BACKGROUND There is a lack of studies on the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)with multidisciplinary collaboration on the nursing outcomes of total knee arthroplasty(TKA).AIM To explore the effect of ER...BACKGROUND There is a lack of studies on the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)with multidisciplinary collaboration on the nursing outcomes of total knee arthroplasty(TKA).AIM To explore the effect of ERAS with multidisciplinary collaboration on nursing outcomes after TKA.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 80 patients who underwent TKA at a tertiary hospital between January 2021 and December 2022.The patients were divided into two groups according to the nursing mode:the ERAS group(n=40)received ERAS with multidisciplinary collaboration,and the conventional group(n=40)received routine nursing.The following indicators were compared between the two groups:length of hospital stay,hospitalization cost,intraoperative blood loss,hemoglobin level 24 h after surgery,visual analog scale(VAS)score for pain,range of motion(ROM)of the knee joint,Hospital for Special Surgery(HSS)knee score,and postoperative complications.RESULTS The ERAS group had a significantly shorter length of hospital stay,lower hospitalization cost,less intraoperative blood loss,higher hemoglobin level 24 h after surgery,lower VAS score for pain,higher knee joint ROM,and higher HSS knee score than the conventional group(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05).CONCLUSION Multidisciplinary collaboration with ERAS can reduce blood loss,shorten hospital stay,and improve knee function in patients undergoing TKA.展开更多
Background Double plate osteosynthesis is the standard treatment for intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus.However,there is still controversy concerning dual plate positions in terms of providing optimal sta...Background Double plate osteosynthesis is the standard treatment for intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus.However,there is still controversy concerning dual plate positions in terms of providing optimal stability.The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes in patients with type C intra-articular distal humeral fractures using perpendicular and parallel plating methods.Methods Between March 2008 and June 2011,a total of 45 patients with type C distal humerus fractures were treated using two different dual plating methods.Of them,24 patients were treated by perpendicular plating (group Ⅰ) and 21 patients were treated by parallel plating (group Ⅱ).The surgical time,blood loss,and union time were compared between the two groups.The fiexion-extension arc,the total range of flexion and extension at the end of follow-up were compared between the two groups.The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was used to determine the elbow functional results.Results All patients were followed up.The mean duration of follow-up was 16 months (range 12-25 months) in group Ⅰ and 15.5 months in group Ⅱ (range 12-25 months).There were no significant differences in the surgical time,blood loss,and the bone union time between the two groups.In group Ⅰ,the mean elbow flexion-extension arc was 101° and the mean MEPS was 85 points.The rate of excellent and good results was 87.5%.In group Ⅱ,the mean flexion-extension arc was 100° and the mean MEPS was 86.1 points.The rate of excellent and good results was 90.5%.There were no significant differences in the MEPS,flexion-extension arc,and the total range of flexion and extension between the two groups.Conclusions Perpendicular and parallel plate configurations with the appropriate surgical techniques can provide anatomical reconstruction and stable fixation of type C intra-articular distal humeral fractures and allow early mobilization of the elbow after an operation.The occurrence of post-operative elbow stiffness can be reduced and good outcomes can be obtained.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND There is a lack of studies on the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)with multidisciplinary collaboration on the nursing outcomes of total knee arthroplasty(TKA).AIM To explore the effect of ERAS with multidisciplinary collaboration on nursing outcomes after TKA.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 80 patients who underwent TKA at a tertiary hospital between January 2021 and December 2022.The patients were divided into two groups according to the nursing mode:the ERAS group(n=40)received ERAS with multidisciplinary collaboration,and the conventional group(n=40)received routine nursing.The following indicators were compared between the two groups:length of hospital stay,hospitalization cost,intraoperative blood loss,hemoglobin level 24 h after surgery,visual analog scale(VAS)score for pain,range of motion(ROM)of the knee joint,Hospital for Special Surgery(HSS)knee score,and postoperative complications.RESULTS The ERAS group had a significantly shorter length of hospital stay,lower hospitalization cost,less intraoperative blood loss,higher hemoglobin level 24 h after surgery,lower VAS score for pain,higher knee joint ROM,and higher HSS knee score than the conventional group(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05).CONCLUSION Multidisciplinary collaboration with ERAS can reduce blood loss,shorten hospital stay,and improve knee function in patients undergoing TKA.
文摘Background Double plate osteosynthesis is the standard treatment for intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus.However,there is still controversy concerning dual plate positions in terms of providing optimal stability.The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes in patients with type C intra-articular distal humeral fractures using perpendicular and parallel plating methods.Methods Between March 2008 and June 2011,a total of 45 patients with type C distal humerus fractures were treated using two different dual plating methods.Of them,24 patients were treated by perpendicular plating (group Ⅰ) and 21 patients were treated by parallel plating (group Ⅱ).The surgical time,blood loss,and union time were compared between the two groups.The fiexion-extension arc,the total range of flexion and extension at the end of follow-up were compared between the two groups.The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was used to determine the elbow functional results.Results All patients were followed up.The mean duration of follow-up was 16 months (range 12-25 months) in group Ⅰ and 15.5 months in group Ⅱ (range 12-25 months).There were no significant differences in the surgical time,blood loss,and the bone union time between the two groups.In group Ⅰ,the mean elbow flexion-extension arc was 101° and the mean MEPS was 85 points.The rate of excellent and good results was 87.5%.In group Ⅱ,the mean flexion-extension arc was 100° and the mean MEPS was 86.1 points.The rate of excellent and good results was 90.5%.There were no significant differences in the MEPS,flexion-extension arc,and the total range of flexion and extension between the two groups.Conclusions Perpendicular and parallel plate configurations with the appropriate surgical techniques can provide anatomical reconstruction and stable fixation of type C intra-articular distal humeral fractures and allow early mobilization of the elbow after an operation.The occurrence of post-operative elbow stiffness can be reduced and good outcomes can be obtained.