Safety of axitinib and sorafenib monotherapy for patients with renal cell carcinoma:a meta-analysis

We sought to investigate safety of axitinib or sorafenib in renal cell carcinoma（RCC） patients and compare toxicity of these two vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors. Databases of PubMed and Embase were searched.We included phase II and III prospective trials, as well as retrospective studies, in which patients diagnosed with RCC were treated with axitinib or sorafenib monotherapy at a starting dose of 5 mg and 400 mg twice daily, respectively.The overall incidence of high grade hypertension, fatigue, gastrointestinal toxicity and hand-foot syndrome, along with their 95% confidence intervals（CI）, were calculated using fixed-or random-effects model according to heterogeneity test results. A total of 26 trials, including 4790 patients, were included in our meta-analysis. Among them, 6 arms were related to axitinib and 22 were associated with sorafenib. The incidences of hypertension（24.9%vs. 7.9%）, fatigue（8.2% vs. 6.6%）, and gastrointestinal toxicity（17.6% vs. 11.3%） were higher in patients receiving axitinib versus those receiving sorafenib, while the incidence of hand-foot syndrome was lower in patients receiving axitinib versus those receiving sorafenib（9.5% vs. 13.3%）. In conclusion, axitinib showed noticeably higher risks of toxicity versus sorafenib. Close monitoring and effective measures for adverse events are recommended during therapy.

Tenofovir amibufenamide vs tenofovir alafenamide for treating chronic hepatitis B:A real-world study

BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety profile of tenofovir amibufenamide(TMF)in chronic hepatitis B(CHB)patients is not well-established.AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of TMF and tenofovir alafenamide(TAF)over a 48-wk period in patients with CHB.METHODS A total of 215 subjects meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled and divided into two groups:TMF group(n=106)and the TAF group(n=109).The study included a comparison of virological response(VR):Undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA levels,alanine transaminase(ALT)normalization rates,renal function parameters,and blood lipid profiles.RESULTS At 24 and 48 wk,VR rates for the TMF group were 53.57%and 78.57%,respectively,compared with 48.31%and 78.65%for the TAF group(P>0.05).The VR rates were also similar in both groups among patients with low-level viremia,both hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative subgroups.The TMF cohort showed ALT normalization and renal safety profiles similar to the TAF group.There was a notable increase in total cholesterol levels in the TAF group(P=0.045),which was not observed in the TMF group(P>0.05).In patients with liver cirrhosis,both groups exhibited comparable VR and ALT normalization rates and renal safety profiles.However,the fibrosis 4 score at 48 wk showed a significant reduction in the TAF group as compared to the TMF group within the liver cirrhosis subgroup.CONCLUSION Our study found TMF is as effective as TAF in treating CHB and has a comparable safety profile.However,TAF may be associated with worsening lipid profiles.

3-year Treatment of Tenofovir Alafenamide vs.Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Chronic HBV Infection in China

Background and Aims:Tenofovir alafenamide(TAF)has similar efficacy to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF)but with improved renal and bone safety in chronic hepatitis B patients studied outside of China.We report 3-year results from two phase 3 studies with TAF in China(Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT02836249 and NCT02836236).Methods:Chinese hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg)-positive and-negative chronic hepatitis B patients with viremia and elevated alanine aminotransferase were randomized 2:1 to TAF or TDF treatment groups and treated in a double-blind fashion for 144 weeks(3 years).Efficacy responses were assessed by individual study while safety was assessed by a pooled analysis.Results:Of the 334 patients(180 HBeAg-positive and 154 HBeAg-negative)randomized and treated,baseline characteristics were similar between groups.The overall mean age was 38 years and 73%were male.The mean HBV DNA was 6.4 log10 IU/mL.The median alanine aminotransferase was 88 U/L,and 37%had a history of antiviral use.At week 144,the proportion with HBV DNA<29 IU/mL was similar among the two groups,with TAF at 83%vs.TDF at 79%,and TAF at 93%vs.TDF at 92%for the HBeAg-positive and-negative patients,respectively.In each study,higher proportions of TAF than TDF patients showed normalized alanine aminotransferase(via the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the China criteria)and showed loss of HBsAg;meanwhile,the HBeAg seroconversion rates were similar.Treatment was well-tolerated among the TAF patients,who showed a smaller median decline in creatinine clearance(−0.4 vs.−3.2 mL/min;p=0.014)and less percentage change in bone mineral density vs.TDF at hip(−0.95%vs.−1.93%)and spine(+0.35%vs.−1.40%).Conclusions:In chronic hepatitis B patients from China,TAF treatment provided efficacy similar to TDF but with better renal and bone safety at 3 years.