolated for histopathological study. Results: Biochemically, both ramipril and irbesartan (without insulin) lowered albumin concentration in urine samples especially at high doses. Histopathologically, there is no beneficial response of both drugs without insulin. Combination of insulin together with either drug has beneficial effects biochemically and histopathologically at high doses. Low dose irbesartan only has renoprotective effect in DR treated with insulin. The other biochemical parameters showed negligible response to both drugs. Conclusion: Low dose irbesartan and high doses of both drugs have renoprotective effect in DR treated with insulin.
基金Shijiazhuang science and technology bureau guidance plan project 2016(No.151461503).
文摘Objective:To explore the effect of Ramipril on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system of young and middle-aged patients with hypertension.Methods 90 young and middle-aged patients with hypertension who had been seeking treatment in the hospital between August 2017 and August 2018 were selected and randomly divided into a control group and an observation group according to the random number table,with 45 cases in each group.The control group received Amlodipine for treatment,whereas the observation group was given Amlodipine combined with Ramipril for treatment.The hemodynamic indexes,blood lipid,blood pressure,angiotensinⅡ(AngⅡ),plasma renin(PRA),aldosterone(ALD)levels and incidence of adverse reactions during the medication in the two groups were compared before and after treatment.Results After treatment,thefibrinogen,plasma viscosity and whole blood viscosity in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group,with statistically significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05);total cholesterol(TC),triacylglycerol(TG)and low density lipoprotein cholesterin(LDL-C)in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group,and statistically significant difference was registered between the two groups(P<0.05);the diastolic pressure and systolic pressure in the observation group were decreased more significantly compared with the control group,with statistically significant difference shown between the two groups(P<0.05);the AngⅡ,ALD and PRA levels in the observation group were significantly lower than the control group,and the difference between two groups were statistically significant(P<0.05);during the medication,no significant bleeding or liver and kidney function damages occurred in the two groups.Conclusions For young and middle-aged patients with hypertension,the treatment with Ramipril,which is of high safety,can effectively improve the activity of their renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system,reduce the level of blood pressure and AngⅡ,ALD and PRA levels.
文摘Background Aliskiren is a novel blood pressure-lowering agent acting as an oral direct renin inhibitor. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of aliskiren on arterial stiffness, compared with that of ramipril in mild to moderate essential hypertensive patients. Methods Following a two week placebo run-in period, patients with a mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (ms-DBP) 〉95 and 〈110 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), and a mean sitting systolic blood pressure (ms-SBP) 〈180 mmHg were randomly allocated to treatment with aliskiren (150 mg/d, n=20) or ramipril (5 mg/d, n=20) for eight weeks. Blood pressure, plasma renin activity, and the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (ba-PWV) were measured before and after eight weeks of treatment. Results Eight weeks of treatment significantly decreased systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in both the aliskiren group and ramipril group. The hypotensJve effect did not differ between the two groups. Plasma renin activity decreased after aliskiren treatment and increased after ramipril treatment. There was no significant difference in baseline ba-PWV between the aliskiren and ramipril groups (P=-0.892). The ba-PWV was significantly reduced in both the aliskiren group (1535 (1405-1666) vs. 1464 (1360-1506) cm/s) (P 〈0.01) and the ramipril group (1544 (1433-1673) vs. 1447 (1327-1549) cm/s) (P 〈0.01). No statistically significant difference was found in the decline of ba-PWV between the two groups (P=0.766). Conclusions The current study revealed that aliskiren (150 mg/d) could ameliorate arterial stiffness and its effect was similar to ramipril (5 mg/d) in mild to moderate hypertensive patients, indicating that in addition to lowering blood pressure, aliskiren had beneficial effect on vascular protection.
文摘Background The results from the ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) indicated that the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan was not inferior to the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor ramipril in reducing the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalization for congestive heart failure in high-risk patients, and telmisartan was associated with slightly superior tolerability. The combination of the two drugs was associated with more adverse events without an increase in benefit. This study aimed to analyze the data from ONTARGET obtained from a subgroup of patients enrolled in China and to evaluate the demographic and baseline characteristics, the compliance, efficacy, and safety of the different treatment strategies in randomized patients in China. Methods A total of 1159 high-risk patients were randomized into three treatment groups: with 390 assigned to receive 80 mg of telmisartan, 385 assigned to receive 10 mg of ramipril and 384 assigned to receive both study medications. The median follow-up period was 4.3 years. Results The mean age of Chinese patients was 65.6 years, 73.6% of patients were male. The proportion of patients with stroke/transient ischemic attacks at baseline in China was two times more than the entire study population (47.7% vs 20.9%). In Chinese patients the proportion of permanent discontinuation of study medication due to cough was 0.5% in the telmisartan group, which was much less than that in the combination or the ramipril group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of primary outcome among three treatment groups of Chinese patients. More strokes occurred in Chinese patients than in the entire study population (8.5% vs. 4.5%). Greater systolic blood pressure reduction (-9.8 mmHg), and more renal function failure were noted in the combination treatment group than in the ramipril or telmisartan group (2.6% vs. 1.6% and 1.0%). Conclusions There was no evidence that the results of ONTARGET differed between Chinese patients and the entire study population with respect to the incidence of primary outcome, particularly safety. Compliance with study medications was good. The evidence from ONTARGET indicated that the treatment strategies in ONTARGET were applicable to patients in China.
文摘Background: Combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers has been successfully used in the ant±hypertensive therapy for many years. Fixed dose combinations of ramipril/amlodipine have a benefit effect for patients to achieve target blood pressure (BP). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of fixed dose combinations oframipril and amlodipine (Egiramlon) in hypertensive diabetic patients. Methods: Hypertensive diabetic patients who were enrolled into the RAMONA trial were included in this open, prospective, Phase Ⅳ observational clinical study. Patients had mild-to-moderate hypertension and failed to reach target BP levels through their previous therapy. During the four months of observation, patients took part in three visits (1 st day - visit 1, 1 st month = visit 2, and 4th month = visit 3) where they received a fixed dose combination of 5/5, 5/10, 10/5, or 10/10 nag ramipril/amlodipine, respectively, with the possibly required dose titrations, based on the decision of their attending physician. Target BP for diabetic patients was 〈 140/85 mmHg. BP levels were measured in all visits, by taking two readings at 2-min interval. Laboratory tests including full blood count, renal function test, electrolytes, blood glucose, serum cholesterol, uric acid, triglycerides, liver function test, creatinine kinase, and midstream urinalysis were performed at visit 1 and visit 3. Results: The 6423 patients completed the study. Among these patients, 1276 (19.9%) patients suffered from type 2 diabetes mellitus. The mean age of these diabetic patients was 64.2 ±10.0 years; 707 (55.4%) patients were males. Target BP was achieved by 891 (69.8%) of diabetic patients at visit 3 (primary endpoint). BP decreased from 157.5/91.3 ±9.6/7.6 mmHg (visit 1) to 130.9/79.6 ± 7.4/5.8 mmHg (visit 3). As for the secondary endpoint of the study, total cholesterol decreased from 5.50 ±1.13 mmol/L (visit 1 ) to 5.20 ±0.95 mmol/L (P = 0.000), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased from 3.20 ±0.93 mmol/L to 3.00 ±0.77 mmol/L (P = 0.000), triglyceride decreased from 2.20 ±1.14 mmol/L to 2.00 ±1.97 mmol/L (P = 0.000), while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased from 1.30 ±0.42 to 1.35 ±0.30 mmol/L (P = 0.001) until the end of the 4th month (visit 3). Fasting blood glucose of the hypertensive diabetic patients decreased from 7.20 ± 1,88 mmol/L to 6.70 ± 1.38 mmol/L (P = 0.000), while HbAlc decreased from 7.90 ± 1.78% to 7.60 ± 1.83% (P = 0.000). Various fixed dose combinations of ramipril/amlodipine were well tolerated and no adverse event related to the use of the medicine has appeared. Conclusions: The fixed dose combination of ramipril/amlodipine was effective in hypertensive diabetic patients who failed to reach target BP previously.