Emergency internal iliac artery temporary occlusion after massive hemorrhage during surgery of cesarean scar pregnancy:A case report

BACKGROUND Cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP)is rare but may result in uterine rupture during pregnancy or massive hemorrhage during abortion procedures.Awareness of this condition is increasing,and most patients with CSP are now diagnosed early and can be managed safely.However,some atypical patients are misdiagnosed,and their surgical risks are underestimated,increasing the risk of fatal hemorrhage.CASE SUMMARY A 27-year-old Asian woman visited our institution because of abnormal pregnancy,and she was diagnosed with a hydatidiform mole through transvaginal ultrasound(TVS).Under hysteroscopy,a large amount of placental tissue was found in the scar of the lower uterine segment,and a sudden massive hemorrhage occurred during the removal process.The bilateral internal iliac arteries were temporarily blocked under laparoscopy,and scar resection and repair were rapidly performed.She was discharged in good condition 5 d after the operation.CONCLUSION Although TVS is widely used in the diagnosis of CSP,delays in the diagnosis of atypical CSP remain.Surgical treatment following internal iliac artery temporary occlusion may be an appropriate management method for unanticipated massive hemorrhage during CSP surgery.

Experience in Surgical Coordination of Type III Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Removal with Combined Assistance of Hysteroscopy and Laparoscopy

Objective:This paper aims to summarize the operative nursing coordination essentials of type III cesareans car pregnancy removal.Methods:Six patients were recruited for this study,and the patient’s condition was fully evaluated before the operation.In addition,the personnel,environment,and materials were well prepared before the operation,and the preparation of special intraoperative instruments and equipment was perfected.Results:The operation is successfully performed in all six patients.Each surgery lasted 70 to 120 minutes with an average duration of 90 minutes.Postoperative blood loss was about 100-500 ml.Postoperative recovery was good without complications in all the patients.Conclusion:In summary,laparoscopic removal of gestational tissue from type III cesareans car pregnancy in conjunction with hysteroscopy ensures compete removal of gestational tissue,while avoiding damaging the surrounding organs and tissues,thus greatly avoiding common complications which usually occur during the surgery.Effective surgical coordination is helpful to further improve the success rate of the operation.

Clinical Analysis of 45 Cases of Caesarean Scar Pregnancy

Objective To summarize the clinical characteristics of caesarean scar pregnancy and to investigate its treatment.Methods Clinical case records of 45 cases of caesarean scar pregnancy from June 2003 to September 2007 were reviewed. The characteristics and management of cases were analyzed.Results The women＇s average age was 32.8 ± 5.1 years. All cases had amenorrhoea, and 27 cases had vaginal bleeding from spotting to morderate. Seven cases were misdiagnosed as normal early intrauterine pregnancy or inevitable miscarriage before dilation and curettage（D ＆ C）. In case of massive bleeding, caesarean scar pregnancy was diagnosed after D ＆ C. Bleeding was controlled and uterus was conserved in 6 cases, and 1 case underwent hysterectomy because of uncontrollable bleeding. The remaining 38 cases had ultrasound scan, which indicated scar pregnancy before primary treatment, Eight cases were primarily treated with dilation and curettage, in which only 2 cases had slight bleeding in the operation and no further treatment, Nineteen cases were primarily treated with dilation and curettage after uterine artery embolization, in which 17 cases needed no further treatment and had no complications. The success rate was 89.4% （17/19）. Eleven cases were primarily treated with trichosanthin 1.2 mg intramuscular. No one encountered massive bleeding, but 7 cases of these 11 cases needed extra treatment.Conclusion Caesarean scar pregnancy must be cautious of especially in cases of inevitable miscarriage. Dilation and curettage followed uterine artery embolization can be used as the primary treatment for caesarean scar pregnancy.

The Value of Transvaginal Ultrasound in Clinical Surgical Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

The clinical value of transvaginal ultrasound in clinical surgical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy（CSP） was evaluated. The clinical data of 104 patients with CSP admitted at Tongji Hospital from 2013 to 2016 were collected and analyzed retrospectively, including the patients＇ age, gestational age, the size of gestational sac or uneven mass, the uterine scar thickness, β human chorionic gonadotropin（h CG） levels and so on. Of these 104 cases, 30 cases were subjected to laparotomy, 29 cases to laparoscopy, 27 cases to hysteroscopy, 16 cases to ultrasound-guided uterine curettage, and 2 cases to conservative treatment. The transvaginal ultrasound showed that uterine scar thickness and gestational sac or uneven mass size had significant difference（P〈0.05） among different surgical methods by comparatively analyzing the patients＇ data. It was suggested that transvaginal ultrasound may provide the valuable reference for choosing clinical surgical procedures for CSP.

Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Report of 11 Cases and Review of the Literature Regarding Subsequent Pregnancy

Background: There is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) because treatment efficacy, safety, and the influence on subsequent pregnancy must be taken into consideration. Here we report our experience with 11 cases of CSP and review the literature regarding subsequent pregnancy. Methods: Records of 11 CSP cases that were treated at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. CSP was treated by local methotrexate (MTX) injection or laparotomic or laparoscopic removal of the gestational mass and myometrial repair. Outcome of subsequent pregnancy after treatment was followed-up until delivery. Results: Local MTX injection was performed for six cases, laparotomic removal of the gestational mass and myometrial repair was performed for two, and laparoscopic removal of the gestational mass and myometrial repair was performed for three. The uterus was preserved in all cases. After CSP treatment, eight pregnancies occurred in five cases, resulting in six live births and two miscarriages. Conclusion: Advantages and disadvantages of various treatment methods for CSP continue to be elucidated. Serum hCG level, location of the gestational mass, thickness of the lower uterine segment at the time of diagnosis, and whether the patient wishes for fertility preservation should be considered when choosing a treatment plan.

Cesarean scar pregnancy

Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy is a consequence of a scar from previous cesarean section.It is rare and is associated with catastrophic complications of early pregnancy.It can occur in women with only one prior cesarean delivery.With increasing rate of cesarean section worldwide,more and more cases are diagnosed and reported.The incidence is likely to rise substantially in the near future.A delay in diagnosis and the treatment can lead to uterine rupture,major haemorrhage,hysterectomy and serious maternal morbidity.Early diagnosis can offer treatment options of avoiding uterine rupture and haemorrhage,thus preserving the uterus and future fertility.Aim of this article is to find the demography,pathophysiology,clinical presentation,most appropriate methods of early diagnosis and management.

The Outcome of 40 Patients Becoming Pregnancy after Conservative Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Background: The rate of uterus is successfully conserved following the treatment of scar pregnancy which is high so pregnancy outcome following caesarean scar ectopics is getting more and more attention. Objectives: To assess pregnancy course and outcome after conservative treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Methods: A retrospective case series of 40 patients become pregnancy after conservative treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy by Foley or Methotrexate and aspiration. Patients in present study were treated at Hung Vuong and Tu Du Hospital between 2015 and 2017. A telephone follow-up was conducted after cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) treatment. The outcomes of these subsequent pregnancies and mode of delivery were all recorded. Results: In 40 pregnancies, there are 22 cases of intrauterine pregnancy with childbirth (55%);all babies were born healthy, with no complications recorded in pregnancy. 12 Women had recurrent scar ectopic (30%). There were 2 abortion cases, 2 cases of ectopic pregnancy, and 2 cases of early miscarriage. Conclusions: Our study shows that reproductive outcomes following treatment of caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies are favourable. The risk of recurrent caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy is a concern.

Uterine artery embolization in cesarean scar pregnancy： safe and effective intervention

Background Cesarean scar pregnancy （CSP） is a very rare but life-threatening entity and there is no optimal management strategy.Here we report a successfully conservative treatment of CSP.Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 54 women with CSP,who underwent uterine artery embolization between January 2007 and September 2012 at the Peking University People＇s Hospital.We evaluated the clinical outcomes,the technique and the complications of uterine artery embolization.Results Of the 54 patients,2 patients with hemorrhage after induced abortion received bilateral uterine artery embolization treatment alone,and 52 patients underwent suction curettage after bilateral uterine artery embolization.All 54 women were successfully cured,without any severe complications,and uterine function was restored.During the follow-up,one patient had accidental normal interuterine pregnancy and received induced abortion during the first trimester.Conclution Uterine artery embolization combined with suction curettage is an effective and safe conservative treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy.

Uterine artery embolization in the treatment of recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy: report of two cases and literature review

Despite the optimal therapeutic protocols of cesarean scar pregnancy （CSP） has not been established, and in the majority of cases, most of women＇s uterus and fertility can be preserved through prompt and active treatment. But due to the rarity of CSP, little is known about the outcome of subsequent pregnancies, especially in an even rarer situation, a recurrent CSP. We report 2 cases of recurrent CSP women who want to preserve their fertility treated by repeated uterine artery embolization and provide a review of the literatures.

Uterine Arteriovenous Malformation:Inducedby A Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Cesarean scar pregnancy （CSP） occurs when a gestation sac is implanted in the previous lower segment cesarean scar. The incidence of CSP is increasing worldwide. Uterine ateriovenous malformation （UA VM） is a rare gynecologic disease. Both of these diseases can cause severe vaginal bleeding and produce high morbidity rate. We describe a ease of UA VM induced by a CSP. The patient suffered intermittent vaginal bleeding after two dilatation and curettage （D＆C） one month before admission. The suspected diagnosis of CSP and UA VM were made after using transvaginal ultra- sound with color Doppler and human chorionic gonadotropin （hCG） examination. Resection of the involved area including the cesarean scar and UA VM by laparotomy was performed successfully and the diagnosis was confirmed by the last pathologic result.

Successful Pregnancy by In Vitro Fertilization after Bilateral Uterine Arterial Embolization for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy:A Case Report

A 35-year-old woman who had one delivery by cesarean section got pregnant again. Color Doppler flow imaging and Magnetic resonance imaging （MRI） showed a cesarean scar pregnancy （CSP）. Uterine arterial embolization （UAE） and curettage was performed successfully to terminate the pregnancy. Six months after the curettage, the patient＇s menstrual flow was reduced to one non-drenched sanitary pad per day for only 1-2 d, every 30 d. The patient underwent hysterosalpingography （HSG）, which suggested the presence of a filling-defect of the left uterine cavity, with obstructed bilateral Fallopian tubes. The patient subsequently underwent lysis of adhesions by hysteroscopy plus an exploratory laparoscopy, under general anesthesia. Her men- struation gradually increased to 5-7 d every 30 d. As the patient did not become pregnant during the first year after surgery, she underwent in vitro fertilization （IVF） treatment and a repeat ultrasound showed a somewhat thin endometrial line. At last, the patient got pregnant and gave birth to a live baby by IVF.

Comparison of Five Treatment Strategies for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Objective:To explore appropriate treatment strategy for cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP)in the first and second trimester.Methods:Clinical characteristics and treatment strategies in 182 patients with CSP were retrospectively analyzed.Treatment strategies were as follows:Group A(n=102),uterine artery chemoembolization(UACE)followed by dilation and curettage(D&C);Group B(n=63),D&C;Group C(n=6),hysteroscopy;Group D(n=6),laparotomy;and Group E(n=5),laparoscopy.The basic clinical findings were collected and analyzed,along with the curative effects.Results:The preoperative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin(β-HCG)level was in the order of Group D,A>B,C>E(P=0.001);the size of gestational sac(GS)was in the order of Group D,E>A,C>B(P=0.000);and the thickness of the anterior myometrium was in the order of Group B>A,C>D,E(P=0.000).Three cases in the second trimester were all in Group D;two cases were treated with UACE before laparotomy with moderate blood loss(100 and 200 mL,respectively)and the third case was initially treated with D&C and had severe hemorrhage.Conclusions:The diameter of GS,thickness of the anterior myometrium,and preoperativeβ-HCG level are important factors for the choice of treatment.UACE combined with D&C is a useful measure for most Type 2 CSP cases in the first trimester.For Type 2 CSP cases in the second trimester,UACE before laparotomy could be a reasonable choice.

Correlation Questions Clinical Discussion of Uterine Artery Embolization in Induced Abortion Patients with Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Objective To analyze retrospectively the utility of uterine arterial embolization （UAE） for cesarean scar pregnancy （CSP）.Methods Fifty-one women with CSP were pretreated with UAE before dilatation ＆ curettage （D＆C）. Indexes such as blood loss volume, operation-associated complications, serum hCG level ultrasound imaging and hospitalization cost were analyzed.Results Thirty-eight women accepted D＆C following UAE （group A）, 10 patients had medicine （3 took trichosanthin injection, 7 took MTX injection） before UAE and D＆C （group B）. Uterine packing following emergency UAE were performed in another 3 women due to severe hemorrhage during direct curettage without pretreatment （group C）. There were no statistically significant differences between group A and group B about the serum fl-hCG level resolution time and the blood loss in the opertation. Patients had shorter duration of hospital stay （P〈0.01） and cheaper cost of hospitalization （P〈0.05） of group A than group B.Conclusion Pretreatment with UAE before curettage is safe and effective in terminating CSP, reducing hospitalization cost. UAE followed by curettage is recommended to medical facilities where UAE is available.

Cesarean Scar Pregnancy with Iniencephaly and Progression to Placenta Accreta Due to Early Management Rejection

To editor:Cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP)is a rare pathology,with an increasingly clear association with morbidly adherent placenta(MAP).1 Although the most recommended treatment is pregnancy termination by cesarean section and scar resection shortly after diagnosis.2 The final decision regarding management depends on the patient's choice,medical advice,the fertility desire,and the social,religious and emotional background that should also be taken into account.

Uterine artery embolization combined with ultrasound-guided dilation and 5–8-year follow-up study

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of uterine artery embolization(UAE) combined with dilation and curettage(D&C) using ultrasound as a treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP) and assess its effect on ovarian and reproductive function.Methods: A total of 54 patients with uterine CSP between January 2011 and December 2015 were included in this retrospective study. The patients were treated with UAE combined with D&C using ultrasound for the treatment of CSP and followed up for 5–8 years. Their medical records, medical histories, clinical manifestations, treatment courses, and treatment results were analyzed.Results: The 54 patients were initially treated without severe complications. β-Human chorionic gonadotropin(β-hCG) normalization took 36.11 ± 10.73 days(range, 25–84 days), length of hospitalization was 6.6 ± 1.5 days(range, 4–10 days), and total blood loss was 18.48 ± 8.41 mL(range, 5–33 mL). All patients resumed normal menstruation after 33.48 ± 8.71 days(range, 26–70 days). At the 5–8-year follow-up after UAE combined with D&C by ultrasound for the treatment of uterine CSP, the menstrual volume in 32(59.3%) patients decreased versus before the operation. Compared with pretreatment, the menstrual cycle was prolonged in two(3.7%) cases,shortened in 10(18.5%) cases, irregular in one(1.9%) case, and unchanged in 39(72.2%) cases. Three patients conceived naturally and successfully gave birth to healthy children. Seven(12.96%) patients with accidental natural pregnancies chose induced abortion with no significant change in their sex lives.Conclusion: UAE combined with D&C using ultrasound for the treatment of uterine CSP is safe and effective and may not affect the fertility of patients aged <40 years. However, menstrual volume may be reduced in some patients.

A Recurrent Ectopic Pregnancy within A Previous Caesarean Scar: A Case Report

Objective To investigate the clinical diagnosis and treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy （CSP）. Methods We reported here a case of recurrent ectopic pregnancy within a previous cesarean scar and reviewed the literature. Results Surgical evacuation of a CSP was a small side effect and effective treatment of CSP. Conclusion Early and accurate diagnosis, timeliness and effective treatment were extremely important in saving patients＇ life and retaining their fertility.