AIM:To investigate the pathophysiology of functional heartburn(FH) in Japanese patients.METHODS:A total of 111 patients with proton pump inhibitor(PPI)-refractory non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent ...AIM:To investigate the pathophysiology of functional heartburn(FH) in Japanese patients.METHODS:A total of 111 patients with proton pump inhibitor(PPI)-refractory non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent intraesophageal pressure testing and 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedancep H(24MII-p H) testing.The patients also completed several questionnaires while they were receiving the PPI treatment, including the questionnaire for the diagnosis of reflux disease(QUEST), the frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease(FSSG), the gastrointestinal symptoms rating scale(GSRS), SF-36, and the Cornell Medical Index(CMI).The subjects were classified into FH and endoscopy-negative reflux disease(ENRD) groups based on the Rome Ⅲ criteria.RESULTS:Thirty-three patients with esophageal motility disorder were excluded from this study, while 22 patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure time(p H-POS) and 34 with hypersensitive esophagus(HE) were included in the ENRD group.The FH group included 22 patients with no reflux involvement.Sex, age, and body mass index did not differ significantly between the groups.The mean SF-36 values were < 50(normal) for all scales in these groups, with no significant differences.The GSRS scores in these groups were not different and showed overlap with other gastrointestinal symptoms.The QUEST and the FSSG scores did not differ significantly between the groups.Neuroticism was diagnosed using the CMI questionnaire in 17 of the 78 included subjects within the p H-POS(n=4),HE(n=8),and FH(n=5)groups,with no significant differences.CONCLUSION:Clinical characteristics of the FH and PPI-refractory ENRD groups were similar.Therefore,esophageal function should be examined via manometry and 24MII-p H testing to differentiate between them.展开更多
AIM: To study if and how physicians use the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) diagnostic criteria and to assess treatment strategies in IBS patients. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 191 physicians regarding IBS crit...AIM: To study if and how physicians use the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) diagnostic criteria and to assess treatment strategies in IBS patients. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 191 physicians regarding IBS criteria, diagnostic methods and treatment. Furthermore, 94 patients who were diagnosed with IBS underwent telephone interview. RESULTS: A total of 80/191 (41.9%) physicians responded to the survey. Overall, 13 patients were diag-nosed monthly with IBS by specialists in gastroenterology (SGs) and 2.5 patients by general practitioners (GPs). All the SGs knew of the criteria to diagnose IBS, as did 46/70 (65.7%) GPs. Seventy-nine percent used the patient's history, 38% used a physical examination, and 38% exclusion of other diseases to diagnose IBS. Only 18/80 (22.5%) physicians used specific IBS criteria. Of the patients interviewed, 59/94 (62.8%) knew they had experienced IBS. Two out of five patients knew IBS and had seen a physician because of IBS symptoms. Half of those received a diagnosis of IBS. A total of 13% were satisfied with treatment. IBS affected daily activities in 43% of cases. CONCLUSION: Half of the patients with IBS who consulted a physician received a diagnosis. Awareness and knowledge of diagnostic criteria for IBS differ between SGs and GPs.展开更多
文摘AIM:To investigate the pathophysiology of functional heartburn(FH) in Japanese patients.METHODS:A total of 111 patients with proton pump inhibitor(PPI)-refractory non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent intraesophageal pressure testing and 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedancep H(24MII-p H) testing.The patients also completed several questionnaires while they were receiving the PPI treatment, including the questionnaire for the diagnosis of reflux disease(QUEST), the frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease(FSSG), the gastrointestinal symptoms rating scale(GSRS), SF-36, and the Cornell Medical Index(CMI).The subjects were classified into FH and endoscopy-negative reflux disease(ENRD) groups based on the Rome Ⅲ criteria.RESULTS:Thirty-three patients with esophageal motility disorder were excluded from this study, while 22 patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure time(p H-POS) and 34 with hypersensitive esophagus(HE) were included in the ENRD group.The FH group included 22 patients with no reflux involvement.Sex, age, and body mass index did not differ significantly between the groups.The mean SF-36 values were < 50(normal) for all scales in these groups, with no significant differences.The GSRS scores in these groups were not different and showed overlap with other gastrointestinal symptoms.The QUEST and the FSSG scores did not differ significantly between the groups.Neuroticism was diagnosed using the CMI questionnaire in 17 of the 78 included subjects within the p H-POS(n=4),HE(n=8),and FH(n=5)groups,with no significant differences.CONCLUSION:Clinical characteristics of the FH and PPI-refractory ENRD groups were similar.Therefore,esophageal function should be examined via manometry and 24MII-p H testing to differentiate between them.
基金Supported by In part by the Medical Research Fund of the National Hospital of Icelandthe Medical Research Fund of Wyeth, Iceland+3 种基金Actavis, IcelandAstraZeneca, Iceland GlaxoSmithKline, Icelandand the Icelandic College of Family Physicians
文摘AIM: To study if and how physicians use the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) diagnostic criteria and to assess treatment strategies in IBS patients. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 191 physicians regarding IBS criteria, diagnostic methods and treatment. Furthermore, 94 patients who were diagnosed with IBS underwent telephone interview. RESULTS: A total of 80/191 (41.9%) physicians responded to the survey. Overall, 13 patients were diag-nosed monthly with IBS by specialists in gastroenterology (SGs) and 2.5 patients by general practitioners (GPs). All the SGs knew of the criteria to diagnose IBS, as did 46/70 (65.7%) GPs. Seventy-nine percent used the patient's history, 38% used a physical examination, and 38% exclusion of other diseases to diagnose IBS. Only 18/80 (22.5%) physicians used specific IBS criteria. Of the patients interviewed, 59/94 (62.8%) knew they had experienced IBS. Two out of five patients knew IBS and had seen a physician because of IBS symptoms. Half of those received a diagnosis of IBS. A total of 13% were satisfied with treatment. IBS affected daily activities in 43% of cases. CONCLUSION: Half of the patients with IBS who consulted a physician received a diagnosis. Awareness and knowledge of diagnostic criteria for IBS differ between SGs and GPs.
