Wittgenstein’s mysticism has been one of the focuses of critics and commentators of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.Two prevailing readings hold different attitudes towards it.The classical reading commits to the myst...Wittgenstein’s mysticism has been one of the focuses of critics and commentators of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.Two prevailing readings hold different attitudes towards it.The classical reading commits to the mysticism in the Tractatus,while the therapeutic reading rejects it amid its interpretation of Wittgenstein’s later philosophy.In this paper,I will argue against both by discussing how the Chinese reading understands the Tractatus.I will show that the ineffable in the Tractatus is not any type of mysticism,and that the Chinese reading of the Tractatus is a metaphysical one without any mysticism.展开更多
文摘Wittgenstein’s mysticism has been one of the focuses of critics and commentators of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.Two prevailing readings hold different attitudes towards it.The classical reading commits to the mysticism in the Tractatus,while the therapeutic reading rejects it amid its interpretation of Wittgenstein’s later philosophy.In this paper,I will argue against both by discussing how the Chinese reading understands the Tractatus.I will show that the ineffable in the Tractatus is not any type of mysticism,and that the Chinese reading of the Tractatus is a metaphysical one without any mysticism.
