Rationale:Acute myocardial infarction in the presence of right bundle branch block.Patient concerns:A 70-year-old,male heavy smoker presented with angina and hypertension.Interventions:Electrocardiography,intravenous ...Rationale:Acute myocardial infarction in the presence of right bundle branch block.Patient concerns:A 70-year-old,male heavy smoker presented with angina and hypertension.Interventions:Electrocardiography,intravenous nitroglycerin infusion,intravenous streptokinase infusion.Diagnosis:Acute myocardial infarction in the presence of with changeable trifascicular heart block.Outcomes:Dramatic clinical improvement with electrocardiographic ST-segment (whether elevation or reciprocal ST-depression) resolution.Lessons:Acute myocardial infarction may be associated right bundle branch block.Accompanied trifascicular heart block had pre-streptokinase left anterior fascicular block with left axis deviation and post-streptokinase left posterior fascicular block with right axis deviation.展开更多
Objective To compare the short-term clinical effect and electrical parameters of His-purkinje bundle pacing(HPBP) and right ventricular inflow tract septal pacing(RVIP) in the elderly. Methods Between April 2017 and S...Objective To compare the short-term clinical effect and electrical parameters of His-purkinje bundle pacing(HPBP) and right ventricular inflow tract septal pacing(RVIP) in the elderly. Methods Between April 2017 and September 2019, sixty patients with indications for permanent cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy in Beijing Anzhen Hospital were divided into the HPBP and RVIP groups, and were analyzed. A ventricular pacing lead was implanted in left ventricular septal sites with left bundle potentials or His potentials in the HPBP group. The lead was placed in right ventricular inflow tract septal sites close to distal His-bundle regions without potentials from the His-purkinje conduction system in the RVIP group. Lead impedance, R wave amplitude, pacing thresholds, QRS duration, left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF), and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD), mitral regurgitation area reflux, QTc, T wave directivity, Tp-e and Tp-e/QT ratio were compared between the HPBP and RVIP groups during the procedure and the short-month follow-up. Results No significant differences were found in lead impedance, R wave amplitude, QRS duration, LVEF, LVEDD, mitral regurgitation area reflux, QTc, T wave directivity, Tp-e and Tp-e/QT ratio between the HPBP and RVIP groups. However, the pacing threshold was significantly lower in the HPBP group than in the RVIP group(0.7 ± 0.2 vs. 0.9 ± 0.3 V, P = 0.02). Conclusions The efficacy and electrical parameters of HPBP is comparable with RVIP during the procedure and the short-term follow-up.展开更多
尽管宽QRS波心动过速时,完全性右束支阻滞(complete right bundle branch block,CRBBB)图形及V_1导联上"左兔耳征"图形诊断室速的特异性很高,但临床经验表明,不能迷信所谓的"特异性图形指标",而要利用心电向量图正...尽管宽QRS波心动过速时,完全性右束支阻滞(complete right bundle branch block,CRBBB)图形及V_1导联上"左兔耳征"图形诊断室速的特异性很高,但临床经验表明,不能迷信所谓的"特异性图形指标",而要利用心电向量图正确理解QRS波形态的形成机制以及其他影响波形的合并因素。本文介绍了临床工作中遇到的5个病例,其在CRBBB的基础上,分别合并有重度右心室肥大、侧后壁心肌梗死、A型心室预激及逆钟向转位,在心电图V_1导联上表现出室速时所特有的"左兔耳征"图形;从心电向量图的角度阐述了这种图形的形成原理;经分析认为,在CRBBB时,凡是伴有导致左心室除极向量明显向前偏移的因素,在出现室上速时,心电图就会出现酷似室速的"左兔耳征"的图形表现。这提示我们在鉴别宽QRS波心动过速时,必须重视这种图形,密切结合临床认真鉴别。展开更多
目的探讨左束支区域起搏(left bundle branch area pacing,LBBaP)对房室传导阻滞(AVB)患者术后新发心房颤动(new-onset atrial fibrillation,NOAF)和心房高频事件(atrial high rate episodes,AHREs)的影响。方法回顾性纳入84例行起搏治...目的探讨左束支区域起搏(left bundle branch area pacing,LBBaP)对房室传导阻滞(AVB)患者术后新发心房颤动(new-onset atrial fibrillation,NOAF)和心房高频事件(atrial high rate episodes,AHREs)的影响。方法回顾性纳入84例行起搏治疗的三度房室传导阻滞(ⅢAVB)患者,根据心室电极位置分为LBBaP组(n=42)和右室间隔部起搏(RVSP)组(n=42)。比较两组患者术前术后QRS波时限(QRSd)、心室起搏参数,并发症、脑卒中事件和NOAF、AHREs发生率。结果(1)LBBaP组术后NOAF、AHREs发生率均低于RVSP组(P<0.05)。(2)LBBaP组的p-QRSd短于RVSP组(P<0.05)。(3)两组患者心室起搏参数、并发症及脑卒中事件发生率之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论相对于右室起搏,LBBaP术后AHREs、NOAF的发生率较低,可改善患者预后。展开更多
Pacemaker post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement is related to multifactorial risk.Nwaedozie et al brought to the body of evidence electrocardiogram and clinical findings.However,procedural characteristics have a...Pacemaker post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement is related to multifactorial risk.Nwaedozie et al brought to the body of evidence electrocardiogram and clinical findings.However,procedural characteristics have at least as much impact on the final need for a permanent pacemaker and potentially on the pacing rate.In this regard,long-term follow-up and understanding of the impact of long-term stimulation is of utmost importance.展开更多
Several anatomical,demographic,clinical,electrocardiographic,procedural,and valve-related variables can be used to predict the probability of developing con-duction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve repla...Several anatomical,demographic,clinical,electrocardiographic,procedural,and valve-related variables can be used to predict the probability of developing con-duction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve replacement(TAVR)that necessitate permanent pacemaker(PPM)implantation.These variables include calcifications around the device landing zone and in the mitral annulus;pre-existing electrocardiographic abnormalities such as left and right bundle branch blocks(BBB),first-and second-degree atrioventricular blocks,as well as bifas-cicular and trifascicular blocks;male sex;diabetes mellitus(DM);hypertension;history of atrial fibrillation;renal failure;dementia;and use of self-expanding valves.The current study supports existing literature by demonstrating that type 2 DM and baseline right BBB are significant predictors of PPM implantation post-TAVR.Regardless of the side of the BBB,this study demonstrated,for the first time,a linear association between the incidence of PPM implantation post-TAVR and every 20 ms increase in baseline QRS duration(above 100 ms).After a 1-year follow-up,patients who received PPM post-TAVR had a higher rate of hospital-ization for heart failure and nonfatal myocardial infarction.展开更多
文摘Rationale:Acute myocardial infarction in the presence of right bundle branch block.Patient concerns:A 70-year-old,male heavy smoker presented with angina and hypertension.Interventions:Electrocardiography,intravenous nitroglycerin infusion,intravenous streptokinase infusion.Diagnosis:Acute myocardial infarction in the presence of with changeable trifascicular heart block.Outcomes:Dramatic clinical improvement with electrocardiographic ST-segment (whether elevation or reciprocal ST-depression) resolution.Lessons:Acute myocardial infarction may be associated right bundle branch block.Accompanied trifascicular heart block had pre-streptokinase left anterior fascicular block with left axis deviation and post-streptokinase left posterior fascicular block with right axis deviation.
文摘Objective To compare the short-term clinical effect and electrical parameters of His-purkinje bundle pacing(HPBP) and right ventricular inflow tract septal pacing(RVIP) in the elderly. Methods Between April 2017 and September 2019, sixty patients with indications for permanent cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy in Beijing Anzhen Hospital were divided into the HPBP and RVIP groups, and were analyzed. A ventricular pacing lead was implanted in left ventricular septal sites with left bundle potentials or His potentials in the HPBP group. The lead was placed in right ventricular inflow tract septal sites close to distal His-bundle regions without potentials from the His-purkinje conduction system in the RVIP group. Lead impedance, R wave amplitude, pacing thresholds, QRS duration, left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF), and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD), mitral regurgitation area reflux, QTc, T wave directivity, Tp-e and Tp-e/QT ratio were compared between the HPBP and RVIP groups during the procedure and the short-month follow-up. Results No significant differences were found in lead impedance, R wave amplitude, QRS duration, LVEF, LVEDD, mitral regurgitation area reflux, QTc, T wave directivity, Tp-e and Tp-e/QT ratio between the HPBP and RVIP groups. However, the pacing threshold was significantly lower in the HPBP group than in the RVIP group(0.7 ± 0.2 vs. 0.9 ± 0.3 V, P = 0.02). Conclusions The efficacy and electrical parameters of HPBP is comparable with RVIP during the procedure and the short-term follow-up.
文摘尽管宽QRS波心动过速时,完全性右束支阻滞(complete right bundle branch block,CRBBB)图形及V_1导联上"左兔耳征"图形诊断室速的特异性很高,但临床经验表明,不能迷信所谓的"特异性图形指标",而要利用心电向量图正确理解QRS波形态的形成机制以及其他影响波形的合并因素。本文介绍了临床工作中遇到的5个病例,其在CRBBB的基础上,分别合并有重度右心室肥大、侧后壁心肌梗死、A型心室预激及逆钟向转位,在心电图V_1导联上表现出室速时所特有的"左兔耳征"图形;从心电向量图的角度阐述了这种图形的形成原理;经分析认为,在CRBBB时,凡是伴有导致左心室除极向量明显向前偏移的因素,在出现室上速时,心电图就会出现酷似室速的"左兔耳征"的图形表现。这提示我们在鉴别宽QRS波心动过速时,必须重视这种图形,密切结合临床认真鉴别。
文摘目的探讨左束支区域起搏(left bundle branch area pacing,LBBaP)对房室传导阻滞(AVB)患者术后新发心房颤动(new-onset atrial fibrillation,NOAF)和心房高频事件(atrial high rate episodes,AHREs)的影响。方法回顾性纳入84例行起搏治疗的三度房室传导阻滞(ⅢAVB)患者,根据心室电极位置分为LBBaP组(n=42)和右室间隔部起搏(RVSP)组(n=42)。比较两组患者术前术后QRS波时限(QRSd)、心室起搏参数,并发症、脑卒中事件和NOAF、AHREs发生率。结果(1)LBBaP组术后NOAF、AHREs发生率均低于RVSP组(P<0.05)。(2)LBBaP组的p-QRSd短于RVSP组(P<0.05)。(3)两组患者心室起搏参数、并发症及脑卒中事件发生率之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论相对于右室起搏,LBBaP术后AHREs、NOAF的发生率较低,可改善患者预后。
文摘Pacemaker post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement is related to multifactorial risk.Nwaedozie et al brought to the body of evidence electrocardiogram and clinical findings.However,procedural characteristics have at least as much impact on the final need for a permanent pacemaker and potentially on the pacing rate.In this regard,long-term follow-up and understanding of the impact of long-term stimulation is of utmost importance.
文摘Several anatomical,demographic,clinical,electrocardiographic,procedural,and valve-related variables can be used to predict the probability of developing con-duction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve replacement(TAVR)that necessitate permanent pacemaker(PPM)implantation.These variables include calcifications around the device landing zone and in the mitral annulus;pre-existing electrocardiographic abnormalities such as left and right bundle branch blocks(BBB),first-and second-degree atrioventricular blocks,as well as bifas-cicular and trifascicular blocks;male sex;diabetes mellitus(DM);hypertension;history of atrial fibrillation;renal failure;dementia;and use of self-expanding valves.The current study supports existing literature by demonstrating that type 2 DM and baseline right BBB are significant predictors of PPM implantation post-TAVR.Regardless of the side of the BBB,this study demonstrated,for the first time,a linear association between the incidence of PPM implantation post-TAVR and every 20 ms increase in baseline QRS duration(above 100 ms).After a 1-year follow-up,patients who received PPM post-TAVR had a higher rate of hospital-ization for heart failure and nonfatal myocardial infarction.
