高粱田的阔叶杂草对除草剂的抗性日趋严重,而能够用于高粱田的除草剂品种有限,导致阔叶杂草的防除比较困难,高粱的产量也受到了巨大影响。因此,生产中迫切需要筛选出对抗性阔叶杂草防效较好的除草剂。试验探讨了不同剂量20%苯嘧磺草胺...高粱田的阔叶杂草对除草剂的抗性日趋严重,而能够用于高粱田的除草剂品种有限,导致阔叶杂草的防除比较困难,高粱的产量也受到了巨大影响。因此,生产中迫切需要筛选出对抗性阔叶杂草防效较好的除草剂。试验探讨了不同剂量20%苯嘧磺草胺悬浮剂对高粱田阔叶杂草苯氏蓼、反枝苋和藜的防效。结果表明,中高剂量(60、90 g a.i./hm^(2))20%苯嘧磺草胺悬浮剂对高粱田阔叶杂草防除效果较好,对阔叶杂草的鲜重防效最高可达97.75%,持效期可达30 d左右,并且对高粱安全,不影响产量,具有减施增效的特点。该试验结果能够为高粱田阔叶杂草的合理防除提供理论依据。展开更多
柑桔园行间定向喷雾试验结果表明,在41%农达AS中加入70%苯嘧磺草胺WG和助剂Dash不仅能有效控制乌蔹莓、铁苋菜、假一年蓬、加拿大一枝黄花等多种耐草甘膦阔叶杂草的危害,控制多年生杂草的再生,而且作用速度可与20%克无踪AS相当,对柑桔...柑桔园行间定向喷雾试验结果表明,在41%农达AS中加入70%苯嘧磺草胺WG和助剂Dash不仅能有效控制乌蔹莓、铁苋菜、假一年蓬、加拿大一枝黄花等多种耐草甘膦阔叶杂草的危害,控制多年生杂草的再生,而且作用速度可与20%克无踪AS相当,对柑桔生长安全。从高效、经济、安全的角度综合考虑,三者混用的适宜剂量为41%农达AS 1 000~1 500 g ai/hm^2+70%苯嘧磺草胺WG 12.5~25.0 g ai/hm^2+助剂Dash(喷液量的1%)。展开更多
Giant ragweed was the first glyphosate resistant weed identified in Canada. It is a very competetive weed in row crop production and has been found to drastically reduce yields of soybean;therefore, control of this co...Giant ragweed was the first glyphosate resistant weed identified in Canada. It is a very competetive weed in row crop production and has been found to drastically reduce yields of soybean;therefore, control of this competitive weed is essential. The objective of this study was to determine effective control options for glyphosate resistant giant ragweed in soybean with herbicides applied preplant. Eighteen herbicide combinations were evaluated in field studies conducted in 2011 and 2012 at five locations with confirmed glyphosate resistant giant ragweed. Glyphosate plus 2,4-D ester or amitrole provided the best control of glyphosate resistant giant ragweed 4 WAA. Glyphosate plus 2,4-D ester provided 98 to 99% control and was equivalent to the weed free check at all locations. Glyphosate plus amitrole provided 90% to 93% control and was equivalent to the weed free check at 4 of 5 locations. Herbicides providing residual activity provided variable control across all locations. Of the herbicides with residual activity evaluated, glyphosate plus linuron provided the best control of glyphosate resistant giant ragweed;however, control was inconsistent across locations and years. Glyphosate plus linuron provided 23% to 99% controland was equal to the weed free check at one location 8 WAA.展开更多
Eight field trials (<span style="font-family:Verdana;">2 in 2016, 3 in 2017, 3 in 2018) </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">were conducted</span><span style="f...Eight field trials (<span style="font-family:Verdana;">2 in 2016, 3 in 2017, 3 in 2018) </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">were conducted</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> in farmers’ fields with heavy infestations of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conyza</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>canadensis</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (Canada fleabane, horseweed or </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">marestail</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) </span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">to evaluate glyphosate (900 g ae ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) plus </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (25 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">), 2,4-D ester (500 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) or paraquat (1100 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) applied </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">preplant</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (PP) as 2-way </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmixes</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, or in 3-way </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmixes</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> with sulfentrazone (140 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">), flumioxazin (107 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) or metribuzin (400 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">)</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> for the glyphosate-resistant (GR) </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> control in GR soybean. </span></span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Glyphosate plus </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> applied PP controlled GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> as much as 90%. The addition of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> metribuzin to the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmix</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> provided as much as 93%, 96% </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 97% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, respectively. Glyphosate plus 2,4-D ester applied PP provided as much as 59% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. The addition of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> metribuzin to the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmix</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> provided as much as 60%, 5</span></span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">9% </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 91% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, respectively. Glyphosate plus paraquat applied PP provided as much as 85% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. The addition of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> metribuzin to the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmix</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> provided as much as 88%, 89% </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 98% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, respectively. Density and biomass reductions of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> with herbicides evaluated followed the same pattern as weed control evaluations. </span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> interference reduced soybean yield 66%. Reduced GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> interference with the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">preplant</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> herbicides evaluated provided soybean yield similar to the</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> weed-free control. Results from this study </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">show</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> that glyphosate plus </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, glyphosate plus 2,4-D ester </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> glyphosate plus paraquat </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmixed</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> with metribuzin can provide effective control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> in GR soybean.</span></span></span></span>展开更多
The fall application of post-emergent (POST) herbicides on winter wheat provided effective control of emerged winter annual, biennial, and perennial broadleaf weeds. In recent years, wheat producers have seen a shift ...The fall application of post-emergent (POST) herbicides on winter wheat provided effective control of emerged winter annual, biennial, and perennial broadleaf weeds. In recent years, wheat producers have seen a shift to these weeds, due in part, to the adoption of reduced-and no-tillage practices and the use of non-residual herbicides such as glyphosate in the preceding soybean and corn crops. The tolerance of winter wheat to ten herbicides, applied POST in the fall, was evaluated between 2008 and 2011 at Exeter and Ridgetown, Ontario. Winter wheat yield was not reduced by applications of MCPA ester, dicamba/ MCPA/ mecoprop, clopyralid, bromoxynil/ MCPA, thifensulfuron /tribenuron +MCPA ester, fluroxypyr +MCPA ester, and pyrasulfotole/ bromoxynil. In contrast, 2,4-D ester and dichlorprop/2,4-D, caused visible injury in June and July of the following year and consistently decreased winter wheat yield by at least 10%. Applications of 100 g a.i. ha-1 saflufenacil also decreased winter wheat yield in two of the four harvest years examined. None of the herbicide options examined were safe on red clover when it was under seeded the spring following winter wheat planting. All herbicides significantly decreased red clover dry biomass one month after wheat harvest.展开更多
Two studies, each consisting of six field experiments were conducted in growers’ fields in 2018 and 2019 to determine the optimal herbicide tankmixes, applied preplant (PP) for the control of glyphosate-resistant<...Two studies, each consisting of six field experiments were conducted in growers’ fields in 2018 and 2019 to determine the optimal herbicide tankmixes, applied preplant (PP) for the control of glyphosate-resistant<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">GR</span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">)</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> marestail in</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 1) identity-preserved and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Study 1) and, 2)</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (Study 2). </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">There was no significant injury in soybean with the PP herbicides evaluated in both studies. </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In Study 1, at 8 weeks after treatment (WAA), glyphosate + saflufenacil, glyphosate + 2,4-D ester, glyphosate + pyraflufen/2,4-D, glyphosate +, 4-D choline or glyphosate + halauxifen-methyl, applied PP, controlled GR marestail 93%, 58%, 60%, 67% and 71%, respectively</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> The addition of metribuzin to </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the tankmixes of glyphosate + </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, 2,4-D ester and pyraflufen/2,4-D increased the control to 98%, 91% and 95%, respectively. The addition of metribuzin + chlorimuron-ethyl to 2,4-D choline/glyphosate and glyphosate + halauxifen-methyl increased the control to 94% and 93%, respectively.</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In Study 2, a</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">t </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">8 WAA,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> glyphosate/dicamba</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">applied PP, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">controlled GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">89</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">% in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean. The addition of metribuzin </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">to glyphosate/dicamba </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">controlled GR marestail 86% and 97%, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">respectively. At </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">8 WAA</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">S</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-metolachlor/dicamba controlled GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 83%.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> The addition of metribuzin or saflufenacil to the above </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">pre</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">mix controlled GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">87% and 97%</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, respectively. </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Density and biomass reductions were similar to visible control. </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail interference reduced soybean yield </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">60% and 53</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">% in</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Study 1 </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and 2, respectively. Reduce</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">d GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail interference with all the herbicide treatments </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">evaluated in both studies </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">resulted in soybean yield that was similar to the weed-free control.</span>展开更多
Nine field experiments were conducted in 2011 and 2012 at various locations in southern Ontario, Canada to determine the tolerance of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) to herbicides inhibiting protoporphyrinogen oxidas...Nine field experiments were conducted in 2011 and 2012 at various locations in southern Ontario, Canada to determine the tolerance of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) to herbicides inhibiting protoporphyrinogen oxidase (Protox) and very long chain fatty acid (VLCFA) synthesis applied alone and in combination. Preemergence applications were evaluated for soybean injury, plant height, shoot dry weight, and yield in the absence of weed competition. Early-season soybean injury from the Protox inhibitors persisted 4 weeks after soybean emergence (WAE) with 3%, 5%, and 18% injury for flumioxazin, saflufenacil, and sulfentrazone, respectively. When Protox inhibitors were tank mixed with VLCFA inhibitors (i.e., dimethenamid-P, S-metolachlor, and pyroxasulfone), additive interactions were observed for injury with saflufenacil and sulfentrazone;whereas synergistic interactions were observed with flumioxazin. However, injury subsided over time decreasing from as much as 34% injury 1 WAE for the flumioxazin + S-metolachlor tank mix down to 9% injury 4 WAE. In general, when saflufenacil or flumioxazin were tank mixed with VLCFA inhibitors, greater than expected reductions in height and dry weight were observed indicating synergistic responses;while no interactive effects were detected with sulfentrazone and VLCFA inhibitor tank mixes. For the flumioxazin tank mixes that contained dimethenamid-P or S-metolachlor, the reduction in yield was greater than expected indicating synergistic interactive effects. Yet, all the demonstrated impacts were transient as the yield for soybean treated with any of the Protox inhibitor and VLCFA inhibitor tank mixes tested were similar to the untreated control. Therefore, usage restriction on these mixtures, based on perceived negative yield impact, should be lifted so the herbicides could be combined to expand weed control options.展开更多
文摘高粱田的阔叶杂草对除草剂的抗性日趋严重,而能够用于高粱田的除草剂品种有限,导致阔叶杂草的防除比较困难,高粱的产量也受到了巨大影响。因此,生产中迫切需要筛选出对抗性阔叶杂草防效较好的除草剂。试验探讨了不同剂量20%苯嘧磺草胺悬浮剂对高粱田阔叶杂草苯氏蓼、反枝苋和藜的防效。结果表明,中高剂量(60、90 g a.i./hm^(2))20%苯嘧磺草胺悬浮剂对高粱田阔叶杂草防除效果较好,对阔叶杂草的鲜重防效最高可达97.75%,持效期可达30 d左右,并且对高粱安全,不影响产量,具有减施增效的特点。该试验结果能够为高粱田阔叶杂草的合理防除提供理论依据。
文摘柑桔园行间定向喷雾试验结果表明,在41%农达AS中加入70%苯嘧磺草胺WG和助剂Dash不仅能有效控制乌蔹莓、铁苋菜、假一年蓬、加拿大一枝黄花等多种耐草甘膦阔叶杂草的危害,控制多年生杂草的再生,而且作用速度可与20%克无踪AS相当,对柑桔生长安全。从高效、经济、安全的角度综合考虑,三者混用的适宜剂量为41%农达AS 1 000~1 500 g ai/hm^2+70%苯嘧磺草胺WG 12.5~25.0 g ai/hm^2+助剂Dash(喷液量的1%)。
基金Funding for this project was provided in part by Monsanto Canada Inc.the Grain Farmers of Ontario and the Agricultural Adaptation Council through the Canadian Agricultural Adaptation Program.
文摘Giant ragweed was the first glyphosate resistant weed identified in Canada. It is a very competetive weed in row crop production and has been found to drastically reduce yields of soybean;therefore, control of this competitive weed is essential. The objective of this study was to determine effective control options for glyphosate resistant giant ragweed in soybean with herbicides applied preplant. Eighteen herbicide combinations were evaluated in field studies conducted in 2011 and 2012 at five locations with confirmed glyphosate resistant giant ragweed. Glyphosate plus 2,4-D ester or amitrole provided the best control of glyphosate resistant giant ragweed 4 WAA. Glyphosate plus 2,4-D ester provided 98 to 99% control and was equivalent to the weed free check at all locations. Glyphosate plus amitrole provided 90% to 93% control and was equivalent to the weed free check at 4 of 5 locations. Herbicides providing residual activity provided variable control across all locations. Of the herbicides with residual activity evaluated, glyphosate plus linuron provided the best control of glyphosate resistant giant ragweed;however, control was inconsistent across locations and years. Glyphosate plus linuron provided 23% to 99% controland was equal to the weed free check at one location 8 WAA.
文摘Eight field trials (<span style="font-family:Verdana;">2 in 2016, 3 in 2017, 3 in 2018) </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">were conducted</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> in farmers’ fields with heavy infestations of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conyza</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>canadensis</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (Canada fleabane, horseweed or </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">marestail</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) </span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">to evaluate glyphosate (900 g ae ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) plus </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (25 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">), 2,4-D ester (500 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) or paraquat (1100 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) applied </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">preplant</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (PP) as 2-way </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmixes</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, or in 3-way </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmixes</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> with sulfentrazone (140 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">), flumioxazin (107 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) or metribuzin (400 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">)</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> for the glyphosate-resistant (GR) </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> control in GR soybean. </span></span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Glyphosate plus </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> applied PP controlled GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> as much as 90%. The addition of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> metribuzin to the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmix</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> provided as much as 93%, 96% </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 97% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, respectively. Glyphosate plus 2,4-D ester applied PP provided as much as 59% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. The addition of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> metribuzin to the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmix</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> provided as much as 60%, 5</span></span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">9% </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 91% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, respectively. Glyphosate plus paraquat applied PP provided as much as 85% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. The addition of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> metribuzin to the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmix</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> provided as much as 88%, 89% </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 98% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, respectively. Density and biomass reductions of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> with herbicides evaluated followed the same pattern as weed control evaluations. </span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> interference reduced soybean yield 66%. Reduced GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> interference with the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">preplant</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> herbicides evaluated provided soybean yield similar to the</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> weed-free control. Results from this study </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">show</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> that glyphosate plus </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, glyphosate plus 2,4-D ester </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> glyphosate plus paraquat </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmixed</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> with metribuzin can provide effective control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> in GR soybean.</span></span></span></span>
文摘The fall application of post-emergent (POST) herbicides on winter wheat provided effective control of emerged winter annual, biennial, and perennial broadleaf weeds. In recent years, wheat producers have seen a shift to these weeds, due in part, to the adoption of reduced-and no-tillage practices and the use of non-residual herbicides such as glyphosate in the preceding soybean and corn crops. The tolerance of winter wheat to ten herbicides, applied POST in the fall, was evaluated between 2008 and 2011 at Exeter and Ridgetown, Ontario. Winter wheat yield was not reduced by applications of MCPA ester, dicamba/ MCPA/ mecoprop, clopyralid, bromoxynil/ MCPA, thifensulfuron /tribenuron +MCPA ester, fluroxypyr +MCPA ester, and pyrasulfotole/ bromoxynil. In contrast, 2,4-D ester and dichlorprop/2,4-D, caused visible injury in June and July of the following year and consistently decreased winter wheat yield by at least 10%. Applications of 100 g a.i. ha-1 saflufenacil also decreased winter wheat yield in two of the four harvest years examined. None of the herbicide options examined were safe on red clover when it was under seeded the spring following winter wheat planting. All herbicides significantly decreased red clover dry biomass one month after wheat harvest.
文摘Two studies, each consisting of six field experiments were conducted in growers’ fields in 2018 and 2019 to determine the optimal herbicide tankmixes, applied preplant (PP) for the control of glyphosate-resistant<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">GR</span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">)</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> marestail in</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 1) identity-preserved and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Study 1) and, 2)</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (Study 2). </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">There was no significant injury in soybean with the PP herbicides evaluated in both studies. </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In Study 1, at 8 weeks after treatment (WAA), glyphosate + saflufenacil, glyphosate + 2,4-D ester, glyphosate + pyraflufen/2,4-D, glyphosate +, 4-D choline or glyphosate + halauxifen-methyl, applied PP, controlled GR marestail 93%, 58%, 60%, 67% and 71%, respectively</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> The addition of metribuzin to </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the tankmixes of glyphosate + </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, 2,4-D ester and pyraflufen/2,4-D increased the control to 98%, 91% and 95%, respectively. The addition of metribuzin + chlorimuron-ethyl to 2,4-D choline/glyphosate and glyphosate + halauxifen-methyl increased the control to 94% and 93%, respectively.</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In Study 2, a</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">t </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">8 WAA,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> glyphosate/dicamba</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">applied PP, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">controlled GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">89</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">% in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean. The addition of metribuzin </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">to glyphosate/dicamba </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">controlled GR marestail 86% and 97%, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">respectively. At </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">8 WAA</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">S</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-metolachlor/dicamba controlled GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 83%.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> The addition of metribuzin or saflufenacil to the above </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">pre</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">mix controlled GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">87% and 97%</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, respectively. </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Density and biomass reductions were similar to visible control. </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail interference reduced soybean yield </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">60% and 53</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">% in</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Study 1 </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and 2, respectively. Reduce</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">d GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail interference with all the herbicide treatments </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">evaluated in both studies </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">resulted in soybean yield that was similar to the weed-free control.</span>
文摘Nine field experiments were conducted in 2011 and 2012 at various locations in southern Ontario, Canada to determine the tolerance of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) to herbicides inhibiting protoporphyrinogen oxidase (Protox) and very long chain fatty acid (VLCFA) synthesis applied alone and in combination. Preemergence applications were evaluated for soybean injury, plant height, shoot dry weight, and yield in the absence of weed competition. Early-season soybean injury from the Protox inhibitors persisted 4 weeks after soybean emergence (WAE) with 3%, 5%, and 18% injury for flumioxazin, saflufenacil, and sulfentrazone, respectively. When Protox inhibitors were tank mixed with VLCFA inhibitors (i.e., dimethenamid-P, S-metolachlor, and pyroxasulfone), additive interactions were observed for injury with saflufenacil and sulfentrazone;whereas synergistic interactions were observed with flumioxazin. However, injury subsided over time decreasing from as much as 34% injury 1 WAE for the flumioxazin + S-metolachlor tank mix down to 9% injury 4 WAE. In general, when saflufenacil or flumioxazin were tank mixed with VLCFA inhibitors, greater than expected reductions in height and dry weight were observed indicating synergistic responses;while no interactive effects were detected with sulfentrazone and VLCFA inhibitor tank mixes. For the flumioxazin tank mixes that contained dimethenamid-P or S-metolachlor, the reduction in yield was greater than expected indicating synergistic interactive effects. Yet, all the demonstrated impacts were transient as the yield for soybean treated with any of the Protox inhibitor and VLCFA inhibitor tank mixes tested were similar to the untreated control. Therefore, usage restriction on these mixtures, based on perceived negative yield impact, should be lifted so the herbicides could be combined to expand weed control options.