Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome associated with rectocele and rectal intussusception

AIM:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stapled transanal rectal resection(STARR),and to analyze the outcome of the patients 12-mo after the operation.METHODS:From May 2007 to October 2008,50 female patients with rectocele and/or rectal intussusception underwent STARR.The preoperative status,perioperative and postoperative complications at baseline,3,6 and 12-mo were assessed.Data were collected prospectively from standardized questionnaires for the assessment of constipation[constipation scoring system,Longo’s obstructed defecation syndrome(ODS)score system,symptom severity score],patient satisfaction (visual analogue scale),and quality of life(Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life Questionnaire).RESULTS:At a 12-mo follow-up,significant improvement in the constipation scoring system,ODS score system,symptom severity score,visual analog scale and quality of life(P<0.0001)was observed.The symptoms of constipation improved in 90%of patients at 12 mo after surgery.The self-reported definitive outcome was excellent in 15(30%)patients,fairly good in 8(16%),good in 22(44%),and poor in 5(10%).CONCLUSION:STARR can be performed safely without major morbidity.Moreover,the procedure seems to be effective for patients with obstructed defecation associated with symptomatic rectocele and rectal intussusception.

Efficacy of the Intraoperative Use of Indocyanine-Green Fluorescence Angiography in Laparoscopic Rectal Resections

Background: In traditional laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, the surgeon’s method assess intestinal stumps blood supply is subject to certain subjectivity and blindness. Indocyanine green (ICG) real-time blood perfusion fluorescence angiography in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer has great potential clinical value and can visually judge intestinal tract blood supply to improve the surgery safety, reduce postoperative complications, and ensure the recovery of patients after surgery. Objective: To explore the efficacy of the intraoperative use of indocyanine-green fluorescence angiography in laparoscopic rectal resections in patients with rectal cancer. Methods: In the present study, 109 rectal cancer patients were included and assigned to different surgical groups [ICG and control groups] for analysis. Statistical analysis was carried out for various common postoperative complications in the two groups. Finally, the patients in the ICG fluorescence imaging group had a timely adjustment of the proximal resection of the intestinal tube before the proximal bowel of the lesion was cut off when the intestinal blood supply was insufficiently assessed by fluorescence imaging. Two subgroups, the adjustment and the non-adjustment groups, were analyzed. Results: Compared with the control group, the postoperative anal ventilation time in the ICG group was shorter than that in the control group (P 0.05). In addition, the postoperative complications were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05). However, the distance between the tumor from the anal verge in the adjustment group was smaller than that in the non-adjustment group, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.01). Conclusion: Compared with conventional laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer, ICG real-time indocyanine green fluore- scence angiography was safe and feasible. This technique is a promising intraoperative tool for the assessment of bowel perfusion especially suitable for patients with lower rectal cancer.

Effects of remifentanil combined with propofol on hemodynamics and oxidative stress in patients undergoing resection of rectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND Rectal carcinoma(RC)treatment primarily involves laparoscopic surgery,which may induce significant hemodynamic changes and weaken immune function.Certain anesthetic approaches using opioid drugs(including remifentanil and sufentanil)pose risks,such as hypotension.AIM To determine the effects of remifentanil combined with propofol on hemodynamics and oxidative stress in patients undergoing RC resection.METHODS A total of 211 patients one hundred and four patients with RC treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University between November 2018 and November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.Among them,the remifentanil group included 45 patients receiving remifentanil with propofol anesthesia and the sufentanil group included 59 patients receiving sufentanil with propofol anesthesia.Changes in the hemodynamic index,oxidative stress index,general data,consumption of remifentanil,and use of vasoactive drugs were compared.The incidences of adverse reactions were calculated.RESULTS The two groups did not significantly differ in terms of operation,anesthesia,and extubation times(P>0.05).At 1 min after intubation,the sufentanil group showed a notably higher heart rate,systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure,and mean arterial pressure(MAP)compared with the remifentanil group(P<0.05),whereas the sufentanil group showed a notably higher SBP and MAP compared with the remifentanil group at 5 min after pneumoperitoneum(P<0.05).Thirty minutes after surgery,the remifentanil group showed significantly lower plasma cortisol,noradrenaline,and glucose levels than the sufentanil group(P<0.001).The remifentanil group consumed significantly less remifentanil than the sufentanil group(P<0.05),and the adoption frequency of ephedrine was lower in the remifentanil group than that in the sufentanil group(P<0.05).The incidence of hypotension was notably higher in the sufentanil group than that in the remifentanil group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Remifentanil combined with propofol can improve hemodynamics and relieve oxidative stress in patients undergoing RC resection.

Effects of Laparoscopic Pelvic Autonomic Nerve-Preserving Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer on Urinary and Sexual Function

Objective:To investigate and analyze the effect of laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving radical resection of rectal cancer on urinary and sexual function.Methods:Cases of laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer in our hospital from April 2018 to April 2023 were selected,and 60 patients who met the requirements were included as research subjects.The patients were divided into an experimental group and a reference group by a double-blind mechanism,with 30 cases in each group.The experimental group underwent laparoscopic pelvic autonomic radical resection,while the reference group underwent ordinary radical resection.The voiding function,urodynamics,sexual function,and blood indexes of the patients of both groups were compared.Results:The total incidence of voiding dysfunction in the experimental group was significantly lower than in the reference group(P<0.05).Urodynamics such as abdominal leak point pressure(ALPP),maximum urethral pressure(MUP),maximum urethral closure pressure(MUCP),and functional urethral length(FUL)in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the reference group(P<0.05).The incidences of erectile dysfunction and ejaculatory dysfunction in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the reference group(P<0.05).Before the surgery,there were no significant differences in the blood indexes such as C-reactive protein(CRP),cortisol(Cor),and pre-albumin(PA)between the two groups(P>0.05);after the operation,the blood indexes of the patients in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the reference group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving radical resection of rectal cancer has lesser effects on urinary and sexual functions.

Limited segmental rectal resection in the treatment of deeply infiltrating rectal endometriosis:10 years’experience from a tertiary referral unit

Background.The management of symptomatic rectal endometriosis is a challenging condition that may necessitate limited stripping or limited segmental anterior rectal resection(LSARR)depending upon the extent and severity of the disease.Objective.To report the efficacy of LSARR in terms of pain,quality of life and short-and long-term complications—in particular,those pertaining to bowel function.Methods.The case notes of all patients undergoing LSARR were reviewed.The analysed variables included surgical complications,overall symptomatic improvement rate,dysmenorrhoea,dyspareunia,and dyschezia.Chronic pain was measured using a visual analogue scale.Quality of life was measured using the EQ-5D questionnaire.Bowel symptoms were assessed using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre(MSKCC)questionnaire.Results.Seventy-four women who underwent LSARR by both open and laparoscopic approaches were included in this study.Sixty-nine(93.2%)women reported improvement in pain and the same percentage would recommend the similar procedure to a friend with the same problem.Approximately 42%of women who wished to conceive had at least one baby.The higher frequency of defecation was a problem in the early post-operative period but this settled in later stages without influencing the quality of life score.Post-operative complications were recorded in 14.9%of cases.Conclusions.LSARR for rectal endometriosis is associated with a high degree of symptomatic relief.Pain relief achieved following LSARR does not appear to degrade with time.As anticipated,some rectal symptoms persist in few patients after long-term follow-up but LSARR is nonetheless still associated with a very high degree of patient satisfaction.

SAFETY MARGIN IN ANUS-SAVING RESECTION FOR LOW RECTAL CANCER

The length and method of measurement of the safety-margin below the rectal cancer, being of the utmost importance for its prognosis, is still under debate.The following study was designed and done for its solution.Light microscopic examination was done on 83 resected rectal cancer specimens to assess the extent of intramural invasion towards the anus.By use of a ruler,the distance between the lower tumour margin and the resection line or the dentate line was measured when the specimen was:l. freshly resected,2.after fixing in 10% formalin, and 3.after being mounted in sections. The measurements were compared. By the same method,the distance between the lower tumor margin and the intended resectyion line was measured immediately before resection.It was compared with the measurement immediately after the resection.In 83 rectal cancer specimens, the extent of intramural infiltration toward the anus was:≤0.5 cm in 75 cases (90.4%).≥l cm in 2 cases which showed highly malignant carcinomas.These 2 cases, however,should not have been indicated for anus-saving resection.In 46 fresh specimens,the tumor-resection line distances gave an average of 2.7 cm.After fixing in 10% formalin, they became shortened by 0.7 cm. And, mouting in sections further shortened them by another 0.5 cm,giving a total shortening of l.2 cm.The tumor-resection line distance in 7 of the 11 fresh specimens resected by the Dixon's operation was shortened,though never more than o.5 cm immediately the operation.In performin ganus-saving resection for the low rectal cancer, after full isolation the rectum and stretching it slightly,≥3 cm of the rectum distal to the lower tumor margin should be resected.A safety margin of more than 2.5 cm is necessary in the fresh specimen.If formalin fixed specimen is measured, the safety margin should be ≥2 cm.

THE FACTORS AND TREATMENT OF LOCAL RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL RESECTION RESERVING THE ANUS IN THE PATIENTS WITH RECTAL CANCER

Of seventy-one patients with rectal cancer after radical resection retaining the anus, 15 developed local recurrence with a recurrence rate of 21.1%. Local recurrence was correlated with improper safety margin from the lower edge of cancer to the anal end. There was statistical significant difference between 3 cm or more and 2 cm or less. The local recurrence was also related to the pathologic stage, histologic differentiation and implant of free cancer cells. It is suggested that the surgical indication of saving the anus be strict and without stretching, the safety margin from the lower edge of cancer to the anal end should not be less than 2 cm in early rectal cancer and not less than 4 cm in advanced lesions. During the operation, no touching tumor technique, thorough rinsing of the peritoneal cavity and pre- or post-operative radiotherapy are important for prevention of local recurrence. Early local recurrent rectal cancer can be detected by periodic examinations.

Colonic pouch confers better bowel function and similar postoperative outcomes compared to straight anastomosis for low rectal cancer

BACKGROUND With advancements in laparoscopic technology and the wide application of linear staplers,sphincter-saving procedures are increasingly performed for low rectal cancer.However,sphincter-saving procedures have led to the emergence of a unique clinical disorder termed anterior rectal resection syndrome.Colonic pouch anastomosis improves the quality of life of patients with rectal cancer>7 cm from the anal margin.But whether colonic pouch anastomosis can reduce the incidence of rectal resection syndrome in patients with low rectal cancer is unknown.AIM To compare postoperative and oncological outcomes and bowel function of straight and colonic pouch anal anastomoses after resection of low rectal cancer.METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of 72 patients with low rectal cancer who underwent sphincter-saving procedures with either straight or colonic pouch anastomoses.Functional evaluations were completed preoperatively and at 1,6,and 12 mo postoperatively.We also compared perioperative and oncological outcomes between two groups that had undergone low or ultralow anterior rectal resection.RESULTS There were no significant differences in mean operating time,blood loss,time to first passage of flatus and excrement,and duration of hospital stay between the colonic pouch and straight anastomosis groups.The incidence of anastomotic leakage following colonic pouch construction was lower(11.4%vs 16.2%)but not significantly different than that of straight anastomosis.Patients with colonic pouch construction had lower postoperative low anterior resection syndrome scores than the straight anastomosis group,suggesting better bowel function(preoperative:4.71 vs 3.89,P=0.43;1 mo after surgery:34.2 vs 34.7,P=0.59;6 mo after surgery:22.70 vs 29.0,P<0.05;12 mo after surgery:15.5 vs 19.5,P=0.01).The overall recurrence and metastasis rates were similar(4.3%and 11.4%,respectively).CONCLUSION Colonic pouch anastomosis is a safe and effective procedure for colorectal reconstruction after low and ultralow rectal resections.Moreover,colonic pouch construction may provide better functional outcomes compared to straight anastomosis.

Analysis of the Clinical Effect of Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for the Treatment of Middle and Low Rectal Cancer

The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for the treatment of middle and low rectal cancer.First,30 patients who received treatment in the hospital from March 2013 to May 2018 were randomly selected as the laparotomy group to receive laparotomy.30 patients who received treatment in the hospital from March 2013 to May 2018 were randomly selected as the laparoscopic group to receive laparoscopic surgery.The postoperative and complications of total rectal mesorectal excision were compared between the two groups.The results showed that the amount of blood loss during laparoscopy was(169.36±106.96)mL,and that during laparoscopy was(180.65±153.22)mL,which was significantly lower than that of the open group(209.65±186.65)mL and(356.54±170.32)mL.Intraoperative blood loss in laparoscopic patients was significantly lower than that in the open group,and the difference was statistically significant(t=2.95,2.87,P<0.05).The duration of anal sparing surgery in the laparoscope group was(232.65±56.35)min,which was longer than that in the laparoscope group(227.65±68.65)min.The duration of non-sparing anal surgery in the laparoscopic group was(246.95±52.65)min,which was significantly shorter than that in the open group(299.65±64.32)min.There was no statistically significant difference in the duration of operation between the laparoscopic group and the open group.The recovery time of intestinal function in the laparoscopic group was(2.11±1.82)days,which was significantly shorter than that in the open group(4.63±1.52)days.The postoperative hospital stay in the laparoscopic group was(11.32±10.01)d,which was significantly shorter than that in the open group(26.62±12.43 d).The recovery time of intestinal function and postoperative hospital stay of patients in the laparoscopic group were shorter than those in the open group,with statistically significant differences(T=2.31,2.43,P<0.05).The tumor diameter was(4.03±1.20)cm in the laparoscopic group and(3.95±1.43)cm in the open group.The number of lymph nodes in the laparoscopic group was(12.75±6.51)cm,while that in the open group was(13.62±7.05).There was no significant difference in the number of lymph nodes dissected or tumor diameter between the two groups(t=0.11,0.22,P>0.05).The complication rate of the abdominal group was 20.00%,significantly lower than that of the open group(66.67%).Complications after total mesorectal resection were significantly higher in the open group than in the laparoscopic group,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(χ2=13.30,P<0.05).Therefore,laparoscopic total rectal mesorectal resection for patients with middle and low rectal cancer is safer and can be used as a reliable treatment plan.

Laparoscopic surgery:A qualified systematic review

AIM: To review current applications of the laparoscopic surgery while highlighting the standard procedures across different fields.METHODS: A comprehensive search was undertaken using the Pub Med Advanced Search Builder. A total of 321 articles were found in this search. The following criteria had to be met for the publication to be selected: Review article, randomized controlled trials, or metaanalyses discussing the subject of laparoscopic surgery. In addition, publications were hand-searched in the Cochrane database and the high-impact journals. A total of 82 of the findings were included according to matching the inclusion criteria. Overall, 403 full-text articles were reviewed. Of these, 218 were excluded due to not matching the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: A total of 185 relevant articles were identified matching the search criteria for an overview of the current literature on the laparoscopic surgery. Articles covered the period from the first laparoscopic application through its tremendous advancement over the last several years. Overall, the biggest advantage of the procedure has been minimizing trauma to the abdominal wall compared with open surgery. In the case of cholecystectomy, fundoplication, and adrenalectomy, the procedure has become the gold standard without being proven as a superior technique over the open surgery in randomized controlled trials. Faster recovery, reduced hospital stay, and a quicker return to normal activities are the most evident advantages of the laparoscopic surgery. Positive outcomes, efficiency, a lower rate of wound infections, and reduction in the perioperative morbidity of minimally invasive procedures have been shown in most indications. CONCLUSION: Improvements in surgical training and developments in instruments, imaging, and surgical techniques have greatly increased safety and feasibility of the laparoscopic surgical procedures.

改良Bresler手术对直肠前突合并直肠套叠的治疗效果

背景:梗阻性排便综合征(ODS)是一种多由直肠前突和直肠套叠引起的排便障碍。本研究旨在通过与吻合器经肛直肠切除术(STARR)的比较,评估一种改良Bresler手术治疗ODS的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2014年6月至2016年6月间76例女性ODS患者的临床资料。按手术方式分为改良组和STARR组。改良组36例患者行改良Bresler手术,采用圆形管状吻合器加多层荷包缝合进行直肠后壁切除。STARR组40例患者则进行标准的STARR手术。记录术后并发症、Wexner便秘评分(WCS)、直肠前突深度和四分法术后满意度量表。结果:改良组手术时间更短,术后并发症更少(均P<0.05)。术后12个月,两组患者WCS评分和前突深度均得以改善;组间比较,改良组WCS评分显著低于STARR组(P<0.05),但前突深度两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后12个月随访,改良组患者有更高的满意度(P=0.05)。结论:对于由直肠前突和直肠套叠引起的ODS,我们的改良Bresler术式是一种有效的治疗方式,可有效缓解便秘症状,且并发症更少。