与传统条形码识别技术相比,射频识别(Radio Frequency Identification,RFID)具有扫描速度快、体积小、易封装、可抵抗污染、可重复使用、穿透性强、存储容量大、安全性高等优势,其应用将给零售、物流等产业带来革命性变化。本文介绍了EP...与传统条形码识别技术相比,射频识别(Radio Frequency Identification,RFID)具有扫描速度快、体积小、易封装、可抵抗污染、可重复使用、穿透性强、存储容量大、安全性高等优势,其应用将给零售、物流等产业带来革命性变化。本文介绍了EPCglobal组织的RFID体系框架和标准化现状,阐明了电子产品代码(Electronic Product Code,EPC)网络的组成,分析了EPC编码标准、EPC标签、读写器、Savant系统、对象名解析系统(Object Numbering System,ONS)、物理标识语言的基本结构和功能原理,最后给出了EPC网络的工作流程。展开更多
Objective To investigate the variations of auditory evoked potentials (AEP) and visual evoked potentials (VEP) of patients with idiot savant (IS) syndrome. Methods Both AEP and VEP were recorded from 7 patients wit...Objective To investigate the variations of auditory evoked potentials (AEP) and visual evoked potentials (VEP) of patients with idiot savant (IS) syndrome. Methods Both AEP and VEP were recorded from 7 patients with IS syndrome, 21 mentally retarded (MR) children without the syndrome and 21 normally age matched controls, using a Dantec concerto SEEG 16 BEAM instrument. Results Both AEP and VEP of MR group showed significantly longer latencies (P1 and P2 latencies of AEP, P<0.01; N1 and N2 latencies of VEP, P< 0.01/0.05), lower P2 amplitudes (P<0.01) and higher P3 amplitudes (P<0.01), as compared with normal controls. But none of above mentioned changes was found with IS group. Almost all MR patients (90.1%) presented P4 component in both AEP and VEP, which was also in sharp contrast with its incidence in other 2 groups (IS: 14.3%; normal controls: 9.5%). Conclusion Patients with idiot savant syndrome presented normalized AEP and VEP.展开更多
文摘Objective To investigate the variations of auditory evoked potentials (AEP) and visual evoked potentials (VEP) of patients with idiot savant (IS) syndrome. Methods Both AEP and VEP were recorded from 7 patients with IS syndrome, 21 mentally retarded (MR) children without the syndrome and 21 normally age matched controls, using a Dantec concerto SEEG 16 BEAM instrument. Results Both AEP and VEP of MR group showed significantly longer latencies (P1 and P2 latencies of AEP, P<0.01; N1 and N2 latencies of VEP, P< 0.01/0.05), lower P2 amplitudes (P<0.01) and higher P3 amplitudes (P<0.01), as compared with normal controls. But none of above mentioned changes was found with IS group. Almost all MR patients (90.1%) presented P4 component in both AEP and VEP, which was also in sharp contrast with its incidence in other 2 groups (IS: 14.3%; normal controls: 9.5%). Conclusion Patients with idiot savant syndrome presented normalized AEP and VEP.
